I'm proud to have suffered the worst moose in gambling history

priskilla22 · 10-10-11, 07:54 PM

What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.

If you had the over tonight, never complain about another moose.

frizzelli · 10-10-11, 07:55 PM

How about you start another 16 useless threads.

Dirty Sanchez · 10-10-11, 07:56 PM

Originally posted by frizzelli

How about you start another 16 useless threads.

iifold · 10-10-11, 07:56 PM

it was 3-3..

if tigers score one in top of inning, and rangers tie it in the bottom, you would have tied...

It was a bad beat, but not the worst... not even close...

priskilla22 · 10-10-11, 07:56 PM

Originally posted by frizzelli

How about you start another 16 useless threads.

How about you take your 3 inch chode and keep jerking it to gay porn and leave this thread.

priskilla22 · 10-10-11, 07:57 PM

Originally posted by iifold

it was 3-3..

if tigers score one in top of inning, and rangers tie it in the bottom, you would have tied...

It was a bad beat, but not the worst... not even close...

It was by far the worst. The only way I lose when the bottom of the inning started is a walk off grand slam, and it has never happened before in the history of baseball.

DrStale · 10-10-11, 07:57 PM

Yeah seriously if this is your worst beat youre not a gambler. I was on the under as well and it was a pretty bad beat but I have suffered many worse.

spankie · 10-10-11, 07:58 PM

I just lost too, but I chalked it up as a loss when they went to extra innings.

I knew it was done.

puff.

SASH · 10-10-11, 07:59 PM

Originally posted by frizzelli

How about you start another 16 useless threads.

LMAO. So true

Holtgetsback · 10-10-11, 08:03 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

Yeah seriously if this is your worst beat youre not a gambler. I was on the under as well and it was a pretty bad beat but I have suffered many worse.

Double Bogey · 10-10-11, 08:05 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

Yeah seriously if this is your worst beat youre not a gambler. I was on the under as well and it was a pretty bad beat but I have suffered many worse.

hawley · 10-10-11, 08:05 PM

tough beat Kerrywood.

CarpeDime · 10-10-11, 08:05 PM

prisser come on pal

bad beat yes

worst in gambling history? Isn't even worst MLB extra innings under-turned-over beat in last two weeks pal.......

Far far far less of a bad beat than the people who had under 8.5 in that 7-6 LA/Arizona game that was 1-1 after 9 pal

Sept 27th pal, look it up

still, it was a tough beat i do know your pain

LLXC · 10-10-11, 08:06 PM

The odds are no where near that bad...

VegasInsider · 10-10-11, 08:07 PM

thats a kick in the rooster.

im sure you'll suffer something worse. when you think it cant get any worse, it does.

tcpugh5 · 10-10-11, 08:08 PM

Originally posted by CarpeDime

prisser come on pal

bad beat yes

worst in gambling history? Isn't even worst MLB extra innings under-turned-over beat in last two weeks pal.......

Far far far less of a bad beat than the people who had under 8.5 in that 7-6 LA/Arizona game that was 1-1 after 9 pal

Sept 27th pal, look it up

still, it was a tough beat i do know your pain

O/U How many times this guy says pal in a day.

big joe 1212 · 10-10-11, 08:08 PM

congrats on your loss

teaserpleaser · 10-10-11, 08:09 PM

Originally posted by frizzelli

How about you start another 16 useless threads.

Avenger · 10-10-11, 08:09 PM

Originally posted by priskilla22

It was by far the worst. The only way I lose when the bottom of the inning started is a walk off grand slam, and it has never happened before in the history of baseball.

Never? I'm thinking of a Cub's game with Zambrano pitching and THE PITCHER hit a grand slam to win the game. The over hit.

Anyone remember this game? Too lazy to look it up.

Tough beat. It happens. Won the over but lost the Tiger's parlay, which hurt a lot more, cuz it looks like it will hit.

nosniboR11 · 10-10-11, 08:13 PM

damit carpe, do not ever mention that damn game again, just when we were becoming friends, you have to stab me in the back again

opie1988 · 10-10-11, 08:25 PM

What an awesome fukkin' win!! Fukk yeah!!!!!!

pokernut9999 · 10-10-11, 08:26 PM

Really the second walk off grand slam in the playoffs , the first only counted as a single.Mets versus Braves years ago the batter never went to second base after hitting a slam as was credited with only a single.I needed all the runs for the over and lost when they did not credit the Mets with all 4. Lost the under 9.5 today with this slam .....How lucky have I been ?

hawley · 10-10-11, 08:30 PM

Will you be charging back this loss KW?

priskilla22 · 10-10-11, 08:31 PM

I don't think you guys understand that they have been playing playoff baseball for a long, long, long, long, long time and it has never happened.

