Major League Umps Call More Strikes for Pitchers of Same Race>>>

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dhuepaxuz
    SBR Sharp
    • 05-19-07
    • 293

    #1
    Major League Umps Call More Strikes for Pitchers of Same Race>>>
    .


    Link


    LiveScience Staff

    LiveScience.com
    Tue Aug 14, 11:55 AM ET

    Major League Baseball umpires are more likely to call strikes for pitchers of the same race or ethnicity, a new study finds.

    Researchers at the University of Texas at Austin analyzed every pitch from the 2004 through 2006 major league seasons to explore whether racial discrimination factored into umpires’ decisions to call a pitch a strike or a ball.

    Just as discrimination in the labor market can affect disparities in wages, promotion and performance evaluation, the researchers said, possible discrimination by umpires could affect the outcome of games and careers.

    During a typical baseball game, umpires call about 75 pitches for each team (they call about 400,000 pitches over the whole season—this figure excludes foul balls), so an umpire’s evaluation heavily influences pitcher productivity and performance.

    “Umpires judge the performance of players every game, deciding whether pitches are strikes or balls,” said study leader Daniel Hamermesh, who will present his findings next month at his campus and later at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. “Discrimination affects the outcome of a game and the labor market, determining the pitcher’s market value and compensation.”

    The researchers found if a pitcher is of the same race or ethnicity as the home plate umpire, more strikes are called and his team’s chance of winning is improved.

    The power to evaluate players’ performances disproportionately belonged chiefly to white umpires, while negative calls particularly impacted minority pitchers, Hamermesh said.

    But, this behavior diminishes when the umpire's calls are more closely scrutinized—for example at ballparks with electronic monitoring systems, in full count situation where there are 3 balls or 2 strikes, or at well-attended games.

    Hamermesh said the study is drawing more comments, so far, from his colleagues than any of his previous work. "I did not know how many economists are hung up on baseball," he told LiveScience.
  • Willie Bee
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 02-14-06
    • 15726

    #2
    Typical worthless crap that flows out of Austin from time to time
    Comment
    • The HG
      SBR MVP
      • 11-01-06
      • 3566

      #3
      This may well be one of those situations where the backlash against something winds up being of a far greater magnitude than the thing itself was in the first place. And since it's the pitcher an ump will focus on, we might see more unders short term in general, especially with umps who normally have a smallish zone.

      I'm going to be extra careful, at least in the near future, and look closely at games where a Negroid umpire is calling games started by a Caucasoid, a Boricua, or a Chinaman. And of course, all the other permutations of that as well: a Caucasoid umpire calling games started by Negroid, Boricua, or Chinaman starters, and so on and so on.

      My hunch is that this may affect Caucasoid umps more, since the notion of "white guilt" may come into play? I'm not sure.

      And my other hunch is that perhaps Caucasoid umps may be more "giving" towards Boricua pitching, since Caucasoids have traditionally been loathe to give much of anything ever to The Black Man, who was The Original Man.

      On the other hand, Negroids have made enormous cultural contributions in the US and by association the world, which can't help but be embedded in the minds of Caucasoid umps, whereas Boricuas haven't contributed much of anything to anyone anywhere, except for Cheech. And I guess Carlos Santana too. So maybe Caucasoid umps will subconsciously now try to uplift The Black Man above the Boricua, at least where starting pitching is concerned. But this is all hunch and speculation on my part.

      Do they got any Jew pitchers in the bigs?? I can't think of any offhand.
      Comment
      • pico
        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
        • 04-05-07
        • 27321

        #4
        i am wondering if there are any gay umpires. do they give more strikes to pretty pitchers.
        Comment
        • The HG
          SBR MVP
          • 11-01-06
          • 3566

          #5
          Originally posted by picoman
          i am wondering if there are any gay umpires. do they give more strikes to pretty pitchers.
          No there are no gay umpires, this has been known for a while. It's not a formal policy, but one that is generally understood. It's not a discriminatory policy either; the reason is that when gay umpires get boners, the chest protectors must be either raised or pushed outward, either of which would render the ump incapable of calling pitches over most of the plate.

