another valid argument regarding climate change

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dante1
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 10-31-05
    • 38647

    #1
    another valid argument regarding climate change
    two ridiculous comments from the right, one claims he believes in climate change but not global warming. omg, the warming of world temperatures is what is directly causing the much greater intensity of these new storms. storms that were once called one in 500 years are now happening with regularity.

    the other clown is annoyed because this may not happen for 20 years or so, well it is happening now and what type of argument is that. well, it will only affect my kids and grandkids so I don't give a fck.

    you know somebody mentioned cows and how they contribute, and they do. and you know what, we would be healthier if we ate less red meat and maybe even became nonmeat eaters.

    have you ever heard of a city in California called Loma Linda? the population consists of many Seventh-day Adventists. that is another Protestant flavor and those people are very serious about health. Almost all of them are vegetarians, non-smokers, non-drinkers and guess what else, they live longer than most other Americans. check it out.

    you know what else is a great argument that I can make. first, let me be 100% truthful, I personally love a great steak cooked on the grill. I eat them very seldom, but in fact, I love almost any dead meat cooked on a grill. and more than likely so do you. but here is the thing my friend that type of cooking and red meat, in particular, is not good for you if you partake in it often.

    second, when high heat hits meat of any kind, meaning high heat grilling, a chemical reaction occurs called the Maillard reaction. that is what causes the great aroma and the great taste of charred meat, especially cooked on the grill. that is why we all love the taste of meat cooked this way. if it wasn't dangerous I would eat it every day. as of right now I eat it only on rare occasions, maybe four or five times a year. I know some of you are thinking, fck you, I will eat what I want and that is your prerogative, I am simply giving you facts. If you eat red meat or processed meat or meat cooked at high temperature every day you are leaving yourself susceptible to a few different cancers.

    life is life and you can't protect yourself from every bad thing, but you can mitigate the bad. you can be aware of the bad and you can do things to make yourself less of a target. for example, eat less of that food, when you prepare it use an acid-based marinade that helps reduce that chemical reaction.

    I only thought about this thread because one of you wrote about cows, and I immediately thought of how, if we were more like the Seventh-day Adventists, we would be healthier. Plus, it will help mediate climate change.

    and yet even today we have some complete crazies on the right denying it. they would deny that water is usually wet.
  • RoyBacon
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 09-21-05
    • 37074

    #2
    My argument is not is it real. It needs more study we all agree on that.

    My argument is on solutions.

    You will not solve climate change by bankrupting the US while the rest of the world laughs their azz off because of our ignorant libtard stupidity.
    Comment
    • dante1
      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
      • 10-31-05
      • 38647

      #3
      Originally posted by RoyBacon
      My argument is not is it real. It needs more study we all agree on that.

      My argument is on solutions.

      You will not solve climate change by bankrupting the US while the rest of the world laughs their azz off because of our ignorant libtard stupidity.
      you're an idiot, the studying has been finished for decades. it was started when you were probably still shitting in your pants.
      Comment
      • RoyBacon
        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
        • 09-21-05
        • 37074

        #4
        Originally posted by dante1
        you're an idiot, the studying has been finished for decades. it was started when you were probably still shitting in your pants.
        Uh-huh...

        tards... they will believe anything their handlers tell them.

        I really love the billionaire tards burning 700 lbs of fuel an hour flying around in their private jets. Ever hear any of them say we should restrict private aircraft travel???

        Oh no... but they have no problem with gas prices doubling and a single mother in the NE paying a $800 month heating bill.
        Comment
        • dante1
          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
          • 10-31-05
          • 38647

          #5
          Originally posted by RoyBacon
          My argument is not is it real. It needs more study we all agree on that.

          My argument is on solutions.

