ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
Comment
FourLengthsClear
SBR MVP
12-29-10
3808
#8
Originally posted by big0mar
Not that much really
Entire world GDP is like $16T a year
Not that much? 1.2 trillion is USD 4,000 for every man woman and child in the US and would bring the debt ceiling up to USD 45,000 for every American. By any standards that is hideous.
...................... and btw Global GDP is well over USD 60 trillion.
Comment
Emily_Haines
SBR Posting Legend
04-14-09
15917
#9
Originally posted by FourLengthsClear
Not that much? 1.2 trillion is USD 4,000 for every man woman and child in the US and would bring the debt ceiling up to USD 45,000 for every American. By any standards that is hideous.
...................... and btw Global GDP is well over USD 60 trillion.
Throw in the fact that 50% don't pay taxes and it's more like 8000 per person
The entire national debt is more like 120000 per person
It will never be paid back!!!!!!
Comment
jmilacek
SBR Sharp
03-17-10
378
#10
You guys realize this was agreed upon by Democrats and Republicans a long time ago, right?
Comment
capitalist pig
SBR MVP
01-25-07
4998
#11
Originally posted by Emily_Haines
Throw in the fact that 50% don't pay taxes and it's more like 8000 per person
And there lies the whole problem with our country. I dont care if you make $3000 a year everyone should be paying federal income taxes, its ridiculous to let off the low income folks from paying, they are the biggest drain on the system and contribute nothing,JMO.
later
Comment
Emily_Haines
SBR Posting Legend
04-14-09
15917
#12
Originally posted by capitalist pig
And there lies the whole problem with our country. I dont care if you make $3000 a year everyone should be paying federal income taxes, its ridiculous to let off the low income folks from paying, they are the biggest drain on the system and contribute nothing,JMO.
later
It's also not OK for the 1% to have their incomes go up 400% over the last 25 years and the 99% go up 80% and expect the 1% not to pay more.
Comment
big0mar
SBR MVP
01-09-09
3374
#13
Originally posted by FourLengthsClear
Not that much? 1.2 trillion is USD 4,000 for every man woman and child in the US and would bring the debt ceiling up to USD 45,000 for every American. By any standards that is hideous.
...................... and btw Global GDP is well over USD 60 trillion.
If you don't have $45k to spare you're a fukkin bum
We are rich because of government. Don't forget that.
[B][B]They key isn't getting rich quick. The key is getting rich slowly, and enjoying it.
It's also not OK for the 1% to have their incomes go up 400% over the last 25 years and the 99% go up 80% and expect the 1% not to pay more.
Thats a tough one, but I see your point, but put yourself in the 1% class and imagine your already paying 45% in income taxes, and the govt wants 55%. Most 1%rs probably wouldnt even notice it in their lifestyles, but its got to seem like a slap in their face the way our govt pisses money away, JMO.
later
Comment
CarpeDime
SBR Hall of Famer
09-01-09
7873
#16
it will go to defense spending so its good
bush and congress did that for aphghanestan and iraq and we kicked complete arab ass not to mention created jobs in defense contracting and created job creaters who own defense contracting small businesses
cant let up now we need to fuk up iran and then pakistan 1.2 tril should do it
Comment
FourLengthsClear
SBR MVP
12-29-10
3808
#17
Originally posted by CarpeDime
it will go to defense spending so its good
bush and congress did that for aphghanestan and iraq and we kicked complete arab ass not to mention created jobs in defense contracting and created job creaters who own defense contracting small businesses
cant let up now we need to fuk up iran and then pakistan 1.2 tril should do it
I like the satire but it won't all go to defense. There is the small matter of servicing the current debt which will allow the Chinese to bolster their own defence spending.
Comment
big0mar
SBR MVP
01-09-09
3374
#18
Originally posted by FourLengthsClear
I like the satire but it won't all go to defense. There is the small matter of servicing the current debt which will allow the Chinese to bolster their own defence spending.
I wonder what kind of rates China is charging us. Must be very high, right?
[B][B]They key isn't getting rich quick. The key is getting rich slowly, and enjoying it.
I wonder what kind of rates China is charging us. Must be very high, right?
Bond yields on the open market are still remarkably low, this is true. This is mostly because there is very little high quality debt out there, the whole of the western world is in the same hole and we have the ultimate case of moral hazard.
If investors were to value US, British or French debt they way they have by historical standards capital markets would have ground to a halt.
Comment
Cougar Bait
SBR Posting Legend
10-04-07
18282
#20
Originally posted by CarpeDime
it will go to defense spending so its good
bush and congress did that for aphghanestan and iraq and we kicked complete arab ass not to mention created jobs in defense contracting and created job creaters who own defense contracting small businesses
cant let up now we need to fuk up iran and then pakistan 1.2 tril should do it
Comment
Emily_Haines
SBR Posting Legend
04-14-09
15917
#21
Originally posted by FourLengthsClear
I like the satire but it won't all go to defense. There is the small matter of servicing the current debt which will allow the Chinese to bolster their own defence spending.
super committee not coming to an agreement results in automatic cuts off 1/2 trillion to the defense budget
Comment
MUHerd37
SBR Posting Legend
10-23-09
12816
#22
Originally posted by Emily_Haines
super committee not coming to an agreement results in automatic cuts off 1/2 trillion to the defense budget
None of that is going to happen. They already admitted all the auto cut stuff was bullshit and isn't going to happen.
