Lawyer: No proof nurse raped Arizona patient who had baby

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ericc
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 08-05-08
    • 8278

    #1
    Lawyer: No proof nurse raped Arizona patient who had baby
    Nathan Sutherland, a licensed practical nurse, has been arrested and charged with one count of sexual assault and one count of vulnerable adult abuse, according to court records.

    PHOENIX (AP) — A nurse who was supposed to be looking after an incapacitated woman at a long-term health care facility was charged Wednesday with raping her, weeks after she stunned her caregivers and family by giving birth to a baby boy .


    “We owed this arrest to the victim. We owed this arrest to the newest member of our community — that innocent baby,” Phoenix Police Chief Jeri Williams said.



    “There’s no direct evidence that Mr. Sutherland has committed these acts,” Defense attorney David Gregan said.
  • Auto Donk
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 09-03-13
    • 43558

    #2
    sounds pretty bad, but need to see how AZ defines rape from a legal standpoint....

    because obviously there's evidence he fathered a child if his dna matches the baby's.... question is whether the az rape statute covers conduct where the alleged victim is incapable of giving consent, and not just conduct against the victim's will....

    but the headline, on its face, of "no evidence" when his dna matches the baby's, makes him sound like an idiot
    Comment
    • cincinnatikid513
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 11-23-17
      • 45360

      #3
      Sutherland, 36, submitted his DNA sample under court order Tuesday and the results came back a few hours later, showing he was a match to the baby. He declined to speak with police and invoked his Fifth Amendment rights, police spokesman Tommy Thompson said.


      "There's no direct evidence that Mr. Sutherland has committed these acts," Gregan said. "I know at this point there's DNA. But he will have a right to his own DNA expert."


      lawyer is doing his best with a losing hand
      Comment
      • Auto Donk
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 09-03-13
        • 43558

        #4
        Originally posted by cincinnatikid513
        Sutherland, 36, submitted his DNA sample under court order Tuesday and the results came back a few hours later, showing he was a match to the baby. He declined to speak with police and invoked his Fifth Amendment rights, police spokesman Tommy Thompson said.


        "There's no direct evidence that Mr. Sutherland has committed these acts," Gregan said. "I know at this point there's DNA. But he will have a right to his own DNA expert."


        lawyer is doing his best with a losing hand
        lawyer's a dumbass to make any statement at all if the best he can say is "no evidence" when there's a dna match (I'd hoped for his sake he was relying on the definition of rape under az law, and was stating that his client's conduct fell outside the definition, such that he could state "there is no evidence that my client raped")... instead, it just sounds like he's a f'n idiot.....

        lawyer by far isn't doing his best, as doing his best would have been to state "no comment" to any such questions, and not make idiotic statements to the press that undercut his and his client's credibility -- particularly his own.......
        Comment
        • BadNina
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 11-27-07
          • 10491

          #5
          Is she not comatose? That would mean she is unable to provide consent. Which means....


          ick
          Comment
          • Chi_archie
            SBR Aristocracy
            • 07-22-08
            • 63172

            #6
            Family has said she's not comatose

            But she's still enough of a vegetable that she couldn't consent.

            Time to plant a little bit of reasonable doubt that another employee with an ax to grind , framed him by artificially unseminatng her.
            Comment
            • Ebumdude
              SBR MVP
              • 11-15-12
              • 2189

              #7
              Originally posted by Chi_archie
              Family has said she's not comatose

              But she's still enough of a vegetable that she couldn't consent.