          You will not solve climate change by bankrupting the US while the rest of the world laughs their azz off because of our ignorant libtard stupidity.
          I really don't like spending time debating with complete idiots but let us take a real look at this argument. first solutions have been provided by science for years, second, he has no problem spending over 20 billion on a wall that is going to solve a non-problem. In fact, BBB Republicans have long been in favor of using these mostly Mexican non-citizens for jobs. That plus the fact that recent stats have shown more immigrants are leaving than coming. So he isn't interested in 20 billion worthless dollars being spent but solving a real problem bothers him.

          but here is the great irony of this whole situation, here is the real reason this man is full of shit. halting global warming will be a net gain in money, not a net loss. the money that would be saved if temperatures can be reduced even 1.5 degrees of expected outcomes, is enormous. So the very opposite of his argument is the truth.

          now he will retort with some BS argument that will make little or no sense. he is wrong again, and I can prove it if I decided to do the research, but what is the benefit. Today he claims something, tomorrow he denies it, and I will need to shove it in his face again. the beat goes on with these idiots.

          yes roy, it will save billions probably trillions, but you didn't know that.
          Comment
          • DwightShrute
            SBR Aristocracy
            • 01-17-09
            • 103583

            #6
            May 17, 2017
            Jasmin Guénette
            Al Gore's Predictions Of Doom Scramble His Message

            www.huffingtonpost.ca/jasmin-guenette, p. web





            Like many doom-mongers before him, Al Gore's predictions of impending disaster have fallen somewhat short of the mark -- a point to keep in mind as his Inconvenient Sequel hits theatres this summer.
            It's a good thing he was wrong, too, because I was worried we might not be around in 2017, given the alarms he was sounding in 2006's An Inconvenient Truth!
            For one thing, I thought sea levels would have risen 20 feet by now thanks to the melting of either West Antarctica or Greenland. Al Gore claimed that this would happen in the "near future," but thankfully, we've been spared so far. In fact, sea levels seem to be rising at maybe three millimetres per year. Twenty feet is over six thousand millimetres, so at this rate, we wouldn't even be halfway by the year 3017.
            That's what a High Court judge in the United Kingdom said ten years ago when he ruled that Gore's film could only be shown in British schools with guidance notes to prevent political indoctrination: "The Armageddon scenario he predicts, insofar as it suggests that sea level rises of seven metres might occur in the immediate future, is not in line with the scientific consensus" and would only happen "after, and over, millennia."
            The judge had other problems with the film's claims. For instance, the film speaks of global warming "shutting down the Ocean Conveyor," by which the Gulf Stream is carried over the North Atlantic to Western Europe, among other things. But the judge said it was "very unlikely" that the Ocean Conveyor would shut down, although it might slow down, based on the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Again, though, so far so good, as NASA found in 2010 that there had been no significant slowing over the previous 15 years, and in fact that the Ocean Conveyor "may have even sped up slightly in the recent past."
            The polar bears are doing fine as well, despite the film's claims that they were drowning because they were unable to find ice. In fact, their numbers have increased over the past decade, from 20,000-25,000 to 23,000-32,000 bears in 2016.
            Finally, though not in the film, Al Gore often predicted that the Arctic Ocean would be ice-free in the summer by now. To be specific, according to the fact checkers at Snopes.com, "In the late 2000s, Al Gore made a series of high-profile statements suggesting the possibility that Arctic sea ice could be completely gone during the summer by around 2013 or 2014." They go on to conclude that while "Arctic sea ice is, without question, on a declining trend," Al Gore "definitely erred in his use of preliminary projections and misrepresentations of research."
            None of this is to say that climate change is not an issue worth addressing, that it won't require adaptation and innovation in the coming decades. It is and it will. But is it an impending catastrophe? Is it a concern that should outweigh, for instance, efforts to help the poorest parts of the world rise out of crushing poverty through the use of cheap and efficient fossil fuels?
            In trying to answer these kinds of questions, we need reliable information of likely costs and benefits. "Misrepresentations of research," which Al Gore seems all too fond of, are the opposite of helpful.
            Jasmin Guénette is Vice President of the Montreal Economic Institute. The views reflected in this op-ed are his own.
            Comment
            • RoyBacon
              BARRELED IN @ SBR!
              • 09-21-05
              • 37074

