Brian Edwards CFB?

[boomerbust]

He was great last year in the RJ. I don't know if he'll be there again. He has two red plays up, is anyone going to subscribe?

[gs]

why dont you subscribe and contribute

[boomerbust]

why dont you subscribe and contribute

I got the light red one S. Carolina, why don't YOU get the other one and contribute yourself instead of being a jackass.

[LVS]

agree....

I got the light red one S. Carolina, why don't YOU get the other one and contribute yourself instead of being a jackass.

Brian is with out a doubt one of the top NCAA Touts out there. Over 70% last year.

He is on LSU

[Numbnuts]

Ha, that is total BULLCHIT over 70% last year. That would top even the great Brandon Lang.

[LVS]

Ha, that is total BULLCHIT over 70% last year. That would top even the great Brandon Lang.

Not about to get into an internet argument with you, but anybody who lives in Vegas and can do so much as to read the RJ knows that Brian went 48-18 in NCAA football. Every game posted every Saturday......now go back and crawl under whatever rock you came out from under until you educate yourself.

[gs]

pm me the link to website and ill purchase

[LVS]

pm me the link to website and ill purchase

i got you buddy....get out ahead of line movment....Ohio +21.... grab next weeks....Brian just spoke at LVH last week during conference...I have been involved in gaming for sometime and when Edwards talks people listen....when Fezzick talks people laugh....not trying to plug the guy too much but he is legit.

[Numbnuts]

Whatever degenerate, wash the chunks off your chin and pull yourself together. Look at how ridiculous you sound when you sober up thumbdick.

[boomerbust]

pm me the link to website and ill purchase

PM'd

[LVS]

Whatever degenerate, wash the chunks off your chin and pull yourself together. Look at how ridiculous you sound when you sober up thumbdick.

Thought you may say something like that...when you come to Vegas you let me know...I have a sweet room for you at The Excalibur...the sportsbook there will have plenty of T-shirts give away for you. Good Luck mate!

[raptor71]

LVS. He sounds very good. Unsure of his plays this week though. Is he on s carolina, Ohio, and LSU?

[Vegasman702]

He is good. All his plays are documented in the local paper here in Vegas.

[LVS]

LVS. He sounds very good. Unsure of his plays this week though. Is he on s carolina, Ohio, and LSU?

Yes I think he is good...the guy picks winners and for the casual player that is not looking at middling and playing numbers he will win you money. That is what he has week 0....I agree sometimes I close my eyes playing his games at the window, but the guy wins. hope that helps

[lovewagering]

So LVS, OU and LSU you're saying??

[Wojo]

Be very leery of Brian Edwards. He had a great season last year. He was using stale newspaper lines and remember that the newspaper wants him to look great. Just like the site Edwards is sold at, the newspaper uses small Vegas book numbers that can be off a point or more from the rest of the world, especially where people outside of Vegas are betting.

In 2011, Brian Edwards was 61-60 at Vegasinsider, a site that uses very old lines and ones at small Vegas books.

In 2010, Brian Edwards is documented at 66-66 at Vegasinsider in CFB.

In 2009, Brian Edwads is documented at 77-77 at Vegasinsider in CFB. Again, remember these are lines WE CANNOT GET!

In 2008, Brian Edwards has ANOTHER losing year at 74-69. (add in the Vig!)

Continue going back for years and Brian Edwards FIRST winning year in the past 10 years was LAST YEAR!

Okay, maybe he changed his capping methods to win at such a rate. Do you believe that?

The guy is a permanent coin flipper who got lucky last year.

Be careful, he is NOT A LONG TERM WINNER.

[GoofyGrape]

Rutgers I think too.

[LVS]

Be very leery of Brian Edwards. He had a great season last year. He was using stale newspaper lines and remember that the newspaper wants him to look great. Just like the site Edwards is sold at, the newspaper uses small Vegas book numbers that can be off a point or more from the rest of the world, especially where people outside of Vegas are betting.

In 2011, Brian Edwards was 61-60 at Vegasinsider, a site that uses very old lines and ones at small Vegas books.

In 2010, Brian Edwards is documented at 66-66 at Vegasinsider in CFB.

In 2009, Brian Edwads is documented at 77-77 at Vegasinsider in CFB. Again, remember these are lines WE CANNOT GET!

In 2008, Brian Edwards has ANOTHER losing year at 74-69. (add in the Vig!)

Continue going back for years and Brian Edwards FIRST winning year in the past 10 years was LAST YEAR!

Okay, maybe he changed his capping methods to win at such a rate. Do you believe that?

The guy is a permanent coin flipper who got lucky last year.

Be careful, he is NOT A LONG TERM WINNER.

Disagree....respectively of course....you can say this about anyone. one persons 10-0 might be another 0-10 since odds are a variable. Goal is to produce winning games with lines that are listed for action. you cant ask the tout to be responsible for the players weak lines.... Edwards list plays with odds and books that provide the line at that time. I understand that last year may be a favorable sample so time will tell. but if a monkey read the paper and bet the games Edwards listed at the lines he listed he won a ton of bananas. that is better than most hard working gamblers do. best of luck....

[Wojo]

Disagree....respectively of course....you can say this about anyone. one persons 10-0 might be another 0-10 since odds are a variable. Goal is to produce winning games with lines that are listed for action. you cant ask the tout to be responsible for the players weak lines

You miss the point. If a site is grading plays on OLD, STALE LINES that are no longer available anywhere, that is basically scamming, not necessarily by Edwards but by the site he is sold at.

