My personal Politics L-O-C-K !!!!! Democratic Party Presidential Nominee

Razz · 01-11-06, 01:54 PM

Originally posted by slacker00

I just can't see Redneck USA voting for a woman.

Damn right.

imgv94 · 10-10-07, 04:00 AM

John,

What do you think about this one now?

Dark Horse · 10-10-07, 04:23 AM

According to the old Tradesports angle, now Intrade, Hillary is the hands down favorite to be the next president. The TS numbers have gotten a lot of publicity in the past for being more accurate than the polls. On a scale from 0-100, she's now at 44, with the closest competitor at 15. My money would be on Gore, now at 9, if he would run.

bigjp5091 · 10-10-07, 05:33 AM

Much like a bet on the Saints to win teh NFC South, this bet is all but done.

SBR_John · 10-10-07, 06:08 AM

Little did I know nearly 2 years ago the best the demos would have to challenge her is Osama Broraco(possibly misspelled

jjgold · 10-10-07, 06:24 AM

Johhny you have no clue, Hilliary is going to be the Pres of the USA!

Yes!!!!

BatemanPatrickl · 10-10-07, 06:41 AM

I enjoy reading posts made by people who don't live in the United States; the ignorance is priceless.

curious · 10-10-07, 06:55 AM

Originally posted by SBR_John

The Democrats main problem is:
There are no moderates that have a big name. Kerry is trying to become a moderate but its hard to hide from a 20 year voting record. My man man Joe L is too conservative. Heck maybe Al Gore has worked through his speech impediment and is ready to give it another roll. I mean, he did invent the internet.

Billary will not win a single Confederate state. No way are southerners going to elect a lesbian. Barack Osama won't get many votes in the south either.

Al Gore couldn't be elected dog catcher.

I think there is going to be a strong 3rd party candidate, I was hoping that the WWF would run a ticket for President this year. Or maybe the body builders association.

Personally, I would vote for anyone who ran on a platform of stopping all this fooling around and smashing our enemies once and for all no matter whether they are foreign or domestic, making the border guard a branch of the military and putting 500,000 border guards on the border and completely stopping illegal immigration, passing laws that make it very difficult for companies to export American jobs, or import foreigners for the sole purpose of driving American wages down, making repatriation of foreign profits tax free, creating huge incentives for companies to repatriate jobs that were shipped overseas...incentives like the CEOs of those companies won't go to prison for long terms...basically an America first platform. I think someone running on a platform like that would win in a landslide. Oh, and get us out of the U.N. and kick those scumbags out of our country.

Rollins08 · 10-10-07, 06:56 AM

I still think Giuliani will beat Hillary for president. The south and midwest will not be happy with their choices, but in the end they are still to close minded to elect a liberal women and will vote for what they see as the lesser of the two evils.

tblues2005 · 10-10-07, 09:26 AM

It is an awful long ways to go still, so things could change between now and election day. I think Hillary Clinton will be tough though and she is doing the right things right now and talking about the issues and not doing these personal attacks like the Republicans have a good habit of doing.

DrunkenLullaby · 10-10-07, 11:02 AM

It has so little to do with Hillary and so much to do with how the Republicans have ****ed everything up in every imaginable (and some quite unimaginable!) ways over the past 8 years.

Shit, in our retarded 2 party system, Michael Vick would probably have a good shot running as the dem nominee vs the Repubs. I would vote for (essentially 3rd party candidate) Ron Paul, but what's the point in wasting my time going to the polls in a country where there are enough imbeciles that only vote Dem/Repub to completely negate any chance a 3rd party ever could have?

paul Mordeeb · 10-10-07, 11:56 AM

It was sad when the best person we can come up for president was an ex presidents son. It will be just as sad if the best we can come up with is and ex presidents wife!!!

Didn't Marty get fired for tring to fill the denfence coridinator position with his brother??

RickySteve · 10-10-07, 12:27 PM

I think you're making a mistake here.

BatemanPatrickl · 10-10-07, 12:29 PM

Originally posted by curious

Billary will not win a single Confederate state. No way are southerners going to elect a lesbian. Barack Osama won't get many votes in the south either.

Al Gore couldn't be elected dog catcher.

I think there is going to be a strong 3rd party candidate, I was hoping that the WWF would run a ticket for President this year. Or maybe the body builders association.

Personally, I would vote for anyone who ran on a platform of stopping all this fooling around and smashing our enemies once and for all no matter whether they are foreign or domestic, making the border guard a branch of the military and putting 500,000 border guards on the border and completely stopping illegal immigration, passing laws that make it very difficult for companies to export American jobs, or import foreigners for the sole purpose of driving American wages down, making repatriation of foreign profits tax free, creating huge incentives for companies to repatriate jobs that were shipped overseas...incentives like the CEOs of those companies won't go to prison for long terms...basically an America first platform. I think someone running on a platform like that would win in a landslide. Oh, and get us out of the U.N. and kick those scumbags out of our country.

I will ask this again but please post any facts that prove Hilary is a lesbian. Also, if Gore threw his name in, he would be leading the polls right now. The man is well liked and well like by a lot of people and even though I am a Republican, I think Gore would do a great job.

The HG · 10-10-07, 01:52 PM

I always thought she was hot as hell, Tipper Gore too.

I know what lesbians are like, and there is zero chance she is a lesbian.

What I wonder is, has she given the last beej she will give in her entire life? And if not, can you imagine how awesome it would be to get a beej from the first female President, to actually be serviced by her?? Totally totally awesome, if she wanted to raise serious cash for any cause, she could literally get 7 figures a pop for a beej, well into 8 figs for the first post-inauguration one.

I would ask the same questions for doggy. Has she done doggy for the last time in her life? Will she do it doggy at any time post-inauguration?

