If u complain about what people buy in for...

[dlowilly]

you're a little bitch

[BigOrange]

if you try to sit with 20 bb's and the other two players have 250 bb's and 360 bb's and they ask you to leave and you run your dicklicker for the next 20 minutes interrupting their game, you might be the most clueless fukk on the planet!

[dlowilly]

It's the only hold em game going! SBR or a poker room decides what the buy ins are, not the players who have built a big stack and want to bully people with it! You didn't even have 360 bb when I sat, you coolered Rudy for it later, but we can tell ur real proud of it

[BigOrange]

If you think it's ok to join a 10/20 table with $400 when the only other two players at the table are playing heads-up with $5200 and $7,200, then it's impossible to have a conversation with you. It's ok to sit and ask if the players mind you joining short but it's not to just jump into the game. Once we both told you we didn't want you in there short, you disturbed the game for the next 20 minutes with your BS.

[USCPHILLYGUY]

Big O don't waste your time with this mental midget.....he sat down with 400 at a 10/20 table then proceeded to tell me how I was "dominated" pre flop with his AJ v my QJ Suited....I shouldn't have even wasted my time asking him if he knew what the pre flop odds were in this "dominated" hand.

On a happier note, the same guy who had to buy a v i s a gift card to turn pro because of his credit issues now claims that just 3 short months later, his credit score is now 800.

Cant make this shit up

[dlowilly]

LOL You did not have those stack sizes when I sat, you coolered and stacked Rudy about 3 or 4 times after I sat, not that stack sizes even matter. You are the only hold em game going. You wouldn't try this shit in a brick and mortar casino, telling people what they need to buy in for and pushing other players to do the same. You would have your teeth rearranged while the room manager laughs at you.

[dlowilly]

Big O don't waste your time with this mental midget.....he sat down with 400 at a 10/20 table then proceeded to tell me how I was "dominated" pre flop with his AJ v my QJ Suited....I shouldn't have even wasted my time asking him if he knew what the pre flop odds were in this "dominated" hand.

On a happier note, the same guy who had to buy a v i s a gift card to turn pro because of his credit issues now claims that just 3 short months later, his credit score is now 800.

Cant make this shit up

Oh look it's that old fat bald yankee USRhillygay

You publicly just displayed your poker ignorance (AcJc isn't a dominating hand over QdJd? ) and expect anyone to look at the mixture of rancid cheese steak and vomit you're flinging against the wall

[USCPHILLYGUY]

dlow when's the last time you played live

[dlowilly]

dlow when's the last time you played live

In Vegas about 3 weeks ago

Hey philly what does it mean when one hand dominates another preflop in Hold EM?

[BigOrange]

Downlow I truly believe that you are not smart enough to tie your own shoes.

You joined the table when I made the nut flush and Rudy had 2nd best flush. That hand gave me $7,200 and Rudy $5,200. I immediately sat out the next hand because you were trying to sit with your $400. I'm not and I never have told you that you can't sit with the minimum, I have stated that I will not play against a short stack when I am playing at a shorthanded table especially a heads-up game. I'm not sure why you can't understand this and why you try to twist it into something it isn't every time. Seriously dude is your IQ under 50?

[USCPHILLYGUY]

Oh look it's that old fat bald yankee USRhillygay

You publicly just displayed your poker ignorance (AcJc isn't a dominating hand over QdJd? ) and expect anyone to look at the mixture of rancid cheese steak and vomit you're flinging against the wall

if you think 65% to 31% is a "completely dominated hand" then carry on

after the flop the odds became 85-15 but great 3x pot bet

when you cant think of an intelligent comeback you revert to name calling..........kind of sad actually

[USCPHILLYGUY]

In Vegas about 3 weeks ago

Hey philly what does it mean when one hand dominates another preflop in Hold EM?

oh that's right....as our group was staying in a 1000sf suite and enjoying all that vegas has to offer, you were writing you book on how to survive vegas on $5 a day

[BigOrange]

LOL

[BigOrange]

Philly we should start calling this guy the "The Undertaker on the Downlow" since all he does is continue to bury himself.

