I Can Hear The Shot Takers Cussing Me Out Already

pico · 05-14-07, 10:54 AM

Originally posted by bigboydan

I was looking at sbrodds just now, and noticed that BetJM posted a bad number on the Oakland/KC game.

Code:

Monday, May 14, 2007    10:05 PM            PREVIEW      MATCHUPS      INJURIES   |   STANDINGS    |   WEATHER   
969	Kansas City Royals
G Meche -R 	+1 ½   -145	+128	O: 7 ½   -105		
970	Oakland Athletics
D Haren -R 	-1 ½   +125	-138	U: 7 ½   -115

I'll take the Oakland MLfor the limit at only -138

hoep you got the bet in last night because they correct their line now.

BigDaddy · 05-14-07, 11:46 AM

Originally posted by bigboydan

I was looking at sbrodds just now, and noticed that BetJM posted a bad number on the Oakland/KC game.

Code:

Monday, May 14, 2007    10:05 PM            PREVIEW      MATCHUPS      INJURIES   |   STANDINGS    |   WEATHER   
969	Kansas City Royals
G Meche -R 	+1 ½   -145	+128	O: 7 ½   -105		
970	Oakland Athletics
D Haren -R 	-1 ½   +125	-138	U: 7 ½   -115

I'll take the Oakland MLfor the limit at only -138

well the limit was $300 so not worth it IMO

bigboydan · 05-14-07, 04:13 PM

Heres the Email I received back from them today on this subject:

Thanks for the notification. The line has now been updated. Can you provide me with your BetJM account so i can credit your account with the notification bonus?

Regards,

Shayla

They did want to give me something for reporting this one, but I turned it down. I could care less about the $25-$50 or whatever it was they were gonna give me. I just wanted to let them know they made an honest mistake, and give them a heads up on it.

MrX · 05-14-07, 04:15 PM

I'm pretty sure turning down that bonus is -EV.

But maybe we can get Ganchrow to analyze it.

Ganchrow · 05-14-07, 04:25 PM

Originally posted by MrX

I'm pretty sure turning down that bonus is -EV.

But maybe we can get Ganchrow to analyze it.

I suspect you're right. I have some Cray time coming up next weeks so perhaps I should run a few simulations to make sure.