Bye Bye Mrs. Clinton
Collapse
X
-
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82840
#36Comment -
imgv94SBR Posting Legend
- 11-16-05
- 17192
#37I wish people would stop quoting tacomax.Comment -
ritehookSBR MVP
- 08-12-06
- 2244
#38"One [racist, anti-feminst] dude among 300,000 voters."
Um, yeah, I think the percentages are a bit higher than that. It's clear that many of the white underclass voted for Edwards.
Some of these people (more than a few) will not vote for a black. Hopefully it will be outweighed by those who will not vote for a superannuated warmonger like McCain. Frikkin' hundred years in Iraq, ^*)#@## Manchurian Candidate . . .
"FAR FROM OVER," as imgv said. Agreed. Esp if the bitch can win Ohio, Texas and Pennsy.
But if no one has all the votes wrapped up going into the convention, and Obama does not get sucked into the vice presidency game (he won't be able to put Hillary on his lap like Cheney does with Bush), then Obama should win.
Because ----- if a "brokered convention" goes for Hillary, the blacks and many of the other Obama voters will boycott the election.
Hello President McCain, Hello Darkness My Old Friend.Comment -
ritehookSBR MVP
- 08-12-06
- 2244
#39And what a loser Ron Paul turned out to be.
Lame percentages despite super funding. And now promises not to run as a 3rd party candidate, despite the fact that McCain, with his imperialist overreach, represents everything that he opposes.Comment -
tacomaxSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-10-05
- 9619
#41
But if no one has all the votes wrapped up going into the convention, and Obama does not get sucked into the vice presidency game (he won't be able to put Hillary on his lap like Cheney does with Bush), then Obama should win.
Because ----- if a "brokered convention" goes for Hillary, the blacks and many of the other Obama voters will boycott the election.
Any please don't quote any of my post - it'll make imgv cry.Originally posted by pags11SBR would never get rid of me...ever...Originally posted by BuddyBearI'd probably most likely chose Pags to jack off too.Originally posted by curioustaco is not a troll, he is a bubonic plague bacteria.Comment -
purecarnaggeSBR MVP
- 10-05-07
- 4843
#43Democrats problems in presidential elections are all tied to the south. They lost the south badly in the last elections. It wasn't even a competition or a comparison. Gore/Kerry it was terrible. They got slaughtered down there. Its clutch to get votes there for the dems.
Now Clinton is banking on winning Texas and Ohio to turn the campaign around. I'm not sure how/if that will happen. I think she will win texas. Clinton does well with Latino Voters, and there is alot of racism down there.
Can Obama win? he could, at this point im rooting for him just from the underdog point of view. Plus i have 50.00 with him at like +1400 odds.
Our current foreign policy is not the best, its sad to say the least. President Bush couldn't negotiate for anything without saying I'll just invade you. Bush Jr is a joke and his presidency will be about starting a war based on incorrect evidence? What else has he done? He's run the country into a recession. Debate it all you want its already here, GM lost 36b btw, as the auto industry goes, so does the countries economy according to an old saying.Comment -
treeceSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-28-07
- 6298
#44I don't get why people vote for Obama.Comment -
ritehookSBR MVP
- 08-12-06
- 2244
#45He posted last month about "How does Barack Obama win the primary when he is going to lose in Cal,NY and Texas" - I don't think he's a pivotal political analyst. -tacomax
Um, TM, please post the entire reply or thread where I said this. If it was so stated, it was done so as a question - and since she has won Cal and NY and is prob fave in Texas, the answer would be a brokered convention. When in January (last month) not too many were thinking that way.
Still, I think you may have me confused with someone else, as I don't recall this comment. Post the full thing, or at least give me the date. If I have early Alzheimer's I want to start making plans for long-term care . . .Comment -
isetcapSBR MVP
- 12-16-05
- 4006
#47He posted last month about "How does Barack Obama win the primary when he is going to lose in Cal,NY and Texas" - I don't think he's a pivotal political analyst. -tacomax
Um, TM, please post the entire reply or thread where I said this. If it was so stated, it was done so as a question - and since she has won Cal and NY and is prob fave in Texas, the answer would be a brokered convention. When in January (last month) not too many were thinking that way.
