Okay we all know no coincidences always complains and creates new threads when he lose a game. When you tell him yea we get it no coin, you took that side and lost and venting but no coin will say it has nothing to do with his bet and he just making an observation
. Funny how this is always a game he has a bet on, otherwise he wouldn't even post.
So some guy in the forum created a thread and said
I'd say most locals and offshore got killed. Easy overs again. People chasing and pounding new England. It's just too easy.
Since we know No Coincidences and how much he complains how they rig games but only on the games he bets.
This is his response to the OP.
Books exist to balance bets out as much as possible. Nothing more.
If you don't think they did that today, then I can't help you.
Is this comment coming from someone who complain about totals getting fixed in the last minute?
And the fact that you keep saying many plays look like sucker bets and so called fishy line and traps and that books are trying to bait people into betting a side?
You then comment on an nba total and say stuff like
If you don't think they fixed the total in that nba game, then I can't help you.
Yet now you make a comment like this where books exist to balance bets out?
So they exist to balance bets out on games you don't bet on but there are fixes only in the games you bet on where you lose? I know you are always bias b/c whenever you have a bet on one side, you always complain.
But if this comment isn't the most hypocrite comment i ever seen posted.
What are you're guys opinion on this. Can you believe this comment coming from No Coincidences? For someone trying to talk about trap lines and rigged totals, he makes a comment like this?
Which is it?
. Funny how this is always a game he has a bet on, otherwise he wouldn't even post.So some guy in the forum created a thread and said
I'd say most locals and offshore got killed. Easy overs again. People chasing and pounding new England. It's just too easy.
Since we know No Coincidences and how much he complains how they rig games but only on the games he bets.
This is his response to the OP.Books exist to balance bets out as much as possible. Nothing more.
If you don't think they did that today, then I can't help you.
Is this comment coming from someone who complain about totals getting fixed in the last minute?
And the fact that you keep saying many plays look like sucker bets and so called fishy line and traps and that books are trying to bait people into betting a side?You then comment on an nba total and say stuff like
If you don't think they fixed the total in that nba game, then I can't help you.
Yet now you make a comment like this where books exist to balance bets out?
So they exist to balance bets out on games you don't bet on but there are fixes only in the games you bet on where you lose? I know you are always bias b/c whenever you have a bet on one side, you always complain.
But if this comment isn't the most hypocrite comment i ever seen posted.
What are you're guys opinion on this. Can you believe this comment coming from No Coincidences? For someone trying to talk about trap lines and rigged totals, he makes a comment like this?
Which is it?
