If you believe Sandy Hook was real...

[Kermit]

Kermit subconsciously nicks my words/phrases all the time. I say subconsciously because I don't think he'd intentionally pluck and recycle them for risk of looking like an idiot. Don't get me wrong, he is an idiot but I doubt he wants to look like one. It's just that when he comes across a passage of mine he likes, he's so tickled that it goes straight into his memory bank and reappears all too soon. I'm not just talking about this thread, but others in which he's reared his puppet head. It just goes to show.. I truly own Kermit the Fraud. They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but Kermit needs to pull his face up out of my lap and take a breath once in a while.

You just made 3 posts in a row dedicated to me.

Now who owns who again?

You're better off to just continue trolling GIVEMETHEMONEY's thread like you do everyday. Which I might add is pretty pathetic.

[Eddy Munny]

Kermit also uses the term "YouTube" derisively as if nothing of value has ever been uploaded on the site, and then promptly turns around and posts two YouTube clips to assert his position. You can't make this shit up.

[Eddy Munny]

Kermit, I own you. Three posts, four posts, five, six.... it really doesn't matter, does it?

If I consolidated them into one post, would it make any difference? The difference between one post and several posts is the "submit" key.

Besides that, I can't predict when and how often you will go into hiding. That's your defense mechanism. Should I just stop posting whenever you've run out of answers? Of course not, retard. But you're free to keep trying.

[Eddy Munny]

Kermit is so tired of being bitch slapped about the events of 9/11 that he's now posting links to other, disparate threads in an attempt to direct attention away from the place he was buried. What a fukking hopeless clown.

[stevenash]

And the video that the conspiracy kooks hate to view.
Now, a good way to tell if a video has been doctored is to count the splices.
This is a credible video of Tower 7, hours before it collapsed.
FEMA, and a whole bunch of other folks that know way about this stuff than the posting forum combined conclude that Tower 7 was brought down by the damage of the debris and lack of water from sprinklers, not the impact from the debris.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d45_1320106542

[Kermit]

Go into hiding? When the fukk have I ever hid from you? All I have to do is post one sentence and I always know that I can expect 3 posts from you as you sit there with your balls in your left hand while you type with your right giggling to yourself of how clever that you think that you are.

I don't exactly see anyone here stroking you off telling you how great that you are.

You're just a silly little boy who thinks if he continues making posts and gets the last word in that he has proven his point and won his argument, meanwhile I am upstairs taking a shit.

[Eddy Munny]

Go into hiding? When the fukk have I ever hid from you? All I have to do is post one sentence and I always know that I can expect 3 posts from you as you sit there with your balls in your left hand while you type with your right giggling to yourself of how clever that you think that you are.

I don't exactly see anyone here stroking you off telling you how great that you are.

You're just a silly little boy who thinks if he continues making posts and gets the last word in that he has proven his point and won his argument, meanwhile I am upstairs taking a shit.

Whoa!!! I just make one little post about your penchant for prolonged absences and you respond with three paragraphs in a row! Wow, who owns who? The gospel according to Kermit the Fraud.

[Kermit]

Whoa!!! I just make one little post about your penchant for prolonged absences and you respond with three paragraphs in a row! Wow, who owns who? The gospel according to Kermit the Fraud.

At least I got everything out in one post.

[Eddy Munny]

Kermit is now miles away from the subject of 9/11 and still running. He can't get out of Dodge fast enough!

[Kermit]

Eddy, were there passengers on the planes, Yes or No?

[Eddy Munny]

Misdirection Kermit, that's your way out... bury your burial with an avalanche of senseless blather, and even throw in a link to a completely different thread for good measure. You fukking retard!

[Kermit]

Misdirection Kermit, that's your way out... bury your burial with an avalanche of senseless blather, and even throw in a link to a completely different thread for good measure. You fukking retard!

Yes or No?

I want to see what kind of Conspiracy Theorist that you are.

[Kermit]

And the video that the conspiracy kooks hate to view.
Now, a good way to tell if a video has been doctored is to count the splices.
This is a credible video of Tower 7, hours before it collapsed.
FEMA, and a whole bunch of other folks that know way about this stuff than the posting forum combined conclude that Tower 7 was brought down by the damage of the debris and lack of water from sprinklers, not the impact from the debris.


http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d45_1320106542

According to kooks like Eddy that building sustained no damage. That must be CGI.

