Books are about to get buried like never before

[No coincidences]

yeee and you're the one that made a thread about it moron

So why are you responding if you don't know and don't care?

[Joe Dogs]

Easy, under

That cleaned the books clocks.

[agendaman]

49rs should have been in sb. not giants/2 shitty fumbles/agree w /pew pew/who cares if public lost

[Pew Pew]

So why are you responding if you don't know and don't care?

because you're a paranoid dipshittttttt

i can bold my letters too. U MAD BRO?

[No coincidences]

Easy, under

That cleaned the books clocks.

Sides are bet at a 10:1 clip in games like this, and the public was pretty split on the total in the first place.

[No coincidences]

because you're a paranoid dipshittttttt

i can bold my letters too. U MAD BRO?

Wow, this has been a very productive conversation with you, as per usual. All started with you thinking the public got buried. Your stupidity is unreal.

[thetrinity]

pats by 3 woulda been the all time burial. middled out the ass.

[millflavor]

[Extra Innings]

[Pew Pew]

Wow, this has been a very productive conversation with you, as per usual. All started with you thinking the public got buried. Your stupidity is unreal.

naaaaah bro your delusional paranoid line movement theories and picks are unrealllllll

[rake922]

No coincidences post your birth certificate

[Jimb0311]

anyone know the amount that vegas lost?

[Pew Pew]

no coin won't respond cuz he's seething inside and jelly that the public buried the books

[dom75]

I imagine the books did well with the first score prop. Who would have thunk the first score would have been a safety.

[No coincidences]

No coincidences post your birth certificate

What do you mean?

I'm 36. You think I'm younger or older?

[TiredPro]

May have dropped the line to 2.5 to draw in Patriot money and soften the blow of being so one sided on the Giants........between the phantom holding call that stalled the Giants drive and the no call on the pass interference by the Patriots defender, it seemed that the Patriots were the chosen ones. Giants overcame a lot this season............nice to see Eli win the MVP in Indy.

[rake922]

What do you mean?

I'm 36. You think I'm younger or older?

I think you're 21-24

[No coincidences]

I think you're 21-24

Why in the hell would I lie about being 36?

[BigDofBA]

Why in the hell would I lie about being 36?

Who cares? I'm not sure why some people get so obsessed with people on the internet that they will never meet.

Anyway, this was a fitting way for my NFL season to end. I feel stupid for taking New England now. I pretty much knew this was what was going to happen.

[raydog]

Sides are bet at a 10:1 clip in games like this, and the public was pretty split on the total in the first place.

line closed 2 pts. lower than it opened....i honestly have no fukking clue where some of you guys get or "think" you have correct info... you , as well, are dead wrong.

[wantitall4moi]

LOL books getting buried. The LEGAL wagers on this game arent a drop in the bucket ot the illegal wagers taken. Books that took legal wagers on this game more than likely made money. despite what people want to think.

Books gave Pats -2.5 that in and of itself was more than enough for them to make money because a lot of guys took that.

Only way books would have gotten buried would be it Pats score a TD on and had time to kick the PAT.

Its always fun watching people base their assertions on personal anecdotal 'evidence'.

[No coincidences]

line closed 2 pts. lower than it opened....i honestly have no fukking clue where some of you guys get or "think" you have correct info... you , as well, are dead wrong.

What are you talking about? The total? I have no doubt that sharps hit up the total at a smaller clip, but the public most certainly wasn't hammering the over. They were hammering the Giants ML.

[No coincidences]

LOL books getting buried. The LEGAL wagers on this game arent a drop in the bucket ot the illegal wagers taken. Books that took legal wagers on this game more than likely made money. despite what people want to think.

Books gave Pats -2.5 that in and of itself was more than enough for them to make money because a lot of guys took that.

Only way books would have gotten buried would be it Pats score a TD on and had time to kick the PAT.

Its always fun watching people base their assertions on personal anecdotal 'evidence'.

Well I saw between 60-65% of the public on the Giants ML before kickoff depending on the site and more people on the Giants at +3 or +2.5 than the Pats -- is that not correct?

[H1Cypher]

What a cornball.... with enough people on the over(more people were on the over)- enough people on the Pats at -... and enough people on the pats spread.... + the exotics.... no one got buried you ******* ccornball.

[Pew Pew]

What a cornball.... with enough people on the over(more people were on the over)- enough people on the Pats at -... and enough people on the pats spread.... + the exotics.... no one got buried you ******* ccornball.

yes don't mind no coin... no coin is just a delusional dumbass

[BigDofBA]

Vegas set a bad line and lost on the spread and ML. That is a fact. Not to mention all of the futures that probably came in on the Giants.

At my office many of our conferences are held in Vegas and there are typically several people from New York that attend.

I can only imagine that New York teams get the majority of futures bets just based on the casual fan throwing money on their team. Am I wrong in thinking this? Isn't that a reason that teams like the Yankees, Giants, Lakers typically have a lot of action?

