Ronald Jones Over 47.5 Yards Rushing / -129.0 units

[JacketFan81]

WrOnG, tHoSe ArE nOt HiS rEcOrDs DuMbShIT

Lol

[JacketFan81]

Wrong, those aren't my records you dumb shit.

Then enlighten us.... What are your records????

[thomorino]

Lol

You are a dumb shit

[mjsuax13]

Loss

-56.6 units

LOL! I’m sure your nearest soup kitchen can help you out with thanksgiving.

[thomorino]

LOL! I’m sure your nearest soup kitchen can help you out with thanksgiving.

My records are strong across the board you dumb shit.

[ThanksForTheFade]

My records are strong across the board you dumb shit.

Your records have nothing to do with you being a brokedik dickfagger, idiot.

Or maybe they do

[thomorino]

Your records have nothing to do with you being a brokedik dickfagger, idiot.

Or maybe they do

You are a dumb shit.

[stevenash]

You know why Corky here is such a loser.

Because he doesn't do any homework or research to back up his incredible sting of stupid, downright idiotic statements he makes and tries to pass of as facts and he knows what he's talking about.

You're trying to tell the world that D'Andre Swift is not a three down running back because he only has 15 rush attempts a game.
You don't know the very definition of the term 'three down back'

A three down running back is a running back that is on the field 75 percent or near 75 percent of the offensive snaps.
This is how math works, if you are on the field three out of four offensive snaps, or downs if you will, you are a three down running back.
Fourth down is always considered an offensive snap, punt or fake punt or field goal attempt so no running back will ever be on the field 100 percent of the snaps.

Now the fun part.
The part where I once again prove to you and the entire world you don't know what you are talking about, and how you pass of your stupid opinions as facts.
The part where your stupid opinions get disproved again as trash.

Based on your definition of a three down back Swift isn't because he only rushes the ball 15 times a game.
Taylor only averages 17.5 rush attempts per game, so I guess he isn't a three down back too?

Here's the top ten running backs listed in order in offensive snaps.
You know, how many downs they're on the field for.
Take a look at Taylor and Swifts receiving targets and receptions.

Swift and Jonathan Taylor are the best running back pass receivers in the NFL.

Swift leads the NFL is targets for a back, receptions, and yardage.
He rushes only 15 times because the rest of the time on the field he's a receiver.
Taylor only rushes 17.5 times a game because he's a receiver.
But they're not three down backs in your opinion when facts prove other wise.

So...
You want to debate this some more with me.
OK, all day, everyday.
Rules are stick to the topic on hand, use facts only in your debate.
First time you digress or use the term 'dumb shit' or any other pejorative you're DQ'ed and I win. Again.

Remember, I'm not only a superior statistical analyst you're going to debate with, but I'm an asshole too to go with my geeky, nerdy, math degree.

Here are the shocking numbers Corky.
Who's a three down back?

			Snaps					Rushing			Receiving
RK	Name	Team	OFF	OFF%	ST	ST%	TOT	ATT	YDS	TD	TAR	REC	YDS	TD
1	Najee Harris	PIT	559	84.95	0	0	559	188	685	5	62	49	337	2
2	Ezekiel Elliott	DAL	463	67.3	0	0	463	151	695	7	38	32	204	1
3	D'Andre Swift	DET	452	71.97	0	0	452	137	555	4	67	53	420	2
4	Jonathan Taylor	IND	436	63.01	0	0	436	193	1122	13	38	32	322	2
5	Austin Ekeler	LAC	428	66.56	0	0	428	123	573	7	58	45	405	6
6	Darrell Henderson	LAR	419	74.82	0	0	419	126	593	5	34	23	154	2
7	Patrick Ricard	BAL	411	58.22	49	17.01	460	2	4	0	10	6	54	1
8	Myles Gaskin	MIA	403	57.33	4	1.35	407	123	433	1	52	41	209	4
9	Joe Mixon	CIN	401	65.85	0	0	401	180	759	9	26	22	194	2
10	Derrick Henry	TEN	392	71.53	0	0	392	219	937	10	20	18	154	0

[Goat Milk]

You know why Corky here is such a loser.

Because he doesn't do any homework or research to back up his incredible sting of stupid, downright idiotic statements he makes and tries to pass of as facts and he knows what he's talking about.

