New World System structuring exposed in 1969!

**PAULYPOKER** · 05-11-13, 04:50 PM

<dt style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF DRUG ABUSE TO CREATE A JUNGLE ATMOSPHERE</dt><dt style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;"> </dt><dt>

Drug use would he increased. Alcohol use would be increased. Law enforcement efforts against drugs would be increased. On first hearing that it sounded like a contradiction. Why increase drug abuse and simultaneously increase law enforcement against drug abuse? But the idea is that, in part, the increased availability of drugs would provide a sort of law of the jungle whereby the weak and the unfit would be selected out. There was a statement made at the time: "Before the earth was overpopulated, there was a law of the jungle where only the fittest survived.

You had to be able to protect yourself against the elements and wild animals and disease, but if you were fit you survived. But now we've become so civilised - we're over civilised - and the unfit are enabled to survive only at the expense of those who are more fit." The abuse of drugs would restore, in a certain sense, the law of the jungle and selection of the fittest for survival. News about drug abuse and law enforcement efforts would tend to keep drugs in the public consciousness. And would also tend to reduce this unwarranted American complacency that the world is a safe place, and a nice place.

________________________________________ ____________________________________

Every ghetto in the US is the law of the Jungle........

Law enforcement claims that it is tooo dangerous for them to go there and clean it up..............

This could not be further from the truth............

Government depends on little pharma as much as they depend on BIG pharma..........</dt>

**PAULYPOKER** · 05-13-13, 02:19 PM

<dt style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">ALCOHOL ABUSE</dt><dt style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;"> </dt><dt>The same thing would happen with alcohol. Alcohol abuse would be both promoted and demoted at the same time. The vulnerable and the weak would respond to the promotions and therefore use and abuse more alcohol. Drunk driving would become more of a problem; and stricter rules about driving under the influence would be established so that more and more people would lose their privilege to drive.

Again, much more in the way of psychological services would be made available to help those who got hooked on drugs and alcohol. The idea being, that in order to promote this - drug and alcohol are used to screen out some of the unfit - people who otherwise are pretty good would also be subject to getting hooked. And if they were really worth their salt they would have enough sense to seek psychological counselling and to benefit from it.

So this was presented as sort of a redeeming value on the part of the planners. It was as if he was saying, "You think we're bad in promoting these evil things - but look how nice we are - we're also providing a way out!"

________________________________________ ________________________________________ _______

Up until the early 90's it was impossible to get a DUI..........

Now in present day if you drink as little as 1 drink you have a 50% chance of getting a DUI.......

DUI convicted people are put on the same level of criminal as a life long low life scum petty criminal.......

You don't have to do any damage or hurt anyone to get these same level of punishment DUI's.......

Sure,we allow you to go to the local bar/nightclub and drink,but we will be waiting and watching for you so we can arrest you on your way home........

A DUI will COMPLETELY ruin your life on all levels, in today's day and age........

________________________________________ ________________________________

Quick Facts: Alcohol abuse in the United States

Consumption of alcohol has many detrimental affects on people, particularly the youth in the United States. It affects the murder, suicide and driving accidents among its other vices including short and long term health problems.

In the United States, the problem has reached a critical stage particularly among the youth to the point that in some schools it is reported that 80 percent of 12th-graders either drink or have drunk alcohol. One of the most recent reports on the rise of alcohol abuse problem in the U.S. was highlighted with Rockport high school in Maine.

In National Health Statistics Report produced in May 2009 by the Office of Applied Studies (OAS), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and by RTI International (a trade name of Research Triangle Institute), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, the following information was produced about the state of Alcohol abuse in the United States:

What is the rate of alcoholism among the American people?

Slightly more than half of Americans aged 12 or older reported being current drinkers of alcohol in the 2009 survey (51.9 percent). This translates to an estimated 130.6 million people, which is similar to the 2008 estimate of 129.0 million people (51.6 percent).

In 2009, nearly one quarter (23.7 percent) of persons aged 12 or older participated in binge drinking. This translates to about 59.6 million people. The rate in 2009 is similar to the estimate in 2008. Binge drinking is defined as having five or more drinks on the same occasion on at least 1 day in the 30 days prior to the survey.

In 2009, heavy drinking was reported by 6.8 percent of the population aged 12 or older, or 17.1 million people. This rate was similar to the rate of heavy drinking in 2008. Heavy drinking is defined as binge drinking on at least 5 days in the past 30 days.

What is the rate of alcoholism among the American youth?

Among young adults aged 18 to 25 in 2009, the rate of binge drinking was 41.7 percent, and the rate of heavy drinking was 13.7 percent. These rates were similar to the rates in 2008.

The rate of current alcohol use among youths aged 12 to 17 was 14.7 percent in 2009, which is similar to the 2008 rate (14.6 percent). Youth binge and heavy drinking rates in 2009 (8.8 and 2.1 percent) were also similar to rates in 2008 (8.8 and 2.0 percent).

Past month and binge drinking rates among underage persons (aged 12 to 20) declined between 2002 and 2008, but then remained unchanged between 2008 (26.4 and 17.4 percent) and 2009 (27.2 and 18.1 percent).

Among persons aged 12 to 20, past month alcohol use rates in 2009 were 16.1 percent among Asians, 20.4 percent among blacks, 22.0 percent among American Indians or Alaska Natives, 25.1 percent among Hispanics, 27.5 percent among those reporting two or more races, and 30.4 percent among whites.

In 2009, 55.9 percent of current drinkers aged 12 to 20 reported that their last use of alcohol in the past month occurred in someone else's home, and 29.2 percent reported that it had occurred in their own home. About one third (30.3 percent) paid for the alcohol the last time they drank, including 9.0 percent who purchased the alcohol themselves and 21.3 percent who gave money to someone else to purchase it.

Among those who did not pay for the alcohol they last drank, 37.1 percent got it from an unrelated person aged 21 or older, 19.9 percent from another person younger than 21 years old, and 20.6 percent from a parent, guardian, or other adult family member.

What does the statistics say about drunk driving among the youth?

In 2009, an estimated 12.0 percent of persons aged 12 or older drove under the influence of alcohol at least once in the past year. This percentage has dropped since 2002, when it was 14.2 percent. The rate of driving under the influence of alcohol was highest among persons aged 21 to 25 (24.8 percent).

What is alcohol and other drug's association with smoking?

Use of illicit drugs and alcohol was more common among current cigarette smokers than among nonsmokers in 2009, as in prior years since 2002.

Among persons aged 12 or older, 22.4 percent of past month cigarette smokers reported current use of an illicit drug compared with 4.5 percent of persons who were not current cigarette smokers.

Past month alcohol use was reported by 67.1 percent of current cigarette smokers compared with 47.2 percent of those who did not use cigarettes in the past month.

The association also was found with binge drinking (44.8 percent of current cigarette smokers vs. 17.2 percent of current nonsmokers) and heavy drinking (16.4 vs. 3.9 percent, respectively).

SAR/HJ/SM
</dt>

**PAULYPOKER** · 05-15-13, 11:52 AM

NTSB recommends lowering blood alcohol level that constitutes drunken driving

<cite>NBCNews.com</cite> ‎- 21 hours ago
The National Transportation Safety Board is advising states to lower the Blood Alcohol Level that defines drunk driving from .08 to .05, which ...

**PAULYPOKER** · 05-15-13, 11:54 AM

<dt style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">RESTRICTIONS ON TRAVEL</dt><dt style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;"> </dt><dt style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">

This also had connection with something we'll get to later about overall restrictions on travel. Not everybody should be free to travel the way they do now in the United States. People don't have a need to travel that way. It's a privilege! It was kind of the high-handed the way it was put.

________________________________________ ________________________________________ ___________

Travel Restrictions: U.S. Government Limits on ... - PolicyArchive

<cite>www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/3501.pdf</cite>‎
by SB Epstein
Jan 28, 2003 – Travel Restrictions: U.S. Government Limits on American Citizens' Travel Abroad. Susan B. Epstein. Specialist in Foreign Policy and Trade ...
</dt>

**PAULYPOKER** · 05-17-13, 01:29 PM

THE NEED FOR MORE JAILS, AND USING HOSPITALS AS JAILS

More jails would be needed. Hospitals could serve as jails. Some new hospital construction would be designed so as to make them adaptable to jail-like use.

________________________________________ ________________________________________ _______

The USA is the most imprisoned country Per-capita in the entire world!!

Enuff said..........