Vegas is never buried but that lost on this game. I'm sure they will make it up on the next game.

[No coincidences]

What a cornball.... with enough people on the over(more people were on the over)- enough people on the Pats at -... and enough people on the pats spread.... + the exotics.... no one got buried you ******* ccornball.

Again, sides are bet at a 10:1 rate vs. totals, and the public was split on the number.

Do some research before you post this bullshit.

[wantitall4moi]

Well I saw between 60-65% of the public on the Giants ML before kickoff depending on the site and more people on the Giants at +3 or +2.5 than the Pats -- is that not correct?

those public numbers dont mean shit some make believe nonsense some website came up with to pretend like they know how to track movement.

People taking +3 on a dog shows they dont have a frigging clue, especially if theyre laying he vig. In a winner take all game playing +3 is as bad as it gets. If you like the team you bet them to win SU or dont play the game at all. Thats how it goes. betting +3 is just dumb. Win or lose. Guys that took +3 -120 basically cost themselves 50-60 cents on the dollar or 50-60%. A guy who bet 5K -120 gets back 2583 less than someone who bet Giants +135 on the ML. You dont think books like taking that type of action?

Also anyone that bets Giants +2.5 are completely braindead, they just happened to get lucky. Guys like that are exactly the typs of players 99.99% of all books want playing with them.

But a win is a win I suppoe but guys who constantly get the worst of it, especially in a game where the line was up for 15 days have zero chance to win long term.

[m11chen]

They got buried, but not cuz of the Giants. The safety + safety first score will KILL the books. Paying off those odds, every square and their mother has a bit of money sprinkled on those long shot props. That buries all their prop profits, since props are over 50% of the handle in superbowls these days...

[thetrinity]

vegas lost on the giants, lost on the giants ml, lost on the total. however they didnt get middled on the spread, likely cleaned up on the props for the most part, also the teasers missed. dont think it ended up that bad for em, theyll survive.

[No coincidences]

those public numbers dont mean shit some make believe nonsense some website came up with to pretend like they know how to track movement.

People taking +3 on a dog shows they dont have a frigging clue, especially if theyre laying he vig. In a winner take all game playing +3 is as bad as it gets. If you like the team you bet them to win SU or dont play the game at all. Thats how it goes. betting +3 is just dumb. Win or lose. Guys that took +3 -120 basically cost themselves 50-60 cents on the dollar or 50-60%. A guy who bet 5K -120 gets back 2583 less than someone who bet Giants +135 on the ML. You dont think books like taking that type of action?

Also anyone that bets Giants +2.5 are completely braindead, they just happened to get lucky. Guys like that are exactly the typs of players 99.99% of all books want playing with them.

But a win is a win I suppoe but guys who constantly get the worst of it, especially in a game where the line was up for 15 days have zero chance to win long term.

So you're trying to make the argument that more money came in on the Pats than the Giants? Come on. All we heard all week was "how can New England possibly be favored"? Every "expert" ESPN rolled out there picked the Giants. It's a New York team. You can't convince me for a second that the public wasn't all over that + ML -- exactly the way the percentages read.

[lightone]

What a cornball.... with enough people on the over(more people were on the over)- enough people on the Pats at -... and enough people on the pats spread.... + the exotics.... no one got buried you ******* ccornball.

More people were on the over? What are you smoking, ALL the money went on the under. When they opened it at 55.5 both sharps AND squares pounded the under. At least here in vegas anyways.

[raydog]

wantitall... the -2.5 money was nowhere even near the +3 and +3.5 money...why would you think differently? you are completely wrong here and a simple phone call to any book will prove that...and nocoin, read your post and mine again...under bets hammered the **** out of the book...you said it was about even...it wasnt even in the same ballpark as even... you guys really dont know what you are talking about, but you think you do...which is the funny part...

the books lost the game side, total, teasers and parlays...that is a fact... they won the 2nd half side and total...that is a fact...and of course they make money on props... thinking anything differently than this is simply wrong..that , also, is a fact.

[BettingWizard]

Books will never lose.......99% of the people who won on this game will give it all back and then some

[thetrinity]

wantitall... the -2.5 money was nowhere even near the +3 and +3.5 money...why would you think differently? you are completely wrong here and a simple phone call to any book will prove that...and nocoin, read your post and mine again...under bets hammered the **** out of the book...you said it was about even...it wasnt even in the same ballpark as even... you guys really dont know what you are talking about, but you think you do...which is the funny part... the books lost the game side, total, teasers and parlays...that is a fact... they won the 2nd half side and total...that is a fact...and of course they make money on props... thinking anything differently than this is simply wrong..that , also, is a fact.

pretty much agree i dont see how they lost on teasers since they missed the window completely on both the side and total unless u did 7 points on the pats. all teasers with over went to the shitter. if this was 28-27 pats they would have paid every teaser.