I would ask the same questions about froggy.

And of course, I would ask the same questions about 69.

And I would ask, does she own a vibrator? No way, no chance of that.

And I would ask, does she play with herself at all any time? I would say rarely because she is too tired most of the time. But I would say yes, maybe 6 or 8 times a year. That would be my guess although of course I would not be surprised by anything.

Dark Horse · 10-10-07, 01:59 PM

lmao

I'd hate to see your entire list of first date questions.

idontlikerocks · 10-10-07, 02:36 PM

there is a law concerning the number of terms a president can serve. wouldn't we also be best served by a law limiting the rights of the relatives of president's from seeking office?

ShamsWoof10 · 10-10-07, 03:04 PM

Some good posts here.. BuddyBear, Taco, and others have some interesting posts...

SBR_John I would say you have a loser... I think the media has been preppin' the public for a female American president... I will make a futures wager on this but I am waiting until just after the Bilderberger meeting (last week of May 08') to find out who I am taking... In 04' it came out that they wanted John Kerry and that Kerry was there... I jumped all over that and told my friend to do the same... It went from -110 to -170 just like that...

THEY DECIDE WHO NOT US... and it's becoming common knowledge that BOTH of Bush's elections were rigged so you don't have to vote for Hillary but it doesn't mean she still can't be our next president... Who votes makes no differance.. WHO COUNTS THE VOTES DOES!!!

McBa1n · 10-10-07, 03:30 PM

Here's the big BIG problem. Hillary is being touted and named by Republicans for a reason - they know they'll crush her... And there's no doubt they will. The Dem field is getting weaker and weaker because of it. There are some really strong candidates, but there are also a ton of stupid people in the US. Feingold, as mentioned, is an outstanding candidate. Edwards is another strong candidate, but he probably can't win.

I can't see Hildog losing the nomination right now - and the Dems will screw up AGAIN because of it.

I think the ONLY shot Hildog would have is vs Guliani. When all his pictures crossdressing start getting more play, that's going to scare off a lot of voters.. And that's just one of the 100s of reasons I can think of right off the top of my head. I don't have much faith in Americans seeing what a dope he is about 9/11 and terrorism... But who knows, the polls seem to think Iraq is a bad idea, and that's a core theme with Rudy.

The HG · 10-10-07, 06:11 PM

Originally posted by McBa1n

Here's the big BIG problem. Hillary is being touted and named by Republicans for a reason - they know they'll crush her... And there's no doubt they will. The Dem field is getting weaker and weaker because of it. There are some really strong candidates, but there are also a ton of stupid people in the US. Feingold, as mentioned, is an outstanding candidate. Edwards is another strong candidate, but he probably can't win.

I can't see Hildog losing the nomination right now - and the Dems will screw up AGAIN because of it.

I think the ONLY shot Hildog would have is vs Guliani. When all his pictures crossdressing start getting more play, that's going to scare off a lot of voters.. And that's just one of the 100s of reasons I can think of right off the top of my head. I don't have much faith in Americans seeing what a dope he is about 9/11 and terrorism... But who knows, the polls seem to think Iraq is a bad idea, and that's a core theme with Rudy.

McBa1n, I'm sorry but I think you're wrong on all this. The Hypocritublicans know they won't crush Hildogg. They tout her because she is fundraising gold for them. And I think Giulinazi has the best chance to beat her. It will be a struggle against anyone, but she will have a firm edge against anyone except him. Edwards would steamroll over any of them, but it's clear Hildogg will be the choice.

After ALLLLL the crap - the shameless dishonesty from the White House, Iraq, the public attempts at male/male lovemaking, Gonzales, and on and on and on, it's just too much, the right has polluted all their go-to topics that they used to brand themselves so well over the years. The middle that matters in elections, the Reagan Democrats, whatever you want to call them, is not going to go for more of it.

regularguy · 10-10-07, 06:25 PM

Here's the problem:

Bush
Clinton
Clinton
Bush
Bush
Clinton

Money does that.

SBR_John · 10-10-07, 11:23 PM

Originally posted by Rollins08

I still think Giuliani will beat Hillary for president. The south and midwest will not be happy with their choices, but in the end they are still to close minded to elect a liberal women and will vote for what they see as the lesser of the two evils.

Excellent post..100% agree.

But I will add that just like in 2000 the demos dont necessarily need a southern state. Well of course if they got Florida it would be all over.

But assuming they dont put a dent in the south it will be won or lost in the rust belt and greater midwest. I think she could stitch Minn and a couple of others like Mich together to go with NY, Cal and the Northeast.

ShamsWoof10 · 10-10-07, 11:30 PM

The Republicians are like an 0-2 football and they have played sooooo bad that who the hell CAN'T beat them... It's as I said before... even their own team mates know they f*cked up!!! If you believe the shadow/buffer goverments as I call them have real power that is...

regularguy · 10-10-07, 11:46 PM

I think the shadow/buffer goverments do in fact have slightly different proponents. So I think it does actually matter. Who do we want to empower?

Oh damn. I'm supposed to be analyzing the Ravens.

mayflower550 · 02-05-08, 10:07 PM

There is a easy answer to this question. Obama all the way!

imgv94 · 02-05-08, 10:14 PM

There is a easy answer to this question. Hillary Clinton all the way!

brock · 02-05-08, 10:17 PM

should have waited to bet this get better odds now id think

Sportsgirl · 02-05-08, 10:41 PM

Originally posted by bigboydan

why beat around the bush here (pardon the pun

)

hilary is a women!! so, thats going to be a very tough decesion for the dem's to make. thats if they wanna win this election.

With this kinda thinking, Dan, the Dems are surely better off with the black guy