Mavs have a 2-16 record in playoff games officiated by Crawford

ryanjep · 04-19-11, 02:37 PM

that is a really weird stat. how far back do those games go.

Dexter · 04-19-11, 02:41 PM

wow...coincidence?

sparkyasu · 04-19-11, 02:42 PM

back to 2001, since mark cuban bought the team

Mavs 2-16 in playoff games ref Crawford works

http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nba/news/story?id=6388692

As far as Dallas conspiracy theories go, referee Danny Crawford working Mavericks playoff games ranks right up there with who shot J.R. Ewing.

Roxxyfish · 04-19-11, 02:42 PM

what a fukkin bullshit i bet on a basketball team not on a ref

Originally posted by Dexter

wow...coincidence?

ohnevah · 04-19-11, 02:50 PM

time to pound portland...

Spartan14745 · 04-19-11, 02:51 PM

Originally posted by Roxxyfish

what a fukkin bullshit i bet on a basketball team not on a ref

Tell that to all the people that lost 16 times in betting on the Mavs in those playoff games. Great stat sparky!

clip1 · 04-19-11, 02:52 PM

Originally posted by Roxxyfish

what a fukkin bullshit i bet on a basketball team not on a ref

and then you wonder why you loose?start betting refs, problem solved

MonkeyF0cker · 04-19-11, 02:56 PM

Yeah. But were all of those games played on a Tuesday?!?! I think not.

ShogunRua · 04-19-11, 02:56 PM

Guy has an epic hatred for the Mavs...

kidkonggolf · 04-19-11, 03:04 PM

Not changing my play...ref or not, Mavs COVER again tonite!
BOL

thezbar · 04-19-11, 03:56 PM

Based on this stat I played Mavs Under 16 made free throws for the game.

Smoke · 04-19-11, 04:31 PM

plus roxxerfish is on dallas..........

and he's a horrible capper...

Portland it is..

sparkyasu · 04-19-11, 04:43 PM

espn is giving this a lot of coverage, Im starting to think Stern is gonna talk to crawford to make sure dallas gets a W so the bad press stops

thadchr · 04-19-11, 04:52 PM

Originally posted by sparkyasu

espn is giving this a lot of coverage, Im starting to think Stern is gonna talk to crawford to make sure dallas gets a W so the bad press stops

Wondering that as well...

THE HITMAN · 04-19-11, 04:53 PM

This sure is an interesting stat/trend

PacmanJr_00 · 04-19-11, 04:55 PM

Originally posted by sparkyasu

espn is giving this a lot of coverage, Im starting to think Stern is gonna talk to crawford to make sure dallas gets a W so the bad press stops

Not likly, as this problem with DC has received press many times since 2006. It didn't stop DC last year against the Spurs when the crew blew TWO crucial calls or the year before that when DEN shot 30+ FTs to Mavs 13.

thadchr · 04-19-11, 04:56 PM

I went and referenced "Personal Foul" (Tim Donaghy's 2009 book shortly the whole betting scandal), and found:

(page 108)

Referee Danny Crawford also had little affection for Mark Cuban, and bragged that since 2001, the Maverick's were 1-15 when he worked their playoff games. One more tidbit of information for my mental rolodex of referees to watch when making my picks.

Just thought that was a piece of info worth adding.

str · 04-19-11, 04:59 PM

If espn was looking for controversy, they got it.

No matter what the outcome,it will be a story.

hanco21 · 04-19-11, 05:25 PM

since it is very publicized on ESPN dont be suprised if Dallas wins.

ManBearPig · 04-19-11, 05:27 PM

Originally posted by thadchr

I went and referenced "Personal Foul" (Tim Donaghy's 2009 book shortly the whole betting scandal), and found: (page 108) Just thought that was a piece of info worth adding.

I think this goes in line with when he said that he could pick games simply based on who was reffing them alone and hit at a really high rate. I bet he or his mob friends made some good money off of said games for sure.

I would love to play DAL to be contrarian here but just don't like the vibe now with this game and think I may be better off passing all together.

CarpeDime · 04-19-11, 05:30 PM

also take into consideration, there was a big disparity in fouls in favor of dallas in game 1, port coach mcmillan complained and got a 35K fine

I think you will see a good amount of fouls on dallas in this game - maybe port tt over? 90 is pretty low

Br0nxer · 04-19-11, 05:31 PM

nba's fixed

how could mavs be 2-16 with crawford officiating

probably has a grudge against cuban

Smoke · 04-19-11, 05:33 PM

Originally posted by Br0nxer

nba's fixed

how could mavs be 2-16 with crawford officiating

probably has a grudge against cuban

CarpeDime · 04-19-11, 05:38 PM

Originally posted by Br0nxer

nba's fixed

how could mavs be 2-16 with crawford officiating

probably has a grudge against cuban

yes nba is fixed which is why it can be so great to bet sometimes

Br0nxer · 04-19-11, 05:38 PM

guarantee crawford and the other two will be in ref locker room before the game laughing about the 2-16

calling there fukkin bets in

NBA is fixed.