              Time to plant a little bit of reasonable doubt that another employee with an ax to grind , framed him by artificially unseminatng her.
              Sounds like the plot to the next Lifetime movie.
              Comment
              • dlowilly
                SBR Posting Legend
                • 11-09-16
                • 13862

                #8
                You know all of SBR's resident racists (kingdumb, thrilla, grits, venom, etc.) got excited reading a name like "Nathan Sutherland", but after clicking the link decided to forget about it and go back to watching interracial porn and eating cocoa puffs
                Comment
                • USCPHILLYGUY
                  SBR Posting Legend
                  • 12-15-12
                  • 21746

                  #9
                  Originally posted by dlowilly
                  You know all of SBR's resident racists (kingdumb, thrilla, grits, venom, etc.) got excited reading a name like "Nathan Sutherland", but after clicking the link decided to forget about it and go back to watching interracial porn and eating cocoa puffs
                  Willy welcome back. Miss your political insight
                  Comment
                  • dlowilly
                    SBR Posting Legend
                    • 11-09-16
                    • 13862

                    #10
                    Originally posted by USCPHILLYGUY
                    Willy welcome back. Miss your political insight
                    Comment
                    • Chi_archie
                      SBR Aristocracy
                      • 07-22-08
                      • 63172

                      #11
                      is this charge going to hurt Nathan Sutherland's Christian rap career?


                      Comment
                      • MinnesotaFats
                        SBR Posting Legend
                        • 12-18-10
                        • 14758

                        #12
                        There was a case in New York, Law and Order did an episode based on it, where 6 teens had a gangbang with a 16 yr old retard.

                        The kids all said they did it, the girl said she wated it and enjoyed it. The parents of the girl brought the case to the DA for prosecution.

                        The jury ruled the retarded girl could not provide consent therefore all 6 are guilty of rape. The judge immediately set aside the jury verdict and set the kids free citing the girls testimony that she 1- asked them to do it and 2- admitted receiving pleasure from it

                        Now, in this case, it'll be interesting to factor in the 1- level of incapacitation of the woman and 2- the legal and cultural needs of the child

                        If the woman if not incapacitated it is not out of the realm of possibility that defense could show she enjoyed the act by physically showing that there are no signs of rape (bleeding, forced penetration, etc) and if the father shows care and financial support for kid there is a good chance that this works as the lawyer suggests

                        Now- if she's clinically dead , only alive by machine, thats different.
                        Comment
                        • cincinnatikid513
                          SBR Aristocracy
                          • 11-23-17
                          • 45360

                          #13
                          Originally posted by MinnesotaFats
                          There was a case in New York, Law and Order did an episode based on it, where 6 teens had a gangbang with a 16 yr old retard.

                          The kids all said they did it, the girl said she wated it and enjoyed it. The parents of the girl brought the case to the DA for prosecution.

                          The jury ruled the retarded girl could not provide consent therefore all 6 are guilty of rape. The judge immediately set aside the jury verdict and set the kids free citing the girls testimony that she 1- asked them to do it and 2- admitted receiving pleasure from it

                          Now, in this case, it'll be interesting to factor in the 1- level of incapacitation of the woman and 2- the legal and cultural needs of the child

                          If the woman if not incapacitated it is not out of the realm of possibility that defense could show she enjoyed the act by physically showing that there are no signs of rape (bleeding, forced penetration, etc) and if the father shows care and financial support for kid there is a good chance that this works as the lawyer suggests

                          Now- if she's clinically dead , only alive by machine, thats different.
                          u crack me up, u think everyone is innocent or plotting for money
                          Comment
                          • MinnesotaFats
                            SBR Posting Legend
                            • 12-18-10
                            • 14758

                            #14
                            I root for the underdog, and against greed

                            ....unless I'm favored
                            Comment
                            • KingKolzig
                              SBR Hall of Famer
                              • 02-02-10
                              • 5550

                              #15
                              Originally posted by dlowilly
                              You know all of SBR's resident racists (kingdumb, thrilla, grits, venom, etc.) got excited reading a name like "Nathan Sutherland", but after clicking the link decided to forget about it and go back to watching interracial porn and eating cocoa puffs
                              amazing how much black guy/white girl porn there is
                              Comment
                              • Frank Mills
                                SBR MVP
                                • 09-26-18
                                • 1244

                                #16
                                Fry this rooster eyed MF and let's move on.
                                Comment
                                Search
                                Collapse
                                SBR Contests
                                Collapse
                                Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                Collapse
                                Working...