[Eddy Munny]

Eddy, were there passengers on the planes, Yes or No?

On the commercial airliners that were hijacked? Yes

On the planes that hit the towers and Pentagon? No

[brainfreeze]

And the video that the conspiracy kooks hate to view.
Now, a good way to tell if a video has been doctored is to count the splices.
This is a credible video of Tower 7, hours before it collapsed.
FEMA, and a whole bunch of other folks that know way about this stuff than the posting forum combined conclude that Tower 7 was brought down by the damage of the debris and lack of water from sprinklers, not the impact from the debris.


http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d45_1320106542

No theory, fact..., the building was " pulled " . Silversteins own words...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk

[jtoler]

How much Kerm? If there are any openings how do I get started and what other forums do I need to join?

[stevenash]

No theory, fact..., the building was " pulled " . Silversteins own words...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk

Silverstein is a drunk.

[Kermit]

On the commercial airliners that were hijacked? Yes

On the planes that hit the towers and Pentagon? No

Even though the bodies of passengers were confirmed through DNA at the Pentagon crash site?

[Eddy Munny]

Kermit please, nothing was confirmed at the Pentagon crash site other than an enormous hoax.

The Pentagon aspect of 9/11 is almost as bad as building 7. If I was dumb enough to accept the shit being shoveled about the Pentagon, I wouldn't even bother getting out of bed in the morning.

[recon1]

Wild stuff... And then one wonders why people are leaving this place in record numbers and renouncing citizenship... I think in time it will come out, but it won't be on the people's time, it will be when they are ready to serve a purpose .. Everything's timing..

Exactly a purpose will be served.

[recon1]

Yeah, IHOP probably should have sponsored the government's official story... Kermit devoured two syrup-drenched stacks on 9/12 while he jacked off to thoughts of Adam West apprehending Bin Laden with a butterfly net.

Pancake theory was in the original 911 commision report, but heat from Architects and Engineers for 911 truth blew that theory out of water so the commision changed the theory. Not sure what B.S. theory they are pushing now. Free-fall speed and pancaking are simotaneously impossible.
I believe the current report still says that office furniture, papers and jet fuel caused the precise temperatures to cause steel to melt. This would be so laughable if this event did not cause the death of so many lives.
Architects and Engineers recreated a recreation of event with the same grade of steel, office furniture and weight pressure the beams would have been holding under the circumstances and it held and had space to hold under even more of a load.
I could go on and on. The evidence is available for anyone who so wishes to know.

[recon1]

still waiting on a Fact... you have your mind made up, i get it... you also dont have a single clue, i get that too... you are like every other conspiracy nut that thinks they are smarter than the rest... son, you arent... you talk about something so much that you have twisted your theory to a point of ignorance and you can now preach about said unproven theory... again, still waiting on A Fact... opinions come cheap pal

Dog, argue with these guys.

http://www.ae911truth.org

Then when you get done with them go search out a guy by name of Demartini i believe who was original engineer/architect of world trade towers and tell him his design was flawed. He made a statement the day of or shortly after this event.

Then you can head over to Firefighters for 911 truth and tell them they're flawed in the way they think.

https://www.facebook.com/firefightersfor911truth

Then head over and tell these absolutely fine Commissioned and non-commisioned Officers they are full of crap.

http://mo911truth.org

Then head over and talk with William Rodriquez. His testimony alone should have brought this entire shananigans to a stop. He also went floor to floor with master key with several cops and Firefighters and all are on record of saying what he's said is true. W. Rodriquez testified before the 911 commission, but the commission decided to leave his testimony out. W. Rodriquez only fault is he is hired by lot's of Muslim countries to speak and they love him because his testimony may one day be used in a sharia type setting. We should have exposed this weeks after the event and prosecuted Bush, Cheyney, Rice and all of NORAD who stood down before we went to war and destroyed innocent lives on false pretense. Now, it aint gonna be that easy, but here is his link.

http://william911.com

Then after you argue with al the above read the actual 911 commision report. Should be mandatory reading for everybody. It's full of Conspiracy theory and dis-information.

http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

[brainfreeze]

Dog, argue with these guys.

http://www.ae911truth.org

Then when you get done with them go search out a guy by name of Demartini i believe who was original engineer/architect of world trade towers and tell him his design was flawed. He made a statement the day of or shortly after this event.