You're trying to tell the world that D'Andre Swift is not a three down running back because he only has 15 rush attempts a game.
You don't know the very definition of the term 'three down back'

A three down running back is a running back that is on the field 75 percent or near 75 percent of the offensive snaps.
This is how math works, if you are on the field three out of four offensive snaps, or downs if you will, you are a three down running back.
Fourth down is always considered an offensive snap, punt or fake punt or field goal attempt so no running back will ever be on the field 100 percent of the snaps.

Now the fun part.
The part where I once again prove to you and the entire world you don't know what you are talking about, and how you pass of your stupid opinions as facts.
The part where your stupid opinions get disproved again as trash.

Based on your definition of a three down back Swift isn't because he only rushes the ball 15 times a game.
Taylor only averages 17.5 rush attempts per game, so I guess he isn't a three down back too?

Here's the top ten running backs listed in order in offensive snaps.
You know, how many downs they're on the field for.
Take a look at Taylor and Swifts receiving targets and receptions.

Swift and Jonathan Taylor are the best running back pass receivers in the NFL.

Swift leads the NFL is targets for a back, receptions, and yardage.
He rushes only 15 times because the rest of the time on the field he's a receiver.
Taylor only rushes 17.5 times a game because he's a receiver.
But they're not three down backs in your opinion when facts prove other wise.

So...
You want to debate this some more with me.
OK, all day, everyday.
Rules are stick to the topic on hand, use facts only in your debate.
First time you digress or use the term 'dumb shit' or any other pejorative you're DQ'ed and I win. Again.

Remember, I'm not only a superior statistical analyst you're going to debate with, but I'm an asshole too to go with my geeky, nerdy, math degree.

Here are the shocking numbers Corky.
Who's a three down back?

			Snaps					Rushing			Receiving
RK	Name	Team	OFF	OFF%	ST	ST%	TOT	ATT	YDS	TD	TAR	REC	YDS	TD
1	Najee Harris	PIT	559	84.95	0	0	559	188	685	5	62	49	337	2
2	Ezekiel Elliott	DAL	463	67.3	0	0	463	151	695	7	38	32	204	1
3	D'Andre Swift	DET	452	71.97	0	0	452	137	555	4	67	53	420	2
4	Jonathan Taylor	IND	436	63.01	0	0	436	193	1122	13	38	32	322	2
5	Austin Ekeler	LAC	428	66.56	0	0	428	123	573	7	58	45	405	6
6	Darrell Henderson	LAR	419	74.82	0	0	419	126	593	5	34	23	154	2
7	Patrick Ricard	BAL	411	58.22	49	17.01	460	2	4	0	10	6	54	1
8	Myles Gaskin	MIA	403	57.33	4	1.35	407	123	433	1	52	41	209	4
9	Joe Mixon	CIN	401	65.85	0	0	401	180	759	9	26	22	194	2
10	Derrick Henry	TEN	392	71.53	0	0	392	219	937	10	20	18	154	0

Mccaffrey and Kamara are the two best receiving rbs, by far. Not everything is about stats. The eye test says it all.

[trobin31]

Mccaffrey and Kamara are the two best receiving rbs, by far. Not everything is about stats. The eye test says it all.

Agree hands down. Even Antonio Gibson is a better pass catching back than Swift, but has Smooches McKissic taking targets. If Barkley is healthy, and had a check down king like Jared Goff at QB, he’d be tier 1 as well.

[stevenash]

Mccaffrey and Kamara are the two best receiving rbs, by far. Not everything is about stats. The eye test says it all.

But the argument is Swift is a three down back.

CMC is the best receiving back, by far, but DQ'ed from this debate because of injury earlier in the season.

Kamara and Swift are behind CMC in my opinion.

Swift is a top three receiving back in the NFL, based on eye test and numbers/

The debate is, he claims Swift is not a three down back.
He is, he's on the field almost every time Stafford takes a snap.
Numbers say so, and he can't disprove that.

[stevenash]

Agree hands down. Even Antonio Gibson is a better pass catching back, but has Smooches McKissic taking targets. If Barkley is healthy, and had a check down king like Jared Goff at QB, he’d be tied 1 as well.

The debate is Swift is a three down back.

