There really needs to be a sub-forum for SHARPS ONLY

[Odessa]

BTJ

When BTJ talks, everybody listen!

[jjgold]

This has to be the silliest idea I have ever heard of

Get rid of this guy

forums are public and trying to privatize it could get you banned

[mathdotcom]

BAUS making a solid run at December POTM

[jjgold]

One thing we frown upon are fukkin rebels trying to divide forum


Baus watch your back

[Fishhead]

BAUS making a solid run at December POTM

[bradthebloke]

this thread intimidates me

[mathdotcom]

Webber can have all the clowns like sammy on here

The rest of us are in the BAUS entourage

[TR88]

Baus your a fukkin hamburger

I was betting into weak lines before you were born

Bause here is a gambling tip..................there is no juice if you pick winners

sharp post

[TR88]

Webber can have all the clowns like sammy on here

The rest of us are in the BAUS entourage

you cant pick a winner to save ur life pal, I remembered u went all in on some hockey like 2 weeks ago and lost ur $10 in the account pal.....

[Fishhead]

The question everyone seems to be asking..........IS JJGOLD'S COMEDIC RUN COMING TO A CLOSE?

[big0mar]

Sharp forum would have to be moderated by FISHHEAD obviously

[BAUS]

You don't need to pick winners to be a winner!

BAUS

[Grits n' Gravy]

What is a sharp??

Is there any such thing?

a sharp is someone who after losing a bet attempts to justify it by saying he had the right side.

the only true sharps are the books. they are taking our money over the long term.

[Nicky Santoro]

sharp has absolutely NOTHING to do with picking winners.. trust me on this one.

ask every bookie offshore who they'd rather book...


a player that lays -110 on every game and never gets an edge on any line and is hitting 70% over the last 200 games??

OR

the player that beats them to the line moves on every game and is hitting 46% over the last 200 games??


If they had to pick, they'd keep the first guy and boot the other guy that is down money but gets the better # each time..


Reason:: The guy that is hitting 70% will eventually piss it all back and go broke, and the guy that is losing now but beating the line will eventually make a killing..


This game has NOTHING to do with picking winners. it's all about beating the #.. which will eventually make you money.. i still can't believe that there's people still out there that think they can make money by just picking winners. no one can make money picking winners. it's IMPOSSIBLE.. sports gambling is all mathematics and nothing but. not who you think will win between chi and philly??

[pavyracer]

Most winners (meaning people who actually see payouts) are not sharp. It's a simple formula for success. If you can pick winners at a high rate you will be a winner. It doesn't matter how you do it. Some people do it by getting the best line others do it with their guts and unit size by strategically unloading on certain plays where they see an edge.

[mathdotcom]

pavy how can you be on the board for so many years and still be so clueless

[pavyracer]

pavy how can you be on the board for so many years and still be so clueless

If being clueless means not letting the books cut my limits by playing it dumb in forums then I would always like to be clueless.

[BAUS]

sharp has absolutely NOTHING to do with picking winners.. trust me on this one. ask every bookie offshore who they'd rather book... a player that lays -110 on every game and never gets an edge on any line and is hitting 70% over the last 200 games?? OR the player that beats them to the line moves on every game and is hitting 46% over the last 200 games?? If they had to pick, they'd keep the first guy and boot the other guy that is down money but gets the better # each time.. Reason:: The guy that is hitting 70% will eventually piss it all back and go broke, and the guy that is losing now but beating the line will eventually make a killing.. This game has NOTHING to do with picking winners. it's all about beating the #.. which will eventually make you money.. i still can't believe that there's people still out there that think they can make money by just picking winners. no one can make money picking winners. it's IMPOSSIBLE.. sports gambling is all mathematics and nothing but. not who you think will win between chi and philly??

As usual Nicky is bang on.

BAUS

[big0mar]

sharp has absolutely NOTHING to do with picking winners.. trust me on this one. ask every bookie offshore who they'd rather book... a player that lays -110 on every game and never gets an edge on any line and is hitting 70% over the last 200 games?? OR the player that beats them to the line moves on every game and is hitting 46% over the last 200 games?? If they had to pick, they'd keep the first guy and boot the other guy that is down money but gets the better # each time.. Reason:: The guy that is hitting 70% will eventually piss it all back and go broke, and the guy that is losing now but beating the line will eventually make a killing.. This game has NOTHING to do with picking winners. it's all about beating the #.. which will eventually make you money.. i still can't believe that there's people still out there that think they can make money by just picking winners. no one can make money picking winners. it's IMPOSSIBLE.. sports gambling is all mathematics and nothing but. not who you think will win between chi and philly??