              #7
              Originally posted by dante1
              I really don't like spending time debating with complete idiots but let us take a real look at this argument. first solutions have been provided by science for years, second, he has no problem spending over 20 billion on a wall that is going to solve a non-problem. In fact, BBB Republicans have long been in favor of using these mostly Mexican non-citizens for jobs. That plus the fact that recent stats have shown more immigrants are leaving than coming. So he isn't interested in 20 billion worthless dollars being spent but solving a real problem bothers him.

              but here is the great irony of this whole situation, here is the real reason this man is full of shit. halting global warming will be a net gain in money, not a net loss. the money that would be saved if temperatures can be reduced even 1.5 degrees of expected outcomes, is enormous. So the very opposite of his argument is the truth.

              now he will retort with some BS argument that will make little or no sense. he is wrong again, and I can prove it if I decided to do the research, but what is the benefit. Today he claims something, tomorrow he denies it, and I will need to shove it in his face again. the beat goes on with these idiots.

              yes roy, it will save billions probably trillions, but you didn't know that.
              You spent your climate policy discussion talking about the wall?

              So your argument is if we invest several trillion dollars and bankrupt ourselves now we will save billions assuming whatever it is we do actually works.(huge assumption btw)

              Another faulty assumption is we can do this unilaterally putting our workers at an incredible disadvantage, losing industries like we have never seen and somehow we will magically have a happy ending and I a'int talking the massage type.

              Pass

              There is a better way. Move deliberately and smartly with free market solutions that can supplant carbon emitters like we are already doing.

              Simply put; you are not going punish the working poor with sky high heating costs or cars they can't afford. They vote too. You must bite your tard lip and find an inbetween solution.
              Comment
              • khicks26
                SBR Aristocracy
                • 09-16-06
                • 45704

                #8
                Who thinks climate change is real & caused by man? The CIA, FBI, Homeland Security, all branch's of the US Military, NSA, NASA, just about every government in the world, Big Oil Companies, & all the other rich assholes that are building bunkers for the day the shit hits the fan.

                Who doesn't think its real? Trump, Roy, Dwight & the majority of far right nut jobs.
                Comment
                • RoyBacon
                  BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                  • 09-21-05
                  • 37074

                  #9
                  Originally posted by khicks26
                  Who thinks climate change is real & caused by man? The CIA, FBI, Homeland Security, all branch's of the US Military, NSA, NASA, just about every government in the world, Big Oil Companies, & all the other rich assholes that are building bunkers for the day the shit hits the fan.

                  Who doesn't think its real? Trump, Roy, Dwight & the majority of far right nut jobs.
                  Actually, it's fuggers like you I'm trying to protect.

                  Can you afford a cheap electric car with a 100 mile range for $50k? You ready to pay $900 a month to heat your house? We are just getting started too. You going to fly across state for $2500 coach?
                  Comment
                  • khicks26
                    SBR Aristocracy
                    • 09-16-06
                    • 45704

                    #10
                    Originally posted by RoyBacon
                    Actually, it's fuggers like you I'm trying to protect.

                    Can you afford a cheap electric car with a 100 mile range for $50k? You ready to pay $900 a month to heat your house? We are just getting started too. You going to fly across state for $2500 coach?
                    WOW there's Roy again looking out for our best interest. LOL

                    Do you really think any of that matters if were dead or under water. The effects are going to cost more than any number you come up with.
                    You can start with Hurricane Michael. 9 billion in damage.
                    Comment
                    • Venom72
                      SBR MVP
                      • 10-05-16
                      • 2041

                      #11
                      You gotta be a stupid son of a bitch to not believe in climate change..so yes i expect the usual trump tards to believe it isnt
                      Comment
                      • Sanity Check
                        SBR Posting Legend
                        • 03-30-13
                        • 10962

                        #12
                        Originally posted by RoyBacon
                        You will not solve climate change by bankrupting the US while the rest of the world laughs their azz off because of our ignorant libtard stupidity.
                        The above comment ^ is true.

