Murray to win Wimbledon...He can not fail!

jjgold · 07-07-12, 11:06 PM

It should be close unless Fed plays real well then thee is no match

Fed in 3 or 4

Ace_of_Spades · 07-07-12, 11:51 PM

I like the over. Murray is going to have a tremendous amount of pressure on his shoulders to pull this winner out of the bag.

Demonata · 07-07-12, 11:58 PM

Murray really great at rallys. Should be close but Murray should win.

paco · 07-07-12, 11:59 PM

Originally posted by Ace_of_Spades

I like the over. Murray is going to have a tremendous amount of pressure on his shoulders to pull this winner out of the bag.

High number at 41.5 ain't it? Fed and joker under. Tsonga and Murray under and it even went 4 sets

Ace_of_Spades · 07-08-12, 02:20 AM

Originally posted by paco

High number at 41.5 ain't it? Fed and joker under. Tsonga and Murray under and it even went 4 sets

I'm of the firm belief that we may see 2 TB's and a 5 setter. Now Fed has been here before, he may start out hot and Murray may have to settle down and win the 2nd, from there it could be a tight battle.

Balco10 · 07-08-12, 02:54 AM

That brown spot on his calf is going to slow him done!

EmpireMaker · 07-08-12, 03:14 AM

Murray is on his period he is going to get cramps after he loses the first set 6-3 and is down a break in the second

lunchbawks · 07-08-12, 03:36 AM

Murray is the sharp play until the finals

secretstash · 07-08-12, 03:37 AM

Originally posted by lunchbawks

Murray is the sharp play until the finals

it is the finals.. lol wtf

-stash

tenbas · 07-08-12, 03:43 AM

Federer really wants to win. He will win. Go champ!

SEAHAWKHARRY · 07-08-12, 03:46 AM

Murray +175 for me just for the chance of England. to win a home game!!!

ttwarrior1 · 07-08-12, 04:04 AM

murray has a better chance at the olympics and us open and next year

this is fed's . If Fed doesn't win this one he might not win another and he knows that.

People act like this is murray's only chance.

Nadal and fed will be retired and murray still playing in a few years

Sawyer · 07-08-12, 04:07 AM

Murray is a loser. A loser is a loser. As Del Potro said, Murray will never win a GS in his career..

In addition, these two never met on GRASS before. Fed will kick Murray's ass.

Probably after 20 years, people will be still saying like: murray must win, he is in a must win positiion. he must win grand slam or queen will blowjob blah blah etc etc

aceking · 07-08-12, 04:25 AM

0.1 percent murray can win .

remember henman ?

allin1 · 07-08-12, 04:41 AM

British guys usually get a lot of pressure from the British media, sometimes it's actually ridiculous. Fed on the other hand looked like the coolest cat in the whole tournament. I will have my money on him.

Goat Milk · 07-08-12, 05:06 AM

neither guy is thinking about the pressure. they both want to win and won't get nervous.

if federer serves well murray cannot win. I wouldn't back murray at those odds. Maybe if he was +300ish. He can certainly win, but I only give him like a 30% shot, if that.

Bbr · 07-08-12, 05:08 AM

Keep in mind both of these players have never played on grass. V good value For Murray considering that it'll be a close encounter.

Ill lean the over here feds class vs murrays desperation= 4/5 setter and indeed possibly some tbs.

If murray takes the first set he should pull through, if he loses it, hes got a massive mountain to climb.

Murray will come out pumped and ready to go, the most desperation you'll ever see from him will be during the first set. He knows he cant let fed take the upper hand in his house.

I honestly think this is it for murray. Home court advantage, playing silky tennis and in a grand slam final. If he can not get it done here. he WILL NOT ever win a grand slam. Just does not get better than this in modern day tennis.

Bbr · 07-08-12, 05:18 AM

Hes not +300 ish because he leads h2H 9-7.

Murray +300 lol what planet you on?

Goat Milk · 07-08-12, 05:26 AM

Originally posted by Bbr

Hes not +300 ish because he leads h2H 9-7.

Murray +300 lol what planet you on?

I said thats the only way I would bet Murray. No way I am betting Murray +185 in a grand slam final against the greatest player in history still close to his prime. Murray hasn't even hit his prime yet so for you to say he'll never win a slam if he doesn't win today is a little outrageous. Murray has another 6 years of tennis at least and Fed will be gone by that time and Nadal's knees will be finished.

Goat Milk · 07-08-12, 05:31 AM

there will be a lot of Fed supporters too. Trust me. This isn't "Murray's house." If anything it's Federer's house. He owns Wimbledon and the fans love him. Murray is Scottish.

Bbr · 07-08-12, 05:48 AM

This is as close to home as he will get....Todays support for him will be the best he will receive compared to other tournaments/slams from all around the world.

Murray hasnt hit his prime lol? You trying to say he may get better when fed or nadal age and retire? absurd. He may win some slams when they retire but that may just be because nadal and fed have retired so its pretty much charity.
He would prefer nadal and fed to play on, Theres depth and relevance of beating say, raonic in a grand slam is not comparable to beating fed in his prime, So like I said, he really wants this one.

Let me rephrase. Murray will NEVER win a grand slam until the likes of djoko/nadal and fed retire. Murray wants to be recognised in this era right now.

Thurgood · 07-08-12, 06:16 AM

Murray playing silky tennis??? What planet you on? I had money on Tsonga over Murray and watched Federer before that match. Federer is on a totally different level.

Thurgood · 07-08-12, 06:19 AM

Murray constantly needs a second serve and a lot easier to deal with as long as you don't charge the net like Tsonga.

Bbr · 07-08-12, 06:41 AM

People comparing murray to fed like murray isnt a top 10 player. Murray has game and is in good form is what I am trying to say. His desperation today is my angle along with his strong record against fed. Not many would be on the positive side of a 16 match h2h series against fed.

Thurgood · 07-08-12, 06:55 AM

Top 10 in tennis means nothing. You have Federer, Djokovic, Nadal and then everyone else.

jjgold · 07-08-12, 06:56 AM

Murray is a very good player

He picked the wrong era to be in tennis

3 of all time greats in their primes

Bbr · 07-08-12, 07:01 AM

None of those 3 players absolutely dominate murray. Murray has always been there but has fallen just short on numerous occasions. Murray can be part of that group, if only he can beat them in grand slams. He has prooven that he can beat all 3 of them in a ATP tourney final but not yet has he done it on the biggest stage and that'll be all it takes.

SO many speaking less of Murray.

Bbr · 07-08-12, 07:03 AM

Originally posted by jjgold

Murray is a very good player

He picked the wrong era to be in tennis

3 of all time greats in their primes

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

One GS win and murray will let loose. Needs to tell himself mentally he can win a GS

aceking · 07-08-12, 07:10 AM

16 Grand Slam singles titles vs 0 .

8 Wimbledon finals vs 1 .

Fed in 3 .

aceking · 07-08-12, 07:11 AM

only reason Murray gets to play today is Lukas Rosol .

Thurgood · 07-08-12, 07:15 AM

What makes Murray special?! He's slow, avg serve and he'd never be top 10 without his size. Being 6'3 allows him to cover ground but that's it. Damn the media is trying to get the public off Federer

Thurgood · 07-08-12, 07:37 AM

Lol Hannah Storm... It's pouring at Wimbledon and that damn roof is open. The crowd is hoping the rain stops lol

baskets · 07-08-12, 07:46 AM

lots of delusion in this thread re Murray

Thurgood · 07-08-12, 07:49 AM

Lots of delusion on this pre-game show.