Bernie Sanders Is A Lock In 2020

[khicks26]

What question?

[brooks85]

Dude, you said the MSM ignored Trump.

After he won you guys were all saying how smart he was to get free coverage from the MSM.

Which is it?

yes, ignored him as a legitimate candidate and ignored his chances to win


lol did you forget all this already? You watched TYT daily so why even bother trying to lie?




again, the press's job is no longer about free press. It's about brainwashing which is why you have people like bernie and hillary running for president ALL while the press ignores the best candidate in modern history and he ended up winning.

[brooks85]

as a matter of fact one MSM outlet said they wouldn't even cover trump anywhere but the political section.


again alice, the free press is who you regurgitate daily. After TYT regurgitates it that is.

[khicks26]

yes, ignored him as a legitimate candidate and ignored his chances to win


lol did you forget all this already? You watched TYT daily so why even bother trying to lie?




again, the press's job is no longer about free press. It's about brainwashing which is why you have people like bernie and hillary running for president ALL while the press ignores the best candidate in modern history and he ended up winning.

Dude Cenk predicted Trump would win on MSM. He knew Hillary was a shit candidate even if he wanted her to beat Trump.

[brooks85]

Dude Cenk predicted Trump would win on MSM. He knew Hillary was a shit candidate even if he wanted her to beat Trump.

lol again, what does this have to do with what we're talking about? This doesn't help your case alice. Focus. And he didn't say trump would win because MSM supporting him you idiot lol notice how you prove me right again. When you're losing you get real stupid and desperate.





again, the press's job is no longer about free press. It's about brainwashing which is why you have people like bernie and hillary running for president ALL while the press ignores the best candidate in modern history and he ended up winning.



"as a matter of fact one MSM outlet said they wouldn't even cover trump anywhere but the political section.


again alice, the free press is who you regurgitate daily. After TYT regurgitates it that is."

[khicks26]

lol again, what does this have to do with what we're talking about? This doesn't help your case alice. Focus. And he didn't say trump would win because MSM supporting him you idiot lol notice how you prove me right again. When you're losing you get real stupid and desperate.





again, the press's job is no longer about free press. It's about brainwashing which is why you have people like bernie and hillary running for president ALL while the press ignores the best candidate in modern history and he ended up winning.



"as a matter of fact one MSM outlet said they wouldn't even cover trump anywhere but the political section.


again alice, the free press is who you regurgitate daily. After TYT regurgitates it that is."

By Cenk saying that, it proves that he thought Trump was a legitimate candidate. Is that not what you were talking about?


I know the press is not free. Its owned by the corporations. Your only going to hear what they want you to hear. Which nowadays is Trump Russia 24/7.

That's why I don't watch it. No TYT is nor MSM. Its not run by a large corporations or has advertisers that influence the content. Do I agree with everything they say. No.

[brooks85]

By Cenk saying that, it proves that he thought Trump was a legitimate candidate. Is that not what you were talking about?


I know the press is not free. Its owned by the corporations. Your only going to hear what they want you to hear. Which nowadays is Trump Russia 24/7.

That's why I don't watch it. No TYT is nor MSM. Its not run by a large corporations or has advertisers that influence the content. Do I agree with everything they say. No.

nope...what I'm talking about is very, very clear.

Again, the press's job is no longer about free press. It's about brainwashing which is why you have people like bernie and hillary running for president ALL while the press ignores the best candidate in modern history and he ended up winning.


but then why does every thing you post line up with MSM and supporting the global elites agenda?

[khicks26]

nope...what I'm talking about is very, very clear.

Again, the press's job is no longer about free press. It's about brainwashing which is why you have people like bernie and hillary running for president ALL while the press ignores the best candidate in modern history and he ended up winning.


but then why does every thing you post line up with MSM and supporting the global elites agenda?

Dude this mostly your opinion. How do explain Fox News (which is MSM) all but giving Trump a blow job live on air?

