Wunderdog Sports Picks. Are they as good as advertised???

[BigRich3113]

Has anybody bought their service? They seem to be very reputable, but are they really as good as the hype? I am thinking about purchasing a package but would like to hear some feedback first. Thanks in advance!!!

[corbatt1]

no, used for the bowl season two years ago. He claimed he won; didn't. Gave me four free weeks because of it. He was only positive one week and claimed he had a winning record so he fulfilled his guarantee. Stay away

[BigRich3113]

Thank you for the heads up!

[linebacker67]

no he is not

[vicshap]

when are people going to understand? with very rare exception, no one can pick 53% consistently. i'm talking months, years. ras is an exception, but hard to afford, and getting their lines, even harder. you want to have a chance at winning? pick a daily post, fade it everyday for the same amount, have patience, and be grateful with the small winnings. cheers.

[Frats]

you want to have a chance at winning? pick a daily post, fade it everyday for the same amount, have patience, and be grateful with the small winnings. cheers.

Honestly, that's terrible advice. It's just as hard to pick 53% winners as it is to pick 53% losers. Fading a coin-flipper just ends up making you a coin-flipper.

[CHANTICLEERS]

when are people going to understand? with very rare exception, no one can pick 53% consistently. i'm talking months, years. ras is an exception, but hard to afford, and getting their lines, even harder. you want to have a chance at winning? pick a daily post, fade it everyday for the same amount, have patience, and be grateful with the small winnings. cheers.

Fading the wonder twins MIGHTY QUINN and HONDO is good enough for me!!! And it only cost $2 a day with the exception on Sundays papers with the NY POST/ NY DAILY NEWS its $3 for both...

RICO SUAVE

[ANDTHEWINNERIS]

Fading the wonder twins MIGHTY QUINN and HONDO is good enough for me!!! And it only cost $2 a day with the exception on Sundays papers with the NY POST/ NY DAILY NEWS its $3 for both...

RICO SUAVE

For what your looking for they are free on line

[CHANTICLEERS]

I get both of them for the house to read... Can't be all that tight gotta spend a little on " world news current events"...

RICO SUAVE

[BigSky]

I have used them in the past and in my opinion their NHL is very good. Unfortunately, they raised their prices on on NHL this season.

[Ferndog68]

I had them for NFL I in 2009-2010 season. They were very very good. but fell of in other sports. and they give the same info for superbowl on prop bets (which is good advice)
least scoring qrt =1st
most scoring quarter =4th
block punt = no
safety= no
highest scoring half = second

[vicshap]

Honestly, that's terrible advice. It's just as hard to pick 53% winners as it is to pick 53% losers. Fading a coin-flipper just ends up making you a coin-flipper.

for some reason, frats, the majority of people, pick at less than 47%. i fade, but wish you luck.

[JR007]

take a look at killer sports and winning points

[bwizzle]

@lineback, corbatt1. I've seen nothing but transparent and honest handicapping. Sure he has to advertise recent good results and downplay losing days, but this is as legit as it gets. I think he gets really hot at times (NFL like you said in 2009) and NHL last year. He'll do better than most dingbats and if you are strict about bankroll management and don't go on tilt like most gambling junkies you'll make a tidy profit hopefully.

[dymd3z]

Just like any other Tout if you ask me.. Let us know who you end up tagging along with if you would. Thanks

[Wojo]

He hasn't been good in football or NBA. I don't know about other sports or college BB.

[chaka]

he never would post how he was just under 50% but managed to lose 44 units in just a few weeks erasing all my fb and SB winnings. (really how,is it even possible but it happened)rather than say we are in major losing streak. spreads / halfs/ full game / totals. all were under 50% but bleeding cash

it would be we went 1-0 on parlay club and we are up 4000 for,year in all sports. i didnt give a shit about other sports not in. my package . of course they sure kept the losing packages in the dark to other package subscribers


pretty much in college hoops any team getting 20+ is a play. lots of laying alot to win little on. ML. -190 vs -4@ -110. reading their writeups often basing selections on past trends: team a covered 8 in row and 9of 11. long range trends

of course they put out as many as 20 plays over the spectrum of sports where to achieve their results you would have to have your entire bankroll always in play unless you are like wunderdog with unlimited bank to put an avg of 2 units on every play 20 plays @ 2 units x $200 wager = if 8k in wagers is 2% of bank as they suggest one needs to have 400k roll.