If a tout is being graded by possible STALE lines at a Vegas book that are NOT available ANYWHERE else, that is also wrong and prone for inaccuracies favoring the tout.

The main point of my post was Edwards had a very good season last year under these easy grading conditions. If you look at his previous college seasons, last year looks like a huge aberration. A regression to his multiple previous years is more likely than a continuation of his results last year.

Yes, last year was quite good, even at stale lines and ones not available to most readers. Maybe all of a sudden Edwards learned how to predict at a higher than 50%. In January we will know.

[Watergate]

You miss the point. If a site is grading plays on OLD, STALE LINES that are no longer available anywhere, that is basically scamming, not necessarily by Edwards but by the site he is sold at.

If a tout is being graded by possible STALE lines at a Vegas book that are NOT available ANYWHERE else, that is also wrong and prone for inaccuracies favoring the tout.

The main point of my post was Edwards had a very good season last year under these easy grading conditions. If you look at his previous college seasons, last year looks like a huge aberration. A regression to his multiple previous years is more likely than a continuation of his results last year.

Yes, last year was quite good, even at stale lines and ones not available to most readers. Maybe all of a sudden Edwards learned how to predict at a higher than 50%. In January we will know.

very good point wojo. It sounds like he was very good last year and hopefully that will continue and we all can benefit if someone would be nice enough to post his plays.

[LVS]

You miss the point. If a site is grading plays on OLD, STALE LINES that are no longer available anywhere, that is basically scamming, not necessarily by Edwards but by the site he is sold at.

If a tout is being graded by possible STALE lines at a Vegas book that are NOT available ANYWHERE else, that is also wrong and prone for inaccuracies favoring the tout.

The main point of my post was Edwards had a very good season last year under these easy grading conditions. If you look at his previous college seasons, last year looks like a huge aberration. A regression to his multiple previous years is more likely than a continuation of his results last year.

Yes, last year was quite good, even at stale lines and ones not available to most readers. Maybe all of a sudden Edwards learned how to predict at a higher than 50%. In January we will know.

No I do understand, I just don't agree. IMO you ask a service to provide you with data that will create a ROI, if that data cant be used because your inadequacies the burden is on you. Not to get too swayed from the point but anyone that says lines are unavailable just have not allowed themselves enough potential to earn. I handle C.C. processing for numerous offshore books and I just find it hard to believe that people allow themselves to not have options on numbers. Yes people playing outside Vegas and only having a "local" to use will clearly be putting themselves at a disadvantage, I dont know why they put themselves there and when they do why are all the inaccuracies favoring the tout. Now I don't play Edwards games but I do know those that do and i understand his lines are not difficult to get.....I could be completely wrong on this point so my true conviction lies in the fact that you have to enable yourself to have the opportunity to get the line the tout is giving you and if you dont than its a no play. He will be interesting to watch this year and you are very right that coming down to earth does seem likely. I am interested in his average margin of victory verses the spread, i am not 100% on this but I believe it was around 4.8 points last year, I find that really impressive. Best of luck I appreciate the dialogue.

[Wojo]

Good post, LVS, I agree with your thesis, but while you are talking about the individual bettor, I am talking about the VI site and perhaps a couple of others, that use lines to grade plays that are not available. The tout's record is unjustly inflated but is marketed by the website.

That's not the fault of the tout, in this case Edwards, that is the poor business practices of the site, specifically VI.

Of course it is the decision of the buyer of the pick to bet on the pick or not. But, if the line wasn't even available when the play was posted, that is deception.

[boomerbust]

Rutgers I think too.

Yes that winner wasn't posted. WTF is going on? He has two more blue plays that haven't been posted. I should have bought the whole weekend but I thought you guys had it covered.

[carolinacapper]

Check out Gary Sharp 1620 twitter- hosts radio show in Nebraska and has Edwards on every Fri at 10:40CT. Sharp then posts picks on his twitter. Not sure if these are Edwards paid plays but they have done well for me.

[boomerbust]

Check out Gary Sharp 1620 twitter- hosts radio show in Nebraska and has Edwards on every Fri at 10:40CT. Sharp then posts picks on his twitter. Not sure if these are Edwards paid plays but they have done well for me.

Thank You!

[Numbnuts]

Ha Ha LVS you pile of schit little pussy, 2-3 Saturday and lost Ohio yesterday. When you get done sucking BE's little dick and you pay the bookie maybe you should admit BE and you both suck ass you IDIOT.

[boomerbust]

He won over a unit this week, what's the problem dumbnuts?

[Numbnuts]

Buzz off geek, go back to manipulating your own meager unit

[boomerbust]

So you hate the member of a crew who had the most success in CFB last year but are drooling over the prospect of getting the GOM of a different member of that same crew? HILARIOUS!

[Numbnuts]

to fade it u absolute moron

[LVS]

Ha Ha LVS you pile of schit little pussy, 2-3 Saturday and lost Ohio yesterday. When you get done sucking BE's little dick and you pay the bookie maybe you should admit BE and you both suck ass you IDIOT.

Come to Vegas this week and we will rap out about Edwards and the rest of your thoughts, otherwise not going to going to get into it too much with you. I got other things going on.