[brooks85]

Dude this mostly your opinion. How do explain Fox News (which is MSM) all but giving Trump a blow job live on air?

none of it is opinion lol why do you lie like a child every time you're losing?


easy, they didn't. Notice how you got caught lying again. The facts show Fox was against trump ALL the way up until he finally won republican nomination. And fox isn't even the media arm for the global elites. Facts. Thank you for proving me right again.
like I said, gate to the pen is open sheepy

[khicks26]

none of it is opinion lol why do you lie like a child every time you're losing?


easy, they didn't. Notice how you got caught lying again. The facts show Fox was against trump ALL the way up until he finally won republican nomination. And fox isn't even the media arm for the global elites. Facts. Thank you for proving me right again.
like I said, gate to the pen is open sheepy

What an I losing? Better yet what am I trying to win?


So your going to tell me Fox doesn't have an agenda. That guys like Hannity, the clowns on Fox & Friends, & others at Fox were not sucking Trumps ball from the start?

Sure a few hate the guy. But most of Fox is on Trumps side.

[brooks85]

What an I losing? Better yet what am I trying to win?


So your going to tell me Fox doesn't have an agenda. That guys like Hannity, the clowns on Fox & Friends, & others at Fox were not sucking Trumps ball from the start?

Sure a few hate the guy. But most of Fox is on Trumps side.

obviously nothing. I'm winning an argument and proving you're still in the sheep pen.

yes, it's called profit.


again, tho thanks for proving me right and lying about fox supporting trump when the facts show they did not at all until he finally even surprised them and won the nomination

[khicks26]

obviously nothing. I'm winning an argument and proving you're still in the sheep pen.

yes, it's called profit.


again, tho thanks for proving me right and lying about fox supporting trump when the facts show they did not at all until he finally even surprised them and won the nomination

Yeah what did you win?


You don't know much about the history of Fox News do you. That original idea was going to call it republican TV. That it never made a profit for years when it started out. So why keep a losing network on TV years if your not trying to influence people?

[brooks85]

Yeah what did you win?


You don't know much about the history of Fox News do you. That original idea was going to call it republican TV. That it never made a profit for years when it started out. So why keep a losing network on TV years if your not trying to influence people?

entertainment

truly hilarious how you prove yourself wrong then ask how you're wrong. Also, you're just prove you're very limited understanding of business again. At that scale they don't just give up alice, this isn't a hamburger shop lol

[khicks26]

entertainment

truly hilarious how you prove yourself wrong then ask how you're wrong. Also, you're just prove you're very limited understanding of business again. At that scale they don't just give up alice, this isn't a hamburger shop lol

If a show on TV doesn't get ratings. Its gone soon after. It never was about profits, they just ended up making some.

[brooks85]

If a show on TV doesn't get ratings. Its gone soon after. It never was about profits, they just ended up making some.

Fox is not a show alice...


do you see how you just buried yourself?

well I know you see it but I always know you're fighting back clockwork khicks desperately.

[khicks26]

Fox is not a show alice...


do you see how you just buried yourself?

well I know you see it but I always know you're fighting back clockwork khicks desperately.

let alone a whole network. LOL

[brooks85]

let alone a whole network. LOL

you'll have to try again in English and in reality. This made no sense.

Again, fox news is not a show alice. Nice work burying yourself.

[PittsburghPlayer]

nope...what I'm talking about is very, very clear.

Again, the press's job is no longer about free press. It's about brainwashing which is why you have people like bernie and hillary running for president ALL while the press ignores ...

dude knows some shit

[DwightShrute]

[khicks26]

We've been over this before. Rich people want to make money, which is why they're going to Mexico and China. All I want to do is eliminate regulatory and tax costs to undercut Mexico and China, which will bring jobs back, and before you tell me that Mexico and China will lower their costs, they have too many politicians there that believe like you that we need to hurt one group to make another better off. The zero sum game theory of wealth has been debunked many times over.

