Most Aggravatiing People To Play Against

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

Biteme is fantastic to play poker with, or anything else for that matter. Guy once made love to my wife and it was so passionate I could do nothing but watch. It was the most beautiful thing I've ever seen.

And I was likewise impressed when neither of you laughed when I broke out the penis pump.
Tangling w/Centaur in SBR poker has been so stressful, I now have to occasionally crack out "mother's lil helper" (if you will).
But, hey, it worked and we even got a submityourflicks.dot.com vid outta the deal.

The downsouth's... nothin but CLASS ACTS
(and in ds's case, a damn good videographer to boot!)

[BeerDog99]

LOL, you have to watch this Centaur. I am sure Biteme can come up with a ball busting name for you.

http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6970151/collegehumor-all-nighter-14-ball-busting-psa

[brainfreeze]

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

LOL, you have to watch this Centaur. I am sure Biteme can come up with a ball busting name for you.

http://www.collegehumor.com/video/69...ll-busting-psa

GREAT FIND!
video
I got one for Centaur all lock n' loaded

He's trained in the sights and will be shot w/it on his next misstep....

[BeerDog99]

lol "Fruitcup"

[TheCentaur]

I've played hours with Beerdog, sin, 4uk, boe, spur, Trip, and many others: How bout asking them if I'm obnoxious at the table?

I never use vile language or name-call like I've seen YOU do (at times) toward opponents.
In fact, just recently Lowly Oaftard commented how much he enjoyed my banter at the table.(you saw that)
It's witty... not obnoxious.

Fact is, you're easy to put on TILT. It's a major hole in your game. So yes, I go after you in certain ways because we're playing a GAME and you have a flaw and it's exploitable. That's what good poker players do.

Now, keepin it even more real: If I was hanging out with you and you used racial pejoratives and slurs like you routinely do round here (mudshark, monkeys & worse, for example) to describe other human beings you know JACKSHIT about, I'd politely tell you to stop saying those pejoratives in my prescence, or else we'd have a problem.

I "go there" right now to graphically illustrate how a guy like you that uses such pejoratives (routinely) in RL hardly has much credibility in determining who's classy/not or obnoxious/not at a fukkin poker table. As the 90's kids would say: You better check yoself.


(from chat last night):
**************************************** *
BiTeMeUsAdOj: bad call
thecentaur: hey biteme want to go play heads up?
**************************************** *
How'd that work out for ya?


(more poker chat from last night... various miscellaneous stuff left out)
**************************************** *********
thecentaur: fukkin superuser
thecentaur: no question anymore
LowlyOaftard: centaur do you really think biteme is a superuser? i havent played him much and im curious if you
LowlyOaftard: think that is a possibility
thecentaur: I hope not
LowlyOaftard: i think he's a superuser at tilting the hell out of opponents lol
thecentaur: biteme would have caught a 9
BiTeMeUsAdOj: well no..i wouldve known it wasnt coming and folded
Brainfreeze: lol
Brainfreeze: theres your cards cent
thecentaur: I swear u just have to play stupid to win here
BiTeMeUsAdOj: superuser!!
Brainfreeze: yea, i hear that cent
thecentaur: no damn way I call with that preflop in real life
BiTeMeUsAdOj: this is RL pal....
BiTeMeUsAdOj: ur not in the fukkin matrix ffs
LowlyOaftard: haha
thecentaur: biteme dont ttry to get cute
Brainfreeze: lol
BiTeMeUsAdOj: mind games...
thecentaur: dude shutup its getting old
thecentaur: I want to continue to like u
BiTeMeUsAdOj: S T F U urself and im serious u effin crybaby
thecentaur: lol
BiTeMeUsAdOj: like i care if u like me
Brainfreeze: hes in training remember bite
BiTeMeUsAdOj: guy can call me superuser make threads etc then cant take gettin it back
LowlyOaftard: a moment of silence for biteme KEEPIN IT REAL
BiTeMeUsAdOj: ^^
BiTeMeUsAdOj: how many times w/ the superuser shoit?
BiTeMeUsAdOj: thats NOT pld?
BiTeMeUsAdOj: old
BiTeMeUsAdOj: but i play along
thecentaur: so ur telling me you were actually offended by me doing that
thecentaur: u are going to sit there and say ur feelings were hurt from that
BiTeMeUsAdOj: what u think?
BiTeMeUsAdOj: not fellings
BiTeMeUsAdOj: not feelings..principle
LowlyOaftard: when the action on the felt isnt scripted but is genuine....TONIGHT ON SBR REAL WORLD POKERS
LowlyOaftard: biteme and centaur open up about the superuser scandal
BiTeMeUsAdOj: u cant take it back..can only dish it
BiTeMeUsAdOj: weaksauce\
LowlyOaftard: biteme rails everyone without predjudice
BiTeMeUsAdOj: bottom line centy can dish it but cant take it
Brainfreeze: he does...
BiTeMeUsAdOj: im watchin porn nowto cool off..seriously..not payin much attention
**************************************** *************************

SEE YA AT THE TABLES!!!

