Two Point Conversion Prop

[frostno98]

I recall seeing this prop was like 2500 or 2000 to 1. All that was needed was an attempt.

[DrStale]

I recall seeing this prop was like 2500 or 2000 to 1. All that was needed was an attempt.

2500 to 1? Unlikely.

+2500?

[frostno98]

2500 to 1? Unlikely.

+2500?

Yeah, my bad. That's what I meant.

[tltaylor89]

SOmebody got rich off that

[andywend]

I recall seeing this prop was like 2500 or 2000 to 1. All that was needed was an attempt.

You never saw this prop anywhere near 20-1.

The odds on a 2 point attempt were around +200 with the odds on a 2 point conversion ranging from +400 to +500.

[Masu485]

wow from +250000 down to +200

[StraitShooter]

You never saw this prop anywhere near 20-1.

The odds on a 2 point attempt were around +200 with the odds on a 2 point conversion ranging from +400 to +500.

[tltaylor89]

LOL 250,000 to 1

[southpaw74]

I think whoever bet that and won also got a free trip to Hawaii to LMAO...I think it was like +300 for a cenverted one

[jgray]

It was a bad call. No way did he have possession through the ground. Certainly not indisputable evidence.

[bigboyfosho]

It was cleary good

[jgray]

It was cleary good

If you won, Congrats. But I disagree.

[frostno98]

I think whoever bet that and won also got a free trip to Hawaii to LMAO...I think it was like +300 for a cenverted one

Nah, it was at least 2,000. I don't think any team has even attempted a two point conversion in the Superbowl. So rarity of something like happening only make sense that the payout would be that high.

[THE PROFIT]

It was good. A 2pt conversion carries the same rules as a TD. You must have possession when the ball crosses the plane. The ball clearly crossed the plane & he was actually down when the ball was kicked out of his hand.

[Powderguy]

Nah, it was at least 2,000. I don't think any team has even attempted a two point conversion in the Superbowl. So rarity of something like happening only make sense that the payout would be that high.

WTF are you talking about?!?

[jgray]

It was good. A 2pt conversion carries the same rules as a TD. You must have possession when the ball crosses the plane. The ball clearly crossed the plane & he was actually down when the ball was kicked out of his hand.

I'd agree on a rush. But on a pass you have to possess the ball through the ground. The only way that was a good 2PT conversion is if you slowed it way down. He bobbled it when it hit his hands and then when he went to the ground, it was knocked out of his hands. Given the fact that there must be indisputable evidence, (which there wasn't) it was the wrong call.

[frostno98]

Okay I just looked at it. The prop payout was around +300 if one was attempted in the game, and -300 if not. You would have to assume that making the two point conversion would be substantially higher, since the payout for just attempting one is already +300.

[andywend]

The prop payout was around +300 if one was attempted in the game, and -300 if not.

+300 on the Yes and -300 on the No?

Nothing better than a vig-free sportsbook, LOL.

+240/-300 on the 2 point conversion attempt
+400/-550 on a successful 2 point conversion attempt

[skrtelfan]

Best line I saw on that prop was +450 which I didn't find any value in.

[podunk]

nice

[floridagolfer]

I'd agree on a rush. But on a pass you have to possess the ball through the ground. The only way that was a good 2PT conversion is if you slowed it way down. He bobbled it when it hit his hands and then when he went to the ground, it was knocked out of his hands. Given the fact that there must be indisputable evidence, (which there wasn't) it was the wrong call.

I disagree. I think overturning the original call was the right thing to do; he clearly had possession with the ball over the plane of the goal line.

[Scorpion]

LOL 250,000 to 1

[Justin7]

I bet the no conversion attempt at -250 to -300, and the no successful successful 2-pt conversion at -500 to -600. Ugly...

[skrtelfan]

Even uglier that I'm sure a lot of the people who had no 2 point convo found a good price on no OT. I think this was the first year I ever got a better price on no safety than no OT (-1000 vs -1050 respectively.)