**PAULYPOKER** · 05-19-13, 10:37 PM

NO MORE SECURITY

Nothing is permanent. Streets would be re-routed and renamed. Areas you had not seen in a while would become unfamiliar. Among other things, this would contribute to older people feeling that it was time to move on, they feel they couldn't even keep up with the changes in areas that were once familiar. Buildings would be allowed to stand empty and deteriorate, and streets would be allowed to deteriorate in certain localities. The purpose of this was to provide the jungle, the depressed atmosphere for the unfit.

Somewhere in this same connection he mentioned that buildings and bridges would be made so that they would collapse after a while, there would be more accidents involving aeroplanes and railroads and automobiles. All of this to contribute to the feeling of insecurity, that nothing was safe. Not too long after this presentation, and I think one or two even before in the area where I live, we had a newly constructed bridge break.

Another newly constructed bridge defect was discovered before it too broke. I remember reading just scattered incidents around the country where shopping malls would fall in right where they were filled with shoppers. I also remember that one of the shopping malls in our area, the first building I'd ever been in where you could feel this vibration throughout the entire building when there were a lot of people in there. I remember wondering at that time whether this shopping mall was one of the buildings he was talking about. Talking to construction people and architects about it they would say, "Oh no, that's good when the building vibrates like that, that means it's flexible not rigid." Well, maybe so, we'll wait and see. Other areas there would be well maintained. Not every part of the city would be slums.

________________________________________ ________________________________________ _________

People are more afraid of the chance of running into police brutality law enforcement than an actual criminal..........

**PAULYPOKER** · 05-21-13, 06:09 PM

CRIME USED TO MANAGE SOCIETY

There would be the created slums and other areas well maintained. Those people able to leave the slums for better areas then would learn to better appreciate the importance of human accomplishment. This meant that if they left the jungle and came to civilization so to speak, they could be proud of their own accomplishments that they made it. There was no related sympathy for those who were left behind in the jungle of drugs and deteriorating neighborhoods.

Then a statement that was kind of surprising, "We think we can effectively limit crime to the slum areas, so it won't be spread heavily into better areas". I should maybe point out here that these are obviously not word for word quotations after 20 years, but where I say that I am quoting, I am giving the general drift of what was said close to word for word, perhaps not precisely so. I remember wondering, how can he be so confident that the criminal element is going to stay where he wants it to stay? But he went on to say that increased security would be needed in the better areas. That would mean more police, better co-ordinate d police efforts.

He did not say so, but I wondered at that time about the moves that were afoot to consolidate all the police departments of suburbs around the major cities. I think the John Birch Society was one that was saying "Support your local police, don't let them be consolidated." I remember wondering if that was one of the things he had in mind about security. It was not explicitly stated.

Anyhow he went on to say there would be a whole new industry of residential security systems to develop with alarms and locks and alarms going into the police department so that people could protect their wealth and their well being. Because some of the criminal activity would spill out of the slums into better, more affluent looking areas that looked like they would be worth burglarizing.

And again it was stated like it was a redeeming quality:

See we're generating all this more crime but look how good we are - we're also generating the means for you to protect yourself against the crime. A sort of repeated thing throughout this presentation was the recognised evil and then the self forgiveness thing, "See we've given you a way out."

**PAULYPOKER** · 05-23-13, 02:24 PM

‘Bush, Obama’s goal to exploit world’

The Bush and Obama administrations’ goal regarding their foreign policy and their so-called ‘war on terror’ is to “secure the world for the peaceful economic exploitation by U.S. corporations”, says Phil Wilayto, editor at Virginia Defender Newspaper.

President Barack Obama is expected to deliver his counterterrorism speech later today and a group of lawmakers has called on Obama to back up his pledge to close the Guantanamo Bay prison.

In 2009, Obama pledged to close Guantanamo, acknowledging that the prison symbolized the U.S.’s violation of human rights.

“The prison has become a tremendous embarrassment to the Obama administration because it is seen as particularly an egregious example of the oppression and repression of Muslims,” said Wilayto in a phone interview today with the U.S. Desk.

“[Moreover,] The United States, 112 years after the Spanish-American war, is still occupying an independent country that is Cuba. This is not U.S. soil. This is occupation that is resisted by the Cuban government ever since their revolution in 1959,” Wilayto added.

ISH/ARA

PressTV

**PAULYPOKER** · 05-26-13, 03:38 PM

Curtailment of American industrial pre-eminence

<dt>American industry came under discussion - it was the first that I'd heard the term global interdependence or that notion. The stated plan was that different parts of the world would be assigned different roles of industry and commerce in a unified global system.

The continued pre-eminence of the United States and the relative independence and self-sufficiency of the United States would have to be changed. This was one of the several times that he said in order to create a new structure, you first have to tear down the old, and American industry was one example of that.

Our system would have to be curtailed in order to give other countries a chance to build their industries, because otherwise they would not be able to compete against the United States. This was especially true of our heavy industries that would be cut back while the same industries were being developed in other countries, notably Japan.

At this point there was some discussion of steel and particularly automobiles - I remember saying that automobiles would be imported from Japan on an equal footing with our own domestically produced automobiles, but the Japanese product would be better. Things would be made so they would break and fall apart, that is in the United States. so that people would tend to prefer the imported variety and this would give a bit of a boost to foreign competitors.</dt><dt></dt><dt>One example was the Japanese. In 1969 Japanese automobiles, if they were sold here at all I don't remember, but they certainly weren't very popular. But the idea was you could get a little bit disgusted with your Ford, GM or Chrysler product or whatever because little things like window handles would fall off more and plastic parts would break which had they been made of metal would hold up.

Your patriotism about buying American would soon give way to practicality that if you bought Japanese, German or imported that it would last longer and you would be better off. Patriotism would go down the drain. It was mentioned elsewhere things being made to fall apart too.

I don't remember specific items or if they were even stated other than automobiles, but I do recall of having the impression, sort of in my imagination, of a surgeon having something fall apart in his hands in the operating room at a critical time. Was he including this sort of thing in his discussion?

But somewhere in this discussion about things being made deliberately defective and unreliable not only was to tear down patriotism but to be just a little source of irritation to people who would use such things.

Again the idea that you not feel terribly secure, promoting the notion that the world isn't a terribly reliable place. The United States was to be kept strong in information, communications, high technology, education and agriculture.

The United States was seen as continuing to be sort of the keystone of this global system. But heavy industry would be transported out. One of the comments made about heavy industry was that we had had enough environmental damage from smoke stacks and industrial waste.

Other people could put up with that for a while. This again was supposed to be a redeeming quality for Americans to accept. You took away our industry but you saved our environment. So we really didn't lose on it.

________________________________________ __________________________________

Just look around you...

This has happened 10 fold..........

</dt>

**Itsamazing777** · 05-26-13, 04:37 PM

Ok.

**PAULYPOKER** · 05-29-13, 01:52 PM

SHIFTING POPULATIONS AND ECONOMIES - TEARING THE SOCIAL ROOTS

And along this line there were talks about people losing their jobs as a result of industry and opportunities for retraining, and particularly population shifts would be brought about. This is sort of an aside. I think I'll explore the aside before I forget it. Population shifts were to be brought about so that people would be tending to move into the Sun Belt.

They would be the sort of people without roots in their new locations, and traditions are easier to change in a place where there are a lot of transplanted people, as compared to trying to change traditions in a place where people grew up and had an extended family, and had roots. Things like new medical care systems, if you pick up from a Northeast industrial city and you transplant yourself to the South Sunbelt or Southwest, you'll be more accepting of whatever kind of, for example, controlled medical care you find there than you would accept a change in the medical care system where you had roots and the support of your family.

Also in this vein was mentioned (he used the plural personal pronoun we) we take control first of the port cities - New York, San Francisco, Seattle - the idea being that this is a piece of strategy, the idea being that if you control the port cities with your philosophy and your way of life, the heartland in between has to yield. I can't elaborate more on that but it is interesting. The heartland, the Midwest, does seem to have maintained its conservatism. But as you take away industry and jobs and relocate people then this is a strategy to break down conservatism.

When you take away industry and people are unemployed and poor they will accept whatever change seems, to offer them survival, and their morals and their commitment to things will all give way to survival. That's not my philosophy, that's the speaker's philosophy. Anyhow, going back to industry, some heavy industry would remain, just enough to maintain a sort of a seed bed of industrial skills which could be expanded if the plan didn't work out as it was intended.

