If today's society is allegedly all about equality, and that no one race is better than the other, why have 1 month glorifying Blacks? Why aren't all the other months dedicated to all the other races? How is it that somebody would be vilified like he's Satan if he wanted to have a White History Month? It's crap like this, along with many others that race issues are at an all time high, and that there'll never be a perfect Utopia that some Libtards want.
-
-
So black people don't whine more than they already doComment -
blackpeoplemeet is still my favorite.
If someone tried whitepeoplemeet, holy sheit would there be an outrage.
So, farmersonly was born.
Someone explain that to me.Comment -
i guess this to reach the racist thread/post count for the monthComment -
He admits that blacks are the worst people on earth.Comment -
i always thought it was an effort to give 'em a meaningless month but to make a big deal out of it so that maybe they'd give The White Man a break and let up on the shootings, thefts, rapes, robberies, carjackings, arsons, stabbings and murders for one month of the year......Comment -
And this whole "BBC" thing..... if we less-endowed whites made a play for all their women by piping off how much more dick we had than black me do; fuckin' black people would lose their f'kn minds!!!!
fortunately for them, they know any claim of BWC would be bullshit, as white guys, as a group, possess mostly pathetic small and medium-sized units, thereby posing no risk of infiltrating the hood to give dem black bitches what they're "really needin"....
As I've only met a handful of bitches in my life that needed "less kahk"Comment -
and they blame white people...Comment -
Comment -
There is a whitepeoplemeet.com
And look, I used to think the same thing. "Why isn't there a WHITE Entertainment Television network? It's not FAIR that we can't have one too"
..............when I was like 15 years old.
It's a stupid argument. If blacks want a place to go to watch shows with black people on it, who the fuk cares? It doesn't affect you, and ComicView used to be a great show, so it was a bonus (it sucks now). It's not meant to be as exclusive as you think it does.
Blacks continue to have problems with their own bottom 20% weighing them down. Any positive influences you can put out there that can show you the great parts of your culture, Black History Month, Kwanzaa, whatever, is a good thing. And again, it doesn't affect the rest of us at all.Comment -
Not as easy as you think. Most of them are racist and freeloaders
Comment -
Great thread. I've thought about it before, the concept of black history, and I still don't understand it. It just doesn't make sense.Comment -
In honor of black history month;
Comment -
yep. poor, lying black women.....
even their damn men don't want them.....
kanye, for all of his shortcomings and craziness, said it best bout dem hos when he told them "and when you get on he leave yo ass for a white girl".....
black women want more respect? they need to get it from their own men before they start asking everybody else to get on the bandwagon....Comment -
88% of South African police force are HIV positive
*The New Observer:
Around 88 percent of all the active staff in the South African Police Services (SAPS) are HIV-positive, according to that country’s Deputy Police Minister Maggie Sotyu.
Speaking at a seminar which is being hosted by the country’s parliamentary Police Portfolio Committee, and which is focused on the high number of police killings in the country, she said the AIDS-ridden force include both “police officers and non-career personnel.”
“The 88 percent is made up of active personnel, clerks, public services act members, and sweepers,” she said.
AIDS is not the only problem plaguing the South African Police Services.*According to a report issued last year,*of the 158,548 operational members, some 40,000*have failed or do not have firearm competency certificates.
According to official opposition Shadow Minister of Police,*Dianne Kohler Barnard, most police services globally require operational members to requalify in firearm competency twice a year. “Here it is becoming the norm for armed officers not to have a competency certificate — which means there are police breaking the law.”Comment -
An Orgy of Violence
FEBRUARY 26, 2016*BY*TNO STAFF—IN*AFRICA*·
“Bullet proof vests in the suburbs; universities trashed; rector’s office petrol bombed; artifacts burnt; farmers murdered; land grabs increase; ‘burn the building and those inside’: ANC Member of Parliament; highway shootings and robberies; 87-year-old bludgeoned in home—twice; restaurateur shot dead; police report 7,000 firearms ‘stolen or missing’; panga attack severs B.Sc. student’s hand: Just another week in blighted South Africa!”
So begins the latest situation report on South Africa issued by the TAU-SA, the oldest agricultural union in South Africa. Founded in 1897, the TAU describes its mission as the promotion of a “productive and safe existence for its members on the land they own,”—an objective, the organization notes, which is currently not achievable.