[dlowilly]

if you think 65% to 31% is a "completely dominated hand" then carry on

after the flop the odds became 85-15 but great 3x pot bet

when you cant think of an intelligent comeback you revert to name calling..........kind of sad actually

I didn't say "completely dominated hand" whatever that means, I said it dominated your hand preflop, which by definition it did. You can choose to recognize that or not. After the TURN you became the favorite because you hit your queen, not after the flop. Why do you expect anyone to respect what you say when you either lie or can't get things right?

[USCPHILLYGUY]

Philly we should start calling this guy the "The Undertaker on the Downlow" since all he does is continue to bury himself.

Big O again I don't know why I continually waste my time with this guy....I actually suggested to him what to do to turn pro since amazingly in this day and age a grown ass man doesn't own a credit or debit card....I'm assuming Rudy was drunk when playing him as it took about 4 hands to read how the guy plays....his exact quote to me was I was "completely domintated pre flop" in that hand but he denies that as well. If you consider a 3/2 fav completely dominated than I cant say anymore....anyway...hope you are well my friend...missed you in vegas - let me know when you're up in the area

[dlowilly]

Big O again I don't know why I continually waste my time with this guy....I actually suggested to him what to do to turn pro since amazingly in this day and age a grown ass man doesn't own a credit or debit card....I'm assuming Rudy was drunk when playing him as it took about 4 hands to read how the guy plays....his exact quote to me was I was "completely domintated pre flop" in that hand but he denies that as well. If you consider a 3/2 fav completely dominated than I cant say anymore....anyway...hope you are well my friend...missed you in vegas - let me know when you're up in the area

LOL you fuking idiot

It doesn't matter what you want "dominate" in poker to mean, it has a definition and I used it correctly. You are wrong , you know ur wrong, but instead of recognizing it like a man you change the subject to unrelated bs. Carry on children

[dlowilly]

If you consider a 3/2 fav completely dominated than I cant say anymore....

Fuking idiot can't even do simple math or take 2 seconds to use a hand odds calculator

Since when does 69%/29%=3/2

[USCPHILLYGUY]

Fuking idiot can't even do simple math or take 2 seconds to use a hand odds calculator

Since when does 69%/29%=3/2

Sorry. Was paying some credit card bills. Something very foreign to you

how about sharing with the group who won the hand?

[dlowilly]

Downlow I truly believe that you are not smart enough to tie your own shoes.

You joined the table when I made the nut flush and Rudy had 2nd best flush. That hand gave me $7,200 and Rudy $5,200. I immediately sat out the next hand because you were trying to sit with your $400. I'm not and I never have told you that you can't sit with the minimum, I have stated that I will not play against a short stack when I am playing at a shorthanded table especially a heads-up game. I'm not sure why you can't understand this and why you try to twist it into something it isn't every time. Seriously dude is your IQ under 50?

Hmm ok

This is the first hand I played at your heads up game. I had been sitting out and watching longer because of your bitching but it wasn't until this hand that Rudy said enough of agreeing with your sit out bs lets play.

***** Hand history (v1.2) *****
Hand ID 6608790
$10/$20 NL Texas Hold'em (No Limit) - 17:46:00 24/06/2017 ET
Table 'Handicapper Hill', 10 seats max, Real money
Seat 8 is the button. Small Blind $10, Big Blind $20
Note: seat IDs range from 1 to 10
Seat 8 (playing) : RudyRuetigger, amount $2247, amount bet $0, penalty (None)
Seat 9 (joined) : dlowilly, amount $400, amount bet $0, penalty (None)
Seat 10 (sitOut) : BigOrange, amount $6887.20, amount bet $0, penalty (None)
RudyRuetigger: Small Blind ($10)
dlowilly: Big Blind ($20)
** Dealing Down Cards **
Dealt to dlowilly: [9c, Js]

Please explain to us Orange, how if I joined the table when you had "$7200 and Rudy $5200" that several hands later when Rudy sat in the totals were $6887 and $2247? Please Mr. Orange, tell us what happened to 3300 in chips if you were playing heads up and I first came to the table when you just coolered Rudy and the stack sizes were $7200 and $5200

You and Philly, a couple of lying, honorless, forum trolls

[dlowilly]

Sorry. Was paying some credit card bills. Something very foreign to you

how about sharing with the group who won the hand?