Comment
mikemca
SBR Posting Legend
03-10-10
10047
#23
Legalize drugs ,online poker,sportsbooks and tax them like cigarettes = Voila
That doesn't erase it but it sure puts a dent in it.Don't know why they are so stubborn ,if people want to slowly kill themselves or flush their money down the drain then so be it.
Comment
rickbo528
SBR MVP
10-22-08
1842
#24
Originally posted by Emily_Haines
What difference does it make? The money can never be paid back so may as well just run the debt up as far as possible.
There's a real intelligent response.
Comment
thebestthereis
SBR Posting Legend
03-01-09
11459
#25
fade lang at your max bet between your 12 different outs and you'll be out of debt in roughly 4.5 years +/-. it won't happen overnight but it will happen, for certain. that is my plan and i am sticking to it. we don't need cuts whatsoever, as a matter of fact my plan adds bonuses every year.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#26
Originally posted by thebestthereis
fade lang at your max bet between your 12 different outs and you'll be out of debt in roughly 4.5 years +/-. it won't happen overnight but it will happen, for certain. that is my plan and i am sticking to it. we don't need cuts whatsoever, as a matter of fact my plan adds bonuses every year.
LANG 2012!
Comment
Romocide
SBR MVP
09-14-11
1404
#27
Originally posted by mikemca
Legalize drugs ,online poker,sportsbooks and tax them like cigarettes = Voila
That doesn't erase it but it sure puts a dent in it.Don't know why they are so stubborn ,if people want to slowly kill themselves or flush their money down the drain then so be it.
Bingo! What people do with their own body and own money in their own business. The government needs to stop trying to save people from themselves and start trying to help the nation as a whole. The war on drugs has been and will continue to be an epic failure. Contrary to propaganda, there would not be gangs of drug addicts roaming the streets at night looking for someone to shoot and rob. No more than their already is. In fact, legalization of drugs would cause a massive decrease in crime. The money gained from taxes and no longer having to pay the costs of nonviolent drug offenders in prison would be enormous.
Legalizing these things would create an almost instant upswing in the economy.
Comment
itchypickle
SBR Posting Legend
11-05-09
21452
#28
Obama's treating the debt issue like a teenager trying to fukk a girl for the first time...drip drip drip....$500 Billion here, $1Trillion there, another $800 Billion here.....Just let me get the tip in baby, I promise that's all and then wham...we're fukked
Comment
Jaug
SBR MVP
01-11-09
3087
#29
Borrowing $40 per $100 spent. Wont hold in the long run.
Comment
crustyme
SBR Posting Legend
09-29-10
16896
#30
Comment
Sam Odom
SBR Aristocracy
10-30-05
58063
#31
Meanwhile... In Hawaii
“The Obama party had a special 5-course tasting menu for $75 a person, $105 per person with wine pairings for each course," according to the pool report. "Highlights include 'Sassey Salad' and bacon wrapped pork loin,” according to CNN’s Peter Morris, who was at the restaurant when the president arrived, according to the report.
Comment
Salvan
SBR Hustler
11-01-10
93
#32
LOL, SBR resident retard conservatives are still confused on how our government works. Obama doesn't spend. The congress spends. We raised the debt ceiling 10 times under Bush, where were all these chuckle heads then? Under Bush is when we should have cut spending and raised taxes, idiot cowboy did the opposite. Cutting deficits in a recession is the last thing you want to do. That is economics 101. Read a book dumbasses.
Comment
Sam Odom
SBR Aristocracy
10-30-05
58063
#33
Originally posted by Salvan
LOL, SBR resident retard conservatives are still confused on how our government works. Obama doesn't spend. The congress spends. We raised the debt ceiling 10 times under Bush, where were all these chuckle heads then? Under Bush is when we should have cut spending and raised taxes, idiot cowboy did the opposite. Cutting deficits in a recession is the last thing you want to do. That is economics 101. Read a book dumbasses.
So who is the dummy? In the same paragraph you say the President (Obama) doesnt spend then go on to say a President (Bush-cowboy) is to blame for spending
.
Attached Files
Comment
Salvan
SBR Hustler
11-01-10
93
#34
Originally posted by Sam Odom
So who is the dummy? In the same paragraph you say the President (Obama) doesnt spend then go on to say a President (Bush-cowboy) is to blame for spending
.
Where did I say "President (Bush-cowboy) is to blame for spending"? Do you have reading comprehension problems, dumb f\*\*k? I said UNDER Bush, as in WHEN bush was president, we should have cut spending and raised taxes. Way to avoid the entire point of my post and then LIE about what I said. You made a stupid misleading thread, admit it and move on.
Blaming the current President for the budget busting policies enacted when Republicans controlled the Congress and White House is lying.
Comment
Salvan
SBR Hustler
11-01-10
93
#35
Fixed for accuracy, when Obama took office we were still operating under a budget BUSH signed into law in 2008. We wouldn't have massive deficits if not for a Republican Recession that sent unemployment to 10% before Obama's/Dems Recovery Act started undoing the damage