Originally Posted by
hotcross
Bro, your memory is confusing two past Bruins seasons. You refer to the game 7 Boston comeback against Toronto - it was the very first time in NHL history a team won Game 7 after trailing by three goals in the third period, which did happen in the first round of 2013 - Trailing by three goals in the third period, and still by two goals with less than 90 seconds left in their season, the Bruins scored twice in a span of 31-seconds to tie it and then eliminated the Maple Leafs on Patrice Bergeron's goal at 6:05 of overtime to win 5-4 score in Game 7.
But the Bruins went on to lose in the Finals 4-2 games to Chicago that year. OK so they did make it to the 2013 finals that year.
Bruins won the cup in 2011, a year in which they played 3x a game 7 (first round, then conference final, and final). They swept the second round matchup against the Flyers. Yes I had to look all this up to confirm my memory with the facts. But I don't recall any miraculous comebacks in-game or being down games huge in those series. Montreal won the first two games of round 1, but then Boston won 3 in a row, and ended up winning game 7 at home in Overtime that opening round against the Canadiens.
The year the Kings won the Cup, yes you're correct about the Sharks choke job of the 3-0 series lead.
Anyway, that wasn't really what I was asking. More about looking for your explanation if the Sharks should have won that game 7 against Vegas this year. It all hinged on that penalty call, very controversial call (wow that never happens in sports, does it?!?). Sharks made the most of the opportunity, and Vegas didn't do their job to hold the lead when faced with the adversity of the 5-minute major. But the point is without getting that penalty, a penalty which was clearly the wrong call, the refs didn't even make the call in real-time meaning the arm never went up...they made the call after seeing the aftermath of Pavelski bleeding down on the ice. Without that, the Sharks were clearly beat in that game.