Correlated parlay definition ruling needed?Is this a loophole?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BrentCrude
    SBR MVP
    • 11-16-05
    • 4665

    #1
    Correlated parlay definition ruling needed?Is this a loophole?
    My favorite parlay that you can only play in baseball and hockey is this.

    Home team is around -125 to -180 on moneyline.But if you take them at -1.5 you get +140 to over +200 Of course in hockey it's allot harder to win by 2 points than in baseball.

    So I take the hometown moneyline favorite on two teams betting they cover -1.5 and then I always take the over on the two game totals.A measely $5 bet pays between $110-$170.

    Since I'm not making even money bets,this really doesn't fit the definition of being a correlated parlay bet.Some of the books that say they don't pay out on correlated parlays pay me on these bets.
  • Justin7
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 07-31-06
    • 8577

    #2
    That is a correlated play. If a book doesn't want you to bet that, they should fix their software.
    Comment
    • RickySteve
      Restricted User
      • 01-31-06
      • 3415

      #3
      I would book the bets he describes.
      Comment
      Search
      Collapse
      SBR Contests
      Collapse
      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
      Collapse
      Working...