that reverse line movement crap has been complete nonsense in college CFB this year
evaluate matchups and determine value, forget everything else. If a line is overpriced or underpriced, then bet on it... Many people have gone broke trying to interpret "line movements"
Wow.
Comment
brahmabull117
SBR Hall of Famer
11-08-10
8622
#72
so many people seem to think "I'm with Vegas bro, They make tons of money and I'll make tons of money mirroring them"
They make tons of money cause the sports gambling industry is absolutely massive so if they just hit 50% ATS, they will make an absolute killing. You don't have that luxury (of being able to hit 50% and make millions) so I don't see what advantage Vegas information gives you
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#73
Originally posted by brahmabull117
so many people seem to think "I'm with Vegas bro, They make tons of money and I'll make tons of money mirroring them"
They make tons of money cause the sports gambling industry is absolutely massive so if they just hit 50% ATS, they will make an absolute killing. You don't have that luxury (of being able to hit 50% and make millions) so I don't see what advantage Vegas information gives you
They make tons of money because people like you get the juice squeezed out of you when you wind up with vig all over your face. You brag about your win percentage yet you end up down because you either pay dearly to get that glossy record or you bet beyond your means and go bust because you think this is all so "easy" (your words)
I can't believe you actually took LSU tonight -- I think that's the second time I can ever remember you taking a team with a "+" in front of them.
Comment
hawley
SBR Posting Legend
05-10-10
14270
#74
Originally posted by brahmabull117
so many people seem to think "I'm with Vegas bro, They make tons of money and I'll make tons of money mirroring them"
They make tons of money cause the sports gambling industry is absolutely massive so if they just hit 50% ATS, they will make an absolute killing. You don't have that luxury (of being able to hit 50% and make millions) so I don't see what advantage Vegas information gives you
You are well out of your depth bro.
Just accept you won with LSU and move on.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#75
Originally posted by brahmabull117
so many people seem to think "I'm with Vegas bro, They make tons of money and I'll make tons of money mirroring them"
They make tons of money cause the sports gambling industry is absolutely massive so if they just hit 50% ATS, they will make an absolute killing. You don't have that luxury (of being able to hit 50% and make millions) so I don't see what advantage Vegas information gives you
I give up.
Comment
P.F.Kasooff
SBR MVP
11-13-10
1903
#76
Originally posted by No coincidences
I give up.
Me too! Post #1 speaks for itself
Comment
brahmabull117
SBR Hall of Famer
11-08-10
8622
#77
Originally posted by No coincidences
They make tons of money because people like you get the juice squeezed out of you .
I'm not gonna bother arguing with you about my personal success in betting - I can show you pictures of my bankroll still at around $4000 dollars (which is nothing special at all, but it's still more than you've made probably in your entire lifetime of making $10 dollar bets) but you will just claim "I'm photoshopping it" or whatever
but that quote is exactly my point. Vegas doesn't beat the public in long term, they win because they charge a service fee in a massive industry that always inevitably evens out (IE public hitting 50%)
so what side the books are on, what side the public is on, etc... none of that means anything. If the public is massively on one side of a play, that just means it has a 50% chance to cover...aka worthless information
Comment
Sunde91
SBR Hall of Famer
11-26-09
8325
#78
Funny that the whole notion of "sharps" is largely a social construction that come from sites like these with loshak's show and guys like lakerboy.
We have no idea who is betting what and for how much
Point to the line movementz all you want, no one is on the inside with any meaningful info that tells you what's going on. Just sitting on a computer watching a number move, which you take an infer there is someone who does have info
Show me confirmed "sharp" (anti-public/RLM) plays that win even 52.38% of the time over a sample of 300+ plays
What matters most is beating the closer and minimizing house edge/maximizing your advantage
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#79
Originally posted by brahmabull117
I'm not gonna bother arguing with you about my personal success in betting - I can show you pictures of my bankroll still at around $4000 dollars (which is nothing special at all, but it's still more than you've made probably in your entire lifetime of making $10 dollar bets) but you will just claim "I'm photoshopping it" or whatever
but that quote is exactly my point. Vegas doesn't beat the public in long term, they win because they charge a service fee in a massive industry that always inevitably evens out (IE public hitting 50%)
so what side the books are on, what side the public is on, etc... none of that means anything. If the public is massively on one side of a play, that just means it has a 50% chance to cover...aka worthless information
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#80
Originally posted by Sunde91
Funny that the whole notion of "sharps" is largely a social construction that come from sites like these with loshak's show and guys like lakerboy
You have no idea who is betting what and for how much
Point to the line movementz all you want, you aren't on the inside with any meaningful info that tells you what's going on
Show me confirmed "sharp" (anti-public/RLM) plays that win even 52.38% of the time over a sample of 300+ plays
What matters most is beating the closer and minimizing house edge/maximizing your advantage
Agree on all counts except ignoring line movement, which I believe can be a useful tool in your arsenal. Not the end-all be-all mind you, but not something you just discount like brahma.
