All over the Bengals ml +170 in the Superbowl

[OldBill]

adding this fact in my new thread the teams that burnt your money all season are 100% losers s/u and ATS in the past SB's i found 0-7 00000000 and SEVEN Rams in season 7/10 ats Bengals 10/7 ats

so sorry about Rams backers


don't ya'll see whats happening that the Bengals gave up right to wear white jerseys ......... Rams get to wear white jerseys

also REMIND you rams backers The Rams share stadium with Chargers when teams are truly home field the other locker room is marked Visitors and Where are THE Chargers? NOT playing in the superbowl LOL

[psufan]

Only if you are right about that.

Evan McPherson>Matt Gay
Chase+Higgins+Boyd>Kupp+Beckham Jr
Mixon>Akers

Word bro. Exactly. People been doubting the bengals all playoffs and look at where they are. Joey B ain’t bad either.

[MartingaleMikey]

Only if you are right about that.

Evan McPherson>Matt Gay
Chase+Higgins+Boyd>Kupp+Beckham Jr
Mixon>Akers

Kickers 🤣. If you really think Cupp and OBJ aren’t as good as Chase and Higgins I don’t know what to tell you 🤷🏻*♂️. Cupp won the triple crown.
Akers has been much better the second half of the season and running backs aren’t even that important.

[MartingaleMikey]

Anyone know lakers superbowl record

He sucks in Super Bowls, NBA finals and World Series but is pretty good in playoffs overall.

Goatmilk is even worse though because he sucks off superstars and favorites every time. Like when he guaranteed the Nets would beat the Bucks in game 7 and bet his house on it. Always fade Goatmilk if he’s extremely confident.

[ChuckyTheGoat]

Laker, you looking fwd to this game?

[Shutup]

I am not worried about spread bring some magic number

look at the teams playing

I brought it
The stat is 9-0 and will be 10-0

[pimike]

Good luck taking Stafford. He will show his true colors at the worst time. I will take my chances with a winner.

Lol

Yea a 2 year kid will have less pressure than Staffiord?

Don’t think so.

However I haven’t bet either way yet.

[Shutup]

Lol

Yea a 2 year kid will have less pressure than Staffiord?

Don’t think so.

However I haven’t bet either way yet.

Yes
Staffords whole career is based on him choking and not being clutch
He needs this
Joey B has showed he is clutch and has his whole career ahead of him
No one is really saying he has to show he is not a choker and he is a winner
Much less pressure on him and Bengals
Young QB and team with years to win

[pimike]

No. The points won't come into play. Bengals win SU or they don't cover. My money is on Bengals. Year of the Tiger. Good luck.

Actually yes 2022 is the year of the Tiger, but this Super Bowl is for the year of 2021 season the year of the OX. So that is closer to a Ram.

[KiDBaZkiT]

Over the years I would say 25% of Lakers NFL wagers have been on the Bengals. I feel it is due to the important place the Tiger holds in the Indian culture.

[budwiser]

Later today (Thursday) is usually when the line finally starts moving.

The Chevy Chase vacation crowd starts coming into the books.

[DJK]

Two biggest losers/windbags at ESPN, Doug Kezirian and Bill Barnwell, are on the Rams.

That can only be good for the Bengals backers.

[ChuckyTheGoat]

Two biggest losers/windbags at ESPN, Doug Kezirian and Bill Barnwell, are on the Rams.

That can only be good for the Bengals backers.

Barnwell is terrible. Nice info.

[budwiser]

Line has started moving to +4. Interesting the money line hasn't made a big move yet, the line did but not much

Do not wait until Sunday afternoon to make your bet, unless you're prepared to wait an hour + in line at a lot of books

[ChuckyTheGoat]

I'll say one thing:

*If you're betting this game, would feel a lot better w/ a +4.5 ticket than +4.

Steelers over Cowboys, 35-31, comes to mind.

[budwiser]

almost 15% of games end at 3, 10% at 7. 6 has almost caught up with 7

around 4% of games end up at 1, 2, 4, 5, and 8

remember the rule change, 2-pointer and long field goal

the major move would be 3. +4.5 to +4 is significant but my guess is the books consider a 3-point win more likely than a 4-point win. Though with millions on the line, every percentage matters to them of course

[johnnyvegas13]

Line has started moving to +4. Interesting the money line hasn't made a big move yet, the line did but not much

Do not wait until Sunday afternoon to make your bet, unless you're prepared to wait an hour + in line at a lot of books

Sounds like they know rams win but don’t wanna give out any xtra pts

[DJK]

The real big money coming in now.

https://twitter.com/DavidPurdum/status/1492134038391377922

Someone has the balls to make that wager...


Maybe it's Billy Walters.

[DJK]

This tweet tells me the public is on the Rams.

https://twitter.com/DavidPurdum/status/1491835851076214795

But then, why in the hell is the line going down and that book is asking for more Rams bets?

[DJK]

Even scores and odds is showing a lot more $ wagered on the Rams.

https://www.scoresandodds.com/nfl/consensus-picks

So again, why in the hell is the line going down and not up to induce more Bengals bets?

[GunShard]

My future vision on what's going to happen:
Tom Brady winning his first super bowl against the Rams as a +10 underdog.
Joe Burrow winning his first super bowl against the Rams as a +4 underdog.