[stevenash]

If you want to play the eye test, opinion only game Matt Forte was the greatest pass receiving running back I've ever seen.

But stay on topic, is Swift three down back?
Yes, or no?

[trobin31]

The debate is Swift is a three down back.

I guess I would say what is ones definition of a three down back? Like I wouldn’t say Barry Sanders or Adrian Peterson were 3 down backs due to drastic inefficiencies in certain situations.

[trobin31]

Swift reminds me a lot of L’veon Bell

[stevenash]

Swift reminds me a lot of L’veon Bell

Snap counts, and snap count percentages say Swift is on the field every first three downs Detroit has the ball.
That's the definition. Three downs. Cut and dried.
The data backs this up, he's a three down back.

Forte in his prime when he was in Chicago was the same back Bell in his prime when he was in Pittsburgh.
Both the data and the eye test backs that up.

I used to love watching Bell run in his prime too.
Forte never dropped a pass, the guy was a machine.

I just went to the database.
Forte in his seven year consecutive prime averaged 7 targets a game, 6.2 of them were caught for receptions for a ten yard gain.
Think about that, how many running backs can average 10 yards per carry?
OK, it was a pass usually in the flats or something out of the backfield, but every time that happens it's ten yards.

[ThanksForTheFade]

Loss

-56.6 units

Mother of god

[thomorino]

Lol

Then enlighten us.... What are your records????

LOL! I’m sure your nearest soup kitchen can help you out with thanksgiving.

Your records have nothing to do with you being a brokedik dickfagger, idiot.

Or maybe they do

You know why Corky here is such a loser.

Because he doesn't do any homework or research to back up his incredible sting of stupid, downright idiotic statements he makes and tries to pass of as facts and he knows what he's talking about.

You're trying to tell the world that D'Andre Swift is not a three down running back because he only has 15 rush attempts a game.
You don't know the very definition of the term 'three down back'

A three down running back is a running back that is on the field 75 percent or near 75 percent of the offensive snaps.
This is how math works, if you are on the field three out of four offensive snaps, or downs if you will, you are a three down running back.
Fourth down is always considered an offensive snap, punt or fake punt or field goal attempt so no running back will ever be on the field 100 percent of the snaps.

Now the fun part.
The part where I once again prove to you and the entire world you don't know what you are talking about, and how you pass of your stupid opinions as facts.
The part where your stupid opinions get disproved again as trash.

Based on your definition of a three down back Swift isn't because he only rushes the ball 15 times a game.
Taylor only averages 17.5 rush attempts per game, so I guess he isn't a three down back too?

Here's the top ten running backs listed in order in offensive snaps.
You know, how many downs they're on the field for.
Take a look at Taylor and Swifts receiving targets and receptions.

Swift and Jonathan Taylor are the best running back pass receivers in the NFL.

Swift leads the NFL is targets for a back, receptions, and yardage.
He rushes only 15 times because the rest of the time on the field he's a receiver.
Taylor only rushes 17.5 times a game because he's a receiver.
But they're not three down backs in your opinion when facts prove other wise.

So...
You want to debate this some more with me.
OK, all day, everyday.
Rules are stick to the topic on hand, use facts only in your debate.
First time you digress or use the term 'dumb shit' or any other pejorative you're DQ'ed and I win. Again.

Remember, I'm not only a superior statistical analyst you're going to debate with, but I'm an asshole too to go with my geeky, nerdy, math degree.

Here are the shocking numbers Corky.
Who's a three down back?

			Snaps					Rushing			Receiving
RK	Name	Team	OFF	OFF%	ST	ST%	TOT	ATT	YDS	TD	TAR	REC	YDS	TD
1	Najee Harris	PIT	559	84.95	0	0	559	188	685	5	62	49	337	2
2	Ezekiel Elliott	DAL	463	67.3	0	0	463	151	695	7	38	32	204	1
3	D'Andre Swift	DET	452	71.97	0	0	452	137	555	4	67	53	420	2
4	Jonathan Taylor	IND	436	63.01	0	0	436	193	1122	13	38	32	322	2
5	Austin Ekeler	LAC	428	66.56	0	0	428	123	573	7	58	45	405	6
6	Darrell Henderson	LAR	419	74.82	0	0	419	126	593	5	34	23	154	2
7	Patrick Ricard	BAL	411	58.22	49	17.01	460	2	4	0	10	6	54	1
8	Myles Gaskin	MIA	403	57.33	4	1.35	407	123	433	1	52	41	209	4
9	Joe Mixon	CIN	401	65.85	0	0	401	180	759	9	26	22	194	2
10	Derrick Henry	TEN	392	71.53	0	0	392	219	937	10	20	18	154	0

But the argument is Swift is a three down back.