                        90% of plastic in the world's oceans come from asia and africa.

                        China is a far bigger polluter than the USA.

                        Yet china receives a free pass on its pollution and climate change sins.

                        While the USA receives massive penalties which negatively affect its ability to conduct business.

                        It wouldn't be farfetched to say that "anti cliimate change" policy like the kyoto and later paris accords are designed to empower chinese business which is an extremely heavy polluter while crippling american busines which doesn't pollute nearly as much as china within the grand scheme of things.
                        Comment
                        • RoyBacon
                          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                          • 09-21-05
                          • 37074

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Sanity Check
                          The above comment ^ is true.

                          90% of plastic in the world's oceans come from asia and africa.

                          China is a far bigger polluter than the USA.

                          Yet china receives a free pass on its pollution and climate change sins.

                          While the USA receives massive penalties which negatively affect its ability to conduct business.

                          It wouldn't be farfetched to say that "anti cliimate change" policy like the kyoto and later paris accords are designed to empower chinese business which is an extremely heavy polluter while crippling american busines which doesn't pollute nearly as much as china within the grand scheme of things.
                          This is what I honestly do not understand about the left.

                          The are oblivious to this assured failure.
                          Comment
                          • Sanity Check
                            SBR Posting Legend
                            • 03-30-13
                            • 10962

                            #14
                            Originally posted by RoyBacon
                            My argument is not is it real. It needs more study we all agree on that
                            ^ Studies are long done.

                            The consensus is: deforestation causes climate change and recent incidence of drought. There is hard empirical evidence for this occurring in brazil as the amazon rainforest is deforested. Water is wet. Trees pull water up from the ground and evaporate them through their leaves. This produces a large percentage of rainfall. Deforestation interruprts this process, resulting in reduced rain. Drought ensues. Et al.

                            Historically, people have cut down between 50% to 80% of the world's natural forests. This reduces the planet's ability to absorb carbon as forests serve as natural carbon sinks.

                            There is also a process known as "global dimming". It occurs when pollution in the air blocks the sun's rays resulting in colder winters.
                            Comment
                            • RoyBacon
                              BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                              • 09-21-05
                              • 37074

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Sanity Check
                              ^ Studies are long done.

                              The consensus is: deforestation causes climate change and recent incidence of drought. There is hard empirical evidence for this occurring in brazil as the amazon rainforest is deforested.

                              Historically, people have cut down between 50% to 80% of the world's natural forests. This reduces the planet's ability to absorb carbon as forests serve as natural carbon sinks.

                              There is also a process known as "global dimming". It occurs when pollution in the air blocks the sun's rays resulting in colder winters.
                              I'm in the camp let's promote and perfect everything that can lead to less of every kind of pollution. As you mentioned deforestation is a serious global problem. A solvable one. Let's go electric, geothermal, solar, wind, ocean waves but let's do it at a free market pace with hefty support(tax credits) from the government.

                              This cant be like Obamacare where it's crammed down our throats and premiums rise 300%. Libs were thrown out of office for it. Same will happen if climate fuggers run off businesses and energy prices increase 300%.
                              Comment
                              • khicks26
                                SBR Aristocracy
                                • 09-16-06
                                • 45704

                                #16
                                Originally posted by RoyBacon
                                I'm in the camp let's promote and perfect everything that can lead to less of every kind of pollution. As you mentioned deforestation is a serious global problem. A solvable one. Let's go electric, geothermal, solar, wind, ocean waves but let's do it at a free market pace with hefty support(tax credits) from the government.

                                This cant be like Obamacare where it's crammed down our throats and premiums rise 300%. Libs were thrown out of office for it. Same will happen if climate fuggers run off businesses and energy prices increase 300%.
                                I see nothing has changed. Roy trying to make a buck & get a tax break off other peoples tragedy. Glad you have our best interest.

