More Proof: Why The USA Resembles A 3rd World Country

[Tech N9ne]

Opie wants to have sex with you

[forsberg21]

Many here have benefited from my trading advice

Pay attention to my threads

God bless

Let's hear some plays you've made then cowboy because based on what you've said in this thread, I'd rather trust my money with a first year college kid than you. Some of the shit you've said here is just simply absurd.

[big0mar]

LOL, do you even know what that means?!? That is the vaguest statement I've heard all week. You sound like some cheap two bit politician.

Good effort at trying to sound sophisticated though, "the market benefits because capital is more efficiently appropriated". You probably don't know the true meaning of at least 3 words in that sentence.

Yes, here is an example:

Company A's current share price is $100.

Company A suffers from executive malfeasance. Its share price is $100, but the real value is $40.

An insider is aware of this malfeasance. If he acts on his insider information, and sells his shares, the price per share will move closer to its real value. Lets say the price of the stock moves to $95.

Now, Joe Schmo buys shares of Company A at $95 instead of $100.

Not only did Joe Schmo get a more accurate price, but now the insider that sold his shares has his capital in securities that aren't mispriced. Thus, the insider's capital is being used more efficiently.

[forsberg21]

Seriously man, WTF are you, 6 years old? Do you even know what the stock market is?

A single inside investor would NEVER be able to come up with the volume to make a stock go from $20 to $25, not even Warren Buffet could do this (a 25% gain). The public would send the shares soaring and NOT the insider because the public has the volume behind them, the single insider doesn't, unless he's buying 20% of the company.

The reason why my example doesn't make any sense because you are too ignorant/stupid to understand it.

Hey, actually on 2nd thought man, I was a little harsh there.

You are, unfortunately, a product of the American public school system, it's not your fault.

[str]

The problem is, your public and private pensions derive their value from the stock market.

As much as you can do yourself to avoid it personally, you'll never be able to do it fully.

Nope.

Always been self employed.

No pensions here.

Not a stock.

But for most people, you are right.

[big0mar]

Let's hear some plays you've made then cowboy because based on what you've said in this thread, I'd rather trust my money with a first year college kid than you. Some of the shit you've said here is just simply absurd.

Here is the most recent play:

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/1353475-anyone-buying-bidu.html

Regardless, you should more into the subject. Adam Pritchard among others has written on this.

[big0mar]

Seriously man, WTF are you, 6 years old? Do you even know what the stock market is?

A single inside investor would NEVER be able to come up with the volume to make a stock go from $20 to $25, not even Warren Buffet could do this (a 25% gain). The public would send the shares soaring and NOT the insider because the public has the volume behind them, the single insider doesn't, unless he's buying 20% of the company.

The reason why my example doesn't make any sense because you are too ignorant/stupid to understand it.

People who are privy to inside information would absolutely be able to affect a stock's price.

[forsberg21]

Yes, here is an example:

Company A's current share price is $100.

Company A suffers from executive malfeasance. Its share price is $100, but the real value is $40.

An insider is aware of this malfeasance. If he acts on his insider information, and sells his shares, the price per share will move closer to its real value. Lets say the price of the stock moves to $95.

Now, Joe Schmo buys shares of Company A at $95 instead of $100.

Not only did Joe Schmo get a more accurate price, but now the insider that sold his shares has his capital in securities that aren't mispriced. Thus, the insider's capital is being used more efficiently.

Your example is absurd. Realistically, the shares wouldn't slide to the tune of 5%. Aside from that, what about the buyers who eventually buy at the fair price of $40 per share? Why is it fair that the insiders were able to sell out at $100 for something that was worth $40? Why do they get to cash out first based on something they did that was illegal?

If you don't see how this is illegal, just stop writing altogether, you're making a fool of yourself.

[big0mar]

Hey, actually on 2nd thought man, I was a little harsh there.

You are, unfortunately, a product of the American public school system, it's not your fault.

Never went to a public school in my life.

[forsberg21]

Here is the most recent play:

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/1353475-anyone-buying-bidu.html

Regardless, you should more into the subject. Adam Pritchard among others has written on this.

$127 is the latest price, how have you fared?

"Baidu, Inc. provides Internet search services. The company offers a Chinese language search platform on its Website, Baidu.com"

So you're investing in a Chinese tech company? LOL... haven't you heard about all the shady gimmicks that go on with their accounting? How can you trust those guys? Well, I guess this is a "gambling" forum.

[big0mar]

$127 is the latest price, how have you fared?

"Baidu, Inc. provides Internet search services. The company offers a Chinese language search platform on its Website, Baidu.com"

So you're investing in a Chinese tech company? LOL... haven't you heard about all the shady gimmicks that go on with their accounting? How can you trust those guys? Well, I guess this is a "gambling" forum.

It was a short-squeeze buddy.

[forsberg21]

People who are privy to inside information would absolutely be able to affect a stock's price.

Man, listen to what you're saying, it's such generic, vague nonsense with no meaning behind whatsoever.

They wouldn't get the volume to significantly move the price of a stock, don't you get it? The circle of insiders is very small, that's the beauty of having inside information. The few guys cash out while the rest wait in line to make their play. It's all about volume. If an insider makes a trade for $500,000 do you know how much that's going to affect the price of the stock? Next to NOTHING.

[Ninersnut]

This is cute is someone taking their first Intro to Finance 101 class at the ole University?

[big0mar]

Man, listen to what you're saying, it's such generic, vague nonsense with no meaning behind whatsoever.

They wouldn't get the volume to significantly move the price of a stock, don't you get it? The circle of insiders is very small, that's the beauty of having inside information. The few guys cash out while the rest wait in line to make their play. It's all about volume. If an insider makes a trade for $500,000 do you know how much that's going to affect the price of the stock? Next to NOTHING.

$500k

Whatever you say

Good luck in life with your losers-mentality

[Ninersnut]

[forsberg21]

$500k

Whatever you say

Good luck in life with your losers-mentality

Anyways, you're an idiot. Any person with a brain who has read what you've wrote in these posts can only make the same conclusion.

[andywend]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel...b_1089906.html But perhaps the most stunning piece of news we're getting in the wake of the MF Global collapse is in the clients of the firm who managed to get away scot-free, with no freezing of accounts or capital -- particularly the accounts of the mega-cap independent oil company Koch Industries, run by the politically active Koch brothers. Reading this stuff makes me so angry. How these ******* elite and government scum absolutely rape the living shit out of us and we are so obsessed with our sports teams and reality TV that we don't even care.

Emily, you didn't have one red cent invested with MF Global and yet you talk about "raping the shit out of US". Those that had money invested with MF Global got screwed, NOT YOU!!!

You deserve to get your Aces cracked 24/7.

[FourLengthsClear]

The market benefits, because capital is more efficiently appropriated.

Sorry dude but I can't have a rational discussion with that sort of statement. First of all the market consists of a multitude of participants only a tiny minority of whom benefit if trading on 'secret' information is allowed. On that basis the market disintegrates.