USCRhillygay:"Oh no, I'm wrong, let me obnoxiously troll and change the subject to unrelated bs"

[dlowilly]

Where did they go?

[dlowilly]

...

[USCPHILLYGUY]

Saturday night & Dlow hitting refresh the whole night while e-battling with 2 total strangers

I mean I know your favorite Orlando nightclub was shut down but Christ man, go get some fresh air

[slikec]

Truth is almost all sites moved minimum buy in from 20bb to 40bb cause short stack strategy was so efficient. Still you cant do anything about ppl not moving from table and would be really strange if you really could so wtf you even start thread about it???? Btw few days ago Rudy didnt let us flip so we had to finish for the day and set date for other day. Shit happens still starting thread about it wont solve shit.

[USCPHILLYGUY]

If you want to play with someone who comes in with a short stack, the decision is yours. I typically wont but Dlow is such an easy target I stayed for a bit

[daneblazer]

Without getting into the middle of this argument...I've never seen the point behind complaining what people buy in for. Especially live. Online if you see someone buy in for like $57.92 in a 100nl game, they're generally an easy target because you can assume they're down to their last buy. If a site is letting people buy in for like $20 in a 1/2 game, that's on the site.

[dlowilly]

Saturday night & Dlow hitting refresh the whole night while e-battling with 2 total strangers

I mean I know your favorite Orlando nightclub was shut down but Christ man, go get some fresh air

If you want to play with someone who comes in with a short stack, the decision is yours. I typically wont but Dlow is such an easy target I stayed for a bit

[Triple_D_Bet]

Without getting into the middle of this argument...I've never seen the point behind complaining what people buy in for. Especially live. Online if you see someone buy in for like $57.92 in a 100nl game, they're generally an easy target because you can assume they're down to their last buy. If a site is letting people buy in for like $20 in a 1/2 game, that's on the site.

Certainly on the site in that there's little to no recourse. In this specific situation though, it seems like dlo inserted himself into a heads up match where he was not wanted, and refused to go away even when this was made clear to him. Regardless of how much he bought in for, I find that to be in poor taste.

[USCPHILLYGUY]

Great thread D LO WILLY

[daneblazer]

Certainly on the site in that there's little to no recourse. In this specific situation though, it seems like dlo inserted himself into a heads up match where he was not wanted, and refused to go away even when this was made clear to him. Regardless of how much he bought in for, I find that to be in poor taste.

I get it then. Too bad there's no heads up tables

[dlowilly]

Certainly on the site in that there's little to no recourse. In this specific situation though, it seems like dlo inserted himself into a heads up match where he was not wanted, and refused to go away even when this was made clear to him. Regardless of how much he bought in for, I find that to be in poor taste.

If sbr wants to create heads up tables then that's fine. There were no other hold em games going. I didn't break any rules. The issue wasn't that I inserted myself where I was unwanted, it was mainly Orange didn't like how much I sat with, so the whole "it was a heads up match and you were interrupting" is nonsense. Later Orange was sitting alone with his 11k stack and refused to play me when I bought in for 400. Still refused at 799. I increased to the max of 2000 and he sat back in (and I left). It's all about bitching about buy in size, not interrupting a heads up match. If you always do things according to what other people want you to do (especially in poker) then good luck, you'll need it.

[boscokid]

You should sit at the 25NL table with $5 buyin and immediately sit out if anybody joins with a full stack.

That'll show em you are serious

[USCPHILLYGUY]

If sbr wants to create heads up tables then that's fine. There were no other hold em games going. I didn't break any rules. The issue wasn't that I inserted myself where I was unwanted, it was mainly Orange didn't like how much I sat with, so the whole "it was a heads up match and you were interrupting" is nonsense. Later Orange was sitting alone with his 11k stack and refused to play me when I bought in for 400. Still refused at 799. I increased to the max of 2000 and he sat back in (and I left). It's all about bitching about buy in size, not interrupting a heads up match. If you always do things according to what other people want you to do (especially in poker) then good luck, you'll need it.

what was your issue in playing him when you had the 2k in chips?

[dlowilly]

what was your issue in playing him when you had the 2k in chips?

Because troll I didn't want to max buy in against a big stack who's main strategy is to bully smaller stacks in NL