better chance of being reported to IRS? 2 $2500 **'s or 5 $1K check signed 2 friend?

[jennahazeplays]

ttotally hypothetical as i pay my taxes, but a buddy of mine was curious about this. Which is more likely to be reported, two $2500 ** transfers, or 5 $1000 checks signed over to a friend of his who would cash them and give him the cash?

[Justin7]

Neither would be on the radar.

[brxbmbers42]

you're a nobody pal. they aint fukkin worried about u. ur not even on the radar. i have sent well over 200k **. never had a single issue.

[brxbmbers42]

A buddy of mine had an issue after sending 6-$5000.00 transfers in a about 10 days. other than that never heard of anyone having an issue. ** is making money.

[tltaylor89]

Banks reserve the right to report transactions at their discretion but it rarely happens because of the sheer volume of checks that range in there amount.

[DwightShrute]

A buddy of mine had an issue after sending 6-$5000.00 transfers in a about 10 days. other than that never heard of anyone having an issue. ** is making money.

he would be better of sending a bank wire if he is sending that much by **

[Bartmeister]

** is the ultimate winner with offshore gambling (as the say its not allowed, lol). They should of given us something for Christmas as we are making them millions of dollars.

[MJFtheGenius]

about a 50/50 chance for both

[brxbmbers42]

he would be better of sending a bank wire if he is sending that much by **

he is a dumb fukk who didnt know any better. told the ** agent on the 6th transfer to go fukk himself. they asked agent to put my friend on the phone. and when he got on the ** guy says why you sending so much money. and my buddy told him to go fukk himself. blacklisted from ** for life.

[DwightShrute]

he is a dumb fukk who didnt know any better. told the ** agent on the 6th transfer to go fukk himself. they asked agent to put my friend on the phone. and when he got on the ** guy says why you sending so much money. and my buddy told him to go fukk himself. blacklisted from ** for life.

sharp as a marble

[whatsgood5]

Neither would draw attention I wouldn't think, but my guess would be ** is the best bet.

[BIGDAY]

No issues there bud.

[jbrent95]

Neither but the cashed checks leave less of a paper trail.

[Pharieswheel]

Don't forget the government is making it impossible to send anything off shore, they've ****** the credit card system, and they'll **** this eventually. If the feds feel that this money is coming from offshore gaming, they'll nail you, tread lightly and have good documentation.

[brxbmbers42]

Don't forget the government is making it impossible to send anything off shore, they've ****** the credit card system, and they'll **** this eventually. If the feds feel that this money is coming from offshore gaming, they'll nail you, tread lightly and have good documentation.

Im sure ** has a senator or two in their pocket. They are making so much money from gambling transfers its not even funny.

[rake922]

[Albert Pujols]

Don't forget the government is making it impossible to send anything off shore, they've ****** the credit card system, and they'll **** this eventually. If the feds feel that this money is coming from offshore gaming, they'll nail you, tread lightly and have good documentation.

Don't be so paranoid. The government has isn't going after gamblers.

[rake922]

he is a dumb fukk who didnt know any better. told the ** agent on the 6th transfer to go fukk himself. they asked agent to put my friend on the phone. and when he got on the ** guy says why you sending so much money. and my buddy told him to go fukk himself. blacklisted from ** for life.

why was he sending 30k?

in post #4 of this thread ..You said he sent 5k, 6 times in the course of 10 days

[brxbmbers42]

why was he sending 30k?

in post #4 of this thread ..You said he sent 5k, 6 times in the course of 10 days

too bet. he is a bigshot with a lot of money. but he's stupid and didnt know their was better ways to do it.