Rose Out - You Don't Need Rose To Cover OKC At Home
Chicago plays solid defense... they have experience. These OKC kids think their sh#$ don't stink. Buy the hook Chicago +7 600/500 peace out.
You aren't going to run up and down on Chicago... I'm sorry.
ridims
SBR MVP
11-15-10
3863
#2
i agree
Comment
Finch Dinero
SBR Sharp
07-28-11
421
#3
Game could get ugly, OKC -7 for me.
Comment
crustyme
SBR Posting Legend
09-29-10
16896
#4
bulls 14-5 without rose.
rose = overrated
Comment
chantrain
SBR MVP
03-14-11
3244
#5
Yeah you're right, Rose sucks. Bulls don't need him. Trade Rose for a bag of potato chips!
Comment
crustyme
SBR Posting Legend
09-29-10
16896
#6
bag of chips?
asking too much.
Comment
d2bets
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-10-05
39995
#7
Originally posted by crustyme
bulls 14-5 without rose.
rose = overrated
Ummmmm, but aren't they 28-6 WITH Rose?
And but for a last tenth of a second tip against a shitty Raptors squad at home, that would be 13-6. And look at the teams they've beaten without Rose -- Wash, Pho, Cle, Char, Char (again), Sac, Bos, Mia, Phi, Orl, Tor, Tor, Atl, Det. A few decent wins in there, mostly at home, but on the whole pretty crappy teams. Only 5 of those have winning records. And then there are 4 DD losses in there too in 19 games. Bulls only lost twice by DD with Rose in 34 games.
Bulls still win games without Rose because they play such good team ball and have the best coach in the league, but over a long season they would ultimately be just marginally better than average without Rose.
Comment
TodayIsForgotten
SBR Wise Guy
06-19-06
534
#8
Yeah, sorta like after MJ left. Kidding. The above is spot-on.
Comment
Smoke
SBR Aristocracy
10-09-09
48111
#9
Why buy the hook then??
Comment
ParlayKing
SBR Wise Guy
02-02-10
774
#10
^ What he said
Comment
TheMoneyShot
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
02-14-07
28672
#11
Originally posted by Smoke
Why buy the hook then??
When I placed my wager earlier... 5D had it +6.5 -108. BetDSI had it with the hook at +7 -120. So I figured the extra $60 in case something shady happens... was worth it. +7 seems solid enough. But regardless... we'll see what happens.
Comment
Illusivecone
SBR Wise Guy
11-08-08
771
#12
Buying from 6.5 to 7 cannot win you money. May push you though
Comment
crustyme
SBR Posting Legend
09-29-10
16896
#13
what other team would win at .737 without their best player? no one.
their winning % without rose is nearly equal to the heat's!
they are slightly better with rose but an mvp should be the difference between lottery team and championship calibre not slightly better. if kobe was out, lakers would be a .500 team.
plus it was rose shooting miserable 25% fg (4th qt) vs heat in the playoffs which cost them the finals last season.
Comment
ChiLLx
SBR Hall of Famer
12-24-11
5412
#14
Bulls ML dropping right before tip
Comment
Chi_archie
SBR Aristocracy
07-22-08
63172
#15
Coach Thibs is the MVP of the that team
Comment
d2bets
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-10-05
39995
#16
Originally posted by crustyme
what other team would win at .737 without their best player? no one.
their winning % without rose is nearly equal to the heat's!
they are slightly better with rose but an mvp should be the difference between lottery team and championship calibre not slightly better. if kobe was out, lakers would be a .500 team.
plus it was rose shooting miserable 25% fg (4th qt) vs heat in the playoffs which cost them the finals last season.
None. Because the Bulls are the best team. Not clear how that takes away from what Rose does. At their peak, the Bulls probably would have been pretty without MJ too. Didn't take away from MJ's greatness. The BEST team should still be good without their best player.
Plus, like I said, small sample, against a bunch of bad teams. Bulls would not win .737 over a full season (60-22) w/o Rose.
Comment
You mad bro
SBR Posting Legend
01-15-12
16641
#17
Originally posted by d2bets
None. Because the Bulls are the best team. Not clear how that takes away from what Rose does. At their peak, the Bulls probably would have been pretty without MJ too. Didn't take away from MJ's greatness. The BEST team should still be good without their best player.
Plus, like I said, small sample, against a bunch of bad teams. Bulls would not win .737 over a full season (60-22) w/o Rose.
Agreed 100% ... Bulls when they had mj had insane ole players jut like this team does
Rose is important but this team is well coached an plays great team defense
Comment
BigDofBA
SBR Posting Legend
09-30-09
19313
#18
If you're so confident, why do you need to buy the hook?
GL.
Comment
ridims
SBR MVP
11-15-10
3863
#19
+8.5 +100 Live bet on SIA
If thats your bookie i suggest you hit that now
Comment
Chi_archie
SBR Aristocracy
07-22-08
63172
#20
regarding the With Rose, Without Rose issue...
I think the Bulls are a system team built for the regular season.... they'd win with or without Rose in the regular season. Same could be said of the Pippen-led Bulls if (Jordan was not there)
but both Teams would suffer greatly without their stars in the playoffs. That's where Star Power can really lift a team...
just ask Dallas regarding Dirk
Comment
jjgold
SBR Aristocracy
07-20-05
388179
#21
Bulls dont seem to lose much without Rose
Go figure
Comment
You mad bro
SBR Posting Legend
01-15-12
16641
#22
Bulls r a joke
Comment
Nick Papageorgio
SBR MVP
01-07-12
2396
#23
Stick to POF thread, you can't cap for sht.
Comment
jayc88
Restricted User
12-30-07
6785
#24
bulls ml 2nd half should be easy
Comment
BigDofBA
SBR Posting Legend
09-30-09
19313
#25
If you need to buy the hook, don't go big on the play because you must have doubts.
Comment
onetrickpony
SBR Hall of Famer
08-23-10
9434
#26
Originally posted by Nick Papageorgio
Stick to POF thread, you can't cap for sht.
moneyshot been losing since '99
his bookie prob lets money fuk his wife he feels so bad for taking all his money
Comment
PickWinnerAllDay
SBR Posting Legend
08-31-11
12722
#27
This line was a little too high but the Bulls have the luxury of being able to take a game off and this was going to be a tough one anyway with no Rose on the road.