Then you can head over to Firefighters for 911 truth and tell them they're flawed in the way they think.

https://www.facebook.com/firefightersfor911truth

Then head over and tell these absolutely fine Commissioned and non-commisioned Officers they are full of crap.

http://mo911truth.org

Then head over and talk with William Rodriquez. His testimony alone should have brought this entire shananigans to a stop. He also went floor to floor with master key with several cops and Firefighters and all are on record of saying what he's said is true. W. Rodriquez testified before the 911 commission, but the commission decided to leave his testimony out. W. Rodriquez only fault is he is hired by lot's of Muslim countries to speak and they love him because his testimony may one day be used in a sharia type setting. We should have exposed this weeks after the event and prosecuted Bush, Cheyney, Rice and all of NORAD who stood down before we went to war and destroyed innocent lives on false pretense. Now, it aint gonna be that easy, but here is his link.

http://william911.com

Then after you argue with al the above read the actual 911 commision report. Should be mandatory reading for everybody. It's full of Conspiracy theory and dis-information.

http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

Recon just unloaded a clip of information that should change some thought patterns...
Grade A post here..

[recon1]

And the video that the conspiracy kooks hate to view.
Now, a good way to tell if a video has been doctored is to count the splices.
This is a credible video of Tower 7, hours before it collapsed.
FEMA, and a whole bunch of other folks that know way about this stuff than the posting forum combined conclude that Tower 7 was brought down by the damage of the debris and lack of water from sprinklers, not the impact from the debris.


http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d45_1320106542

A few office fires will never make a building symetrically collapse at free fall speed. Absolutely 100% impossibile without explosives.

[jtoler]

A few office fires will never make a building symetrically collapse at free fall speed. Absolutely 100% impossibile without explosives.

Strange isn't it. Nasher seems like a common sense guy but not on this topic.

[recon1]

Recon just unloaded a clip of information that should change some thought patterns...
Grade A post here..

Thanks, Brain. Hard material for anybody to refute unless one believes in the official 911 commission conspiracy theories.

[recon1]

Strange isn't it. Nasher seems like a common sense guy but not on this topic.

Not really familiar with him. I too once just believed what i was told by the news and forces acting as our Government. WTC 7 is the absolute smoking gun.

[Kermit]

Not really familiar with him. I too once just believed what i was told by the news and forces acting as our Government. WTC 7 is the absolute smoking gun.

Say building 7 never suffered any damage or caught on fire by the towers falling down on top of it, how could it be all part of the plan that it was going to be demolished anyways? I mean how do you know prior to the planes hitting the towers to plant that specific building with explosives to bring it down if you are unsure if it is ever going to to be damaged enough to have an excuse to bring it down?

Wouldn't it have made much more sense to bring it down when the towers originally fell? Why wait and then bring it down 7 hours later after it has been on fire all day? Couldn't the explosives been prematurely set-off by all of the fires that were burning throughout the building all day?

To me, this is where the common sense that jtoler is referring to should come into the picture.

[Kermit]

Something else to think about, if both of the Twin Towers were already laced with explosives to bring them down, how can a pilot fly a large aircraft filled with jet fuel(that is going to explode and create massive fires on impact) hit the building with such precision on a specific floor on each tower and know that he has enough room to not prematurely detonate any of the explosives that have been already placed there?

Can you imagine the risk involved with planning this out and the jet hits too low and then triggers the explosives and the building comes crashing down as soon as it is impacted?

[brainfreeze]

Say building 7 never suffered any damage or caught on fire by the towers falling down on top of it, how could it be all part of the plan that it was going to be demolished anyways? I mean how do you know prior to the planes hitting the towers to plant that specific building with explosives to bring it down if you are unsure if it is ever going to to be damaged enough to have an excuse to bring it down?

Wouldn't it have made much more sense to bring it down when the towers originally fell? Why wait and then bring it down 7 hours later after it has been on fire all day? Couldn't the explosives been prematurely set-off by all of the fires that were burning throughout the building all day?

To me, this is where the common sense that jtoler is referring to should come into the picture.

Proximity assured it would, along with any other building in the area... I don't think anyone was unsure of anything that was in on " the plan ". Who knows why they waited, maybe those towers represented something... and 7 did as well, as I said earlier, these people play by timing and symbolizing as well.