They post lines unable sometimes and use for their record. in their defense they would recalculate when brought to their attention.
i digress
hockey they seem to do better but nba and ncaa no so good

just my .02

[Wojo]

It just seems like he is deceptive and doesn't respond to queries from clients.

I don't like that.

[clockwise1965]

he never would post how he was just under 50% but managed to lose 44 units in just a few weeks erasing all my fb and SB winnings. (really how,is it even possible but it happened)rather than say we are in major losing streak. spreads / halfs/ full game / totals. all were under 50% but bleeding cash

it would be we went 1-0 on parlay club and we are up 4000 for,year in all sports. i didnt give a shit about other sports not in. my package . of course they sure kept the losing packages in the dark to other package subscribers


pretty much in college hoops any team getting 20+ is a play. lots of laying alot to win little on. ML. -190 vs -4@ -110. reading their writeups often basing selections on past trends: team a covered 8 in row and 9of 11. long range trends

of course they put out as many as 20 plays over the spectrum of sports where to achieve their results you would have to have your entire bankroll always in play unless you are like wunderdog with unlimited bank to put an avg of 2 units on every play 20 plays @ 2 units x $200 wager = if 8k in wagers is 2% of bank as they suggest one needs to have 400k roll.

They post lines unable sometimes and use for their record. in their defense they would recalculate when brought to their attention.
i digress
hockey they seem to do better but nba and ncaa no so good

just my .02

Thanks for the info

[Mr. Jinx]

Another problem I had with Wunderdog a couple years ago was his guarantee. If you purchased a losing package he would give you a similar package for free, However, if your paid package lost 10 units and the replacement package won 2 units, because you received a winning package he considered his guarantee honored and you had to pay if you wanted to continue with his service.

[onakoli13]

Pls don't waste your money on buying his picks. I'm not sure where he gets his percentage of winning cause since I've bought his season picks I think I've only won 3 or 2 times. It's a waste of my money!!!

[Wojo]

One of the easiest ways touts show a good record is by playing the money line which Wunderdog does a lot.
The guys at Pregame.com and Vegasinsider do it a lot.

VERY Deceptive to make your record look better. Stay away from touts stretching the truth.

[daytradernation]

vicshap is correct,

Its very hard to fade and follow. You need to wait until a capper who hits around 50-55% get to either: 70-80% winners and fade away, or 20-30% winners and start to tail.

That to me is decent. You need to have the discipline and bankroll to sustain the ebb & flow of sports betting.

If you dont have either, forget it.

Good example: Covers has their league contests. Take a look at the leaders and the losers, check their prior years. I would say 99 out of 100 NEVER, EVER had a winning season. Problem is you cant fade them because of the juice and the 53% needed (close to) to be profitable! A majority of people can throw darts, pick from a hat, flip a coin, and hit 50%. That does nobody any good.

Its a tough, tough game! I wish you all the best!

[gui_m_p]

You need to wait until a capper who hits around 50-55% get to either: 70-80% winners and fade away, or 20-30% winners and start to tail.

There is no statistical backgroung to it. The events are independent. If someone are losing you can't tell the chances to win next are greater, and vice versa.

This is the Monte Carlo Fallacy. In 1913, on a roulette table, after Black come up 15 times in a row, bettors were piling onto Red, assuming the chances of yet another Black were becoming astronomical, thereby ilustrating an irrational belief that one spin somehow influences the next.
Black come up 26 times in a row that day.

[jdub2]

When they have a GOM in something they usually always win that his cball been doing pretty decent he just plays a lot of games that is the bad part of them

[Ranger1604]

Used him a few times mixed results ....nfl picks tons of dogs and just fades public on totals , college football less then good when I used it..... Tons of games are sent in both sports... Not worth it

[linebacker67]

save your money and stay away