Still, I think you may have me confused with someone else, as I don't recall this comment. Post the full thing, or at least give me the date. If I have early Alzheimer's I want to start making plans for long-term care . . .
Just make sure you watch your spelling. Tacomax ran off a "well-respected", "self-proclaimed", "English major" who used to make a lot of picks (but never bet the under).Comment -
INVEGA MANSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-30-08
- 6802
#48The choices we have for out next president is very scaryComment -
curiousRestricted User
- 07-20-07
- 9093
#49"One [racist, anti-feminst] dude among 300,000 voters."
Um, yeah, I think the percentages are a bit higher than that. It's clear that many of the white underclass voted for Edwards.
Some of these people (more than a few) will not vote for a black. Hopefully it will be outweighed by those who will not vote for a superannuated warmonger like McCain. Frikkin' hundred years in Iraq, ^*)#@## Manchurian Candidate . . .
"FAR FROM OVER," as imgv said. Agreed. Esp if the bitch can win Ohio, Texas and Pennsy.
But if no one has all the votes wrapped up going into the convention, and Obama does not get sucked into the vice presidency game (he won't be able to put Hillary on his lap like Cheney does with Bush), then Obama should win.
Because ----- if a "brokered convention" goes for Hillary, the blacks and many of the other Obama voters will boycott the election.
Hello President McCain, Hello Darkness My Old Friend.Comment -
curiousRestricted User
- 07-20-07
- 9093
#50Democrats problems in presidential elections are all tied to the south. They lost the south badly in the last elections. It wasn't even a competition or a comparison. Gore/Kerry it was terrible. They got slaughtered down there. Its clutch to get votes there for the dems.
Now Clinton is banking on winning Texas and Ohio to turn the campaign around. I'm not sure how/if that will happen. I think she will win texas. Clinton does well with Latino Voters, and there is alot of racism down there.
Can Obama win? he could, at this point im rooting for him just from the underdog point of view. Plus i have 50.00 with him at like +1400 odds.
Our current foreign policy is not the best, its sad to say the least. President Bush couldn't negotiate for anything without saying I'll just invade you. Bush Jr is a joke and his presidency will be about starting a war based on incorrect evidence? What else has he done? He's run the country into a recession. Debate it all you want its already here, GM lost 36b btw, as the auto industry goes, so does the countries economy according to an old saying.
Exactly how did the President run the country into a recession? Again, Congress controls the law making ability to correct some of the excesses that led to the recession. They did nothing as usual.
Yes, Bush the lesser got us into a war we shouldn't be in. Bush the elder set the stage for this mess. It all goes back to Iraq invading Kuwait because the Kuwaitis were stealing Iraq's oil by slant drilling into the Iraqi oil fields. The UN could have stopped the Kuwaitis but did nothing except pass a few meaningless resolutions. The Iraqis then told the US ambassador that they planned to stop the Kuwaitis stealing their oil by military intervention. The US reply was "that is a regional issue", which gave the Iraqis the green light. Why did we go to war over Kuwait in the first place? What do we care?
The Clintonistas kept the economic sanctions and the no fly zone in place after the war for the liberation of Kuwait was over. So, they continued the failed policy of Bush the Elder.
Our current foreign policy is simply an extension of the Kissinger doctrine and the cold war. "Project power into areas deemed to be in the interests of the US by any means necessary".
Why are we still in NATO? The purpose of NATO was to defend Europe against the USSR. The USSR is no more. We need to get out of NATO. Why are we in the middle east? We fought a war to liberate Kuwait, then we subjected the Iraqi people to years of economic sanctions and aerial bombing in a pseudo war called "the no fly zone", then we invaded Iraq in order to project power into the middle east because the Iranians are trying to switch the currency that oil is traded in from the dollar to the euro.
Now the arm chair strategists will quote Bush the Lesser on how we are fighting 'them' over there instead of over here. But consider this, the Taliban were defeated before the invasion of Afghanistan began. Several hundred special forces and CIA operatives allied with some local tribesmen made mincemeat out of the Taliban BEFORE the invasion started. There was no reason to occupy Afghanistan and lots of reasons not to do so. Now we are propping up a central government which is propped up by northern warlords some of whom are not even Afghani.