You want answers, concern yourself and look for them, and stop accepting tight tie lies...
here, this can get you started, we can all say pentagon and twin towers were " symbolic " to America, is why they were targeted...

http://www.secretsinplainsight.com/tag/twin-towers/

[recon1]

Say building 7 never suffered any damage or caught on fire by the towers falling down on top of it, how could it be all part of the plan that it was going to be demolished anyways? I mean how do you know prior to the planes hitting the towers to plant that specific building with explosives to bring it down if you are unsure if it is ever going to to be damaged enough to have an excuse to bring it down?

Wouldn't it have made much more sense to bring it down when the towers originally fell? Why wait and then bring it down 7 hours later after it has been on fire all day? Couldn't the explosives been prematurely set-off by all of the fires that were burning throughout the building all day?

To me, this is where the common sense that jtoler is referring to should come into the picture.

I'm not sure i'm understanding the question fully.

nonetheless, documents stored by the SEC (security exchange commission) involving countless fraudulent trades and money laundering of many companies connected to politicians is definite motive, but none stands out more than the destroying the SEC's evidence gathered against Enron. Ironically enough Enron CEO Ken Lay just happened to be best buddies with Bush Sr. and Jr.
This just scratches the surface of the records destroyed in this event. WTC 7 housed many records of investigative agencies. You can look it up and see what you think.

I don't nor do you know why WTC-7 wasn't destoyed earlier, i only know that the implossion was absolutely 100% without a doubt put in place over a period of time. This would be a big job.

If you haven't seen it a video exist of the BBC doing a live on scene interview with a women reporter reporting the WTC-7 had collapsed while it was still standing behind her. after a few minutes WTC-7 starts collapsing and the BBC looses Satellite signal. You can't make this stuff up.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6mxFRigYD3s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

You make it sound like wtc-7 was on-top of WTC 1 & 2, it wasn't. Have you ever been to the complex? either 1 or 2 buildings seperated WTC-7 from World trade towers 1 & 2. WTC-7 was ablolutely salvagable after the destruction of towers 1 & 2. It was not destroyed, but damaged.

Again, why was WTC-7 not pulled earlier? i don't know and not all missions go as planned. The video of BBC reporting the destruction of WTC-7 while it stood is absolute damning proof of something so big that it should scare the absolute shit out of you. The forces that be are evil to the core.

[raydog]

On the commercial airliners that were hijacked? Yes

On the planes that hit the towers and Pentagon? No

this is where you embarrass yourself.... the bldgs fell... how, well its obvious that if 10 floors fall on 1, the 1 will fall...then so on and so forth... if it was controlled and lied about, so be it...even though i believe its very possible, there is no proof, so im not going to worry about it... but for you to think that there were no people aboard these planes is completely asinine ... we are talking dumbest shit said in the entire thread... but hey, its your opinion... you still havent provided a single fact, and wont... its all your minds theory... hate the govt, hate laws and the way the country is run... but present something rational when making an argument... and at least something factual... no matter how hard you want it and how bad you want us to believe, your gut guesses arent facts

fwiw, when you have a theory that is without facts, that you want others to believe, when they dont, childish name calling isnt going to win them over... its going to make them question your state of mind

[brainfreeze]

Proximity assured it would, along with any other building in the area... I don't think anyone was unsure of anything that was in on " the plan ". Who knows why they waited, maybe those towers represented something... and 7 did as well, as I said earlier, these people play by timing and symbolizing as well.

You want answers, concern yourself and look for them, and stop accepting tight tie lies...
here, this can get you started, we can all say pentagon and twin towers were " symbolic " to America, is why they were targeted...
http://www.secretsinplainsight.com/tag/twin-towers/

Just wanted to add, I don't really agree with the videos here, but I do agree that the towers represented Boaz and Jachin of solomons temple, this is common masonry ...

[brainfreeze]

Just wanted to add, I don't really agree with the videos here, but I do agree that the towers represented Boaz and Jachin of solomons temple, this is common masonry ...

Here's more of it in D.C. ...http://www.cuttingedge.org/n1040.html
What do think " a pentagon " outlines ? ... You got it, a pentagram ...

[recon1]

Here's more of it in D.C. ...http://www.cuttingedge.org/n1040.html
What do think " a pentagon " outlines ? ... You got it, a pentagram ...

Brain, look up the date for the begining of construction for the Pentagon. Tell me what you think.