Again, you won't get profit out. Once the public decides to tip the laws in their favor so their life is easier at someone else's expense we're in trouble. I love how you have so much faith in a free press, that's owned by very wealthy individuals and corporations, who will be getting their rings kissed by the politicians if you had your way.

Inverted totalitarianism is what you and your ideas have created. When Obama left office, we were more regulated than at any point in US history.

Are the rich not hurting a large group of people to make their lives better. Do you even see the hypocrisy as you type?

I have no faith in the MSM that is owed by corporations. That's you putting words in my mouth.

I'm no fan of Obama, I know what he was. I also know that Inverted totalitarianism is to complex to fit in your ideology. So you have to make shit up & put words in my mouth.

[RoyBacon]

You should carefully consider what Josh is telling you. Smart guy.

The ideas from those vids you watch will not only not grow the economy but it will cause the economy to shrink. Businesses and capital will simply leave. And I'm pretty sure you know that.

[guitarjosh]

Are the rich not hurting a large group of people to make their lives better. Do you even see the hypocrisy as you type?

I have no faith in the MSM that is owed by corporations. That's you putting words in my mouth.

I'm no fan of Obama, I know what he was. I also know that Inverted totalitarianism is to complex to fit in your ideology. So you have to make shit up & put words in my mouth.

If the rich are making their lives better off via government regulations, corporate welfare, etc, then yes they are hurting people to make themselves better off, and I'm against that. I'm typing this on a MacBook Pro using Cox as my ISP. My Mac set me back around 2k. Did Apple hurt me? No, they didn't! I went to them and voluntarily gave them 2k for my Mac because I feel I'm better off with the Mac than the 2k, they feel they're better off with the 2k than the Mac. Voluntary exchange wouldn't occur unless all sides feel they're better off in the transaction.

So then what media do you trust, that isn't spinning things to get money from donations or advertising. Please tell me that you don't think a government run media would produce nothing but the truth...

I haven't made anything up. We spend more per capita now than we did during WWII. We're more regulated now than we were during WWII. For us to go back to pretty much any democrat presidents policies, other than maybe Obama, we would have to move to the right. That includes FDR. To get back to the New Deal era, we would have to slash federal spending, including eliminating many social programs, and deregulate. At least you get that my ideology is summed up by saying don't initiate the imposing a cost on another against their will.

[guitarjosh]

You should carefully consider what Josh is telling you. Smart guy.

The ideas from those vids you watch will not only not grow the economy but it will cause the economy to shrink. Businesses and capital will simply leave. And I'm pretty sure you know that.

Some people don't really value growing the economy, they're most interested in everyone has the same outcome, even if everyone is worse off.

[reigle9]

OP's net worth is 0

[RoyBacon]

Some people don't really value growing the economy, they're most interested in everyone has the same outcome, even if everyone is worse off.

I agree. Below the surface, many of those who don't want the economy to grow are not looking to work hard and get ahead. Their "American Dream" is to do as little as possible and get as much as possible. Hence; income inequality.

[reigle9]

I agree. Below the surface, many of those who don't want the economy to grow are not looking to work hard and get ahead. Their "American Dream" is to do as little as possible and get as much as possible. Hence; income inequality.

This is the american dream. But you can't have it handed to you.

[khicks26]

You should carefully consider what Josh is telling you. Smart guy.

The ideas from those vids you watch will not only not grow the economy but it will cause the economy to shrink. Businesses and capital will simply leave. And I'm pretty sure you know that.

There leaving anyway Roy.

[khicks26]

If the rich are making their lives better off via government regulations, corporate welfare, etc, then yes they are hurting people to make themselves better off, and I'm against that. I'm typing this on a MacBook Pro using Cox as my ISP. My Mac set me back around 2k. Did Apple hurt me? No, they didn't! I went to them and voluntarily gave them 2k for my Mac because I feel I'm better off with the Mac than the 2k, they feel they're better off with the 2k than the Mac. Voluntary exchange wouldn't occur unless all sides feel they're better off in the transaction.

