-
Comment -
And what if you can't differentiate between a 70% and a 60%? What if all you knew was this play was a 70% play, and the other play is unknown (so say 50%).
Because that's the way it is with me. I only know 70% plays. I don't know 60% plays. Therefore, your strategy wouldn't work with me (the one who can find 70% plays) or you (the one who can't find 70% plays)
Fail againComment -
1. I bet ML favorites? The avg ML of the teams I bet on so far is -103 and last year it + something.
Strike 1
2. I've counted every loss I had regardless of injury
Strike 2
3. It's been proven and documented that I actually do put real money on games (though it's not clear how much) and the 70% is also documented
Strike 3!
You're out!
One of the biggest fail posts I've seen
Where has this been proven. Link please. Or else post a screen shot of a bet you have made.
Or.... GTFO
Comment -
SSK:
There has NEVER been any proof or documentation of your ficticious 70% win rate.
I'll never understand why you feel the need to outright lie to everyone posting in this forum in a pathetic attempt to build yourself up.
You have serious self-esteem issues.
If you're willing to bet using regular spreads, I would be willing to wager up to $10,000 that you can NOT pick 60% winners let alone 70% if you're willing to make at least 100 selections over say a 12 month period. I would trust either Bill Dozer or Lou to hold the funds.
If you can truly pick 70% winners as you claim, then you should jump all over this.Comment -
Of course I would take that bet. I bet someone last year I could hit 70%. And I did hit 70%. And guess what, the person also said yes you hit 70%.
But why the f*uck would I take that bet with you? You are outright saying I didn't hit 70% last year when I did, so what makes me think that this time when I hit 70% again you will admit I hit 70%? At the end, after I hit 70% or 80%, you will just say I lie and say I didn't.
Bottom-line, I don't bet with people who lie. As far as taking bets to hit 70%? Did so last year, and won it.Comment -
Okay so let me get this straight. You are saying you can hit 70% long-term on your POTW selections?
Do you understand the logic coming from you? 1st you say it's impossible to hit 70% long-term. And now, when arguing between a selective 70% long-term rate vs. a less-selective 60% long-term rate, you are using your POTW selections as an argument?
Contradiction at its finest
Come on Scott, smarten upComment -
Still waiting for that screen shot...Comment -
Okay so let me get this straight. You are saying you can hit 70% long-term on your POTW selections?
Do you understand the logic coming from you? 1st you say it's impossible to hit 70% long-term. And now, when arguing between a selective 70% long-term rate vs. a less-selective 60% long-term rate, you are using your POTW selections as an argument?
Contradiction at its finest
Come on Scott, smarten up
Last year it was 70%, it won't always be that good for me. But then, you won't finish over 70% either every year. I HIGHLY doubt you would hit >60% over 50 plays.Comment -
Your fairy tales are indeed entertaining and you are very persistent in spinning them, hence the size of this thread.
"I don't post screen shots because the FBI might figure out who I am"
SSK, if spinning these fairy tales of you picking 70% winners and calling yourself a "God" makes you feel better about yourself, then have at it.
However, NOBODY on this forum will ever take you seriously.Comment -
So SSK went from wanting respect for about a 24 hour period, back to his delusional self. He just can't stay away.Comment -
Who in their sane mind would let this thread get lost in the second page...
Worthless haters...Comment -
wtf is going on here? I wasted 5 minutes went back 5 pages of garbage and no picks, no record, whats is the deal here?
Does anyone post plays anymore?
ssk you need to send me some points for compensation.Comment -
No this thread is done. I will make a new thread soon (today or tomorrow), and be focusing on picks instead of all this hater BS. It's time to make some $$$Comment -
Did you make any plays this past week?Comment -
Maybe I should make seperate threads for ATS and ML, so then there will be no reason to post 5-8 and only great records like 100% ATS or 75% ML will be postedComment -
ssk 2011 record
38%
down over 300 units if you include nba
and phillybadboy has given ssk at least 300 blowjobsComment -
[quote=boeing power;11622119]ssk 2011 record 38% down over 300 units if you include nba and phillybadboy has given ssk at least 300 blowjobs[/quote]
Funny how phillybadbody only backs scrubs like ssk, henryhill, crustyme airbetting style posters.
Comment -
It's fine to display net units. But no one keeps track of their parlay or teaser record. 1-100 record of a parlay could be better than a 100-1 record. So what does a teaser/parlay record really indicate?
And it's even worse when you mix it with ATS and ML
Like I said, pure stupid. But no way can you include a parlay/teaser record in a thread dedicated to ATS. So please don't force me to make a separate thread for just ATS or ML.Comment -
you would include them if they were winning
now shut the fuk upComment -
SSK you are burying meComment