Tons of weird and questionable calls on a daily basis

great sport to watch but not bet

Roxxyfish · 04-19-11, 05:38 PM

horrible 75% capper u broke clown

Originally posted by Smoke

plus roxxerfish is on dallas.......... and he's a horrible capper...

Portland it is..

Git Lo · 04-19-11, 05:40 PM

So follow the trend or no play right?

Inkwell77 · 04-19-11, 05:40 PM

The over might be the best play, but picking a side here is crazy! Lots of fouls with these two teams = over.

Greekster · 04-19-11, 05:47 PM

I have to laugh at some of you guys saying the NBA if fixed and now youre basing your pick based on that 2-16 stat. If there was a fix in, shouldnt the record be 0-16?

Vegas must love guys like you. If the Mavs win tonight, what will you guys say? I bet you will continue to say there is a bias and the record is 3-16. No wait, even better, if the Mavs win by only 2, you guys who lost will say that Crawford had something to do with that.

Gamblers who lose always have excuses...the fix is in, the mob, bias, blah blah blah blah blah.

CarpeDime · 04-19-11, 05:49 PM

Originally posted by Br0nxer

guarantee crawford and the other two will be in ref locker room before the game laughing about the 2-16

calling there fukkin bets in

NBA is fixed.

Tons of weird and questionable calls on a daily basis

great sport to watch but not bet

awesome

i wonder if these refs can keep from laughing WHEN they are calling in their bets

the bookies are like "um......sure I can give you mavs -3.5.........what's so funny?"

and the refs are like "

nothing, nothing,ummmmm.......

yeah, yeah let me get mavs -3.5! BWHAHAHAHAHAH!!!"

and the bookie's like "

ok dude.........mavs -3.5......

..........."

unbelievable

Br0nxer · 04-19-11, 05:49 PM

Originally posted by Greekster

I have to laugh at some of you guys saying the NBA if fixed and now youre basing your pick based on that 2-16 stat. If there was a fix in, shouldnt the record be 0-16?

Vegas must love guys like you. If the Mavs win tonight, what will you guys say? I bet you will continue to say there is a bias and the record is 3-16. No wait, even better, if the Mavs win by only 2, you guys who lost will say that Crawford had something to do with that.

Gamblers who lose always have excuses...the fix is in, the mob, bias, blah blah blah blah blah.

if you dont think the nba is fixed than you dont have a clue

not just talking about the 2-16 in question tonight

there are 25 calls every postseason that are very weird.

the sh1t is fixed

Greekster · 04-19-11, 05:55 PM

Originally posted by Br0nxer

if you dont think the nba is fixed than you dont have a clue

not just talking about the 2-16 in question tonight

there are 25 calls every postseason that are very weird.

the sh1t is fixed

Um you do know, there is such a thing as human error, dont you?

Can there be fixing of games? Sure, there are all sorts of criminals out there, but who do you think brought this stat out? The one and only Mark Cuban who whines when he doesnt get his way. That stat isnt about his research, its about his paranoia.

Was the blown call the other night in Oklahoma a fix?

Dont think so. I havent decided who I am betting on this game yet, but if I take the Mavs and they lose, I am not gonna complain about Crawford. This is professional sports, guys make great plays and some make awful plays and bad calls and when it comes to gambling its a risk. Guys think they should win every wager they make cause they sit on the computer and research for hours on end. When you start thinking wagers are locks, youre ****** as a gambler.

Br0nxer · 04-19-11, 05:57 PM

Originally posted by Greekster

Um you do know, there is such a thing as human error, dont you?

Can there be fixing of games? Sure, there are all sorts of criminals out there, but who do you think brought this stat out? The one and only Mark Cuban who whines when he doesnt get his way. That stat isnt about his research, its about his paranoia.

Was the blown call the other night in Oklahoma a fix?

Dont think so. I havent decided who I am betting on this game yet, but if I take the Mavs and they lose, I am not gonna complain about Crawford. This is professional sports, guys make great plays and some make awful plays and bad calls and when it comes to gambling its a risk. Guys think they should win every wager they make cause they sit on the computer and research for hours on end. When you start thinking wagers are locks, youre ****** as a gambler.

the word lock is nowhere in my post

i dont bet the nba

because i am not a mind reader on who the zebras bet

MonkeyF0cker · 04-19-11, 05:58 PM

Originally posted by Br0nxer

if you dont think the nba is fixed than you dont have a clue

not just talking about the 2-16 in question tonight

there are 25 calls every postseason that are very weird.

the sh1t is fixed

2-16?!?!?

IT HAS TO BE FIXED.

They couldn't possibly have played better teams, been on the road, or played poorly in ALL of those games!

EXPLAIN THIS, PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!