          It would be essentially impossible, for practical purposes, to have a game called by a gay HP umpire, because the game would have to be delayed for all the time during the game where he had a boner, which could be hours, a condition known as "priapism", which is a condition you would just be begging for if a gay man were asked to umpire a game with nothing but dozens of sweaty athletic mens in sight.

          I suppose in theory a gay man with a penis small enough that a boner wouldn't affect the positioning of the chest protector is possible, but essentially for now you can assume that no umpire is gay.
          Comment
          • Willie Bee
            SBR Posting Legend
            • 02-14-06
            • 15726

            #6
            Your theories are interesting, if not borderline insane, HG. But I believe if there is any bias by umpires it has to do with them squeezing a pitcher they just don't like more than them shrinking or expanding a strike zone based on their ethnicity or sexual orientation.

            However, pico's notion about a gay umpire calling more strikes for handsome pitchers is something to ponder. Being a big ugly myself, I know umps used to call a lot of balls when I was on the mound in my youth.
            Comment
            • pico
              BARRELED IN @ SBR!
              • 04-05-07
              • 27321

              #7
              Originally posted by Willie Bee
              Your theories are interesting, if not borderline insane, HG. But I believe if there is any bias by umpires it has to do with them squeezing a pitcher they just don't like more than them shrinking or expanding a strike zone based on their ethnicity or sexual orientation.

              However, pico's notion about a gay umpire calling more strikes for handsome pitchers is something to ponder. Being a big ugly myself, I know umps used to call a lot of balls when I was on the mound in my youth.
              come to think of it, gay umpire won't necessarily call more strikes for a pretty pitcher. maybe the gay umpire like to see the pretty boy in a stressful situation (with runner on base). or maybe he like to see more sweaty guys around the bases. now here is a brain teaser. what if both the hitter and the pitcher are pretty boys, i bet the gay umpire would try to get full count in that situation so he'll see both of them longer.
              Comment
              • rjt721
                SBR Hall of Famer
                • 02-06-07
                • 7929

                #8
                Originally posted by picoman
                i am wondering if there are any gay umpires. do they give more strikes to pretty pitchers.
                No. If there was, Randy Johnson wouldn't have anywhere near 284 career wins.
                Comment
                • The HG
                  SBR MVP
                  • 11-01-06
                  • 3566

                  #9
                  Originally posted by picoman
                  come to think of it, gay umpire won't necessarily call more strikes for a pretty pitcher. maybe the gay umpire like to see the pretty boy in a stressful situation (with runner on base). or maybe he like to see more sweaty guys around the bases. now here is a brain teaser. what if both the hitter and the pitcher are pretty boys, i bet the gay umpire would try to get full count in that situation so he'll see both of them longer.
                  Right pico, these are some of the main differences between factoring in an ump's race as opposed to his possible sexual orientation.

                  The effect of umpire bias based on race is much much more predictable than the effect of umpire bias based on faggotism. You can generally assume that race-based umpire bias will enhance the performance of players of his same race, while the effects of faggotism-based umpire bias is almost impossible to determine, even if the sexual orientation of the ump could be definitively ascertained to begin with. A gay ump is as likely to want to see players get excruciatingly sweaty as he is to want to see them not break a sweat at all, or as likely to want to see players bending over completely as he is to want to see players standing up completely straight, it just depends on his particular fetishes, which of course would never be anywhere close to public knowledge.

                  As I've said though, while I will be looking closely at race-based ump bias backlash in the near future at least, faggotism-based ump bias can for now be assumed to be a non-factor in the majors.
                  Comment
                  • LargeMouthBass
                    Restricted User
                    • 03-18-07
                    • 1095

                    #10
                    Is this why most of the Dominican players avoid being a pitcher?
                    Comment
                    Search
                    Collapse
                    SBR Contests
                    Collapse
                    Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                    Collapse
                    Working...