statistically..

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jrcaces
    SBR Sharp
    • 08-25-07
    • 284

    #1
    statistically..
    If JJ is such a degenerate losing gambler wouldn't fading all his picks in the long run be profitable?
  • SBR Lou
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 08-02-07
    • 37863

    #2
    there was a great video about this. sadly it is gone.
    Comment
    • jrcaces
      SBR Sharp
      • 08-25-07
      • 284

      #3
      Was it one of JJ's videos and what did it say ?
      Comment
      • SBR Lou
        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
        • 08-02-07
        • 37863

        #4
        Yes, he begged people not to fade him and demanded respect. Pro gamblers have feelings too bro.
        Comment
        • jrcaces
          SBR Sharp
          • 08-25-07
          • 284

          #5
          I remember one video when he said " DON'T YOU FADE ME EVERYONE WHO FADES ME WILL PAY " something along those lines lol.
          Comment
          • BuddyBear
            SBR Hall of Famer
            • 08-10-05
            • 7233

            #6
            Not really.

            Unlike poker, there is not much discrpency between great gamblers and very bad gamblers. Wheras poker, you will be destoryed in a few rounds if you sit with elite poker players. By chance alone you can hit 50% ATS in sports gambling, throw in some luck a little bit more or less. The wrost sports gamblers in the world will hit approximately 45-47%% ATS. Given JJ's experience he is unlikely to be in that category. He is probably like most people in the 48-52% range. I wouldn't fade him....
            Comment
            Search
            Collapse
            SBR Contests
            Collapse
            Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
            Collapse
            Working...