The best way to fight an insurgency is with a counter insurgency. Operation Phoenix in the Vietnam war was fought with a few thousand special forces, CIA operatives and tribal allies (the Montenyard and the Hmong). At the end of Operation Phoenix the Viet Cong was no longer a viable force.
The Iraqis have proven that they cannot form a central government. The Sunnis and the Kurds have proven that provincial governments can work. We have given the Iraqis 5 years to create a country. They refuse. Game over.Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82840
#51The wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round,
round and round.
The wheels on the bus go round and round, all through the town.Comment -
Willie BeeSBR Posting Legend
- 02-14-06
- 15726
#52
It won't make a rat's rump of difference which one of the Democrats wins Texas, other than getting their convention delegates. When the election comes this November, all of the electoral votes will go to the GOP candidate. But hey, what do I know? I'm just a racist Texican.Comment -
SportsgirlSBR MVP
- 09-10-06
- 4493
#53
It won't make a rat's rump of difference which one of the Democrats wins Texas, other than getting their convention delegates. When the election comes this November, all of the electoral votes will go to the GOP candidate. But hey, what do I know? I'm just a racist Texican.
In fact, the presidency may go GOP simply because the Dems are so evenly divided between Barack and Hilary that once one of them gets the nom, the other people won't vote at all. It's a love 'em or hate 'em deal with the dems this year. John Edwards is who they should have been pushing, imo.Comment -
treeceSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-28-07
- 6298
#55I wish we had Bill Clinton to run again. Dumb 2 term rule should be scrapped.Comment -
SportsgirlSBR MVP
- 09-10-06
- 4493
#56I think Barack and hilary are actually the same person. It's conspiracy, I tell you!
Comment -
ritehookSBR MVP
- 08-12-06
- 2244
#58I think Tacomax was referencing his good friend imgv when he was rehashing this statement. Fortunately you appear to be politically cognizant enough that Tacomax does not need to point out your shortcomings, whereas it is often necessary with others.
Just make sure you watch your spelling. Tacomax ran off a "well-respected", "self-proclaimed", "English major" who used to make a lot of picks (but never bet the under).
And, of corse, I ahwayz wach my spelingComment -
BullajamiSBR Sharp
- 12-23-05
- 472
#59
The Articles of Confederation were written in 1777 and replaced by the Constitution in 1788. We gave ourselves 11 years to make a country. Happily, the instant gratification generation was not officiating back then.Comment -
McBa1nSBR MVP
- 01-02-06
- 2642
#60Thanks, Taco, for keeping the US protected. I wish I had the cash to snag that magic rock.Comment -
ritehookSBR MVP
- 08-12-06
- 2244
#61
I'm not sure this would happen (tho they'd be some rumblings about it) but I would like to see it come down.
Also like to see the super-rich mayor of New York City make an independent run.
The two parties we have now are all too often like "one party."
Some say a multi-party country has too many inefficiencies, and is often paralyzed.
My reply: Really!!! Promise??Comment -
mrmarkSBR High Roller
- 08-19-07
- 115
#62Boys! Ms Clinton will win this election! Oprah will lose!!!!!!!!Comment -
slacker00SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-05
- 12262
#64I agree with tacomax. Buy as much Republican at +166 as you can.Comment -
CannonRestricted User
- 01-03-08
- 3329
#65Put a fork in her she is done. What a bitch.Comment -
tacomaxSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-10-05
- 9619
#66Originally posted by pags11SBR would never get rid of me...ever...Originally posted by BuddyBearI'd probably most likely chose Pags to jack off too.Originally posted by curioustaco is not a troll, he is a bubonic plague bacteria.Comment -
moses millsapSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-25-05
- 8289
#67Tacomax doesn't **** around when it comes to the Magic Beans. He and they are the real deal.Comment -
isetcapSBR MVP
- 12-16-05
- 4006
#68The Magic Beans are powerful.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code