So the country would not be devoid of assets and skills. But this was just sort of a contingency plan. It was hoped and expected that the world-wide specialisation would be carried on. But, perhaps repeating myself, one of the upshots of all of this is that with this 'global interdependence' the national identities would tend to be de-emphasised. Each area depended on every other area for one or another elements of its life. We would all become citizens of the world rather than citizens of any one country.

**PAULYPOKER** · 06-01-13, 04:44 PM

SPORTS AS A TOOL OF SOCIAL CHANGE

And along these lines then we can talk about sports. Sports in the United States was to be changed, in part as a way of de-emphasising nationalism. Soccer, a world-wide sport, was to be emphasised and pushed in the United States. This was of interest because in this area the game of soccer was virtually unknown at that time. I had a few friends who attended an elementary school other than the one I attended where they played soccer and they were a real novelty. This was back in the 50's.

So to hear this man speak of soccer in this area was kind of surprising. Anyhow, soccer is seen as an international sport and would be promoted and the traditional sport of American baseball would be de-emphasised and possibly eliminated because it might be seen as too American. And he discussed eliminating this. One's first reaction would be - well, they pay the players poorly and they don't want to play for poor pay so they give up baseball and go into some other sport or some other activity. But he said that's really not how it works.

Actually, the way to break down baseball would be to make the salaries go very high. The idea behind this was that as the salaries got ridiculously high there would be a certain amount of discontent and antagonism as people resented the athletes being paid so much, and the athletes would begin more and more to resent among themselves what other players were paid and would tend to abandon the sport.

And these high salaries also could break the owners and alienate the fans. And then the fans would support soccer and the baseball fields could be used as soccer fields. It wasn't said definitely this would have to happen, but if the international flavour didn't come around rapidly enough this could be done. There was some comment along the same lines about football, although I seem to recall he said football would be harder to dismantle because it was so widely played in colleges as well as in the professional leagues and would be harder to tear down.

There was something else also about the violence in football that met a psychological need that was perceived, and people have a need for this vicarious violence. So football, for that reason, might be left around to meet that need. The same thing is true of hockey. Hockey had more of an international flavour and would be emphasised.

There was some foreseeable international competition about hockey and particularly soccer. At that time hockey was international between the United States and Canada. I was kind of surprised because I thought the speaker just never impressed me as being a hockey fan, and I am. And it turns out he was not. He just knew about the game and what it would do to this changing sports program. But in any event soccer was to be the keystone of athletics because it is already a world wide sport in South America, Europe, and parts of Asia and the United States should get on the bandwagon.

All this would foster international competition so that we would all become citizens of the world to a greater extent than citizens of our own narrow nations. There was some discussion about hunting, not surprisingly. Hunting requires guns and gun control is a big element in these plans. I don't remember the details much, but the idea is that gun ownership is a privilege and not everybody should have guns. Hunting was an inadequate excuse for owning guns and everybody should be restricted in gun ownership. The few privileged people who should be allowed to hunt could maybe rent or borrow a gun from official quarters rather than own their own. After all, everybody doesn't have a need for a gun, is the way it was put.

Very important in sports was sports for girls. Athletics would be pushed for girls. This was intended to replace dolls. Baby dolls would still be around, a few of them, but you would not see the number and variety of dolls. Dolls would not be pushed because girls should not be thinking about babies and reproduction.

Girls should be out on the athletic field just as the boys are. Girls and boys really don't need to be all that different. Tea sets were to go the way of dolls, and all these things that traditionally were thought of as feminine would be de-emphasised as girls got into more masculine pursuits. Just one other thing I recall was that the sports pages would be full of the scores of girls teams just right along- there with the boys teams.

And that's recently begun to appear after 20 years in our local papers. The girls sports scores are right along with the boys sports scores. So all of this is to change the role model of what young girls should look to be. While she's growing up she should look to be an athlete rather than to look forward to being a mother.

________________________________________ _________________________________

This is a baseball bat of pure prediction coming TRUE, to the highest degree imaginable, directly to you doubters faces!

carry on...................................... ......

**PAULYPOKER** · 06-04-13, 01:00 PM

Sex and violence inculcated through entertainment

Entertainment. Movies would gradually be made more explicit as regards sex and language. After all, sex and rough language are real and why pretend that they are not? There would be pornographic movies in the theatres and on television. VCR's were not around at that time, but he had indicated that these cassettes would be available, and video cassette players would be available for use in the home and pornographic movies would be available for use on these as well as in the neighbourhood theatre and on your television. He said something like: "you'll see people in the movies doing everything you can think of."

He went on to say that all of this is intended to bring sex out in the open. That was another comment that was made several times- the term "sex out in the open." Violence would be made more graphic. This was intended to desensitise people to violence. There might need to be a time when people would witness real violence and be a part of it. Later on it will become clear where this is headed. So there would be more realistic violence in entertainment which would make it easier for people to adjust.

People's attitudes toward death would change. People would not be so fearful of it but more accepting of it, and they would not be so aghast at the sight of dead people or injured people. We don't need to have a genteel population paralysed by what they might see. People would just learn to say, well I don't want that to happen to me. This was the first statement suggesting that the plan includes numerous human casualties which the survivors would see.

This particular aspect of the presentation came back in my memory very sharply a few years later when a movie about the Lone Ranger came out and I took my very young son to see it and early in the movie were some very violent scenes. One of the victims was shot in the forehead and there was sort of a splat where the bullet entered his forehead and blood and I remember regretting that I took my son and feeling anger toward the doctor who spoke. Not that he made the movie, but he agreed to be part of this movement, and I was repelled by the movie and it brought back this aspect of his presentation very sharply in my memory. As regards music, he made a rather straightforward statement like: Music will get worse. In 1969 Rock music was getting more and more unpleasant. It was interesting the way he expressed it, "it would get worse" acknowledging that it was already bad. Lyrics would become more openly sexual. No new sugary romantic music would be publicised like that which had been written before that time. All of the old music would be brought back on certain radio stations and records for older people to hear, and older folks would have sort of their own radio stations to hear and for younger people, their music as it got worse and worse would be on their stations.

He seemed to indicate that one group would not hear the other group's music. Older folks would just refuse to hear the junk that was offered to young people, and the young people would accept the junk because it identified them as their generation and helped them feel distinct from the older generation. I remember at the time thinking that would not last very long because even young kids wouldn't like the junk when they got a chance to hear the older music that was prettier they would gravitate toward it.

Unfortunately I was wrong about that, when the kids get through their teens and into their 20's some of them improve their taste in music, but unfortunately he was right. They get used to this junk and that's all they want. A lot of them can't stand really pretty music. He went on to say that the music would carry a message to the young and nobody would even know the message was there they would just think it was loud music. At the time I didn't understand quite what he meant by that, but in retrospect I think we know now what the messages are in the music for the young. And again he was right. This aspect was sort of summarised with the notion that entertainment would be a tool to influence young people. It won't change the older people, they are already set in their ways, but the changes would all be aimed at the young who are in their formative years and the older generation would be passing. Not only could you not change them but they are relatively unimportant anyhow.

Once they live out their lives and are gone the younger generation being formed are the ones that would be important for the future in the 21st century. He also indicated all the old movies would be brought back again and I remember on hearing that through my mind ran quickly the memory of a number of old movies. I wondered if they would be included, the ones that I thought I would like to see again. Along with bringing back old music and movies for older people there were other privileges that would also be accorded older folks: free transportation, breaks on purchases, discounts, tax discounts, - a number of privileges just because they were older.

This was stated to be sort of a reward for the generation which had grown up through the depression and had survived the rigors of World War II. They had deserved it and they were going to be rewarded with all these goodies, and the bringing back of the good old music and the good old movies was going to help ease them through their final years in comfort. Then the presentation began to get rather grim, because once that generation passed, and that would be in the late 80's and early 90's where we are now, most of that group would be gone and then gradually things would tighten up and the tightening up would be accelerated. The old movies and old songs would be withdrawn, the gentler entertainment would be withdrawn.

________________________________________ ______________________________

Most of you will freak out after reading this part.............

**PAULYPOKER** · 06-07-13, 02:45 PM

Travel restrictions and implanted ID

Travel, instead of being easy for old folks, travel then would become very restricted. People would need permission to travel and they would need a good reason to travel. If you didn't have a good reason for your travel you would not be allowed to travel, and everyone would need ID. This would at first be an ID card you would carry on your person and you must show when you are asked for it. It was already planned that later on some sort of device would be developed to be implanted under the skin that would be coded specifically to identify the individual.

