World Poker Cup Interrupted Tournaments note

[pavyracer]

Only the lowest scum of the earth will double dip tonight. We call them cockroaches in my town.

[Cuse0323]

I played three times this week and one was Thursday, I'm playing tonight.

Not even close in the standings and rarely play more than 1-2 times a week so

[Triple_D_Bet]

You're exactly right. I'll be shocked if these tourney's aren't maxed out at 40, no matter who agrees to sit out. I have the luxury of sitting out. But no telling what Tripe may do, since he doesn't want to publicly state his intentions as I've done. My guess is he'll play, since he'll be lucky to hang on for a Confederates spot.

If Tripe plays it will have no bearing on our annul challenge, as I'll simply deduct any pts derived from it. But in the grand scheme of things who am I kidding about deducting pts, when he has a 1.4% chance of cashing in a 40 man tourney.

Yeah...no telling what I'd do, except, ya know, the part where I made it extremely clear to anyone who can read. On the other hand, your opening thoughts on the matter weren't "I can afford to sit it out"; rather, you needed assurance from someone else in order to do the right thing. Consistent with your constant angle-shooting at least...but being consistently dumb isn't really a consistency worth praising

Who is going to call out the scammers?

Gonna guess it won't be you: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/foru...ust-facts.html

[Optional]

the 2 tourneys will most likely be maxed out at 40

I'll be shocked if these tourney's aren't maxed out at 40, no matter who agrees to sit out.

Has your faith in human nature increased any?

Ended up that the people so worried about "outing the scammers" ended up getting an easy ride to the cash so few played.

[bobbywaves]

Has your faith in human nature increased any?

Indeed it has.

[bobbywaves]

but being consistently dumb isn't really a consistency worth praising

Your above statement is not "consistent" with Waves leading our annual challenge by 2k+.

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

**************************************** *
Top 3 SBR'ers worried about "outing the scammers"

1. Opti
2. bobbywaves
3. carseller
****************************************

[Triple_D_Bet]

Your above statement is not "consistent" with Waves leading our annual challenge by 2k+.

Luckily for you, being dumb doesn't prevent someone from running hot or getting participation awards

[bobbywaves]

Unfortunately for you, being dumb will cost you 29k.

But you can chalk it up as a lesson learned, albeit the hard way.

[Cuse0323]

I guess karma is a bitch for me playing again and getting 1st. This tunaguitar fcker leaves me with 23 left on my rollover after taking most of my shit. One post in 2 years, SBR bots come out at night. stikymess too, guy hits it all and folds when I have anything but I think he's just good.

[yisman]

Too much time involved for anyone to go badge hunting. Even if you found all of Thursday's badges that would only give you half, or less than half of all entries. Pretty sure No1here & Yisman played in my 7pm. An ethical issue perhaps...but SBR is allowing it, so there's no rule being broken. I suppose they want a better shot at a World Cup spot, although No1Here's WC spot is pretty much secure already.

Yes, I played in the 7 PM Thursday.

I not only did NOT play last night, I never even registered in the first place. You can check my points history.

No1here did play last night. I did not. I'm not sure why you're flat out making stuff up.

[yisman]

http://store.sportsbookreview.com/points/log/yisman

http://store.sportsbookreview.com/points/log/No1here

[BeerDog99]

http://store.sportsbookreview.com/points/log/No1here

Seems pretty obvious that no1here double dipped. That is sad.

[hhsilver]

Seems pretty obvious that no1here double dipped. That is sad.

Him and 10 others. 5 cashed.

3 even had badges from 7/10, 2 were in my hand history from my 7/10 game, others determined by 10 pt buy in to poker on 7/10 ( excluding, of course, those named in post #1 who were signed for the 9 and 11 pm ).

Is there any interest in knowing the names? In the past when I've tried to correct an error, etc , I was the bad guy or tattletale or simply wasn't believed ( until I was).

[Robber]

Post it please

[GUMMO77]

Seems pretty obvious that no1here double dipped. That is sad.

He played more than 5 tournaments this week?

I would look but I'm on my phone and it's a hassle.

[bobbywaves]

Yes, I played in the 7 PM Thursday.

I not only did NOT play last night, I never even registered in the first place. You can check my points history.

No1here did play last night. I did not. I'm not sure why you're flat out making stuff up.

When I checked the 9pm tourney, I could have sworn I saw you & No1Here registered. When I checked back later, I only saw NolHere registered. I must have clicked on the 5pm by mistake, so I apologize for saying you registered for the 9pm. There's no 10pt debit & refund credit in your pts history, so I obviously clicked on wrong tourney. I know you didn't play the 9pm & never said you did, but I apologize for mistakenly saying you registered for it.

I have no problem admitting a mistake & know what it feels like to be unfairly slandered. As according to clueless idiots like TryTryTry & others, I'm the owner of both 18th Hole & SnakeEyes sportsbooks.

[daneblazer]

Us poker players will bitch about anything. We were basically told to go sit on a corn cob when we wanted a make up tournament in the triathlon. You're lucky to even get one here. Now we want everyone that played Thursday to be nice and not play Saturday as if there are ethics in poker. Can't have it all

[BeerDog99]

The key point is that anybody who double dipped on Thursday/Saturday games is a douche in my book.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Him and 10 others. 5 cashed.

3 even had badges from 7/10, 2 were in my hand history from my 7/10 game, others determined by 10 pt buy in to poker on 7/10 ( excluding, of course, those named in post #1 who were signed for the 9 and 11 pm ).