So then what media do you trust, that isn't spinning things to get money from donations or advertising. Please tell me that you don't think a government run media would produce nothing but the truth...

I haven't made anything up. We spend more per capita now than we did during WWII. We're more regulated now than we were during WWII. For us to go back to pretty much any democrat presidents policies, other than maybe Obama, we would have to move to the right. That includes FDR. To get back to the New Deal era, we would have to slash federal spending, including eliminating many social programs, and deregulate. At least you get that my ideology is summed up by saying don't initiate the imposing a cost on another against their will.

You just did.

[RoyBacon]

Some are. Turn on your TV. Many leaders announcing increased investment in the US.

Trump is shredding regulations and cutting taxes. That's how we get companies to stay and even attract companies to come here.

Maybe in his 2nd term Trump could run on a 15% corp tax rate. Man this is exciting.

[guitarjosh]

You just did.

No, just look at the numbers. We spend more per capita now than we did under FDR. I think that's the problem, you refuse to listen to any source that doesn't agree with you, you just assume people are making things up. Inflation adjusted federal spending per capita currently is $12,622. In 1944 that was $8386, and 86% of that spending was for defense. In 1940, that was $1093, and 79% was non defense.

Notice you didn't say anything about the rest of my post:

If the rich are making their lives better off via government regulations, corporate welfare, etc, then yes they are hurting people to make themselves better off, and I'm against that. I'm typing this on a MacBook Pro using Cox as my ISP. My Mac set me back around 2k. Did Apple hurt me? No, they didn't! I went to them and voluntarily gave them 2k for my Mac because I feel I'm better off with the Mac than the 2k, they feel they're better off with the 2k than the Mac. Voluntary exchange wouldn't occur unless all sides feel they're better off in the transaction.

So then what media do you trust, that isn't spinning things to get money from donations or advertising. Please tell me that you don't think a government run media would produce nothing but the truth...

[guitarjosh]

Maybe in his 2nd term Trump could run on a 15% corp tax rate. Man this is exciting.

Imagine if it was 0%

[RoyBacon]

Imagine if it was 0%

If there wasn't complicated conflicts between pass throughs and individual rates then it really should be 0%.

I've tried to explain to kelly and hicks companies don't pay taxes, people do. Taxes are simply a cost passed on to consumers. Many of those consumers should not be paying any taxes.

But their leaders have brain washed them that companies are part of "the rich".

[guitarjosh]

If there wasn't complicated conflicts between pass throughs and individual rates then it really should be 0%.

I've tried to explain to kelly and hicks companies don't pay taxes, people do. Taxes are simply a cost passed on to consumers. Many of those consumers should not be paying any taxes.

But their leaders have brain washed them that companies are part of "the rich".

Yeah, it really is a case of liberals not being able to see the unseen. They're convinced if you can tax companies and give them a small cut of the money they'll be better off, not realizing that comes at the expense of higher unemployment, higher prices for the consumer, and lower pay.


Hey Khicks, is your real name AQ smith? I read this today and it sounds like something you would endorse:

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/03/its-basically-just-immoral-to-be-rich

How much of that do you agree with?

[PittsburghPlayer]

never mind, here is to hoping that it is a good one

[rkelly110]

If there wasn't complicated conflicts between pass throughs and individual rates then it really should be 0%.

I've tried to explain to kelly and hicks companies don't pay taxes, people do. Taxes are simply a cost passed on to consumers. Many of those consumers should not be paying any taxes.

But their leaders have brain washed them that companies are part of "the rich".

Don't put me in there pal, I run a business remember?

Your customer gets charged for advertising, sales tax, jacked up price for goods/parts everything and anything
and then claim it at the end of the year. So let's not suck the corporate dick when they are taxed 38% which
they don't pay anyway and is passed to the consumer.

So you and Josh are condoning the fleecing of people? Who woulda thunk.