This would eliminate the possibility of false ID and also eliminate the possibility of people saying "Well, I lost my ID." The difficulty about these skin implant that ID was stated to be getting material that would stay in or under the skin without causing foreign body reaction whereby the body would reject it or cause infection, and that this would have to be material on which information could be recorded and retrieved by some sort of scanner while it was not rejected by the body.

Silicon was mentioned. Silicon at that time was thought to be well tolerated. It was used to augment breasts. Women who felt their breasts were too small would get silicon implants, and I guess that still goes on. At any rate silicon was seen at that time as the promising material to do both: to be retained in the body without rejection and to be able to retain information retrievable by electronic means.

________________________________________ ________

Patient's Guide To Traveling With an Implanted Device brochure [PDF]

health.sjm.com/~/media/SJM%20Health/AA/PDF/.../Travel.ashx‎

manual provided with each implantable device. ... technology, leisure activities, such as traveling, ... restrictions of which you should be aware. Also, he or she ...

**PAULYPOKER** · 06-10-13, 11:01 AM

FOOD CONTROLcccccccccccccccccc

Food supplies would come under tight control. If population growth didn't slow down, food shortages could be created in a hurry and people would realise the dangers of overpopulation. Ultimately, whether the population slows down or not the food supply is to be brought under centralised control so that people would have enough to be well-nourished but they would not have enough to support any fugitive from the new system. In other words, if you had a friend or relative who didn't sign on, and growing ones own food would be outlawed. This would be done under some sort of pretext. In the beginning I mentioned there were two purposes for everything - one the ostensible purpose and one the real purpose, and the ostensible purpose here would be that growing your own vegetables was unsafe, it would spread disease or something like that.

So the acceptable idea was to protect the consumer but the real idea was to limit the food supply and growing your own food would be illegal. And if you persist in illegal activities like growing your own food, then you're a criminal.

________________________________________ ____________________________

One word:

MONSANTO!!!

**PokinSmot** · 06-10-13, 12:13 PM

Order out of Chaos

the gobberment is tracking you PP...shit...now they trackin me

**Smoke** · 06-10-13, 01:02 PM

SmokinPot

**PAULYPOKER** · 06-11-13, 12:53 PM

**PAULYPOKER** · 06-13-13, 03:48 PM

nbnn WEATHER CONTROL

There was a mention then of weather. This was another really striking statement. He said, "We can or soon will be able to control the weather." He said, "I'm not merely referring to dropping iodide crystals into the clouds to precipitate rain that's already there, but REAL control." And weather was seen as a weapon of war, a weapon of influencing public policy.

It could make rain or withhold rain in order to influence certain areas and bring them under your control. There were two sides to this that were rather striking. He said, "On the one hand you can make drought during the growing season so that nothing will grow, and on the other hand you can make for very heavy rains during harvest season so the fields are too muddy to bring in the harvest, and indeed one might be able to do both." There was no statement how this would be done.

It was stated that either it was already possible or very, very close to being possible. Politics. He said that very few people really know how government works. Something to the effect that elected officials are influenced in ways that they don't even realise and they carry out plans that have been made for them and they think that they are authors of the plans. But actually they are manipulated in ways they don't understand.

________________________________________ _______________________________________
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025. A Research Paper. Presented To. Air Force 2025by. Col Tamzy J. House. Lt Col James B. Near, Jr.

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
The government was controlling the weather in 1966, Vietnam,the UK Royal Air Force was controlling weather in 1949.......

Read all my posts in this thread......

Did I hear right: DC metro area got more than 1

All the proof of capability is there and then some..........

Originally Posted by PAULYPOKER

HAARP used in the Vietnam war to extend the monsoon season known as:

operation Popeye

Originally Posted by PAULYPOKER

The US military have been using harp since Vietnam.........

It was called operation Popeye......

Just imagine what they are capable of now!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<iframe class="restrain" title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Cpr5JVWjIW4?wmode=opaque" frameborder="0" id="yui-gen77"></iframe>

Operation Popeye

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Operation Popeye (Project Popeye/Motorpool/Intermediary-Compatriot) was a US military cloud seedingoperation (running from March 20, 1967 until July 5, 1972) during the Vietnam war to extend the monsoon season overLaos, specifically areas of the Ho Chi Minh Trail. The operation seeded clouds with silver iodide, resulting in the targeted areas seeing an extension of the monsoon period an average of 30 to 45 days. As the continuous rainfall slowed down the truck traffic, it was considered relatively successful.^[1] The 54th Weather Reconnaissance Squadron carried out the operation to "make mud, not war." ^[2]
The resultant rain and subsequent flooding of the nearby Song Con River is sometimes blamed for the move of POWs from the prison camp at Son Tay and therefore, the failure of Operation Ivory Coast.^[3]

Operation Popeye - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Popeye
Operation Popeye (Project Popeye/Motorpool/Intermediary-Compatriot) was a US military cloud seeding operation (running from March 20, 1967 until July 5, ...
Overview - Objectives - Implementation - Public revelation

ENMOD and the US Congress

www.sunshine-project.org/enmod/US_Congr.html
Operation Popeye first came to public light in March 1971, when reporter Jack Anderson published a story based on a secret 1967 memo from the Joint Chiefs of ...

Operation Popeye / Project Popeye

www.globalsecurity.org › ... › Air Campaign
Mar 14, 2012 – Operation Popeye Project Popeye. Weather modification was a technology once embraced by the US military as a tool to help both wartime ...

Operation Popeye - Weather Warfare in Vietnam - YouTube

► 2:48► 2:48

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cpr5JVWjIW4
Sep 21, 2011 - Uploaded by Goodfightlads
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Popeye Taken from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICqAzLhP9JE ...

Operation Popeye: Military And Civil Chemtrails [Video]

► 2:06► 2:06

www.disclose.tv/.../Operation_Popeye__Military_And...
Apr 28, 2011
Operation Popeye (Project Popeye/Motorpool/Intermediary-Compatriot) was a US military cloud seeding ...

More videos for Operation Popeye »

Operation Popeye – Vietnam War Chemtrails & Weather Modification

covvha.net/operation-popeye-vietnam-war-chemtrails-weather-modif...
Operation Popeye – #Vietnam War #Chemtrails & Weather Modification. By Children Of Vietnam Veterans Health Alliance On May 7, 2012 ·. Bookmark and ...

Operation Popeye Weather Manipulation

www.slideshare.net/kynize/operation-popeye
Oct 28, 2012 – was a US military cloud seeding operation (running from March 20, 1967 until July 5, 1972) during the Vietnam war to extend the monsoon ...

Weather Warfare - Operation Popeye

www.scribd.com/doc/35260071/Weather-Warfare-Operation-Popeye
Aug 2, 2010 – Weather Warfare - Operation Popeye - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online

Seeding the clouds with aluminum oxide.....

HAARP is a US government radio wave project in Alaska which could be ... Radio transmissions need reflective layers to channel the energy in specific directions. ... of aluminum oxide, found as the primary component of these reflectiveclouds, ...

The UK Royal Air Force experimented with weather manipulation in the late 40's...

Project Cumulus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Operation Cumulus was a project of the UK government in the 1950s which was investigating weather manipulation, in particular through cloud seeding experiments. Known jokingly within the project as Operation Witch Doctor,[1] the project was operational between 1949 and 1952.

Motivation

The military were controlling the weather for several reasons, as detailed in minutes of an Air Ministry meeting held on 3 November 1953.[1] They included:

"bogging down enemy movement";
"incrementing the water flow in rivers and streams to hinder or stop enemy crossings";
clearing fog from airfields.

The Lynmouth disaster

Main article: Lynmouth: 1952 Lynmouth flood
On 16 August 1952 a severe flood occurred in the town of Lynmouth in north Devon. 9 inches (229 millimetres) of rain fell within twenty-four hours[2] and the East Lyn River rose rapidly and burst its banks. Thirty-four people died and many buildings and bridges were seriously damaged.
Conspiracy theorists speculate that Project Cumulus contributed to the conditions that caused this flood,[3] but evidence was never found. A few days before the disaster a seeding experiment was carried out over southern England. Alan Yates, an aeronautical engineer and glider pilot who was working with the operation, sprayed salt in the air and was "elated" to learn of a heavy rainfall in Staines shortly after.[1] Conspiracy theorists claim that there are rumours that official documents were deliberately destroyed and that certainly some classified documents are missing.[3]
Experts however deny that the experiments could have caused the accident. Meteorologist Philip Eden claims that "it is preposterous to blame the Lynmouth flood on such experiments"

________________________________________ ________________________________________ ___

There is now man made global warming,the Earth forms its own weather path,however man can alter the weather that the Earth forms............

