i see why biteme can't grasp the concept of me not having any intent to do anything wrong...... this stpid fcck acts is if i knew the cards in the hands AF was playing, saying I had the intent to benefit when AF slo plays a set (funny, he blew me out of a hand with a flopped set.... guess I had to guess which way he was "soft-playing" any particular hand -- but i digress) or any other hand.....
biteme's error is based on his own playing/skyping experience at SBR, where he in fact knows the other player in the hand's cards.......
biteme, without an accurate crystal ball or someone telling me AFs hole cards, how can I intend to cheat when making a bet under the gun, such as shoving short stacked with AJ (the hand that i ultimately go out on)....... your analysis is skewed by your own well-documented super-using ways............. in fact, you have admitted in numerous ring games that you "superuse"......
oh wait, you were only joking.... guess only you can joke on in-game chat, and everyone else's words are taken in a "most serious shit on the planet, ie. penny poker on SBR" way..........
now, for my final words on this issue to you:
GO FCK YOURSELF
biteme's error is based on his own playing/skyping experience at SBR, where he in fact knows the other player in the hand's cards.......
biteme, without an accurate crystal ball or someone telling me AFs hole cards, how can I intend to cheat when making a bet under the gun, such as shoving short stacked with AJ (the hand that i ultimately go out on)....... your analysis is skewed by your own well-documented super-using ways............. in fact, you have admitted in numerous ring games that you "superuse"......
oh wait, you were only joking.... guess only you can joke on in-game chat, and everyone else's words are taken in a "most serious shit on the planet, ie. penny poker on SBR" way..........
now, for my final words on this issue to you:
GO FCK YOURSELF