You know what dude, I really didn't think you were capable of this type of stuff

You have deleted and pasted what you wanted to include and exclude, made this look like one conversation which it was several, and thus taken things out of context to portray what you want

I also noticed you conveniently deleted the part where your vehement defense for the constant talk to me after I lose a hand was that I created a thread about you being a superuser (which of course was a joke ). Then when I pointed out that your needling was not just to me but to everyone, so how could it be a payback for a thread and not just being generally annoying and bad etiquette, well then you said you were going to watch porn and cooling off. You didn't care to address that discrepancy did you?

Bottom line, I am far from perfect. Yes, I can acknowledge it. This is a site of far from perfect people, I think everyone can acknowlege that also. Everyone that is, except you. You who as far as I have seen are incapable of recognizing flaws in yourself, admitting you are wrong or underinformed about something, and you absolutely blow up if you sense anyone challenging your perfection.

In small doses the needling is fine. I mean I wouldn't do it unless someone has deliberately slowrolled me or insulted me because even at penny poker I think it's rude poker behavior, but you enjoy it so fine. Doing it after every hand making fun of players when you bluff them out and telling them to rebuy when you bust them is not something to be proud of. I thought maybe hockey216 had hacked your account or something.

So I said "shutup dude it's getting old, I want to continue to like you". Similar to things I have heard you say in threads and in the poker rooms. Yeah maybe "shutup" was strong language to use. I just don't see how you can point out things I have done as so egregious but turn around and justify incessantly rubbing salt into wounds of players that are losing at penny poker to gain an edge or exploit a hole in their game.

Hey look ur a smart guy, a great poker player, but you aren't perfect. What you did with those chats up there I wish was a joke, but I know it isn't. Best thing to do I guess is just silence ur chat, even though I greatly enjoy the chatting at the table when it isn't aimed at making fun of players that are losing. Whatever, enjoy the points you won from me

[Chipup]

My nick name for Centaur is

[Chipup]

Damnit Centaur, You posted right while I was and now I feel like a real hockey216 (arse).. Your post was well articulated, thought out, and honest. Wtf man, none of those things belong here.

I was going to push bitemes buttons for in one thread saying he wasn't going to let your crys for attention outbursts be rewarded but then goes ahead in his chat does that exact thing. But I see you two have real issues so Im backing off.

Oh and hey the Beerdog, thank you sir. For being one of the few real people on this site.

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

and honest.

Problem is, it isn't honest.
It's Centaur's attempt to "play the victim". Ironic because it's the exact type of thing he rails on about when he perceives some minority playing the victim card. But, you bought it... so to some extent it worked for him. I think most others will see it for what it's worth, and draw the proper conclusion.

He disingenuously says this:

You have deleted and pasted what you wanted to include and exclude, made this look like one conversation which it was several, and thus taken things out of context to portray what you want

Nothing was taken out of context. I implore Oaftard & brainfreeze to come forward NOW and state if the above chat is a mischaracterization in any way. "made this look like one conversation" Ah... I think what I said here pretty much covers that:

various miscellaneous stuff left out

It was, in effect, "one conversation" that took place over a period of time (like all poker chats basically are, in between "nh"'s and other miscellaneous stuff). I posted what was pertinent to the issue(s), and again, I ask oaftard and brainfreeze to come forward and state if anything was misrepresented. Hell, I left out stuff where brainfreeze said I say good things about players too (showing ME in a good light) because it wasn't pertinent to the overall issue, and because people reading chat logs don't want to slog through a bunch of misc stuff... they want the meat of what the issue is.

