[Poisec]

For juice lovers, surface is said to be quick this year and his opponent is a clay courter. Donskoy should go through comfortably.

[jjgold]

Too high for quali
Why the risk?

[Poisec]

Well motivation should be the highest to qualify for main draw. They get good prize money too. Donskoy won a challenger on hard court few weeks ago, its his best surface.
Domingues played only 7 matches on hard court in 1 year and half!

[astrobloke]

you been on a roll bro, thanks, and BOL.

keep up the great work.

[Poisec]

you been on a roll bro, thanks, and BOL.

keep up the great work.

Thanks man, no big stake here though, never know with these lower ranked players. But yeah confident otherwise wouldnt post.

[jjgold]

When is it?

[lonegambler23]

you been on a roll bro, thanks, and BOL.

keep up the great work.

thanks for a -300 play im just curious what do u actually bet on that kind of line?

[Poisec]

thanks for a -300 play im just curious what do u actually bet on that kind of line?

to be honest, stakes are not necessarily correlated to the odds. It can be 100 or 2000 (rarely). Last time I bet 2000 at -300 was on Djokovic to beat Nadal, Australian Open final, after he won the first set. Nadal looked helpless. For this match, just a small-average stake of 150, you wouldn't put a grand on Donskoy right? But I think he wins this 3 out of 4 times.

[Poisec]

When is it?

In 3 hours I believe, but sleeping time in my timezone anyway, will check the outcome tomorrow. BOL.

[Darkside Magick]

Wow... - 300 on a 3 set match with a tiebreaker in the 3rd

[asiagambler]

to be honest, stakes are not necessarily correlated to the odds. It can be 100 or 2000 (rarely). Last time I bet 2000 at -300 was on Djokovic to beat Nadal, Australian Open final, after he won the first set. Nadal looked helpless. For this match, just a small-average stake of 150, you wouldn't put a grand on Donskoy right? But I think he wins this 3 out of 4 times.

If you truly believe he wins this 3/4 then what is the logic in betting -300? Winning 3 out of 4 is the break even point.

[jtoler]

may win but definitely not worth it

[jjgold]

Qualies so erratic

How can there even be a favorite

[leetreaper]

to be honest, stakes are not necessarily correlated to the odds. It can be 100 or 2000 (rarely). Last time I bet 2000 at -300 was on Djokovic to beat Nadal, Australian Open final, after he won the first set. Nadal looked helpless. For this match, just a small-average stake of 150, you wouldn't put a grand on Donskoy right? But I think he wins this 3 out of 4 times.

[Dogball]

Won 2-0 but wasn’t easy
Pinnacle had -400 ore match
Live line at one point had other guy favored -145

[Brooklyn Dick]

Winner. Not easy, but counts the same. 7-6 7-5

[jjgold]

nice call

[Otters27]

Damn nice call. My book didn't offer

[astrobloke]

damn bro, you are on FIRE.....

Thanks tailed you, GOT IT, great stuff.

Keep up great work.

[stepaside777]

easy one

[Poisec]

If you truly believe he wins this 3/4 then what is the logic in betting -300? Winning 3 out of 4 is the break even point.

Sorry I meant at least 3 out of 4, to break even at worst.
Anyway a winning bet but a poor choice given how close it was, Domingues was a tough ************ out there it seems.