**PAULYPOKER** · 06-18-13, 08:11 AM

KNOW HOW PEOPLE RESPOND - MAKING THEM DO WHAT YOU WANT

Somewhere in the presentation he made two statements that I want to insert at this time. I don't remember just where they were made, but they're valid in terms of the general overall view.

One statement is, "People can carry in their minds and act upon two contradictory ideas at one time, provided that these two contradictory ideas are kept far enough apart."

The other statement is, "You can know pretty well how rational people are going to respond to certain circumstances or to certain information that they encounter. So, to determine the response you want you need only control the kind of data or information that they're presented or the kinds of circumstance that they're in; and being rational people they'll do what you want them to do. They may not fully understand what they're doing or why."

__________________________________

22 shocking quotes world elite | Encyclopedia of safety

survincity.com/2011/06/22-shocking-quotes-world-elite/‎

The following 22 quotes shocking the world elite of birth control, from which you throw up … 1) Summary of Policy Unit UN Population, March 2009 … "What can ...

The Globalist Agenda - Quotes

globalistagenda.org/quotes.htm‎

The Globalist Agenda - How the Elite Control Your Mind and Your Life ... "We are not going to achieve a new worldorder without paying for it in blood as well as ...

Who Really Controls the World? - New Dawn Magazine

www.newdawnmagazine.com › Articles‎

Dec 14, 2011 – Secrecy is essential for Elite control – if the world finds out the truth about the ... To quote Eustace Mullins from his book The World Order:.

30 Population Control Quotes That Show That The Elite Truly ...

thetruthwins.com/.../30-population-control-quotes-that-show-that-the-elit...‎

Jan 24, 2013 – 30 Population Control Quotes That Show That The Elite Truly ... Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and ...

**PAULYPOKER** · 07-02-13, 05:54 PM

Falsified Scientific Research

<dl><dt>Somewhere in this connection, then, was the statement admitting that some scientific research data could be, and indeed has been, falsified in order to bring about desired results. Here he said, "People don't ask the right questions. Some people are too trusting." Now this was an interesting statement because the speaker and the audience all being doctors of medicine and supposedly very objective, dispassionately scientific and science being the be all and end-all. To falsify scientific research data in that setting is like blasphemy in the church, you just don't do that. Anyhow, out of all of this was to come the New International Governing Body, probably to come through the U.N. and with a World Court, but not necessarily through those structures. It could be brought about in other ways.

Acceptance of the U.N . at that time was seen as not being as wide as was hoped. Efforts would continue to give the United Nations increasing importance. People would be more and more used to the idea of relinquishing some national sovereignty. Economic interdependence would foster this goal from a peaceful standpoint. Avoidance of war would foster it from the standpoint of worrying about hostilities. It was recognized that doing it peaceably was better than doing it by war. It was stated at this point that war was "obsolete."
</dt><dt> </dt><dt>

I thought that was an interesting phrase because obsolete means something that once was seen as useful is no longer useful. But war is obsolete, because of nuclear bombs, war is no longer controllable. Formerly wars could be controlled, but if nuclear weapons would fall into the wrong hands there could be an unintended nuclear disaster. It was not stated who the "wrong hands" are. We were free to infer that maybe this meant terrorists, but in more recent years I'm wondering whether the wrong hands might also include people that we've assumed they've had nuclear weapons all along, maybe they don't have them. Just as it was stated that industry would be preserved in the United States - a little bit just in case the world wide plans didn't work out; just in case some country or some other powerful person decided to bolt from the pack and go his own way, one wonders whether this might also be true with nuclear weapons.

When he said they might fall into the wrong hands, there was some statement that the possession of nuclear weapons had been tightly controlled, sort of implying that anybody who had nuclear weapons was intended to have them. That would necessarily have included the Soviet Union, if indeed they have them. But I recall wondering at the time, "Are you telling us, or are you implying that this country willingly gave weapons to the Soviets?."
</dt><dt> </dt><dt>

At that time that seemed like a terribly unthinkable thing to do, much less to admit. The leaders of the Soviet Union seem to be so dependent on the West though, one wonders whether there may have been some fear that they would try to assert independence if they indeed had these weapons. So, I don't know. It's something to speculate about perhaps. Who did he mean when he said, "If these weapons fall into the wrong hands"? Maybe just terrorists. Anyhow, the new system would be brought in, if not by peaceful co-operation with everybody willingly yielding national sovereignty and then by bringing the nation to the brink of nuclear war.

Everybody would be so fearful as hysteria is created by the possibility of nuclear war that there would be a strong public outcry to negotiate a public peace and people would willingly give up national sovereignty in order to achieve peace, and thereby this would bring in the 'New International Political System.' This was stated and a very impressive thing to hear then, "If there were too many people in the right places who resisted this, there might be a need to use one or two or possibly more nuclear weapons." As it was put this would be possibly needed to convince people that, "We mean business." That was followed by the statement that, "By the time one or two of those went off then everybody, even the most reluctant, would yield." He said something about, "This negotiated peace would be very convincing", as in a framework or in a context that the whole thing was rehearsed but nobody would know it.
</dt><dt> </dt><dt>

People hearing about it would be convinced that it was a genuine negotiation between hostile enemies who finally had come to the realization that peace was better than war. In this context discussing war, and war is obsolete, a statement was made that there were some good things about war. One was you're going to die anyway and people sometimes in war get a chance to display great courage and heroism. If they die they've died well and if they survive they get recognition. So that in any case, the hardships of war on soldiers are worth it because that's the reward they get out of their warring.

Another justification expressed for war was, if you think of the many millions of casualties in WWI and WWII had not died but had continued to live and continued to have babies then there would be millions upon millions and we would already be overpopulated. So those two great wars served a benign purpose in delaying over-population. But now there are technological means for the individual and governments to control over-population so in this regard war is obsolete.

It's no longer needed. And then again it's obsolete because nuclear weapons could destroy the whole universe. War, which once was controllable, could get out of control and so for these two reasons it's now obsolete.

________________________________________ ______________________

</dt><dt class="title"> New Research Claims Science is 'Awash in False Findings ... </dt><dd class="source"> http://www.thedailybeast.com/newswee...-findings.html - 55k - Cached - Similar pages </dd><dd class="summary">Feb 25, 2013 ... There is, writes Daniele Fanelli in a recent issue of Nature, something rotten in the state of scientific research—“an epidemic of false, biased, ...</dd><dt class="title"> False positives: fraud and misconduct are threatening scientific ... </dt><dd class="source"> http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/20...d-bad-practice - 154k - Cached - Similar pages </dd><dd class="summary">Sep 13, 2012 ... High-profile cases and modern technology are putting scientific deceit under the microscope.</dd><dt class="title"> Scientific misconduct - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia </dt><dd class="source"> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconduct - 227k - Cached - Similar pages </dd><dd class="summary">[edit]. Cyril Burt was an English educational psychologist who made contributions to educational ...</dd><dt class="title"> How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? - Science News </dt><dd class="source"> http://phys.org/news162795064.html - 94k - Cached - Similar pages </dd><dd class="summary">It's a long-standing and crucial question that, as yet, remains unanswered: just how common is scientific misconduct? In the online, open-access journal PLoS ...</dd><dt class="title"> How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic ... </dt><dd class="source"> http://www.plosone.org/article/info%...l.pone.0005738 - 203k - Cached - Similar pages </dd><dd class="summary">Sep 24, 2009 ... PLOS ONE: an inclusive, peer-reviewed, open-access resource from the PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE. Reports of well-performed scientific ...</dd><dt class="title"> Scientific Falsification - Falsifying Evidence in Research </dt><dd class="source"> http://explorable.com/scientific-falsification - 44k - Cached - Similar pages </dd><dd class="summary">Scientific falsification is loosely defined as publishing or reporting misleading facts associated with a study, research or experimentation.</dd><dt class="title"> How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic ... </dt><dd class="source"> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19478950 - - Cached - Similar pages </dd><dd class="summary">May 29, 2009 ... The frequency with which scientists fabricate and falsify data, or commit other forms of scientific misconduct is a matter of controversy.</dd><dt class="title"> Study: Under Pressure, More Scientists Are Falsifying Research ... </dt><dd class="source"> http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/201...ying-research/ - 103k - Cached - Similar pages </dd><dd class="summary">Oct 2, 2012 ... There's growing pressure to publish papers quickly and receive dwindling research dollars, according to findings published in the "Proceedings ...</dd><dt class="title"> Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes </dt><dd class="source"> http://www.csun.edu/~vcsoc00i/classe...11/Lakatos.pdf - - Cached - Similar pages </dd><dd class="summary">1 Part 3 The Validation of Scientific Knowledge. Falsification and the. Methodology of Scientific. Research Programmes1. Imre Lakatos. SCIENCE: REASON OR ...</dd><dt class="title"> How Many Scientists Fabricate And Falsify Research? - Science Daily </dt><dd class="source"> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0528203745.htm - 66k - Cached - Similar pages </dd><dd class="summary">May 29, 2009 ... It's a long-standing and crucial question that, as yet, remains unanswered: just how common is scientific misconduct? A new study finds the first ...</dd></dl>

**PAULYPOKER** · 07-04-13, 05:25 AM

TERRORISMccc

There was a discussion of terrorism. Terrorism would be used widely in Europe and in other parts of the world. Terrorism at that time was thought would not be necessary in the United States. It could become necessary in the United States if the United States did not move rapidly enough into accepting the system. But at least in the foreseeable future it was not planned. And very benignly on their part.

