Why In The F**k Did N. Carolina Take a Time Out W 45 Sec Left

**dsgator55** · 12-30-21, 04:05 PM

Carolina put the backup QB in after they got the ball back. It makes zero sense.

**d2bets** · 12-30-21, 04:07 PM

What if he had missed the FG? In theory, you can score 2 TD's in 45 seconds.

**USCPHILLYGUY** · 12-30-21, 04:15 PM

Ok

**d2bets** · 12-30-21, 04:22 PM

I didn't understand why they didn't use the TO before that though. I never have a problem with a team that's behind who tries anything to have a chance. Like I said, let's say he misses the FG and they bomb a TD on the first snap. Get that onsides and you're in business. 0.1% chance is still better than 0.00%.

**no options** · 12-30-21, 04:27 PM

good point

**jjgold** · 12-30-21, 04:31 PM

USC part of game man

There are winners and there are losers with bad beat your move onto the next game and you don’t dwell on the past

**USCPHILLYGUY** · 12-30-21, 04:34 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

USC part of game man

There are winners and there are losers with bad beat your move onto the next game and you don’t dwell on the past

You’re right coach. Game should have been over way before that.

**d2bets** · 12-30-21, 04:34 PM

Originally posted by USCPHILLYGUY

You’re right coach. Game should have been over way before that.

Actually, the game was an over all game. Under should have never had a chance. Losing that under is not a bad beat at all.

**Slurry Pumper** · 12-30-21, 04:38 PM

They did it because they knew that I had the over and I was on the side of the fixed game this time. Its not even a bad beat for the under players. The game was an over the whole time. It would have been a unfortunate loss for me had the under happened.
I also knew that SC would kick the field goal if given the chance in the end because the kicker needed 3 for some record and he already had 2 in the game so toss him a bone in who cares time for the team.

**pavyracer** · 12-30-21, 04:40 PM

The coaches do what the books ask. The timeout was called to give time to consult with Vegas book managers.

**big joe 1212** · 12-30-21, 09:16 PM

They wanted to block the FG and return it for a TD, then onside kick, recover, then score another TD

**hehfest** · 12-31-21, 12:16 AM

The South Carolina coach had no choice but to make that kick once the UNC coach called the senseless timeout. The fact of the matter is is he should've used that timeout way way before he did. The fact he still had that timeout left at that point in the game just goes to show you he didn't want to be covered in MAYO.

**hehfest** · 12-31-21, 12:19 AM

Originally posted by big joe 1212

They wanted to block the FG and return it for a TD, then onside kick, recover, then score another TD

0.000001% chance of all that with SC playing a prevent D that whole time. Although, the odds of that and a healthy person dying from Covid-5g6g are about the same.

**BigJay** · 12-31-21, 01:06 AM

I think the fg kicker set a school record with that kick.

I was real surprised he kicked it too. Really only way SC could have lost. NC could have blocked it for a TD. Onside kick, a couple of long throws for a TD to tie.

**thetrinity** · 12-31-21, 07:27 AM

Brown should have called the timeout long before that. The kicker for sc was going for a school record or something so of course they would kick it. Odd stuff goes on in these bowls sometimes