You are such an arrogant kid. You obviously walk around with a permanent chip on your shoulder but I will try to enlighten you as to how this disagreement got started.
You went off on your analysis of the economy in the United States on a pure anecdotal rant. My issue was that you didn't use a single piece of evidence to back up what you said. Anecdotal is ok when you don't have direct evidence to refer to. You do have this (solid/direct evidence) available and you chose just to talk out of your piehole without ever trying to convince someone that you were more than just a blowhard. How do you ever expect to convince someone of anything if all you do is insult and act like the only one's who get things are people like you.
Shrute, Andywend and bigdaddy as your personal cheerleaders
does not mean you are making any progress in being cogent.
Back to the title of the thread. I realize I haven't given my two cents.
Consensus on Obama in the north depends on who you talk to and how educated they are. My friends who are in the academic world have a far more enlightened view than my friends who just read the news. We have a classic newspaper for neanderthals in the Toronto Sun. Ask those Canadians how Obama is doing and they would give the same opinion as those Americans who consume a healthy diet of Fox News.
In general, the view of Obama is positive in Canada.
You went off on your analysis of the economy in the United States on a pure anecdotal rant. My issue was that you didn't use a single piece of evidence to back up what you said. Anecdotal is ok when you don't have direct evidence to refer to. You do have this (solid/direct evidence) available and you chose just to talk out of your piehole without ever trying to convince someone that you were more than just a blowhard. How do you ever expect to convince someone of anything if all you do is insult and act like the only one's who get things are people like you.
Shrute, Andywend and bigdaddy as your personal cheerleaders
does not mean you are making any progress in being cogent. Back to the title of the thread. I realize I haven't given my two cents.
Consensus on Obama in the north depends on who you talk to and how educated they are. My friends who are in the academic world have a far more enlightened view than my friends who just read the news. We have a classic newspaper for neanderthals in the Toronto Sun. Ask those Canadians how Obama is doing and they would give the same opinion as those Americans who consume a healthy diet of Fox News.
In general, the view of Obama is positive in Canada.
I used plenty of "evidence." The best kind actually. First hand experience. Which I can guarandamntee you is more accurate than the bullshit you're being spoonfed by other people. Just because it ain't reported in big block letters on the front page of the NY Times for dense ankle-grabbers like you to read doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Again you fukking twit, almost all history is anecdotal evidence, except for numerical records. The only difference between what you're calling "evidence" and my description is that no reporter called me to write an article about it. Anyone who works in a fukking bank knows what went down, as well as plenty of others who understand how bureaucratic pressure works on private enterprises when they need gov't authorization to operate. The only reason you don't is because you're too fukking stupid and lazy to know where to look.
I've got a Phd economist from Stanford backing me. What do you have? Not shit. Other than a mouse in your pocket and a bunch of self-absorbed whiny-ass pussy liberal pals "in the academic world" who don't know the first goddam thing about how life works for anyone other than themselves.
In the words of Shannon Sharpe, "You can't even spell Dow Jones."