Maybe terrorism would not be required here, but the implication being that it would be indeed used if it was necessary. Along with this came a bit of a scolding that Americans had had it too good anyway and just a little bit of terrorism would help convince Americans that the world is indeed a dangerous place, or can be if we don't relinquish control to the proper authorities.

**PAULYPOKER** · 07-07-13, 02:31 PM

FINANCIAL CONTROLccc

There was discussion of money and banking. One statement was, "Inflation is infinite. You can put an infinite number of zeros after any number and put the decimals points wherever you want", as an indication that inflation is a tool of the controllers. Money would become predominately credit. It was already. Money is primarily a credit thing but exchange of money would be not cash or palpable things but electronic credit signal. People would carry money only in very small amounts for things like chewing gum and candy bars. Any purchase of any significant amount would be done electronically. Earnings would be electronically entered into your account. It would be a single banking system. It may have the appearance of being more than one but ultimately and basically it would be one single banking system, so that when you got paid your pay would be entered for you into your account balance and then when you purchased anything at the point of purchase it would be deducted from your account balance and you would actually carry nothing with you. Also computer records can be kept on whatever it was you purchased so that if you were purchasing too much of any particular item and some official wanted to know what you were doing with your money they could go back and review your purchases and determine what you were buying.

There was a statement that any purchase of significant size like an automobile, bicycle, a refrigerator, a radio or television or whatever might have some sort of identification on it so it could be traced, so that very quickly anything which was either given away or stolen - whatever - authorities would be able to establish who purchased it and when. Computers would allow this to happen. The ability to save would be greatly curtailed. People would just not be able to save any considerable degree of wealth. There was some statement of recognition that wealth represents power and wealth in the hands of a lot of people is not good for the people in charge so if you save too much you might be taxed. The more you save the higher rate of tax on your savings so your savings really could never get very far. And also if you began to show a pattern of saving too much you might have your pay cut. We would say, "Well, your saving instead of spending. You really don't need all that money."

That was basically the idea being to prevent people from accumulating any wealth which might have long range disruptive influence on the system. People would be encouraged to use credit to borrow and then also be encouraged to renege on their debt so they would destroy their own credit. The idea here is that, again, if you're too stupid to handle credit wisely, this gives the authorities the opportunity to come down hard on you once you've shot your credit. Electronic payments initially would all be based on different kinds of Creditt cardds which were already in use in 1969 to some extent. Not as much as now, but people would have Creditt cardds with the electronic strip on it and once they got used to that then it would be pointed out the advantage of having all of that combined into a single CC, serving a single monetary system and then they won't have to carry around all that plastic.

**PAULYPOKER** · 07-12-13, 10:42 AM

SURVEILLANCE, IMPLANTS, AND TELEVISIONS THAT WATCH YOU!ccc

So, the next step would be the single card and then the next step would be to replace the single card with a skin implant. The single card could be lost or stolen, give rise to problems; could be exchanged with somebody else to confuse identify. The skin implant on the other hand could not be not lost or counterfeited or transferable to another person so you and your accounts would be identified without any possibility of error. And the skin implants would have to be put some place that would be convenient to the skin; for example your right hand or your forehead. At that time when I heard this I was unfamiliar with the statements in the Book of Revelation. The speaker went on to say, "Now some of you people who read the Bible will attach significance to this to the Bible," but he went on to disclaim any Biblical significance at all. This is just common sense of how the system could work and should work and there's no need to read any superstitious Biblical principals into it. As I say, at the time I was not very familiar with the words of Revelations.

Shortly after I became familiar with it and the significance of what he said really was striking. I'll never forget it. There was some mention, also, of implants that would lend themselves to surveillance by providing radio signals. This could be under the skin or a dental implant, put in like a filling so that either fugitives or possibly other citizens could be identified by a certain frequency from his personal transmitter and could be located at any time or any place by any authority who wanted to find him. This would be particularly useful for somebody who broke out of prison. There was more discussion of personal surveillance. One more thing was said, "You'll be watching television and somebody will be watching you at the same time at a central monitoring station." Television sets would have a device to enable this. The T.V. set would not have to be on in order for this to be operative. Also, the television set can be used to monitor what you are watching. People can tell what you're watching on TV and how you're reacting to what you're watching. And you would not know that you were being watched while you were watching your television. How would we get people to accept these things into their homes? Well, people would buy them when they buy their own television. They won't know that they're on there at first.

This was described by being what we now know as Cable TV to replace the antenna TV. When you buy a TV set this monitor would just be part of the set and most people would not have enough knowledge to know it was there in the beginning. And then the cable would be the means of carrying the surveillance message to the monitor. By the time people found out that this monitoring was going on, they would also be very dependent upon television for a number of things. Just the way people are dependent upon the telephone today. One thing the television would be used for would be purchases. You wouldn't have to leave your home to purchase. You just turn on your TV and there would be a way of interacting with your television channel to the store that you wanted to purchase. And you could flip the switch from place to place to choose a refrigerator or clothing. This would be both convenient, but it would also make you dependent on your television so the built-in monitor would be something you could not do without.

There was some discussion of audio monitors too, just in case the authorities wanted to hear what was going on in rooms other than where the television monitor was. In regard to this the statement was made, "Any wire that went into your house, for example your telephone wire, could be used this way". I remember this in particular because it was fairly near the end of the presentation and as we were leaving the meeting place I said something to one of my colleagues about going home and pulling all of the wires out of my house, except I knew I couldn't get by without the telephone. And the colleague I spoke to just seemed numb. To this day I don't think he even remembers what we talked about or what we hear that time, cause I've asked him. But at that time he seemed stunned. Before all these changes would take place with electronic monitoring, it was mentioned that there would be service trucks all over the place, working on the wires and putting in new cables. This is how people who were on the inside would know how things were progressing.

________________________________________ _______________

Is your TV watching you? Latest models raise concerns - NBC ...

www.nbcnews.com/technology/your-tv-watching-you-latest... CachedThis means if you tell the TV whose faces belong to which users in your family, ... Can Samsung or Samsung-authorized companies watch you watching your Samsung TV?
1. Is your television watching YOU? Smart TVs can spy on their ...
  
  www.naturalnews.com/038911_smart_TVs_television... CachedTags: smart TVs, television, surveillance: Tweet: Pin It (NaturalNews) ... allowing them to watch everything you do," RT.com reported recently. ...
2. 1. Smart TVs can spy on their owners — RT USA
    
    rt.com/usa/smart-tv-security-access-092 CachedViewers, beware: while you’re watching TV, your TV might be watching you back. A security firm discovered that Samsung’s Smart TV can give hackers access to the ...

**PAULYPOKER** · 07-17-13, 01:38 PM

Home ownership a thing of the past

Privately owned housing would become a thing of the past. The cost of housing and financing housing would gradually be made so high that most people couldn't afford it. People who already owned their houses would be allowed to keep them but as years go by it would be more and more difficult for young people to buy a house. Young people would more and more become renters, particularly in apartments or condominiums. More and more unsold houses would stand vacant.

People just couldn't buy them. But the cost of housing would not come down. You'd right away think, well the vacant house, the price would come down, the people would buy it. But there was some statement to the effect that the price would be held high even though there were many available so that free market places would not operate. People would not be able to buy these and gradually more and more of the population would be forced into small apartments. Small apartments which would not accommodate very many children.

Then as the number of real home-owners diminished they would become a minority. There would be no sympathy for them from the majority who dwelled in the apartments and then these homes could be taken by increased taxes or other regulations that would be detrimental to home ownership and would be acceptable to the majority.