[OldBill]

GUNSHARD the spread will never go to -6 i never saw spreads moved that much in any superbowls

it's will stay at 3.5 or 4 hoping it's 4 so bigger ML on Bengals

and i really prefer Begals colors Balck jerseys whit pants is dominant Rams white jerseys over yellow pants is like girls colors too princess like

ask any female that knows nothing about foot ball whose colors they like BETCHA close to 100% say Rams

[GunShard]

My mistake I meant to type +4.

[thinwhiteduke]

GUNSHARD the spread will never go to -6 i never saw spreads moved that much in any superbowls

it's will stay at 3.5 or 4 hoping it's 4 so bigger ML on Bengals

and i really prefer Begals colors Balck jerseys whit pants is dominant Rams white jerseys over yellow pants is like girls colors too princess like

ask any female that knows nothing about foot ball whose colors they like BETCHA close to 100% say Rams

Haha

[GunShard]

Two biggest losers/windbags at ESPN, Doug Kezirian and Bill Barnwell, are on the Rams.

That can only be good for the Bengals backers.

Barnell had 49ers defeating Chiefs super bowl which was wrong and Chiefs defeating Bucs super bowl also wrong. Could be a good analyst to fade.

https://www.newsweek.com/super-bowl-2020-predictions-heres-who-football-experts-are-picking-win-2020-super-bowl-miami-1485307

https://www.newsweek.com/super-bowl-2021-predictions-heres-who-football-experts-are-picking-win-1567419

[DJK]

Barnell had 49ers defeating Chiefs super bowl which was wrong and Chiefs defeating Bucs super bowl also wrong. Could be a good analyst to fade.

https://www.newsweek.com/super-bowl-2020-predictions-heres-who-football-experts-are-picking-win-2020-super-bowl-miami-1485307

https://www.newsweek.com/super-bowl-...ng-win-1567419

He writes pages after pages with his analysis of the games. He writes 10X of any other ESPN analysts and always wrong.

I probably made a fortune if I faded all his picks.

He is a perfect example of paralysis by analysis and that's probably what's happening on this board right now.

Just make a pick and hope it wins. Like what I did asking my kids and betting huge and hope they were right.

[pavyracer]

The line won't move until the NFL finalizes the script on what will happen at the end.

[gauchojake]

I see +188 now

Sorry laker

[ChuckyTheGoat]

He writes pages after pages with his analysis of the games. He writes 10X of any other ESPN analysts and always wrong.

I probably made a fortune if I faded all his picks.

He is a perfect example of paralysis by analysis and that's probably what's happening on this board right now.

Just make a pick and hope it wins. Like what I did asking my kids and betting huge and hope they were right.

DJK, you are spot-on.

A little knowledge can be dangerous. Barnwell uses a technique that I might call "Research and Project."

If he finds something, he thinks he struck gold. Problem is that his method isn't predictive.

DJK, keep us abreast of his results. You may have found a live-one!

[unde0087]

I see +188 now

Sorry laker

Seaweed and Landers on Rams. I would say his case is pretty strong.

[DJK]

DJK, you are spot-on.

A little knowledge can be dangerous. Barnwell uses a technique that I might call "Research and Project."

If he finds something, he thinks he struck gold. Problem is that his method isn't predictive.

DJK, keep us abreast of his results. You may have found a live-one!

ESPN goes back only about a year on their articles from Bill Barnwell.

These are his results from last year's playoffs, which may not mean much since it's only 1 sample. The closing lines are based on SBR bet365's.

Saints 31 - Bears 10 Push as the line was Saints -11.
Seahawks 24 - Rams 10 NOT even freaking close as the Rams won SU. The line was Seattle -3.
Buccaneers 17 - Washington 7 Push as the line was Tampa -10.
Bills 30 - Colts 20 LOSS as the odd was Buffalo -7.
Steelers 34 - Browns 7 HA HA HA Browns win SU when they were the dog by 5.5.
Ravens 30 - Titans 23 Win as the odd was Ravens -3.5.

Saints 30 - Seahawks 20 Saints lost SU vs Tampa, so wrong again.
Buccaneers 27 - Packers 20 WIN as Tampa was the dog.
Steelers 24 - Bills 21 Didn't count or matter as Pitt lost SU vs Cleveland.
Chiefs 31 - Ravens 20 Chiefs didn't cover -8.5, so LOSS.

Saints 34 - Buccaneers 14 Saints didn't make out of the divisional round, so this doesn't count, but he was wrong either way.
Chiefs 30 - Steelers 24 This doesn't matter as Pitt lost in the 1st round.

Saints 24 - Chiefs 20 This could have been right, but the Saints didn't make to the SB55.

You see his pick history for the last year's playoffs? Not very good.


For this year's SB, after pages after pages of whatever the hell he said which I didn't bother reading, he predicted Rams 27 - Bengals 17.

I'm hoping he is dead wrong.

However, there is one prediction which I tend to respect and that's Howie Long's. He is predicting Rams 27 - Bengals 20. Now, that concerns me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q34fg_Ww-dk

[ThaTopMoron]

if the bengals close over +170 when the Rams are up early LB will come in and post "looks like a loser" then not say anything else and pray the bengals fluke it out

[lakerboy]

if the bengals close over +170 when the Rams are up early LB will come in and post "looks like a loser" then not say anything else and pray the bengals fluke it out

I fully expect the rams to be up early and lose in the end.

[ThaTopMoron]

I fully expect the rams to be up early and lose in the end.

here we are... yawn

[ChuckyTheGoat]

I fully expect the rams to be up early and lose in the end.

Laker, you have a Live camera feed?