He disingenuously says this:

I also noticed you conveniently deleted the part where your vehement defense for the constant talk to me after I lose a hand was that I created a thread about you being a superuser (which of course was a joke

So, so disingenuous. (and yes, Centaur is being very calculating here in order to play the victim. No one said he wasn't smart)

The only, and I mean, ONLY time I mentioned the superuser thread is ... *drumroll*... what I already POSTED in the above chat log. FACT. Nothing else. NOTHING. So much for my "vehement" defense. People can conclude how vehement it was b/c they can see it all.

Ya see, the angle Centaur's shooting here is devious: The actual point (and I think most peeps can discern it) for me bringing up the superuser thread is that I'm trying to get across to him... "hey, if you can joke on & on incessantly about the superuser shit, then I'm allowed to joke on & on about the mind games shtick". There's gonna be no double standard here. Sorry.

So, who started up the shtick first? Ah, that'd be centaur, as illustrated by the above chat log and can be confirmed by anyone sitting at/observing the table. So, when he says "shutup" (which would have got him laid out if he said that to my face in RL) all bets are pretty much off. So, I made it crystal clear, i.e., no double standards on the joking shtick.
His "payback, discrepancy" stuff is disingenuous blabber and therefore wasn't further responded to; he's either more disingenuous than I thought or has a serious perception problem (which includes all his nonsense about how I supposedly think I'm perfect )

And let him find one instance where I told anyone to "shutup"... anywhere (save for a couple vile posters spewing obscenities). More disingenuousness from Centaur. "similar to what I've seen you say"... yeah, right. Just out and out lying. The ones I've played hours with here will know that's a lie.

BOTTOM LINE: My banter/shtick in poker chat is playful... not mean-spirited. Many other players would agree with that assessment. Centaur's attempt here to portray it as something different than that is a transparent ploy in his attempt to play victim. Does anyone here who's played w/me for hours really believe I mean-spiritedly go after other players? Pffft... of course not.
Nice try tho, Centaur... I guess.

Does anyone else notice that Centaur is the common denominator when having issues with many other players?

[TheCentaur]

Chipup what is wrong with you, don't you realize you have to check with Biteme first before having an opinion?

There are several things I would like to address in the previous post, like me having issues with players (the only ones I can think of that I have a legitimate issue with is hockey216 and dynamite140 but I haven't seen him in awhile) yet biteme also has issues with players (konck, bobbywaves, carseller), like the omission of parts of the chats making it look like certain dialogues were directly related to others which they weren't, like your claim that the only time you brought up the superuser thread was in those two posts when you know damn well you have brought it up in previous conversations and pms when we have been at odds, and the list goes on.

At this point it is useless to continue the discussion. When you have a discussion or even an argument with someone you do so in the hopes that someone else can compromise, see your point of view, or even admit a mistake. Biteme is simply not capable of this, and this is the actual issue I have with him while the needling was just the catalyst. He is EXTREMELY sensitive to any type of criticism, even to the point of hinting at violence (which he has done a couple times when pointing out aspects of me he finds distasteful) which does not worry me in the least besides wondering how you can go from friends to wanting to fight because someone doesn't agree with something you're doing.

Many of you may not agree with things I have said or things I have done, but I am very receptive to others opinions and the possibility that I am wrong, because I have been many times. Any time someone disagrees with Biteme though he meets it with derision, mockery, or violent overreaction. I realize though that many of you will blindly agree with and back Biteme no matter what.

Just be sure not to disagree with him or criticize him, and realize that the second coming of the perfect baby Jesus is very unlikely to be hanging out on a gambling forum playing penny poker while watching porn.

[brainfreeze]

I don't know why you keep going on cent, and to use Jesus name like that is very disrespectful. Chill out dude, really.

[GUMMO77]

BOTTOM LINE: My banter/shtick in poker chat is playful...

You forgot erotic

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

1) When you say peeps will blindly agree w/me you're insulting them ... people agree w/me because of the EVIDENCE. They've spent hours in poker with me and have observed my banter/shtick and have come to their own conclusions that it's not mean-spirited (like you maliciously tried to characterize it) but rather, playful poking. Just as others do to me. I think 4uk and my back-and-forths are the perfect example of this playful needling.

And you have the audacity to call ME extremely sensitive?!
You're the instigator of everything, including the other night when you started (unprovoked) again with the superuser shtick.
I ask again if brainfreeze & Oaftard will comment and say if any of the chat is mischaracterized. They won't, because it isn't... and they know it was you that started first with your shtick.
Like I told you in PM (and in which you later wrote me an apology PM... shall I post it?), you're always the first to start w/me. You just get pissed that I subsequently then engage you and proceed to kick your cyber ass.