The situation report, part of the TAU-SA’s international news service, continues:
The ANC and its followers have reverted to type. Violence gets them what they want or what they think they want. The more compromise and concessions given, the more demands are made and more violence ensues.* Violence works for the ANC—it always has. It’s a tried and tested recipe that delivers every time. And after the violence, after the lust has been satiated, after the racial hatred has been slaked and the resentment played out, then what?
This question is being asked by many South Africans as they witness yet again the mindless Khmer Rouge-type vandalism that has become the hallmark of many young Africans “demanding” everything under the sun, whether they want it or not. A free-for-all lawlessness has gripped the country: unbridled mayhem has become a modus operandi, and everyone and everything is fair game.
The seeds of this mindless fury were sown many moons ago. Historically the ANC used violence as a means to obtain the political rights which they declare were denied them by the British and later white South Africa. South Africa has been particularly convulsed by revolutionary violence since the early sixties. Late seventies and mid-eighties’ terrorism increased in barbarity and brutality. It was hallmarked by its own particular savagery: the relentless intimidation of blacks who would not join their revolution and a grotesque cruelty which out Mau-Mau’d the Mau Mau. The ANC called it “a people’s war”. It targeted not only policemen and soldiers but also local councilors, “collaborators,” “informers” and all “puppets of the regime”. The aim was to render South Africa ungovernable and to ultimately overthrow all authority. The seeds of violence as an effective political tool were planted.
In 1990, Nelson Mandela was released from prison, the ANC was unbanned and negotiations began for universal suffrage. To all intents and purposes, the violence should have stopped. Its raison d’etre no longer existed. The demands had been met. Or so we thought.
Violence however intensified. In his book*The Secret Revolution,*the National Party’s Intelligence chief Neil Barnard tells of how former prime minister P W Botha pleaded with Nelson Mandela to renounce violence as a condition of his release. Mandela refused. He declared that practical negotiations should begin as soon as possible. “Then the momentum of the process will make violence superfluous”. How wrong he was. Or did he know he was offering Botha a pie in the sky?
The rest as they say is history. After Mandela’s February 1990 release, violence increased fourfold. It continued even after the United Democratic Front (the internal wing of the once-banned ANC) was disbanded in August 1991. Some 9,500 people died between February 1990 and April 1994, an average of 300 per month compared to a monthly average of 90 from September 1984 to February 1990.
The use by the UDF of the necklace method of torture and death (where a rubber tire is placed around a person’s neck, filled with petrol and set alight) decreased during the 1986 state of emergency but increased after Mandela was released, and increased further in 1992. Declares John Kane Berman in his bookPolitical Violence in South Africa:*“The investment in terror pays off because people learn to behave in ways expected of them”. This tactic harks back to the Soviet KGB and the Gulags.
Terror campaigns against black local authorities were part of an overall strategy to achieve the collapse of apartheid, writes Kane Berman. These campaigns rendered black areas ungovernable and were strategies created by the UDF at its formation in 1983. “In 1990 (after Mandela’s release) the campaigns were stepped up”. (So much for the swindle punted by Mandela to Prime Minister Botha that violence would become “superfluous” once negotiations were under way!)
In a 1990 editorial the black newspaper*City Press*blamed black youth for their “political immaturity in introducing the necklace method of killing and going on the rampage, stoning and burning houses.” The then secretary general of the ANC, Alfred Nzo, said that “collaborators must be eliminated”. Asked by theSunday Times*of London whether this included necklacing, Nzo nodded emphatically: “If they decide to use necklacing, we support it”.
Not once during his premiership did Nelson Mandela ever condemn necklacing, let alone the relentless violence perpetrated by his supporters. Indeed it was his party’s policy to keep up the violence until power was handed over to the ANC. Few young South Africans who were born after the end of apartheid know the history of this era. They only see the endless puff-piece books on bookstore shelves lauding those who had previously made South Africa practically ungovernable.
The ANC-sanctioned violence of those days against the previous government is being repeated today under an ANC government. It is the same mindless gangsterism. Any chance to go to the streets and tear something apart is taken up with alacrity, whatever the so-called causes.
The true background of the ANC is being slowly eliminated from a history whose realities, were they available to present-day South Africa, might explain this mindless mayhem now being perpetrated under the guise of demands for better education, or free housing, or service delivery.
In any sane country, farmers would be cherished. After all, what is more basic than three meals a day? In South Africa, the malice shown towards the commercial farming sector is so patent that it can only be attributed to an illogical animosity and resentment rooted in a huge (but justified) inferiority complex. After all, what sort of agriculture existed before whites arrived in South Africa?* The ANC cannot face an “inconvenient truth”, as the movie title says.* Can the ANC feed SA’s population of 53 million?