I think the mistake anti-line movement people make is assuming pro-line movement bettors expect RLM to hit 100% of the time. They exaggerate that point to feel more secure about ignoring that aspect of capping, or exaggerate how much people who follow line movement rely on that and that alone.
There is no "sharp" or "square" bet -- only winning bets and losing bets.
Comment
brahmabull117
SBR Hall of Famer
11-08-10
8622
#81
Originally posted by Sunde91
Funny that the whole notion of "sharps" is largely a social construction that come from sites like these with loshak's show and guys like lakerboy
You have no idea who is betting what and for how much
Point to the line movementz all you want, you aren't on the inside with any meaningful info that tells you what's going on
Show me confirmed "sharp" (anti-public/RLM) plays that win even 52.38% of the time over a sample of 300+ plays
What matters most is beating the closer and minimizing house edge/maximizing your advantage
he's a pseudo sharp
he thinks he's getting some sort of a huge advantage by studying line movements 10 hours a day and playing nothing but anti public plays every week
Comment
k13
SBR Posting Legend
07-16-10
18130
#82
Originally posted by Sunde91
Show me confirmed "sharp" (anti-public/RLM) plays that win even 52.38% of the time over a sample of 300+ plays
I am going to show you that tomorrow.
Sample size of 450 +
Comment
brahmabull117
SBR Hall of Famer
11-08-10
8622
#83
Originally posted by No coincidences
There is no "sharp" or "square" bet -- only winning bets and losing bets.
now something we can finally agree on
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#84
Originally posted by brahmabull117
he's a pseudo sharp
he thinks he's getting some sort of a huge advantage by studying line movements 10 hours a day and playing nothing but anti public plays every week
Show me one post that indicates I believe I am a "sharp" bettor or that there even is such thing.
I dare you.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#85
Originally posted by brahmabull117
now something we can finally agree on
There are also educated and uneducated bettors.
You have gaping holes in your theories and understanding of how sports betting works.
Comment
brahmabull117
SBR Hall of Famer
11-08-10
8622
#86
Originally posted by No coincidences
Show me one post that indicates I believe I am a "sharp" bettor or that there even is such thing. I dare you.
stop acting stupid
you're the guy who wants nothing to do with favorites 90% of the time, you'll play the ugliest damn dogs around...but the #1 team in the country getting 5 points...nah no way you can play that, there's way too much public support to play that right??
Comment
Sunde91
SBR Hall of Famer
11-26-09
8325
#87
Line movment is useful yeah. You can anticipate where a line will go so you can beat it. I feel better about being on RLM side than not
Would all those who bet Bama still have bet it if the public were on them big? That's where I think it gets ridiculous if the answer is no
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#88
Originally posted by brahmabull117
stop acting stupid
you're the guy who wants nothing to do with favorites 90% of the time, you'll play the ugliest damn dogs around...but the #1 team in the country getting 5 points...nah no way you can play that, there's way too much public support to play that right??
How does that make me a "sharp" or pseudo-"sharp" -- especially when I have never in my life claimed to have believed either or the idea in general? Where or why are you jumping to that conclusion?
The fact that you find it offensive that I win playing a lot of dogs and + numbers is hilarious. Are you intimidated by that or something?
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#89
Originally posted by Sunde91
Would all those who bet Bama still have bet it if the public were on them big? That's where I think it gets ridiculous if the answer is no
Hard to say -- I'm a huge home bettor so my answer would be yes personally.
Comment
brahmabull117
SBR Hall of Famer
11-08-10
8622
#90
Originally posted by No coincidences
How does that make me a "sharp" or pseudo-"sharp" -- especially when I have never in my life claimed to have believed either or the idea in general? Where or why are you jumping to that conclusion?
The fact that you find it offensive that I win playing a lot of dogs and + numbers is hilarious. Are you intimidated by that or something?
why would I be intimidated by that??