                                By the time the market scammers get around to this, we will all be dead.
                                Comment
                                • Sanity Check
                                  SBR Posting Legend
                                  • 03-30-13
                                  • 10962

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by RoyBacon
                                  I'm in the camp let's promote and perfect everything that can lead to less of every kind of pollution. As you mentioned deforestation is a serious global problem. A solvable one. Let's go electric, geothermal, solar, wind, ocean waves but let's do it at a free market pace with hefty support(tax credits) from the government.

                                  This cant be like Obamacare where it's crammed down our throats and premiums rise 300%. Libs were thrown out of office for it. Same will happen if climate fuggers run off businesses and energy prices increase 300%.
                                  Exactly.

                                  Obamacare was funded by 20 tax hikes and $2 trillion dollars in spending over 10 years.

                                  Now we have Bernie Sanders promising "free healthcare" that will probably cost another 20 tax hikes and another $2 trillion in spending.

                                  If it didn't work the 1st time. Why would it work the 2nd time?

                                  "Fool me once, fool me twice" could become the anti trumpers life motto if they continue to refuse to learn from history and their own life experience.
                                  Comment
                                  • RoyBacon
                                    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                    • 09-21-05
                                    • 37074

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by khicks26
                                    I see nothing has changed. Roy trying to make a buck & get a tax break off other peoples tragedy. Glad you have our best interest.

                                    By the time the market scammers get around to this, we will all be dead.
                                    You're so girly dramatic these days. Does your wife post for you sometimes or what?

                                    Can you add something, anything to the discussion? No?

                                    This is where I'm a little lib but you're trolling to hard to notice anything except the steam coming out your ears.

                                    The US can get aggressive to encourage R&D and market penetration of cleaner energy. If you look at the tax break for solar it's a great top line write off but even with the write off it's a losing investment. We need solar and all alternate energy prices to decline and bigger tax credits or there will be no meaningful penetration.

                                    Let's not mandate change, Obama style(erased by Trump), let's prime the pump of the free market.
                                    Comment
                                    • khicks26
                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                      • 09-16-06
                                      • 45704

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by RoyBacon
                                      You're so girly dramatic these days. Does your wife post for you sometimes or what?

                                      Can you add something, anything to the discussion? No?

                                      This is where I'm a little lib but you're trolling to hard to notice anything except the steam coming out your ears.

                                      The US can get aggressive to encourage R&D and market penetration of cleaner energy. If you look at the tax break for solar it's a great top line write off but even with the write off it's a losing investment. We need solar and all alternate energy prices to decline and bigger tax credits or there will be no meaningful penetration.

                                      Let's not mandate change, Obama style(erased by Trump), let's prime the pump of the free market.
                                      I have learned that subjects like this are not worth talking to you clowns about. Anything I add will just be disregarded & most of you have no fuking clue what your talking about. I find it best to just point out your hypocrisy, then laugh when you cry about it.

                                      Mental Case in point: They cut all the trees down & now the earth is warming. LOL

                                      Dumbasses someone had to burn all that carbon into the air, with or without the trees.
                                      Comment
                                      • RoyBacon
                                        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                        • 09-21-05
                                        • 37074

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by khicks26
                                        I have learned that subjects like this are not worth talking to you clowns about. Anything I add will just be disregarded & most of you have no fuking clue what your talking about. I find it best to just point out your hypocrisy, then laugh when you cry about it.

                                        Mental Case in point: They cut all the trees down & now the earth is warming. LOL

                                        Dumbasses someone had to burn all that carbon into the air, with or without the trees.
                                        Hey, if you don't know much about a subject then yea, thanks for the troll I guess.
                                        Comment
                                        • khicks26
                                          SBR Aristocracy
                                          • 09-16-06
                                          • 45704

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by RoyBacon
                                          Hey, if you don't know much about a subject then yea, thanks for the troll I guess.
                                          By the crap your posting about it. I know more than you. Your Welcome.
                                          Comment
                                          • RoyBacon
                                            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                            • 09-21-05
                                            • 37074

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by khicks26
                                            By the crap your posting about it. I know more than you. Your Welcome.
                                            Hard to tell from each of our posts. LOL.
                                            Comment
                                            • Sanity Check
                                              SBR Posting Legend
                                              • 03-30-13
                                              • 10962

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by khicks26
                                              By the crap your posting about it. I know more than you. Your Welcome.