Is there any interest in knowing the names? In the past when I've tried to correct an error, etc , I was the bad guy or tattletale or simply wasn't believed ( until I was).

I'd want to hear the names, post em up so we can make sure everyone's aware of the scammers like no1here

[sinmiedo]

Me too

[sinmiedo]

So I can have a fun when they are at the table trying to roll over .

[sinmiedo]

I would like some of those to Germans or Brazilians to enjoy it better.

[Cuse0323]

Post the names, already said I did. Thing is, I'm not trying to make the teams and just want points so I don't care if that hurts peoples feelings over some free poker.

[BeerDog99]

Cuse, to each his own. While you are not in contention and it is "free poker", the point is you took some equity from the legitimate players that are trying to make the teams.

No feelings hurt here, just do not think it was the honorable thing to do.

[pavyracer]

I didn't play on Thursday and after careful consideration I decided not to play on Saturday because it was the right thing to do since I'm not in contention for the World Cup.

[hhsilver]

I'd want to hear the names, post em up so we can make sure everyone's aware of the scammers like no1here

Me too

So I can have a fun when they are at the table trying to roll over .

The 3 who had badges from 7/10 :

no1here
pureajb
sammygran ( 4th on Sat )

In hand history from my 7/10 game

chipup

(no1 here)

10 pt buy in on 7/10 ( I made sure there was not a +10 for an unregister).
There is a remote ( extremely remote ) possibility that one of the following bought into a ring game that day exactly one time for exactly 10 non-rollover pts AND did not play a tourney.

oneunder ( 11th on Sat )
tradeout ( 7th on Sat )
bettingstation
cuse0323 ( 1st on Sat )

with the 600 and a 300 badge i see from Friday, I wonder if cuse is as far out of the running as he thought. I know he didn't play nearly as much as most contenders, but I believe he had a bunch of high finishes. I wonder what a hot final 2 weeks would mean for his chances.

there are 3 others --- all very new to sbr poker. I won't name them because I believe it's possible they had no idea about this situation and maybe just saw a tourney they could join for 10 pts.

[Cuse0323]

They can take the 600 off my total for all I care. I am still far off, could possibly make it with a few firsts but only play a couple times anyway. Thursday was a random 10 AM for me, half asleep and I gave up 10 mins in, so I played again cause I play twice a week anyway and only want the points. I won't play this week though, not gonna risk making it and causing some controversy over SBR poker.

[Cuse0323]

Cuse, to each his own. While you are not in contention and it is "free poker", the point is you took some equity from the legitimate players that are trying to make the teams.

No feelings hurt here, just do not think it was the honorable thing to do.

I get it, I'm a douche. I took 600 from someone but in the end I didn't play more than 5, everyone had the ability to play 5 and those who played against me had the ability to beat me. Now, people who played 6...fck those guys.

I should just be the villain now, play everyday and make the confederates.

[Chipup]

I did register on Thursday early on and was given errors n disconnects. Sbr should be able to verify that by their server logs of my ip trying to connect.

I was able to play a few hands. And maybe that should of been enough in some of your minds that I should not of registered. To either end it was fruitless as I didn't place.

I considered both sides before signing up but figured I was fairly robbed on Thursday like every one else. Combined with all the times I missed due to health I wasn't going to not play a fair replay.

[sinmiedo]

The 3 who had badges from 7/10 :

no1here
pureajb
sammygran ( 4th on Sat )

In hand history from my 7/10 game

chipup

(no1 here)

10 pt buy in on 7/10 ( I made sure there was not a +10 for an unregister).
There is a remote ( extremely remote ) possibility that one of the following bought into a ring game that day exactly one time for exactly 10 non-rollover pts AND did not play a tourney.

oneunder ( 11th on Sat )
tradeout ( 7th on Sat )
bettingstation
cuse0323 ( 1st on Sat )

with the 600 and a 300 badge i see from Friday, I wonder if cuse is as far out of the running as he thought. I know he didn't play nearly as much as most contenders, but I believe he had a bunch of high finishes. I wonder what a hot final 2 weeks would mean for his chances.

there are 3 others --- all very new to sbr poker. I won't name them because I believe it's possible they had no idea about this situation and maybe just saw a tourney they could join for 10 pts.

copyed

[Cuse0323]

Uh oh, Sin on a mission.

[pavyracer]

The 3 who had badges from 7/10 :

no1here
pureajb
sammygran ( 4th on Sat )

In hand history from my 7/10 game

chipup

(no1 here)

10 pt buy in on 7/10 ( I made sure there was not a +10 for an unregister).
There is a remote ( extremely remote ) possibility that one of the following bought into a ring game that day exactly one time for exactly 10 non-rollover pts AND did not play a tourney.

oneunder ( 11th on Sat )
tradeout ( 7th on Sat )
bettingstation
cuse0323 ( 1st on Sat )

with the 600 and a 300 badge i see from Friday, I wonder if cuse is as far out of the running as he thought. I know he didn't play nearly as much as most contenders, but I believe he had a bunch of high finishes. I wonder what a hot final 2 weeks would mean for his chances.

there are 3 others --- all very new to sbr poker. I won't name them because I believe it's possible they had no idea about this situation and maybe just saw a tourney they could join for 10 pts.

Thanks for doing this silver. We now know who the scumbags are.

[daneblazer]

Look at all the paragons of virtue on SBR now

[sinmiedo]

Uh oh, Sin on a mission.