Ultimately, people would be assigned where they would live and it would be common to have non-family members living with you. This by way of your not knowing just how far you could trust anybody. This would all be under the control of a central housing authority. Have this in mind in 1990 when they ask, "How many bedrooms in your house?

How many bathrooms in your house? Do you have a finished game room? "This information is personal and is of no national interest to government under our existing Constitution. But you'll be asked those questions and decide how you want to respond to them.

________________________________________ ____________________________

Home ownership: a dream of the past? - YouGov | What the ...

yougov.co.uk/.../06/03/home20ownership-a-dream-of-the-past CachedAs the old popular adage goes: an Englishman’s home is his castle. The posher version says that Britain is a property-owning democracy. Most of us own our own homes ...
Conference: Is the Desire to Become a Homeowner a Thing of ...

www.frbatlanta.org/news/conferences/13perspectives_real... CachedIs the Desire to Become a Homeowner a Thing of the Past? - May 21, 2013. ... They associate homeownership with greater control over their lives, ...

Karl Case: American Dream of Home Ownership ‘is Just Gone’

www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/Case-American-Dream-Home/... CachedThe housing market is bumping along the bottom and due to improve but the American Dream of home ownership as most know it is “just gone” and becoming a thing of ...
Pride of Ownership Is Becoming a Thing of the Past [OPINION]

www.qualitylogoproducts.com/blog/pride-ownership... CachedPride of Ownership Is Becoming a Thing of the Past [OPINION] by Joseph Giorgi 20 comments. in General Musings. ... MARKETING BLOG HOME. Subscribe via RSS; Want more?
1. Is American Dream of Home Ownership a Thing of the Past ...
  
  video.foxbusiness.com/v/968437585001 CachedFBN’s Stuart Varney on why real estate is not just an investment but still a fundamental part of the American Dream. Now Stuart Varney live with the -- studio ...
2. Home ownership to become a thing of the past as mortgage ...
  
  www.derbyshirebuilders.org/blog/property/home-ownership... CachedSpeakers at the council of mortgage lending expressed their concern at what they see as overzealous mortgage lending restrictions. With the UK housing market staging ...

**PAULYPOKER** · 07-22-13, 01:34 PM

THE ARRIVAL OF THE TOTALITARIAN GLOBAL SYSTEMccc

When the new system takes over people will be expected to sign allegiance to it, indicating that they don't have any reservations or holding back to the old system. "There just won't be any room", he said, "for people who won't go along. We can't have such people cluttering up the place so such people would be taken to special places", and here I don't remember the exact words, but the inference I drew was that at these special places where they were taken, then they would not live very long. He may have said something like, "disposed of humanely", but I don't remember very precisely, just the impression the system was not going to support them when they would not go along with the system. That would leave death as the only alternative.

Somewhere in this vein he said there would not be any martyrs. When I first heard this I thought it meant the people would not be killed, but as the presentation developed what he meant was they would not be killed in such a way or disposed of in such a way that they could serve as inspiration to other people the way martyrs do. Rather he said something like this. "People will just disappear." Just a few additional items sort of thrown in here in the end which I failed to include where they belong more perfectly. The bringing in of the new system he said probably would occur on a weekend in the winter. Everything would shut down on Friday evening and Monday morning when everybody wakened there would be an announcement that the New System was in place.

During the process in getting the United States ready for these changes everybody would be busier with less leisure time and less opportunity to really look about and see what was going on around them. Also, there would be more changes and more difficulty in keeping up as far as one's investments. Investment instruments would be changing. Interest rates would be changing so that it would be a difficult job with keeping up with what you had already earned. Interesting about automobiles; it would look as though there were many varieties of automobiles, but when you look very closely there would be great duplication. They would be made to look different with chrome and wheel covers and this sort of thing, but looking closely one would see that the same automobile was made by more than one manufacturer.

This recently was brought down to me when I was in a parking lot and saw a small Ford - I forget the model - and a small Japanese automobile which were identical except for a number of things like the number of holes in the wheel cover and the chrome around the plate and the shape of the grill. But if you looked at the basic parts of the automobile, they were identical. They just happened to be parked side-by-side where I was struck with this and I was again reminded of what had been said many years ago. I'm hurrying here because I'm just about to the end of the tape. Let me just summarize here by saying, all of these things said by one individual at one time in one place relating to so many different human endeavors and then to look and see how many of these actually came about. Meaning the changes accomplished between then and now [1969 - 1988] and the things which are planned for the future. I think there is no denying that this is controlled and there is indeed a conspiracy.

The question then becomes what to do. I think first off, we must put our faith in God and pray and ask for his guidance. And secondly do what we can to inform other individuals as much as possible, as much as they may be interested. Some people just don't care, because they're preoccupied with getting along in their own personal endeavors. But as much as possible I think we should try to inform other people who may be interested, and again put our faith and trust in God and pray constantly for his guidance and for the courage to accept what we may be facing in the near future. Rather than accept peace and justice which we hear so much now. It's a cliché! Let's insist on liberty and justice for all.

________________________________________ ____________________

The New Totalitarianism: Cyber-hegemony and the Global System

www.i-p-o.org/perdue.htm CachedThe New Totalitarianism: Cyber-hegemony and the Global System by William Dan Perdue, Ph.D Paper presented at the International Roundtable on the Challenges of ...
totalitarianism Facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia ...

www.encyclopedia.com/topic/totalitarianism.aspx Cachedtotalitarianism , a modern autocratic government in which the state involves itself in all facets of society, including the daily life of its...
The Fate of the Global Financial System Hangs in the Balance

kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/... CachedWhat's going on in France is starting to look a little bit totalitarian, ... The world and the global financial system are in an extremely dangerous situation.
[PDF] CHAPTER 3 POLITICS LAW AND BUSINESS ETHICS LEARNING ...

www2.dsu.nodak.edu/users/rbutz/International%20Business/...File format: Adobe PDF
Global Legal and Ethical Issues Standardization Intellectual Property Industrial Property ... Secular totalitarianism: political system in which leaders rely on
totalitarian - definition of totalitarian by the Free Online ...

www.thefreedictionary.com/totalitarian Cachedto·tal·i·tar·i·an (t-t l-târ-n) adj. Of, relating to, being, or imposing a form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and ...
WFF Totalitarianism Project - World Future Fund

www.worldfuturefund.org/.../wfftotalitarianismpproject.htm CachedTotalitarianism is a political system where the state tries to control almost all ... Our Global Totalitarian Research Project is very specifically designed to ...
1. Totalitarianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  
  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism Cached
  Totalitarianism (or totalitarian rule) is a term employed by some political scientists to describe a political system in which the state holds total authority over ...

**PAULYPOKER** · 07-25-13, 03:59 PM

'These are all three original recordingss on the "New World System." Tapes one and two were recorded in 1988 and are the recollections of Dr. Lawrence Dunegan regarding a lecture he attended on March 20, 1969 at a meeting of the Pittsburgh Paediatric Society. The lecturer at that gathering of paediatricians (identified in tape three recorded in 1991) was a Dr. Richard Day (who died in 1989). At the time, Dr. Day was Professor of Paediatrics at Mount Sinai Medical School in New York. Previously he had served as Medical Director of Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Dr. Dunegan was formerly a student of Dr. Day at the University of Pittsburgh and was well acquainted with him, though not intimately. He describes Dr. Day as an insider of the "Order" and although Dr. Dunegan's memory was somewhat dimmed by the intervening years, he is able to provide enough details of the lecture to enable any enlightened person to discern the real purposes behind the trends of our time. This is a transcript of a loose, conversational monologue that makes for better listening than reading.'

New World SystemThis is a transcript of two out of three tapes on the "New World System." Tapes one and two were recorded in 1988 and are the recollections of Dr. Lawrence Dunegan regarding a lecture he attended on March 20, 1969 at a meeting of the Pittsburgh Paediatric Society. The lecturer at that gathering of paediatricians (identified in tape three recorded in 1991) was a Dr. Richard Day (who died in 1989). At the time, Dr. Day was Professor of Paediatrics at Mount Sinai Medical School in New York. Previously he had served as Medical Director of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Dr. Dunegan was formerly a student of Dr. Day at the University of Pittsburgh and was well acquainted with him, though not intimately. He describes Dr. Day as an insider of the "Order" and although Dr. Dunegan's memory was somewhat dimmed by the intervening years, he is able to provide enough details of the lecture to enable any enlightened person to discern the real purposes behind the trends of our time. This is a transcript of a loose, conversational monologue that makes for better listening than reading.

