Donald Trump's US President Odds Improving!!

[jt315]

The report states he could not exonerate and left it up to trumps appointed AG....which of course made the decision on his own in trumps favor.

You can’t obstruct justice by firing an executive branch subordinate without corrupt intent .


Was the investigation impeded in any way dummy ?

[Hareeba!]

C'mon Hareeba...you're better than that.

If no evidence can be presented which shows wrongdoing, then no exoneration is required.

Isn't how the law in your country usually works?

Have you actually read Barr's letter?

The way the law works is "not guilty" isn't the same as "innocent".


This link provides some useful education in how the law works.

https://twitter.com/NoahBookbinder/status/1109925772595265537

[Russian Rocket]

Have you actually read Barr's letter?

The way the law works is "not guilty" isn't the same as "innocent".

Yeah I've read the letter.

What I was saying is in the criminal context the term exonerate refers to a state where a person convicted of a crime is later proved to be innocent.

In our case here with Trump, you can't even prove that he did something wrong...so what the hell are you're gonna exonerate him from?

[Russian Rocket]

This link provides some useful education in how the law works.
https://twitter.com/NoahBookbinder/s...25772595265537

So according to this guy, we're still might be talking about a serious misconduct




gotcha

[Hareeba!]

Yeah I've read the letter.

What I was saying is in the criminal context the term exonerate refers to a state where a person convicted of a crime is later proved to be innocent.

In our case here with Trump, you can't even prove that he did something wrong...so what the hell are you're gonna exonerate him from?

As I've already pointed out, courts don't ever find people to be innocent. They can find them not guilty of the charges brought. A most important difference.

There is clearly a good deal of evidence in Mueller's report implying wrongdoing but it seems that he and the AGs aren't sufficiently confident that they could obtain a guilty verdict so have brought no charges on either the Russian or obstruction issues.

There is an abundance of evidence of a whole lot of other wrongdoings so sit tight and weather the coming storm.

[reigle9]

C'mon Hareeba...you're better than that.

If no evidence can be presented which shows wrongdoing, then no exoneration is required.

Isn't how the law in your country usually works?

lol fukk, if there's 1 thing that's fact in the world, it's that hareeba is better than nothing

[Russian Rocket]

As I've already pointed out, courts don't ever find people to be innocent. They can find them not guilty of the charges brought.

There is clearly a good deal of evidence in Mueller's report implying wrongdoing but it seems that he and the AGs aren't sufficiently confident that they could obtain a guilty verdict so have brought no charges on either the Russian or obstruction issues.

There is an abundance of evidence of a whole lot of other wrongdoings so sit tight and weather the coming storm.

I see what you're saying -This is Mueller just leaving the door open for the swamp to continue to harass Trump in the years to come.

Still this whole thing smells like a clear victory for Trump and his supporters imo.

[DwightShrute]

C'mon Hareeba...you're better than that.

If no evidence can be presented which shows wrongdoing, then no exoneration is required.

Isn't how the law in your country usually works?

[reigle9]

some equally as hc tds outside of this thread, quite impressive

always brokedikks that dont think reality is reality somehow

[Hareeba!]

I see what you're saying -This is Mueller just leaving the door open for the swamp to continue to harass Trump in the years to come.

Still this whole thing smells like a clear victory for Trump and his supporters imo.

LOL. You lot are truly delusional.

If he's so sure it total exonerates him why isn't he demanding the full report be released?

[Russian Rocket]

LOL. You lot are truly delusional.

If he's so sure it total exonerates him why isn't he demanding the full report be released?

Didn't he say 3 days ago to make it public?

[Venom72]

Didn't he say 3 days ago to make it public?

I honestly doubt he'd say that now

[vitterd]

Didn't he say 3 days ago to make it public?

Lol. He said he wanted to meet with Mueller also. He doesn’t want it released. He lies constantly.....he will just say it’s up to the AG but he does not want it released. No way.

[jt315]

Didn't he say 3 days ago to make it public?

They need something new to whine about . They want to start a cover up narrative . Today’s news was devastating for the tards .

[Venom72]

As I've already pointed out, courts don't ever find people to be innocent. They can find them not guilty of the charges brought. A most important difference.

There is clearly a good deal of evidence in Mueller's report implying wrongdoing but it seems that he and the AGs aren't sufficiently confident that they could obtain a guilty verdict so have brought no charges on either the Russian or obstruction issues.

There is an abundance of evidence of a whole lot of other wrongdoings so sit tight and weather the coming storm.