                                              I'm sure you do.
                                              Comment
                                              • khicks26
                                                SBR Aristocracy
                                                • 09-16-06
                                                • 45704

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by RoyBacon
                                                Hard to tell from each of our posts. LOL.
                                                Originally posted by Sanity Check


                                                I'm sure you do.

                                                But as long as you're not contributing to discussion here (as anti trumpers typically do) could you kindly not disrupt the flow of legitimate discussion occurring here with your off topic posts.
                                                Fine, carry on clowns. Please tell us more about the trees & how to make a buck off tragedy.

                                                I will just sit here & watch the Jr science lesson. What are you going to next? Put Mentos in a 2 liter of coke?
                                                Comment
                                                • RoyBacon
                                                  BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                                  • 09-21-05
                                                  • 37074

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by khicks26
                                                  Fine, carry on clowns. Please tell us more about the trees & how to make a buck off tragedy.

                                                  I will just sit here & watch the Jr science lesson. What are you going to next? Put Mentos in a 2 liter of coke?
                                                  I will give you credit for not posting a propaganda vid. I'm sure you were tempted.

                                                  So many of these elite tard issues work directly against your Marxist economic justice views. It's funny you don't seem to see them. Immigration is one as is going bankrupt due to the climate hoax.
                                                  Comment
                                                  • brooks85
                                                    SBR Aristocracy
                                                    • 01-05-09
                                                    • 44709

                                                    #26
                                                    lol the moron who doesn't even know the basics of the scientific method(documented) is making more threads about global warming. And this is AFTER I retired him for the 4th time.
                                                    Comment
                                                    • brooks85
                                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                                      • 01-05-09
                                                      • 44709

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by khicks26
                                                      Who thinks climate change is real & caused by man? The CIA, FBI, Homeland Security, all branch's of the US Military, NSA, NASA, just about every government in the world, Big Oil Companies, & all the other rich assholes that are building bunkers for the day the shit hits the fan.

                                                      Who doesn't think its real? Trump, Roy, Dwight & the majority of far right nut jobs.
                                                      wrong. In fact, current NASA employees will tell you you're full of shit. The problem is you're a sheep so you just listen to the press releases.

                                                      Another fact, the guy who coined the term "global warming" has also admitted he was wrong. Facts vs your BS khicks. You will never win but you will always be the shining example of why I should have went into politics. You're just so stupid and gullible.
                                                      Comment
                                                      • rkelly110
                                                        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                                        • 10-05-09
                                                        • 39691

                                                        #28
                                                        I'm on the fence on this. Yes, the climate is changing. Us on the east coast have been inundated this year with rain.

                                                        Just going by the local news, we are breaking records from about 100 years ago. That tells me we had this before.
                                                        It's just coming around, history repeating itself.

                                                        The sun is way past it's 11 year cycle blowing that theory outta the water. We should be getting cooler, yet we are getting hotter.

                                                        If this spring/ summer is this bad, I'd hate to see winter. Be like a marine, overcome/ adapt (buy shit like generators).
                                                        Comment
                                                        • khicks26
                                                          SBR Aristocracy
                                                          • 09-16-06
                                                          • 45704

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by brooks85
                                                          wrong. In fact, current NASA employees will tell you you're full of shit. The problem is you're a sheep so you just listen to the press releases.