**PAULYPOKER** · 09-08-13, 10:49 AM

Study: “Beginning of the longest period of economic decline in American history”

Economists will often argue that booms and busts are cyclical. Every depression or recession we’ve ever experienced in America has, usually within just a few years, been followed by booming periods of growth.

But, as the best and brightest of the financial world like to say, past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

According to a demographic study from economists at Cornell University and the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation, the recovery that many Americans believe is taking hold right now may not actually be happening. In fact, it could take another 30 years or more…

Keep in mind that the study takes into account only the demographic factors over the next several decades and does not include additional government taxation, currency devaluation, and overall global economic supply & demand factors.

The next few decades could be uncharacteristically bleak, according to a new study.

…

Demographic factors - which have largely aided the U.S. economy in the past - could end up pushing incomes down for the next 30 years or more.If other factors don’t force incomes up, we may be at the beginning of the longest period of economic decline in American history.

…

These trends alone could reduce the median income by 0.43 percentage points per year between now and 2020, 0.52 points per year between 2020 and 2030, and 0.2 points per year between 2030 and 2040.

Those numbers might sound small, but over time they would add up to a significant loss of purchasing power for the typical American and a long era of decline for the nation as a whole.

A typical worker earning $50,000 today would earn only about $48,400 by 2020 if his or her income fell by the amounts projected in the study. The worker’s income would fall to about $45,900 in 2030, $45,000 in 2040 and to less than $44,000 in 2050. In a society built upon consumer power and the idea that succeeding generations leap ahead of preceding ones-rather than fall behind them-four decades of falling incomes could be catastrophic.

The study only makes income projections relating to demographic changes.

Other changes could either offset those income declines, or exacerbate them. Future tax hikes or cutbacks in Social Security-some combination of which seems likely, to deal with mounting government debt-would reduce income even more, for instance.

It’s no secret that the middle class is dying a slow and horrible death, which will ultimately lead to impoverishment of the majority of our population. As of right now 100 million Americans are already living at or near poverty - and this is supposed to be an economic recovery!

The study notes that if you’re making $50,000 today, you’d be making $45,000 by 2040. And again, this analysis is based strictly on demographic changes.

Now take into account the continued and inevitable destruction of the US dollar. Over the last hundred years, since the establishment of the Federal Reserve, the US dollar has lost over 95% of its value. In another 30 years we can expect a further devaluation, if not an all out collapse. That reduces your purchasing power another 30% or so. In the future, you’ll be paying $10 for a gallon of gas or milk, but making less money.

And that purchasing power decrease doesn’t even take into account the increased demand on global resources for economies like China, India, Russia, and Brazil, which are adding more strain on supplies of oil and food commodities. Supply and demand alone will drive prices higher.

Finally, as the government (local, state, and federal) goes deeper into the hole, we can fully expect a number of austerity measures that will include increased taxation on individuals (think Obamacare, which has been officially labeled a tax by the US Supreme Court), cuts in benefits like social security & disability, and increased regulatory fees and burdensome mandates on businesses.

Everything that is being done right now is working against us, on almost every level.

While there may be positive swings in economic growth, wages or real estate prices throughout the next thirty years, the reality is that Americans will continue to get poorer, until there is no middle class left.

We often look to the third-world for an idea of what real poverty looks like, but we don’t have to do that anymore.

This trend is now taking shape in the United States, and we’ll soon see slums like those in Detroit springing up all over the country to house the tens of millions of people who will be affected by this collapse over coming years.

**PAULYPOKER** · 09-14-13, 08:01 PM

Originally posted by PAULYPOKER

<dt style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">FAMILIES TO DIMINISH IN IMPORTANCE</dt><dt style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;"></dt><dt>

Families would be limited in size. We already alluded to not being allowed more than two children. Divorce would be made easier and more prevalent. Most people who marry will marry more than once. More people will not marry. Unmarried people would stay in hotels and even live together. That would be very common - nobody would even ask questions about it. It would be widely accepted as no different from married people being together.

More women will work outside the home. More men will be transferred to other cities and in their jobs, more men would travel. Therefore, it would be harder for families to stay together. This would tend to make the marriage relationship less stable and, therefore, tend to make people less willing to have babies.

The extended families would be smaller, and more remote. Travel would be easier, less expensive, for a while, so that people who did have to travel would feel they could get back to their families, not that they were abruptly being made remote from their families. But one of the net effects of easier divorce laws combined with the promotion of travel, and transferring families from one city to another, was to create instability in the families.

If both husband and wife are working and one partner is transferred, the other one may not be easily transferred. Soon, either gives up his or her job and stays behind while the other leaves, or else gives up the job and risks not finding employment in the new location. Rather a diabolical approach to this whole thing!</dt>

Study: The American family is no more

It is becoming increasingly difficult to identify what a "traditional" American family looks like. Once that meant a married couple, a father who worked, kids in school and a relatively stable lifestyle.

But due to a whirlwind of economic and social changes that took place during the last decade, young people are delaying marriage longer, permanent singlehood has increased, and the "marriage-go-round" of divorce and remarriage continues to rise. Those are the findings of a new study from a researcher at Ohio State University.

The study's author, Sociology Professor Zhenchao Qian, studied data from the 2000 Census and the 2008 to 2010 American Community Survey, concluding that in the 2000s, "there is no longer any such thing as a typical American family."

But the most troubling finding, Qian said, is the large disparity that has grown between families of different races and socioeconomic classes. Race, education, the economy and immigration status weigh heavily on how well families fare financially, he said.

Despite the negative changes in American families, one group has remained stable and most closely resembles what was once considered the American norm and that is the immigrant community. Qian found that immigrants tend to be married at a higher rate, and divorce and remarry at a lower rate when compared to those born in the United States.

Qian said the Great Recession of the late 2000s can account for many of the changes - across the board, regardless of race, young people born in the United States have delayed getting married, moved back in with their parents, and those who do marry get divorced at a higher rate.

There is no doubt that the gap between America's haves and have-nots grew larger than ever during the 2000s," Qian said in a statement. "This gap has shaped American families in multiple ways. It influences the kind of families we live in and the kind of family environment in which we raise our children."

From 2008 to 2010, nearly half of young adults between the ages of 20 and 24 lived with their parents. During the same time, the percentage of US-born women of that age who had ever been married declined from 31 percent in 2000 to 19 percent in 2008 to 2010. The decline for men was similar, dropping from 21 percent to 11 percent.

Not only are young people putting off getting married, but when they do, they are more likely to get divorced and remarried, a cycle Qian calls the "marriage-go-round." Among currently married men, Qian found the percentage of those who were married more than once increased from 17 percent in 1980 to 25 percent in 2008 to 2010.

Outcomes were even worse for African-Americans: they had the lowest percentage of people who had ever been married, at every age group, the highest proportion of permanent singlehood by the age of 50 and the highest divorce-to-marriage ratios.

"Economic inequality is key to the polarization of American families, and the disadvantages of children living in single and unstable families will just worsen the racial and ethnic inequalities we already have in this country," Qian said.

AHT/HJ

**PAULYPOKER** · 11-08-13, 07:18 PM

US political system in ‘very bad shape’

The US political system is in a very “poor shape” and in dire need of “reform” to win back the trust of the American public, says Larry Birns, director of Council on Hemispheric Affairs (COHA).

“The American system of three branches of government is very much under stress right now and the American system of politics-- political process-- is in very poor shape and battle shape,” Birns said in a phone interview on Thursday.

The constant partisan bickering in Congress has dragged its approval ratings to near all times lows. A recent Associated Press-GfK survey found that just 5 percent of the public approves of the job being done by senators and representatives, while 83 percent disapprove.

“At the present time Congress as an institution in the US is perhaps at the lowest rating it has received in its history,” Birns noted.

Members of Congress showed little interest in preventing a $5 billion reduction to food stamp benefits last week. The cut affected nearly 48 million recipients. More than two million Americans will also lose unemployment insurance at the end of the year unless Congress takes action.

Congress has been showing a “mean and nasty face” to the American people and it needs to “improvise some new initiative” to win back popularity, Birns said.

The electorate will be demanding lawmakers make more “concessions” on their behalf, he added.

The federal government shutdown that lasted for 16 days last month is expected to cost the US economy between $2 billion and $6 billion in economic output, according to a report by the Office of Management and Budget released Thursday.

HJ/HJ

**TheRifleman** · 11-08-13, 09:32 PM