READ**Black Population in South Africa Has Increased by 920% in 100 Years
From 1990 to 2015, 1785 farmers were murdered and 3,745 farms were attacked. In January 2016, six farmers were murdered and there were 26 attacks. In many of these cases, the murders can be termed atrocities. Newspaper pages are replete with reports of knifings, hackings with pangas, suffocations, rapes of farmers’ wives and daughters, burning with hot irons, and worse.
In addition to this onslaught, the government tinkers with expropriation legislation, with plans to take 50 per cent of many farms to give to “the workers”, and farmers are burdened with the myriad legislative inhibitions already placed on them. Land grabs have increased as squatters take possession of “unoccupied” land.
South Africa’s endemic violence has affected the SA economy. During the 1960s there was an annual growth rate of 6 per cent. This halved in the 1970s and halved again in the 1980s. In the 1970s, even while facing terrorism, riots and involvement in a border war with the Cubans in Angola, the SA rand was stronger than the US dollar. In Mandela’s first four years as president, the rand lost 80 per cent of its value and more than 2,8 million man days were lost to strikes. The national debt also doubled under Mandela’s presidency.
The ANC has reaped what it has sown.Comment -
Comment -
New York City: 89% of All Crime Committed by Non-Whites
The New Observer
March 5, 2016
Nonwhites commit 89 percent of all crime in New York City, including 97.7 percent of all shootings, 96 percent of all robberies, 94.2 percent of all murders, 94.9 percent of all Juvenile Felony and Misdemeanor crimes, and 90.6 percent of all rapes.
These figures are contained in the New York City Police Department’s latest “Crime and Enforcement Activity in New York City” report, which covers the dates January 1 to December 31, 2015.*It can be found on the New York Government website here (PDF).
*
The report is almost unique in present-day America because it openly presents statistics on race and crime compiled from the New York City Police Department’s records management system—statistics that are most often suppressed by other police departments.
In addition, the NYPD breaks down the racial categories correctly, listing “Hispanic” separately instead of grouping it together with “white,” which is what most of the US government does (thereby artificially inflating the “white” crime levels).
The only potential problem with the NYPD figures is that the racial classifications are made by officers or precinct clerical staff interviewing the victim or complainant.
As the report said, the “suspect’s description is also recorded at this time but relies on the victim’s assessment of race and ethnicity given their interaction with the suspect.* The arrestee race/ethnicity is recorded as a result of the officer’s assessment of the individual’s identification documents, the individual’s physical characteristics, and in many cases their prior criminal record. Arrestee race/ethnicity and victim designation of suspect race/ethnicity may therefore vary due to the different methods of determination.”
Considering that the public at large is highly ignorant of race and unaware of accurate racial categories—and that nonwhites will often classify light-skinned Hispanics as “white”—there will inevitably be a margin of error in the NYPD statistics.
Nonetheless, even using the figures as they are, they clearly demonstrate the fact that the vast majority of serious crime in America’s largest city is nonwhite in origin.
The report shows that nonwhites, as a group, commit:
94.2 percent of all murders;
90.6 percent of all rapes. Whites account for 18.6 percent of all rape victims;
*
87.9 percent of “other felony sex crimes,” which includes sodomy, sexual abuse first degree, incest and sexual conduct against a child. White victims account for 22.6 percent of all victims in this category;
96 percent of all robberies;
*
90.8 percent of all felonious assault crimes;
88 percent of all grand larceny crimes;
88.3 percent of all misdemeanor sex crimes, which include sex abuse, sexual misconduct, and forcible touching;
88.9 percent of all misdemeanor assault and related offenses;
84.6 percent of all petit larceny crimes;
83.2 percent of all misdemeanor criminal mischief;
97.7 percent of all shootings;
87.5 percent of all firearm arrests;
85.5 percent of all proactive offenses (drug arrests & allegations);
87 percent of all proactive property crimes;
88.8 percent of all violent crime and stop question and frisk activity;
*
94.9 percent of all felony and misdemeanor complaint records with identified juvenile victims, suspects, and arrestees.
This works out at a statistical average of 89.61 percent of all crimes in New York City.
According to the report’s Appendix B, which lists the New York City population by race, white non-Hispanics account for 2,738,547, or 32.3 percent of the population.Comment -
sbr
Comment