Spot on, trumptards doing a victory lap thinking this is over with

[Russian Rocket]

They need something new to whine about . They want to start a cover up narrative .

We need a new investigation to investigate the investigation investigating our original investigation + another 25-50M of taxpayers' money please.

You'd think a fkng country would be pleased to hear that their president isn't a traitor.

Libs are just too much, man.

[itchypickle]

All that matters is nobody with the name Trump or Kushner is being indicted much less a traitor or anything. All the rest is political and guess what....all the casual middle of the road moderates will now see this and his numbers will rise while the Dems as Bloomberg said fall over themselves aplogizing and being PC and out the door goes their shot next year.

[DwightShrute]

Didn't he say 3 days ago to make it public?

He did and will keep saying it. Barr will only release what he is legally allowed to.

[vitterd]

He did and will keep saying it. Barr will only release what he is legally allowed to.

Of course he will say it because he can just have Barr protect him. He did the same thing when he said he wanted to sit with Mueller and his lawyers screamed no because they know he lies so much.

[DwightShrute]

Mueller knew he had nothing 20 months ago I bet. He stretched it this long for 2 reasons.

1. To make it to the midterms. Help the anti-trump deep state.
2. To line his and his teams pockets. I heard Mueller made a cool mil for doing this.
Mission accomplished.

[Venom72]

Mueller knew he had nothing 20 months ago I bet. He stretched it this long for 2 reasons.

1. To make it to the midterms. Help the anti-trump deep state.
2. To line his and his teams pockets. I heard Mueller made a cool mil for doing this.
Mission accomplished.

Shut up

[Hareeba!]

Didn't he say 3 days ago to make it public?

I understand he did. But that was 3 days ago.
You must know he changes his mind as frequently as every 3 minutes?

[reigle9]

some of you tards are literally so retarded idk how you eat anything but baby food

[jt315]

We need a new investigation to investigate the investigation investigating our original investigation + another 25-50M of taxpayers' money please.

You'd think a fkng country would be pleased to hear that their president isn't a traitor.

Libs are just too much, man.

See post 57153 .

As predicted . Right on cue with the cover up and protect narrative .

I told you he will always be my little bitch . LOL !

[reigle9]

Shut up

2+2 is 4

hey now! stfu

jump off a fuckin bridge, it would be worth the 1/1millionth of a cent i have to pay to support you

[Hareeba!]

All that matters is nobody with the name Trump or Kushner is being indicted much less a traitor or anything. All the rest is political and guess what....all the casual middle of the road moderates will now see this and his numbers will rise while the Dems as Bloomberg said fall over themselves aplogizing and being PC and out the door goes their shot next year.

YOU may "know" that but the rest of us aren't privy to whatever confidential reports you seem to have access to.

Once again I advise patience on your part.

[DwightShrute]

Shut up

[reigle9]

this guy not only tries to race horses in the opposite direction, he thinks the harness is their fukkin tail

guy needs to get a room with chico in the old folks home

[Hareeba!]

Shut up

Good grief!
DipShit making an utter fool of himself all over again with his absurd conspiracy theories.

[jt315]

this guy not only tries to race horses in the opposite direction, he thinks the harness is their fukkin tail

guy needs to get a room with chico in the old folks home

[Hareeba!]

So according to this guy, we're still might be talking about a serious misconduct




gotcha

misconduct

a nothing though

Serious presidential misconduct a "nothing"?
In Russia, da
But this is America

[Venom72]

2+2 is 4

hey now! stfu

jump off a fuckin bridge, it would be worth the 1/1millionth of a cent i have to pay to support you

Shouldnt you be responding to the dude that called youre punk ass out? Get youre bitch ass outta here

[Venom72]

Good grief!
DipShit making an utter fool of himself all over again with his absurd conspiracy theories.

Yup, thats what sbr pays him for

[Russian Rocket]

Serious presidential misconduct a "nothing"?
In Russia, da
But this is America

US is no different, than Russia.

If you're a president of the United States, there are two things, that can happen to you in this particular scenario:
You either committed a crime or you've done nothing - just ask pretty much every single of your previous presidents.

[Hareeba!]

Interesting that Barr's letter didn't touch on the subject of campaign finance violation.

But maybe because that subject wasn't specifically part of Mueller's brief? Nevertheless he went for Cohen on it.

Here's a reminder:



And on top of that there was a conspiracy to disguise the reimbursements as legal fees.
False accounting?
Potential tax fraud?

And not forgetting that Individual 1 failed to disclose the debt in his financial disclosure report.