It's just baffling to me how a guy who loves to play dogs wants nothing to do with the #1 team in the country getting 5 points
it's like a guy who loves steak but wants nothing to do with one of those Kobe Beef Filet Mignon steaks that taste like heaven
Comment
brahmabull117
SBR Hall of Famer
11-08-10
8622
#91
Originally posted by Sunde91
Would all those who bet Bama still have bet it if the public were on them big? That's where I think it gets ridiculous if the answer is no
of course not, are you really even asking this???
Comment
thechaoz
SBR Posting Legend
10-23-09
12154
#92
I'd just like to say that was a very boring game ...throw the damn ball for christs sake
Comment
lakerboy
SBR Aristocracy
04-02-09
94463
#93
Originally posted by Sunde91
Line movment is useful yeah. You can anticipate where a line will go so you can beat it. I feel better about being on RLM side than not
Would all those who bet Bama still have bet it if the public were on them big? That's where I think it gets ridiculous if the answer is no
I took bama based on my opinion that they would get it done at home. i honestly had no clue who the public was on. i was happy that i beat the closer as that is my aim on most bets. if you beat the closer you win more than you lose
Comment
hawley
SBR Posting Legend
05-10-10
14270
#94
Originally posted by brahmabull117
why would I be intimidated by that??
It's just baffling to me how a guy who loves to play dogs wants nothing to do with the #1 team in the country getting 5 points
it's like a guy who loves steak but wants nothing to do with one of those Kobe Beef Filet Mignon steaks that taste like heaven
You would feature regularly in a leader board for stupidest comparisons and things said on this forum.
Comment
brahmabull117
SBR Hall of Famer
11-08-10
8622
#95
Originally posted by lakerboy
I took bama based on my opinion that they would get it done at home.
stop pretending
you know nothing about college football (which you have admitted yourself), you probably couldn't name 5 players on Bama without googling it...yet I'm supposed to believe that you, a guy who takes underdogs like 90% of the time, took an anti public home favorite because "you believed they would get it done"???
Comment
lakerboy
SBR Aristocracy
04-02-09
94463
#96
Originally posted by brahmabull117
stop pretending
you know nothing about college football (which you have admitted yourself), you probably couldn't name 5 players on Bama without googling it...yet I'm supposed to believe that you, a guy who takes underdogs like 90% of the time, took an anti public home favorite because "you believed they would get it done"???
yes. i had no clue who the public was on. i bet this game cause i thought bama would get it done. if you look at all the college plays i have made this year alot of them are lesser known schools or more obscure games. If i was fading the public in ncaaf this year i would be buried.
im up 37 units in the NCAA and hitting 58%.
Comment
BigDeem5
SBR Posting Legend
02-26-11
17191
#97
LSU + the points was never really in question. Alabama hasn't played the tough schedule and no one is a better coach than Les Miles
Comment
TheMoneyShot
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
02-14-07
28690
#98
Sharp and Square were so misused in this thread... it cracks me up.
P.F. You need to stop patting yourself on the back with your Bengay.
Take your Geritol in the morning... and we'll see what NFL plays you come up with.
Im not Sharp but am a firm believer that LSU was going to win the BCS Championship game this year.. This is the second time this season LSU has gotten points.. First time was opening weekend against the Ducks when they played at home +3 and +140 ML.. I jumped on LSU simply cause they were getting the points. Don't need to be a sharp to make a decision like that
Was on LSU +6 made this bet like 13 days before the game when it opened up a extra week early on my book at +6.. went down to +4 and back up to +5.5 right before kickoff. My book had it circled till it hit +4.. I also jumped on the ML +180.. Had to wait tho, came out around +165 and it hit +190.. Also hit the 2H +3.5... LSU Cash some serious coin tonight for me and a lot of others..
look you fxckin idiot, you beat the closing line you are sharp. that is why lsu +6 is a sharp play. over the long haul, you will profit in the margins. go back go your crib
Comment
Romanov
SBR MVP
10-08-10
4137
#101
Originally posted by brahmabull117
stop pretending you know nothing about college football (which you have admitted yourself), you probably couldn't name 5 players on Bama without googling it...yet I'm supposed to believe that you, a guy who takes underdogs like 90% of the time, took an anti public home favorite because "you believed they would get it done"???
you don't have to know all the names if your computer does it for you
Comment
stevenash
Moderator
01-17-11
66093
#102
Originally posted by TheMoneyShot
Sharp and Square were so misused in this thread... it cracks me up.
P.F. You need to stop patting yourself on the back with your Bengay.
Take your Geritol in the morning... and we'll see what NFL plays you come up with.