Please explain to me why the line moves then...

[statnerds]

The question everyone seems to be asking..........IS JJGOLD'S COMEDIC RUN COMING TO A CLOSE?

It should, but it will not. He still makes me chuckle with his videos. And as long as he keeps bringing SBR some pigs to the slaughter for the Books, then it will continue.

Additionally, I enjoy reading posters bash him cause they think that he is fukk-up or they believe that fukkin losing Spreadsheet he posts.

Nobody loses consistently. Variance works out in favor of the schleps once in a while too.

[Sunde91]

Please explain to me why the line moves then...

Good question to bring up.

There needs to be a distinction between "sharps" who do nothing but scalp/middle/get best possible line, and "sharps" who are big time players, rarely bet, but throw down 25k on their spots cause they have their edge/"inside info".

The latter, of course, is who moves lines.

[big0mar]

Good question to bring up. There needs to be a distinction between "sharps" who do nothing but scalp/middle/get best possible line, and "sharps" who are big time players, rarely bet, but throw down 25k on their spots cause they have their edge/"inside info". The latter, of course, is who moves lines.

And all that is assuming that the market is operating efficiently. There are plenty of closing lines that are off, but many don't notice

[ronald]

And all that is assuming that the market is operating efficiently. There are plenty of closing lines that are off, but many don't notice

Don't know/Don't care

[jjgold]

pavy how can you be on the board for so many years and still be so clueless

Mathy why do 24 guys a day ask paver for soccer plays in PM's?

[mathdotcom]

24 is probably 100x less than Brock Landers and what do we know about him?

[Fishhead]

They have entertained this idea across the street..........

[Flying Dutchman]

sharp has absolutely NOTHING to do with picking winners.. trust me on this one.

ask every bookie offshore who they'd rather book...


a player that lays -110 on every game and never gets an edge on any line and is hitting 70% over the last 200 games??

OR

the player that beats them to the line moves on every game and is hitting 46% over the last 200 games??

Why do you make this distinction? These players are almost always the same.

The originators are the people who drive the market, usually by their sponsors.

And damn few of them post on this, or any other forum making the silly-assed chest-beating statements I see here.

[Fishhead]

The important thing to remember here is that everyone is a winner at SBR............

[polskboy]

Baus your a fukkin hamburger I was betting into weak lines before you were born Bause here is a gambling tip..................there is no juice if you pick winners

great post jj great post

[Fishhead]

great post jj great post

Why, explain.

[underthe total]

There are people on this board making 20k+ per month who NEVER look at stats, analyze trends, etc. BAUS

20k? thats a streatch isnt it? well maybe not if times are good. but as of late it hasnt worked out real good for me, about a 4 week loser. it has started to turn around tho

[underthe total]

[quote=Nicky Santoro;7839910]sharp has absolutely NOTHING to do with picking winners.. trust me on this one. ask every bookie offshore who they'd rather book... a player that lays -110 on every game and never gets an edge on any line and is hitting 70% over the last 200 games?? OR the player that beats them to the line moves on every game and is hitting 46% over the last 200 games?? If they had to pick, they'd keep the first guy and boot the other guy that is down money but gets the better # each time.. Reason:: The guy that is hitting 70% will eventually piss it all back and go broke, and the guy that is losing now but beating the line will eventually make a killing.. This game has NOTHING to do with picking winners. it's all about beating the #.. which will eventually make you money.. i still can't believe that there's people still out there that think they can make money by just picking winners. no one can make money picking winners. it's IMPOSSIBLE.. sports gambling is all mathematics and nothing but. not who you think will win between chi and philly??[/quote

understanding this takes a little time, and most will never get it no matter how hard they try

[BAUS]

20k? thats a streatch isnt it? well maybe not if times are good. but as of late it hasnt worked out real good for me, about a 4 week loser. it has started to turn around tho

No, it is not a stretch. It is true and it is playful.

BAUS

[underthe total]

u lean?

[BAUS]

u lean?

Of course sir.

BAUS