2) konck - yes... b/c he's an idiot and thinks I'm an SBR employee/plant... and some other idiots round here that think likewise, and in which your superuser shtick feeds into their feeble brains. I know SBR poker ain't much, but it does get a lil tiresome to have poker accomplishments round here often denigrated by being called a cheat. bobbywaves - never said boo to him till he responded to a post I made to Trip, not him. The guy has never beat me in anything poker-related round here but started mouthing off. Again, like you, chicken or egg? carseller - you know this has nothing to do w/ poker and everything about his loan bs. More of your disingenuous reaching to try and prove a point.
I get along w/95% of the SBR community. You on the other hand.....

3) I was talking specifically (and truthfully) about you maliciously stating I misrepresented the poker chat I posted, and you deviously know it. Any other reference to the superuser thread is irrelevant (PM). You tried to claim I omitted it in THIS POKER CHAT. Which is a lie. You know it. I know it. Oaftard and Brainfreeze know it. The extent of that discussion in that poker chat, I posted. FACT. You tried to say otherwise.

4) This whole obsession you have of trying to psychoanalyze me with all your pseudo-bullshit, i.e., "can't admit he's wrong", "he's overly sensitive can't admit a mistake", "can't take criticism" blah blah blah is so far out in left field you've actually left the ballpark. It's just plain ignorant of you that you think you can draw those conclusions.
Tell ya what: How bout spending less time trying to psychoanalyze me, and more time turning those keen analytical skills (*cough*) inward so you can maybe figure out why you use racial slurs routinely like mudshark, monkeys, n-word, etc...

5) Can we please stop with the nonsense that showing players my bluffs is somehow disrespecting them or rubbing it in. I don't care if I show every fukkin bluff I make, there's nothing wrong with that. It's all part of an overall poker strategy, and only a poker rube thinks otherwise. And, b/c you're not a rube, this is just another example of your disingenuous mischaracterizing while trying to reach to make a specious point. No one will buy it tho. Nice try. Oh wait... but I type in "reload!!!" (with the obv playful exclamation points) a lot when players go bust. Yeah, whatta mean-spirited guy I am.

6) Yes, Gummo... playful and most erotic, fer sure! And cent, brainfreeze just told you & everyone all you need to know... HE WAS THERE!

/thread

[Optional]

You're both bloody drama queens.

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

You're both bloody drama queens.

Perhaps... but least neither of us wear the dress & high heels like you do

[pureajb]

This is funny.... keep going

[TheCentaur]

Well it's exactly as I expected, a response amounting to "your wrong about this and that and this and I am perfect and never wrong."

Please, if you still have the chat log, post it in it's entirety so people can compare. Include when you flipped out and said "We're done!" after I told you to shutup it's getting old, like we're in a relationship or something. Post the entire part about me saying "I would never play that starting hand" and "I swear you just have to play stupid to win here" so that people can see I was critiquing my own play of a hand I got very lucky on, not criticizing the play of someone else. Just post it all including the dealer so people know what is being talked about and let people compare that with what you decided to post. Then they can decide if it was an accurate portrayal. If also you want to be that guy who posts pms go for it, that would be classy.

As far as the apology, I have known you for quite awhile on here and appreciated you pm ing me so I wanted to make peace, and recognize the things I was at fault with and my own shortcomings. Your message however was, to summarize, "I was just getting you back for that thing you said from 9 months ago and your thread you made about being a superuser and it's all your fault but let's get along." For the 15th time, how is your needling and banter towards me a consequence of my past actions, when you do it to everyone even the newbies?

It's also easy to see right through your attempts to vilify me invoking the race card. What it has to do with you running your mouth on the poker table to someone who is losing so you can exploit a huge hole in their game (apparently this is a huge hole in everyone's game because you do it to everyone) I'm not sure.

Also, I don't remember ever criticizing you for showing bluffs, I don't know where that came from. Then this semantics stuff about it may have been in previous chats or pms but not in this specific chat so I'm a devious liar? WTF is that. You have said time after time my supposed hurtful actions including some shit said from 9 months ago was justification for needling at the poker table, but since only a few sentences of that justification were contained in this particular chat session everything else is irrelevant? You get to call on years of historical text that apparently you took offense to but I have to limit myself to what can be read in this particular chat?

