This certain to lose, but Lazio +425 against Bayern

[texhooper]

Was perusing my friendly neighborhood ESPN Bet app, been getting my asshole absolutely pasted by Aborigine natives as a reference to how badly I have been losing sports bets these days, and I stumbled across this number which is probably mostly me wanting a little payday but it does look to be a little inflated if you peruse around the posted numbers across the globe for said match. And one of my recent losers was the Bayern German Bitchtit Fukks the other day against Leverkusen or whatever the fukk they’re called so screw em anyway

I realize now it’s about to start, so I will shut up and post. But I took this and I suggest you fade, or at least wait til they do down two nil and get +10,000

[texhooper]

This IS certain to lose, IIISSSSSS!!!!!

NOW IT REALLY WILL LOSE!!!!! DAMN YOU THUMBS!!!

[texhooper]

Nil nil at half

FORUM LIFE BITCH

[texhooper]

1-0 Lazio

AMERICA

[texhooper]

Holy shit it won.

It won!!!

STARS AND BARS

[Optional]

Holy shit it won.

It won!!!

STARS AND BARS

Great call!

[bjb7223]

Holy shit it won.

It won!!!

STARS AND BARS

Had a feeling it would hit. Bayern are in a bad moment this week.

[texhooper]

Had a feeling it would hit. Bayern are in a bad moment this week.

Yeah I would normally think to take a typically dominant team like them to bounce back off the last game they had, clean slate so to speak in CL. But nah, fukk em like you said. They stink right now

[ChuckyTheGoat]

Wow, great call.

[slayer14]

Lazio one of the great teams

[texhooper]

Lazio one of the great teams

They’re in the anals for sure

[bjb7223]

Yeah I would normally think to take a typically dominant team like them to bounce back off the last game they had, clean slate so to speak in CL. But nah, fukk em like you said. They stink right now

Bayern have also lost the first leg of UCL round of 16 for the first time in 11 seasons.

Tuchel will be unemployed soon.

[slayer14]

Is this the Harry kane curse guys

[mjsuax13]

Holy shit it won.

It won!!!

STARS AND BARS

Great job! Should have tailed.

[texhooper]

Great job! Should have tailed.

I didn’t do a lot to inspire confidence

[pavyracer]

Losing the first leg means nothing . The second leg is more important. A lot of teams play not to lose big on first game. Nice pick!

[Da Manster!]

good job, excellent call, and congrats Tex!

[str]

Very Nice call !

[texhooper]

Alright so I will now disclose that I made this bet with $22 of “cashback” money from ESPN Bet. Let’s just call it a freeplay that would have left me in Daddy’s Sex Cauldron Of Love, fighting for a chance to re-up (think Chippendale’s meets receiving anal). Then I went all in on Oakland -1.5 last night, that hit, then I threw a hundo on Cyprus juggernauts APOEL +120, that hit, then Benfica -270 and pow, I have 500 gloryhole tokens! Just like that in 24 hours!

Now I got Memphis +1.5 to win another hundred, and because I’m posting this it might NOW be a good time to fade, so I’m giving you plenty of time to jump on North Texas. Or you can hop on the male sex train with me, the choice is yours. Bear in mind I will eventually lose, that is Satan’s inevitability. But wouldn’t it be cool if I didn’t.

Go tigers go!

[gauchojake]

[lakerboy]

Losing the first leg means nothing . The second leg is more important. A lot of teams play not to lose big on first game. Nice pick!

Both legs are important but taking away the away goal rule puts Munich at a clear advantage now

[texhooper]

Adding Merrimack -10.5 live

[pavyracer]

Both legs are important but taking away the away goal rule puts Munich at a clear advantage now

The away rule was a disaster as teams played not to concede goals at home. The idea with eliminating it was to increase scoring and get more people to watch.

[texhooper]

Adding Merrimack -10.5 live

Cashed this out and put the amount lost on Memphis +1.5.

Tigers baby let’s go!

[texhooper]

Adding Merrimack -10.5 live

Stupid idea. Loser. Hope no one tailed and didn’t cash out.

Tigers look engaged now after playing like total shit to start so that’s good

[texhooper]

If you tailed Merrimack all the way through then double up on Memphis. North Texas had an onslaught of threes early, didn’t make a two til like 5 minutes left in the half. 9 threes to 2 twos ain’t gonna repeat itself over the course of a college basketball game and the Tigers are clearly more talented and are figuring it out offensively and only down 3 after being down 18-4 early.

Tigers HAVE played like shit all year compared to how good they SHOULD be so don’t go crazy. I just can’t see them losing this game

[lakerboy]

The away rule was a disaster as teams played not to concede goals at home. The idea with eliminating it was to increase scoring and get more people to watch.

The away goals rule was good man. They got rid of it for one reason and that was to avoid dogs winning. Look at the position Lazio would be in now if the rule was still in place. They would need a goal to kill the tie.

Uefa wants the Munich and city types moving on.

[texhooper]

The away goals rule was good man. They got rid of it for one reason and that was to avoid dogs winning. Look at the position Lazio would be in now if the rule was still in place. They would need a goal to kill the tie.

Uefa wants the Munich and city types moving on.

Edit: nm I get it now

[lakerboy]

The away goals rule was good man. They got rid of it for one reason and that was to avoid dogs winning. Look at the position Lazio would be in now if the rule was still in place. They would need a goal to kill the tie.

Uefa wants the Munich and city types moving on.

[lakerboy]

Edit: nm I get it now

Yup

Lazio is +180 to qualify that would not be the case If away goals rule was in place.

[pavyracer]

The away goals rule was good man. They got rid of it for one reason and that was to avoid dogs winning. Look at the position Lazio would be in now if the rule was still in place. They would need a goal to kill the tie.

Uefa wants the Munich and city types moving on.

You think UEFA cares about the gamblers and the dogs? This was done to get more people to watch the games as the games become more high scoring. In the old system a team with a 1 million dollars payroll will park the bus vs a team with a 100 million payroll to get a 0-0 at home as not conceding was very important (denying the visiting team the away goal). So most coaches played very defensively on first game to get the 0-0 draw at home. Yes this is bad for the gamblers but this is not why UEFA changed it.

[lakerboy]

You think UEFA cares about the gamblers and the dogs? This was done to get more people to watch the games as the games become more high scoring. In the old system a team with a 1 million dollars payroll will park the bus vs a team with a 100 million payroll to get a 0-0 at home as not conceding was very important (denying the visiting team the away goal). So most coaches played very defensively on first game to get the 0-0 draw at home. Yes this is bad for the gamblers but this is not why UEFA changed it.

Wrong again. It didn't increase scoring though. Stats show that. Yes they do care about dogs winning your own argument proves that because they want the name teams in. They stopped it right after Spurs made the final after a late away goal vs Ajax.

[pavyracer]

Wrong again. It didn't increase scoring though. Stats show that. Yes they do care about dogs winning your own argument proves that because they want the name teams in. They stopped it right after Spurs made the final after a late away goal vs Ajax.

I'd listen to the UEFA president. He knows more about you.

UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin explained: "The impact of the rule now runs counter to its original purpose as, in fact, it now dissuades home teams - especially in first legs - from attacking, because they fear conceding a goal that would give their opponents a crucial advantage."

[lakerboy]

I'd listen to the UEFA president. He knows more about you.

He proved my point though. Who is the home team usually first? The dog. Dogs started winning too much and that's not good because they want name teams in. He also said home advantage isn't what it used to be. Well then why do they base who plays at home second on record in the competition?

He basically echoed what I was saying. They don't want the dogs to win no matter how it goes about.

[texhooper]

Memphis loses. Bad times