Do you clowns realize why some people get limited

[jjgold]

It’s not because there are winners That is a extremely rare example

1. Arbers
2. Betting off markets where books do not pay attention to off lines
3. Betting bad lines
4 steam players
5. Bonus whores going all in


None of these people win Just bottom of the barrel Gamblers the Books don’t want it I’m glad they get rid of them

[stevek173]

[Runeblade]

Betting the Hawks +4 last night was a bad line for me......lol

[flyingillini]

Words to live by

[thedenthead]

JJ you never been limited.

[Crusherrr]

It’s not because there are winners That is a extremely rare example

1. Arbers
2. Betting off markets where books do not pay attention to off lines
3. Betting bad lines
4 steam players
5. Bonus whores going all in


None of these people win Just bottom of the barrel Gamblers the Books don’t want it I’m glad they get rid of them

3 and 4 correct.

The rest, wrong. But what does a lifetime loser know anyways.

[TommieGunshot]

It’s not because there are winners That is a extremely rare example

1. Arbers
2. Betting off markets where books do not pay attention to off lines
3. Betting bad lines
4 steam players
5. Bonus whores going all in


None of these people win Just bottom of the barrel Gamblers the Books don’t want it I’m glad they get rid of them

1 - There is no possible way a book would know if I am making arbitrage bets. If DK has one side at -220 and bookmaker has the other side at +230, how would they know that I'm betting both of them?
2 - Which books will limit players for doing this that don't already have low limits for everyone on these off markets?

3 - Possibly

4 - Maybe on small markets. Doing it on NFL or Premier League games usually won't happen.

5 - Which sportsbooks will limit action based on this, instead of just limiting bonuses?

I'm going to predict jj won't be able to answer these questions, because as usual he has no clue what he is talking about.

[mjsuax13]

3 and 4 correct.

The rest, wrong. But what does a lifetime loser know anyways.

Buried ‘em!

[dmm]

None of those items matter to a competent bookmaker.

Set the line, take the bet, repeat.

[Eddy Munny]

They shouldn't care if you're chasing steam, it means you'll always be getting a less favorable number.

[KVB]

They shouldn't care if you're chasing steam, it means you'll always be getting a less favorable number.

Depends on the book, and teh eixstence of a win streak.

But if they are beating the steam, then it lends to my next point.

[RudyRuetigger]

you guys are all arguing semantics


when everything is defined, i doubt many disagreements

[KVB]

It’s not because there are winners That is a extremely rare example

1. Arbers
2. Betting off markets where books do not pay attention to off lines
3. Betting bad lines
4 steam players
5. Bonus whores going all in


None of these people win Just bottom of the barrel Gamblers the Books don’t want it I’m glad they get rid of them

I've been limited on Totals at one of your favorite books when I wasn't even losing money. But I was beating the shit out of their closing line with a fairly new account, regularly and by a lot. It was NCAAB Totals.

I've also been limited, then eventually booted, after completing bonus rollover and being told nobody completes the rollover and that I must have misrepresented myself as an amateur bettor, they don't offer accounts to professionals.

Don't believe those fall into any of your catagories, Gold.

[RudyRuetigger]

It’s not because there are winners That is a extremely rare example

1. Arbers
2. Betting off markets where books do not pay attention to off lines
3. Betting bad lines
4 steam players
5. Bonus whores going all in


None of these people win Just bottom of the barrel Gamblers the Books don’t want it I’m glad they get rid of them

3 and 4 correct.

The rest, wrong. But what does a lifetime loser know anyways.

1 - There is no possible way a book would know if I am making arbitrage bets. If DK has one side at -220 and bookmaker has the other side at +230, how would they know that I'm betting both of them?
2 - Which books will limit players for doing this that don't already have low limits for everyone on these off markets?

3 - Possibly

4 - Maybe on small markets. Doing it on NFL or Premier League games usually won't happen.

5 - Which sportsbooks will limit action based on this, instead of just limiting bonuses?

I'm going to predict jj won't be able to answer these questions, because as usual he has no clue what he is talking about.

2 is pretty clear cut


jj is right


tommie made a statement, i guess to add a further point, it is what jj said

[KiDBaZkiT]

I’ve been limited plenty of times. Mostly at shot books and was for nine of the above. You know bookmaker? Hot shots take 50k bets right? They have limited me to win $200 and $300 multiple times. Limited me to win $100 on KHL hockey lines, do I need to embarrass SBR like I just did Sammy when he unjustly called me out cuz hardcore bookmaker made a line live before the match started? Guess the guy should stick to selling cars and losing 3k on mlb

[Ghenghis Kahn]

JJ that can't even do 3+4x2 is giving advice on gambling.

The reason why you get limited is because you go on a run and the books actually think you have a clue.

[RudyRuetigger]

JJ that can't even do 3+4x2 is giving advice on gambling.

The reason why you get limited is because you go on a run and the books actually think you have a clue.

11??????

[pavyracer]

The guy with the -$60,000 spreadsheet hitting 49% lifetime on -110 bets is going to teach us how people get limited at books!

[thedenthead]

I’m currently limited on Nba player props at Pointsbet. Anytime I try to wager a 1000 or more it’ll accept for about a 3rd of it, then bump the line up 25-30 cents.

[Eddy Munny]

Depends on the book, and teh eixstence of a win streak.

But if they are beating the steam, then it lends to my next point.

If I was a legitimate bookmaker with good volume, I wouldn't care that a guy got hot by chasing steam. It's not some infallible approach to gambling or else literally anyone could do it. The point of moving the number is to adjust the action and respond to the market. If some guy who's constantly picking off the worst of the number after the market has spoken is taking me to the cleaners, well then I guess it's time to close up shop because there's obviously a major hole in the business model. It's not like he's engaging in anything shady or illegal, just betting with the line movement.

More than likely I would just let him keep playing the game he's chosen and eventually he'll give the money back because A) inevitably he's going to suffer a cold streak chasing steam and B) being REactive rather than PROactive and taking the less valuable numbers is going to flip some wins into losses. Then he'll probably become frustrated and resort to some other tactic just like every other Joe Blow.

[Thrilla]

It’s not because there are winners That is a extremely rare example

1. Arbers
2. Betting off markets where books do not pay attention to off lines
3. Betting bad lines
4 steam players
5. Bonus whores going all in


None of these people win Just bottom of the barrel Gamblers the Books don’t want it I’m glad they get rid of them