sick beat... is it legit call by SBGGlobal?

[stats13]

I took over on over 15.5 pts + assists for Bibby + Chalmers, -150

Chalmers had like 18 pts and 6 assists

Bibby's sorry ass sat the bench the entire game

They ruled it NO ACTION because Bibby didn't play (all players must play)... he suited up, just was a coaches decision not to play him

I mean thats some horseshit aint it, i wonder if they cancelled the bets that had the UNDER

[nosniboR11]

that is sick

[ChileCheese]

I took over on over 15.5 pts + assists for Bibby + Chalmers, -150

Chalmers had like 18 pts and 6 assists

Bibby's sorry ass sat the bench the entire game

They ruled it NO ACTION because Bibby didn't play (all players must play)... he suited up, just was a coaches decision not to play him

I mean thats some horseshit aint it, i wonder if they cancelled the bets that had the UNDER

You got Fukked buddy.
If your bet would have lost, they would of cited Bibby as dressing up as the reason it counts.

[SBR Lou]

Hi stats,

Shoot the details via sportsbook complaint form.

[Djstucky]

Sounds like bull$hit...Should be a win...

[stats13]

Hi stats,

You have a legit beef here unless SBG spelled out what 'playing' constitutes. He was active for tonight's game.

Shoot the details via sportsbook complaint form.

thanks, done!

[Jrod124]

yeah but interesting if someone had the under for this prop. I had the over also and was graded a loss

[Halifax]

Graded correctly.

Many books have this rule, and "playing" means actually getting into the game for some period of time ... sitting on the bench is not considered "playing".

[dzzznutz]

shit move thats a w

[ttwarrior1]

usually have to play, not be active. Its not a complaint.

[Kaabee]

it sucks, but the ruling seems correct, as long as they are grading the unders the same way.

[stats13]

M. Bibby DNP - COACH'S DECISION

per nba.com

[Jrod124]

I had the over and it should be a push. Just curious if anyone had the under and got their money back

[stats13]

seriously tho why the **** did bibby not get a single minute tonight? LOL

[donkdown]

Hi stats,

You have a legit beef here unless SBG spelled out what 'playing' constitutes. He was active for tonight's game.

Shoot the details via sportsbook complaint form.

No he doesnt sweet lou read the ******* rules!! If 1 of the guy's doesnt play it is no action PERIOD!! quit trashing sbg cuz your friends got screwed sir!! They have paid me over 200k in the past 6 yrs!! U had BetEd rated higher then sbg b4 they up and ran with all the players money!! Thats the beef that should be investigated Sweet Lou!!

[Jrod124]

seriously tho why the **** did bibby not get a single minute tonight? LOL

Seriously man, one of the worst beats of the year for me

[stats13]

I tilted on casino blackjack and won back more than this bet would have won me, so i'm kinda not too pissed but i still am.

i get that by the rules, most techincally, they might be right but i might too because it was a coaches decision and he dressed up. plus there are 2 ******* guys in my bet, not just 1. weaksauce.

screw sbg anyway, the right thing to do woulda been to give it to me as a decent customer. it wouldnt have broken their bank.

i'm done with them after this money runs out or is withdrawn or whatevs.

[stats13]

i also wonder how quick they woulda instalossed me if i had the under

you know tons of people did have the over if it got bet up to -150

[mtneer1212]

Do the rules state that both player must play, be eligible to play, be active....... whatever...... that is the determining factor. If it was not listed, then you have a beef.

[donkdown]

stats call and talk to oscar or i will on your behalf i have a better chance than sbr bto get u the cash trust me

[donkdown]

they 100% both have to play for action

[Jive]

This is one of those pushes that linger, but SBG made the correct call by their rules it seems. I am sure they will tell you that they grade it that way to protect players from late scratches. Not that this is true, but that is what they will tell you.

[stats13]

This is one of those pushes that linger, but SBG made the correct call by their rules it seems. I am sure they will tell you that they grade it that way to protect players from late scratches. Not that this is true, but that is what they will tell you.

except no one got scratched. to me, a guy who DNP via coaches decision counts as "played" for a bet. I mean, if i was on the losing side and pushed due to that, i'd feel incredibly lucky

[raydog]

I tilted on casino blackjack and won back more than this bet would have won me, so i'm kinda not too pissed but i still am.

i get that by the rules, most techincally, they might be right but i might too because it was a coaches decision and he dressed up. plus there are 2 ******* guys in my bet, not just 1. weaksauce.

screw sbg anyway, the right thing to do woulda been to give it to me as a decent customer. it wouldnt have broken their bank.

i'm done with them after this money runs out or is withdrawn or whatevs.

cmon guy...this is fukking stupid...you think the right thing for them to do is pay you on the bet when the bet clearly states both players must play... it never ceases to amaze me what goes on in the mind of gamblers...always feel like the book owes them something...

[Kaabee]

DNP should count as played because it was coach's decision? not quite.

[dzzznutz]

I tilted on casino blackjack and won back more than this bet would have won me, so i'm kinda not too pissed but i still am.

i get that by the rules, most techincally, they might be right but i might too because it was a coaches decision and he dressed up. plus there are 2 ******* guys in my bet, not just 1. weaksauce.

screw sbg anyway, the right thing to do woulda been to give it to me as a decent customer. it wouldnt have broken their bank.

i'm done with them after this money runs out or is withdrawn or whatevs.

damn how did you win blackjack, i constantly get robbed on these sites blow all my sports winnings

[donkdown]

if this bet was offered by any of the books on the top of this page it would of been graded the same way!!

[Extra Innings]

no action

[Jrod124]

yeah congrats on winning at BJ at Global. Have lost $100 in there already I think I will steer clear of the online casino

[blix177]

Dude if they suit up, and can play your are action regardless of their time on the court.

[Extra Innings]

Dude if they suit up, and can play your are action regardless of their time on the court.

not usually the case

[iQon]

Dude if they suit up, and can play your are action regardless of their time on the court.

False. Player props are made under the assumption that the player(s) will actually get onto the court. You always need at least one play for action. In some cases, it will specify that the player has to start. DNP is an automatic push. That's a universal rule.

It's just a bad beat. I also took a Bibby (solo) prop as soon as they confirmed Chalmers would start. It was practically a freeroll since Spoelstra clearly removed him from the rotation in Game 5. Obvious bet was taking the Under and hoping for a blow out either way where he'd get garbage minutes. Almost happened.

[Conan]

ya that sucks id say if they call no action for the unders as well though its fair as there rules are there rules

[Maniac]

I would say DNP, meaning Did Not Play would mean that for all purposes he Did Not Play, and therefore a push should be the correct call here as most books have a "Must Play for Action" rule - just because he is dressed to play, doesnt mean anything if he didnt get on the court, in exactly the same way a substitute player in Soccer doesnt get counted as playing if he never makes it off the bench - that is the coaches decision as well (even with limited substitutions allowed).

However, this Push should apply to ALL bets - so all Over bets and all Under bets need to be pushed - if they have done anything different, such as void the Overs and grade the Unders as losses, then there is a legitimate complaint, but sadly here I think this is just a bad beat, though would be interesting if we can find anyone who has backed the under there to confirm it was settled as a Push also...

[wtt0315]

yep its a crap book anyways