DrStale · 10-10-11, 08:34 PM

Originally posted by priskilla22

I don't think you guys understand that they have been playing playoff baseball for a long, long, long, long, long time and it has never happened.

The odds of it never having happened until now are pretty ridiculous too, so your argument is irrelevant. When the game went into extras there were still plenty of ways to lose. When the Rangers loaded the bases with Cruz at the plate there was certainly a possibility he was going to hit one out.

pokernut9999 · 10-10-11, 08:35 PM

Originally posted by priskilla22

I don't think you guys understand that they have been playing playoff baseball for a long, long, long, long, long time and it has never happened.

The Grand Slam Single is a reference to the hit that ended Game 5 of the 1999 National League Championship Series between the New York Mets and one of their biggest rivals, Atlanta Braves. The game was played on October 17, 1999 at Shea Stadium.The game was tied 2-2 going into the top of the 15th inning, until Mets pitcher Octavio Dotel gave up an RBI triple to Keith Lockhart, giving the Braves a 3-2 lead.In the bottom of the 15th inning, the Mets loaded the bases against Braves relief pitcher Kevin McGlinchy. Mets catcher Todd Pratt drew a bases loaded walk, tying the score 3-3.The next batter was Mets third baseman Robin Ventura. Ventura crushed the 2-1 pitch over the wall in right-center for an ostensible grand slam, winning the game for the Mets and driving the Mets players and fans into a frenzied celebration. Ventura, however, never reached second base as Todd Pratt, the runner who was on first, picked up Ventura in celebration. Subsequently, Ventura was mobbed by his teammates, never finishing his trot around the bases. Because he failed to touch all four bases, the hit was officially scored a single. Roger Cedeno, the runner on third at the time, was ruled the only runner to have crossed home plate before the on-field celebration began and the Mets were awarded a 4-3 victory. Thus, Ventura was only credited with a single and one RBI. As a result, there had never been an official walk-off grand slam in MLB postseason history until Nelson Cruz hit one to allow the Texas Rangers to beat the Detroit Tigers 7-3 in Game 2 of the American League Championship Series on October 10, 2011.

Jonah · 10-10-11, 08:37 PM

You must not bet basketball

ebbearsfb1 · 10-10-11, 08:39 PM

Originally posted by priskilla22

It was by far the worst. The only way I lose when the bottom of the inning started is a walk off grand slam, and it has never happened before in the history of baseball.

you must not of been on toledo this year, when the ref missed the call

or on utah + 8.5, when they had a blocked kick.. final 17-14 only to be changed to 23-14

could go on for days

priskilla22 · 10-10-11, 08:41 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

The odds of it never having happened until now are pretty ridiculous too, so your argument is irrelevant. When the game went into extras there were still plenty of ways to lose. When the Rangers loaded the bases with Cruz at the plate there was certainly a possibility he was going to hit one out.

The chances all 4 batters of the bottom of the 11th reach base? The chances Cruz hits it out on a 1-2 pitch?

They weren't good.

The chances of losing in the bottom of the 11th were less than 1%.

DrStale · 10-10-11, 08:52 PM

If the Tigers would have scored 1 and then the Rangers hit a 3 run shot you would be saying the same thing right now. Was it very unlikely they would lose in that specific way? Of course. But there was definitely a possibility of losing the entire time. I was never confident in that under.

Hell Holland got away with some terrible pitching early on, he could have given up 6 runs easy, so you could argue over bettors were unlucky there.

priskilla22 · 10-10-11, 09:03 PM

It was a tough beat. Very tough. In fact, when it went to 0-2 on Cruz, it was even less likely for a grand slam. He took a full swing surprisingly.

DrStale · 10-10-11, 09:10 PM

I think youre completely forgetting that right before he hit it he crushed a pitch just to the left of the foul pole that also would have been a grand slam. It's a loss, and there are far worse.

laclippers504 · 10-10-11, 09:11 PM

Not that bad man. You're just basing it on those circumstances....if game would have gone deeper circumstances would have been different

priskilla22 · 10-10-11, 09:14 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

I think youre completely forgetting that right before he hit it he crushed a pitch just to the left of the foul pole that also would have been a grand slam. It's a loss, and there are far worse.

They've been playing postseason baseball since what? 1890 or so? And it has NEVER happened.

This is one of the worst.

But irregardless, I doubled down on the Bears +7.5 so we will find out whether this beat hurts me.