This has already become way too long and is of course a waste of time so let's be done with it. I'm sure you'll want to respond so go for it. If you want to alternate justifying the needling of everyone between "it's just in good fun" and "you started it first" knock yourself out. It's the refusal of you to accept any responsibility whatsoever, and instead cook up this bs justification that it's payback for some cherry picked posts on the forum that offends me. Once again, I don't care about your needling near as much as your delusional rationalizations of it to protect your perfect self image.

And if you want to post the table chat logs between you and boeing from the table a little while back that pertains to the pms when I was running so bad and didn't care to chat do that as well. That was kind of when this new "strategy" of yours was beginning to hit it's stride. Went wayyyy beyond "rebuy!" and "mind games". You might pull a Lois Lerner though on that one I suspect.

[TheCentaur]

You're both bloody drama queens.

Uh oh now you did it. He's done with you now

[Optional]

I'll always be #1 on his lists ;-)

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

I'll always be #1 on his lists ;-)

Or... MAYBE NOT!

***************************
TOP 5 Most Disingenuous SBR'ers

1. Centaur
2. Carseller
3. Snickerdoodles
4. ttwarrior
5. Opti

**************************

LOL, you have to watch this Centaur. I am sure Biteme can come up with a ball busting name for you.

http://www.collegehumor.com/video/69...ll-busting-psa

[daneblazer]

TOP 5 Most Disingenuous SBR'ers

1. Centaur
2. Carseller
3. Snickerdoodles
4. ttwarrior
5. Opti

Is Snickers still around? TT may be coming back soon

[bobbywaves]

I noticed that stiff Snicker was in a poker tournament early this week, or late last week.

How is Opti on a top 5 most disingenuous list?

[BeerDog99]

How is Opti on a top 5 most disingenuous list?

Most likely a joke.

[TheCentaur]

How is Opti on a top 5 most disingenuous list?

Because he dared to question Biteme's perfection

Most likely a joke.

Maybe so, but I guess now he has some justification ammunition if there is ever a disagreement between him and Biteme

[BeerDog99]

Because he dared to question Biteme's perfection



Maybe so, but I guess now he has some justification ammunition if there is ever a disagreement between him and Biteme

LOL. I doubt that very much.

Opti is one of those guys that are generally very pleasant but will stand up and go off if he feels it necessary (e.g. his concern with Triple_D and Wulfman). While I *generally* disagreed with Opti in that thread, I respected that made a stand against something he disagreed with.

But if Biteme really does not like Opti, that would be a surprise and something I would love to know more about....

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

*************************
Top 2 SBR'ers that will "get it"

1. Beerdoggy
2. Opti


************************
Top 2 Most Clueless SBR'ers

1a. Centaur
1b. bobbywaves

***********************

[bobbywaves]

********************
Top SBR Super User

BiTeMe UsAdOj

********************

Congratulations!

[BeerDog99]

LOL I like this thread.

[Chipup]

I hate opti, he used mod super user to suck out on me twice then to felt me in a tourney..

I lost those precious pts I surely would of rolled over... Opti you owe me pts pal (the above is sarcasm. Noted for the benefit of certain sbr players)

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

Hey bobbo, the other day I took my 250pt rollover and rolled it over/turned it into over 1300pts in ~ 10 minutes.
FACT
Then I subsequently proceeded to run it up to over 3k

Question for ya, bobbo: Can you do that chopping $1.90 H/L pots w/eberetta?

Just wondering...

Enquiring minds want to know!

[bobbywaves]

Bitter, you're results are to be expected with superuser status.

I'm more than content with my 97% rollover ratio & 500%+ ROI.

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

Oh, so IOW, bobbo:




BTW, it was a trick question: Everyone knows you actually got to be able to play real poker to do that

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

Woo hoo, Centy! Put a condom on and CLICK THIS!!!

[bobbywaves]

Apparently Cent, Bitter can indeed admit when he's wrong....But apologizing is another matter obviously.

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

Apparently Cent, Bitter can indeed admit when he's wrong....But apologizing is another matter obviously.

Shari & downsouth basically said the tourney had a lot of no shows due to tech problems (and Shari said pts won't be included if that's the case, people sitting at tables with players but they're not really there) so... perhaps an apology isn't in order?... and perhaps an update to my "Most Disingenuous List" is? (we'll see how things develop)

I freely admit my mistakes and apologize easily, when warranted.

p.s. Ah, bobbo... the superuser shtick is so unoriginal & played out... can't you think of anything else on your own?
Oh wait......