2 questions for Trump supporters

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vitterd
    Restricted User
    • 09-14-17
    • 58460

    #71
    Totally exonerated. Lmao. These trumptards need serious help.
    Comment
    • MinnesotaFats
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 12-18-10
      • 14758

      #72
      When you say "news source" do you mean Journalists or their sources?

      If it's sources, Trump has given that statement. The Attorney General works for Trump, and has stated there will be no charges, in writing.

      Guiliani was on Wolf today and said it, also took at shot at Mueller for being so vague in the report. Mind you noone has seen the report other than Trump & the AG. So those are the ONLY sources that can make such a statement.

      If you are looking for a journalist to say that, good luck lol, they've been wrong on this topic for 2 years and many have lost their credibility. Even insiders, like Brenen, are finished in the media.
      Comment
      • Turd Ferguson
        SBR Hall of Famer
        • 08-26-10
        • 7260

        #73
        Originally posted by vitterd
        Totally exonerated. Lmao. These trumptards need serious help.
        It’s pretty cringy how apeshit they’ve been going. Rest assured their victory dancing will age about as well as an Ivanka tweet about being honest...
        Comment
        • DwightShrute
          SBR Aristocracy
          • 01-17-09
          • 103679

          #74
          Originally posted by MinnesotaFats
          When you say "news source" do you mean Journalists or their sources?

          If it's sources, Trump has given that statement. The Attorney General works for Trump, and has stated there will be no charges, in writing.

          Guiliani was on Wolf today and said it, also took at shot at Mueller for being so vague in the report. Mind you noone has seen the report other than Trump & the AG. So those are the ONLY sources that can make such a statement.

          If you are looking for a journalist to say that, good luck lol, they've been wrong on this topic for 2 years and many have lost their credibility. Even insiders, like Brenen, are finished in the media.
          Exactamundo!

          The AG read the report and based on the law, he decides if he is exonerated. The rest is just background noise.
          Comment
          • JohnGalt2341
            SBR Hall of Famer
            • 12-31-09
            • 9138

            #75
            Originally posted by MinnesotaFats
            When you say "news source" do you mean Journalists or their sources?

            If it's sources, Trump has given that statement. The Attorney General works for Trump, and has stated there will be no charges, in writing.

            Guiliani was on Wolf today and said it, also took at shot at Mueller for being so vague in the report. Mind you noone has seen the report other than Trump & the AG. So those are the ONLY sources that can make such a statement.

            If you are looking for a journalist to say that, good luck lol, they've been wrong on this topic for 2 years and many have lost their credibility. Even insiders, like Brenen, are finished in the media.
            I'm telling you... ANY NEWS SOURCE YOU WANT... besides Trump or Huckabee Sanders. Even Barr didn't say he was totally exonerated. He left that part out.

            I'm going to let you in on a little secret... Trump has been known to lie... just because he told you he was "completely and totally exonerated" doesn't make it true no matter how bad you want to believe it. What I am asking you to do is... just find 1 NEWS SOURCE that confirms what he said. You pick the news source... surely there must be at least 1 news source that agrees with Trump on this.
            Comment
            • Turd Ferguson
              SBR Hall of Famer
              • 08-26-10
              • 7260

              #76
              Congressman Quotes Anti-Semitic Hitler Passage In House To Attack Democrats, Press










              Back to business as usual for the party of Lincoln...
              Comment
              • khicks26
                SBR Aristocracy
                • 09-16-06
                • 45704

                #77
                Originally posted by Turd Ferguson
                Congressman Quotes Anti-Semitic Hitler Passage In House To Attack Democrats, Press










                Back to business as usual for the party of Lincoln...
                This shit is getting dangerous.
                Comment
                • The Kraken
                  BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                  • 12-25-11
                  • 28918

                  #78
                  I would love to see whatever building the damn thing is in burn down

                  And hopefully there are no copies
                  Comment
                  • DwightShrute
                    SBR Aristocracy
                    • 01-17-09
                    • 103679

                    #79
                    Comment
                    • darrell74
                      SBR Posting Legend
                      • 04-16-07
                      • 14648

                      #80
                      Originally posted by DwightShrute
                      Comment
                      • rkelly110
                        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                        • 10-05-09
                        • 39691

                        #81
                        Originally posted by Turd Ferguson
                        Congressman Quotes Anti-Semitic Hitler Passage In House To Attack Democrats, Press










                        Back to business as usual for the party of Lincoln...
                        You mean back to business as usual from a guy named "Brooks".
                        Comment
                        • MinnesotaFats
                          SBR Posting Legend
                          • 12-18-10
                          • 14758

                          #82
                          What's wrong with correllating the conspiracy between media and this investigation against the incestual business and financial relationship that the Jewish community fosters?

                          Everyone knows the book and it's author is a piece of shit, however, if you've ever done business within a Jewish community you know what the reference is.

                          It's not anti semantic, it's pointing out the tied relationship...the incestual relation and dependence that is solely reliant upon a hoped for and framed out come.

                          For many who don't understand, Jewish communities are remarkably closed. They are open to the public, they'll do business with 'gentiles' as we're called, but the financial, sales, doctors, agents, advisors are all from the Jewish community. 90% of relationships are (depending on level of commitment to faith) are first criteria being Jewish and very rarely will a Gentile sit Shiva or enjoy a seder in a Jewish home.

                          In his book, Hitler pointed to this as conspiracy to create an independent race aimed at taking over Germany and displacing Germans by sheer exclusion. In his speech, Brooks connects the media and the D party as the same objective. Displace R's without winning elections, by sheer propaganda and skewed press.
                          Comment
                          Search
                          Collapse
                          SBR Contests
                          Collapse
                          Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                          Collapse
                          Working...