CMC is the best receiving back, by far, but DQ'ed from this debate because of injury earlier in the season.

Kamara and Swift are behind CMC in my opinion.

Swift is a top three receiving back in the NFL, based on eye test and numbers/

The debate is, he claims Swift is not a three down back.
He is, he's on the field almost every time Stafford takes a snap.
Numbers say so, and he can't disprove that.

The debate is Swift is a three down back.

If you want to play the eye test, opinion only game Matt Forte was the greatest pass receiving running back I've ever seen.

But stay on topic, is Swift three down back?
Yes, or no?

Snap counts, and snap count percentages say Swift is on the field every first three downs Detroit has the ball.
That's the definition. Three downs. Cut and dried.
The data backs this up, he's a three down back.

Forte in his prime when he was in Chicago was the same back Bell in his prime when he was in Pittsburgh.
Both the data and the eye test backs that up.

I used to love watching Bell run in his prime too.
Forte never dropped a pass, the guy was a machine.

I just went to the database.
Forte in his seven year consecutive prime averaged 7 targets a game, 6.2 of them were caught for receptions for a ten yard gain.
Think about that, how many running backs can average 10 yards per carry?
OK, it was a pass usually in the flats or something out of the backfield, but every time that happens it's ten yards.

Mother of god

Dumb shits

[thomorino]

Swift is not a three down back and the bigger point here dumb shit Nash doesn't understand is that the distinction between full time and part time backs isn't snap count it's usage. Swift has gotten less than 15 carries in half the game he has played in, he's not a fulltime back at all.

[thomorino]

If you want to play the eye test, opinion only game Matt Forte was the greatest pass receiving running back I've ever seen.

But stay on topic, is Swift three down back?
Yes, or no?

Matt Forte was nowher near as good as faulk or Kamara as a refeivingrunning back. Just stop you dumb shit.

[thomorino]

Mccaffrey and Kamara are the two best receiving rbs, by far. Not everything is about stats. The eye test says it all.

Aaron Jones is a very good receiving running back as well, he runs routes like a receiver, including fade routes.

[thomorino]

David Montgomery over 80.5 yards rushing -114

Risking 5.7 units to win 5

[thomorino]

Ezekiel Elliot over 62.5 yards rushing -117

Risking 5.68 units to win 5

[KnuckleHeadz]

Ezekiel Elliot over 62.5 yards rushing -117

Risking 5.68 units to win 5

🤣🤣🤣

[unlearn]

Thanks for the fades. God bless

[HappyGilmore18]

Ezekiel Elliot over 62.5 yards rushing -117

Risking 5.68 units to win 5

StRoNg ReCoRdS aCrOsS ThE bOaRd

[KnuckleHeadz]

Thanks for the fades. God bless

Ezekiel can’t even muster over 2.8ypc when Thomorino places a bet on him 🤣🤣🤣

[thomorino]

Thanks for the fades. God bless

StRoNg ReCoRdS aCrOsS ThE bOaRd

Ezekiel can’t even muster over 2.8ypc when Thomorino places a bet on him 🤣🤣🤣

Dumb shits

[thomorino]

Marathon Lattimore over 3.5 tackles -135 risking 7 units to win 5.18

[thomorino]

Matt Milano over 6.5 tackles -115 risking 5.75 units to win 5

[mjsuax13]

david montgomery over 80.5 yards rushing -114

risking 5.7 units to win 5

loss. -62.3

[ThanksForTheFade]

Hes super unhinged LOL. desperation indeed now

[mjsuax13]

Ezekiel Elliot over 62.5 yards rushing -117

Risking 5.68 units to win 5

Another LOSS. -67.98

[ThanksForTheFade]

-135, -115 it begins!!!

[HappyGilmore18]

Marathon Lattimore over 3.5 tackles -135 risking 7 units to win 5.18

Is Lattimore running a marathon tonight?