Why would someone pretend to like an UNDERwear to seem sharp ?
Ex: 2 Strong Defenses and Average/Bad Offenses.
One might assume, it will be a game of field goals and low scoring.
But if the game is played mostly at 20-30 yard lines, wouldnt it mean just as likely for fumbles/ INTs to occur and hence scoring ? -maybe even fumble/INT returned for TDs and safeties.
Bottomline, you cannot cap turnovers and they are especially deadly at the RZ.
---------
I generally dont bet totals. But only way I see it, maybe if you play certain angles like:
STrong Running game + Low passing game + Good Defense & Safeties = Under
Bad safeties + Good defenses + QBs who can take shots = Overs
High powered Offenses (Passing) + Bad Pass Ds - One dimensional Offenses = Overs
High powered offense + Opposing team Bad/overrated Defense = TT overs
-----------
TL;DR Version = Is liking an game to go under really sharp or just trying to play the public-fade-over ?
One might assume, it will be a game of field goals and low scoring.
But if the game is played mostly at 20-30 yard lines, wouldnt it mean just as likely for fumbles/ INTs to occur and hence scoring ? -maybe even fumble/INT returned for TDs and safeties.
Bottomline, you cannot cap turnovers and they are especially deadly at the RZ.
---------
I generally dont bet totals. But only way I see it, maybe if you play certain angles like:
STrong Running game + Low passing game + Good Defense & Safeties = Under
Bad safeties + Good defenses + QBs who can take shots = Overs
High powered Offenses (Passing) + Bad Pass Ds - One dimensional Offenses = Overs
High powered offense + Opposing team Bad/overrated Defense = TT overs
-----------
TL;DR Version = Is liking an game to go under really sharp or just trying to play the public-fade-over ?