Thats what its all about.
But in all seriousness. I do not understand why a lawyer is any different than a construction worker. Both are legitimate "jobs" that a person can do for a living. Would the father be disappointed in his son becoming a lawyer over a construction worker? Would a construction worker consider a lawyer as having a job? It just seems hard to argue the fact lawyers do not do "real" work, or do not have a "real" job. There is a demand for that work and lawyers are there to satisfy the demand. Its the same with any "job". Whether it be law, construction, educating.
But in all seriousness. I do not understand why a lawyer is any different than a construction worker. Both are legitimate "jobs" that a person can do for a living. Would the father be disappointed in his son becoming a lawyer over a construction worker? Would a construction worker consider a lawyer as having a job? It just seems hard to argue the fact lawyers do not do "real" work, or do not have a "real" job. There is a demand for that work and lawyers are there to satisfy the demand. Its the same with any "job". Whether it be law, construction, educating.