I bet them like a blind mouse not knowing their 2 best players were suspended before tipoff.
Anyone else bet Kansas St tonight?
Collapse
X
-
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82668
#1Anyone else bet Kansas St tonight?Tags: None -
SamsNCharge99SBR Aristocracy
- 10-22-08
- 41244
#2me tooComment -
james4512SBR MVP
- 10-27-08
- 3707
#3i didnt bet them blind i checked and it still said nothing, fukking great rebels by 20Comment -
saints7011SBR Hall of Famer
- 09-21-09
- 5544
#4they were suspended literally 15 minutes before tip off , suited up and ready to play , you would think ncaa would have started the suspension with the next game...Comment -
daneault23SBR MVP
- 09-08-09
- 3877
#5I just took the under
, but KSTATE should get it goin in the 2nd half. Watchaley.
Comment -
LordVodkaSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-17-09
- 5206
#6I bet them in the 2H. Hope they come back from this but doesn't look good so far. I knew it was a bad bet too but the degen in me took over.Comment -
mlbSBR Posting Legend
- 12-04-09
- 10509
#7I took UNLVComment -
BigDofBASBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-09
- 19313
#8I did the same. I'm pissed.Comment -
LordVodkaSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-17-09
- 5206
#9I'm ******* retarded. Had them in a 2H parlay and the other team covered. Why the **** did I bet it knowing the two leading scorers were out?Comment -
PhilavanhSBR MVP
- 08-18-06
- 2800
#10Took Kansas St. as well....
Comment -
BigMoneySBR High Roller
- 10-15-07
- 149
#11I lost my ass as well, 15 mins before game time shit let em play start with next 3 gamesComment -
Willie BeeSBR Posting Legend
- 02-14-06
- 15726
#12Count me among those that had KSU last night.Comment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#13Sorry Voddy but this is quite funny.Originally posted by LordVodkaI'm ******* retarded. Had them in a 2H parlay and the other team covered. Why the **** did I bet it knowing the two leading scorers were out?
Comment -
gshock1SBR Hall of Famer
- 12-04-09
- 5367
#14Took Kansas State at -3, but bought out of it in the 2nd Half and didn't lose the juice either since UNLV was at +100.
I didn't realize that their 2 best players were out beforehand otherwise I wouldn't have pulled the trigger. Martin must be in cahoots w/ the books.
Comment -
Vol_BengalSBR Sharp
- 11-30-10
- 480
#15This. I researched this game thoroughly yesterday and really liked it. But, quite literally, they had Vitale (and his sidekick) read the press release like 10-15 minutes before the tipoff. The head coach and AD had this information when they got back Saturday night from Florida (according to the announcers last night) but didn't say a damn thing until right before tipoff... quite literally, about 5-10 minutes after I called my bet in. Lovely.Originally posted by saints7011they were suspended literally 15 minutes before tip off , suited up and ready to play , you would think ncaa would have started the suspension with the next game...
With them, Austin Peay laying 2 and winning by 1, and Northwestern just not showing up after the first 15 minutes.. 0-3. Great night.
Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82668
#16This is bullshit. All bets made prior to this announcement should have been voided. This is like 15 min before the game when the announcement was made.Comment -
firedawgBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-08-08
- 39230
#17yes
Comment -
Willie BeeSBR Posting Legend
- 02-14-06
- 15726
#18Eh, suck it up guys. You can't have basketball or football bets contingent on starting lineups.Comment -
Vol_BengalSBR Sharp
- 11-30-10
- 480
#19Really? I'm hoping you've said this tongue planted firmly in cheek. I guess I'm not saying they're contingent on them but you cap the game based on rosters, returning players, starters, etc.Originally posted by Willie BeeEh, suck it up guys. You can't have basketball or football bets contingent on starting lineups.
One team loses its best player and a second starter and the spread was less than 4 with them there... gonna change quite a bit of betting for sure.Comment -
firedawgBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-08-08
- 39230
#20
Originally posted by Vol_BengalReally? I'm hoping you've said this tongue planted firmly in cheek. I guess I'm not saying they're contingent on them but you cap the game based on rosters, returning players, starters, etc.
One team loses its best player and a second starter and the spread was less than 4 with them there... gonna change quite a bit of betting for sure.Comment -
WIZARDOFBEANTOWNSBR Posting Legend- 03-18-10
- 13389
#21That was screwed upComment -
Willie BeeSBR Posting Legend
- 02-14-06
- 15726
#22Sure, if it was known well in advance, the spread would be different. If I had known there was even a 20% chance that Pullen wouldn't play, I'd have never bet it.Originally posted by Vol_BengalReally? I'm hoping you've said this tongue planted firmly in cheek. I guess I'm not saying they're contingent on them but you cap the game based on rosters, returning players, starters, etc.
One team loses its best player and a second starter and the spread was less than 4 with them there... gonna change quite a bit of betting for sure.
But Pavy, let's say a book puts out a line based on the Wildcats starting the following players: Pullen, McGruder, Kelly, Samuels and Spradling. The line is -4. You bet them on that line. Frank Martin decides at the last minute to use Irving in place of Spradling. K-State wins, 76-71. Are you seriously telling me that you're going to be happy with the book canceling your bet?Comment -
zanman822SBR Sharp
- 06-18-10
- 322
#23I really expected a much higher scoring game last night than what it was.Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82668
#24OK Willie here is the scenario for NFL. Lets say 15 min before kickoff during warm ups 40% of the starters of the Baltimore Ravens are hit by lightning when facing the Pittsburgh Steelers. You have Ravens -3 to win the game. So the game starts and Flacco, Boldin, Ray Rice and Ray Lewis, Terrell Suggs and Ed Reed are not playing. Would you like the book to void both bets for both teams and offer new lines?Comment -
Willie BeeSBR Posting Legend
- 02-14-06
- 15726
#25You've done a great job avoiding my question by simply posing a rather outlandish scenario of your own. My guess is the book would indeed void the bet because the game would never have started. If lightning struck the stadium area -- I'm assuming the players would have been at the stadium 15 mins before kickoff -- then I have to assume the NFL would have canceled the game out of safety concerns for the rest of the players and fans.
If you can get a book to start setting wagers dependent on a basketball or football starting lineup, then more power to you Pavy. But yesterday, you made your wager based on 'action' and have no recourse for the outcome of the game now. Maybe stay away from hoops and foots until books see things your way.Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82668
#26Willie it was a lone lightning strike that came out of the blue. It didn't endanger any other players or fans. After the players went to the hospital the NFL decided since the weather was perfect and the fans were not endangered the game should proceed with the remaining players on roster. Will you like your bet to be voided? Because suspending 2 players out of the 5 starters 15 min before kickoff is the same as a lone lightning striking some players in the warmups. An unexpected event that cannot be predicted by the bettors. There is one thing the coach deciding not to start 2 players because of strategy or because of disciplinary reasons. I have seen starters being held off from first half and play in second halfs. But suspending 2 starters 15 minutes before game starts is unheard off.Comment -
onionSBR High Roller
- 12-16-10
- 126
#27I prefer Kansas -11
Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