                                                          Another fact, the guy who coined the term "global warming" has also admitted he was wrong. Facts vs your BS khicks. You will never win but you will always be the shining example of why I should have went into politics. You're just so stupid and gullible.
                                                          Wrong dumbass. WTF you think they are doing at the International Space Station.
                                                          Comment
                                                          • brooks85
                                                            SBR Aristocracy
                                                            • 01-05-09
                                                            • 44709

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by khicks26
                                                            Wrong dumbass. WTF you think they are doing at the International Space Station.
                                                            lol this is how you prove yourself an idiot over and over. The fact you think this was an intelligent response...


                                                            Again, as I said and proved long ago, you are wrong. Current and ex-nasa say you're full of shit. The only thing you think "NASA" believes is what the press releases say. NASA has also been caught changing data so again you're a sheep.
                                                            Comment
                                                            • khicks26
                                                              SBR Aristocracy
                                                              • 09-16-06
                                                              • 45704

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by RoyBacon
                                                              I will give you credit for not posting a propaganda vid. I'm sure you were tempted.

                                                              So many of these elite tard issues work directly against your Marxist economic justice views. It's funny you don't seem to see them. Immigration is one as is going bankrupt due to the climate hoax.
                                                              Yeah I'm the victim of propaganda.
                                                              Comment
                                                              • khicks26
                                                                SBR Aristocracy
                                                                • 09-16-06
                                                                • 45704

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by brooks85
                                                                lol this is how you prove yourself an idiot over and over. The fact you think this was an intelligent response...


                                                                Again, as I said and proved long ago, you are wrong. Current and ex-nasa say you're full of shit. The only thing you think "NASA" believes is what the press releases say. NASA has also been caught changing data so again you're a sheep.
                                                                OK prove it douche bag. We know your word is shit & far right propaganda put out by the Oil companies.

                                                                Your also the guy that says Coal is clean.
                                                                Comment
                                                                • brooks85
                                                                  SBR Aristocracy
                                                                  • 01-05-09
                                                                  • 44709

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by khicks26
                                                                  OK prove it douche bag. We know your word is shit & far right propaganda put out by the Oil companies.

                                                                  Your also the guy that says Coal is clean.
                                                                  yeah just like my 2 + 2 = 4 was rightwing propaganda too huh? lol you're a broken record khicks. Next you'll drop hitler as you panic and dig deeper into your rut.


                                                                  Also, nice work again proving you have no idea how to debate. Burden of proof is on you.


                                                                  also, you're a lazy clown aka liberal aka sheep

                                                                  NASA scientists challenge mainstream climate change narratives, sparking heated debates in the scientific community.



                                                                  here is a list of scientists who also know you're a sheep, notice one of them was a NASA lead


                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • khicks26
                                                                    SBR Aristocracy
                                                                    • 09-16-06
                                                                    • 45704

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by brooks85
                                                                    yeah just like my 2 + 2 = 4 was rightwing propaganda too huh? lol you're a broken record khicks. Next you'll drop hitler as you panic and dig deeper into your rut.


                                                                    Also, nice work again proving you have no idea how to debate. Burden of proof is on you.


                                                                    also, you're a lazy clown aka liberal aka sheep

                                                                    NASA scientists challenge mainstream climate change narratives, sparking heated debates in the scientific community.



                                                                    here is a list of scientists who also know you're a sheep, notice one of them was a NASA lead


                                                                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ural_processes
                                                                    You posting Oil Company propaganda doesn't prove shit.

                                                                    One guy. Was a NASA lead. LOL I wonder why he's no longer there.
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    • brooks85
                                                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                                                      • 01-05-09
                                                                      • 44709

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by khicks26
                                                                      You posting Oil Company propaganda doesn't prove shit.

                                                                      One guy. Was a NASA lead. LOL I wonder why he's no longer there.



                                                                      so easy to prove what an idiot you are.

                                                                      And that isn't one guy, that is a list. And no shit why he isn't there, he is dead moron which paved the way for fake scientists to take his spot which is why you have idiots like yourself thinking global warming is real when all science proves it is not lol sheep
                                                                      Comment
                                                                      Search
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      SBR Contests
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Working...