Why is Chicago even showing up? NO gonna stump on them
42-13
Might start betting again
Chi_archie
SBR Aristocracy
07-22-08
63165
#2
I think this game will be tricky
Comment
Myranda Jones
SBR Sharp
04-28-20
264
#3
Chicago is the worst team besides Washington.
Comment
JMobile
SBR Posting Legend
08-21-10
19070
#4
This is one of those obvious games that not even seaweed can jinx it
Comment
Zlaniner
SBR MVP
08-12-19
1697
#5
Da Bears with points, Def, Montgomery been goin off lately , Trubisky been playing well last few games, Saints offense no Big Plays, Brees banged up, Run game coming off covid, Thomas been out most of year.
Comment
thomorino
Restricted User
06-01-17
45842
#6
Saints have some injury concerns, Brees with his king is obviously not fully healthy, Saints should roll if healthy
Comment
pavyracer
SBR Aristocracy
04-12-07
82489
#7
It's in the NFL rules. They have to show up else they would be fined heavily.
Comment
SBR_Guest_Pro
SBR MVP
02-10-15
3955
#8
Maybe for the TV dollars? Haven't made any money on ticket sales this year so need to get some revenue from TV viewership
Comment
johnnyvegas13
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
05-21-15
27812
#9
I already said bears win
thx weeders
Comment
stevenash
Moderator
01-17-11
65220
#10
Originally posted by Myranda Jones
Chicago is the worst team besides Washington.
Don't sleep on Washington their defense makes life difficult for straight drop back QB's.
Last I checked TB has a 43 year old straight back QB.
Let's not lose sight of the fact that Washington closed like a freight train going 5-2 down the stretch.
People laughed at me when I told them they'd beat SF straight up.
Fade me if you want tomorrow night.
I love, don't like, but love Washington and 7.5
My best bet.
Comment
d2bets
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-10-05
39990
#11
Hard to count on Trubisky for sure, but it's not impossible. Bears offense has a chance here. They've gotten sneaky better over the last several weeks, if they can avoid turnovers. But if Mooney is out, that's a big loss. He's been coming in along with Kmet and Montgomery. They have weapons, and while Trubisky was more cautious he'll run here when given a chance and he could be dangerous there. Bears do have some major injury issues though. Over 47 looks like the best play to me, but if they push to +11 that's hard to pass up.
Comment
jjgold
SBR Aristocracy
07-20-05
388189
#12
Seaweed anything is possible
Comment
Headsterx
SBR Posting Legend
12-03-16
22435
#13
Originally posted by Seaweed
42-13
Might start betting again
Not after Sunday.
Comment
JIBBBY
SBR Aristocracy
12-10-09
83691
#14
Weeders!!! We missed ya pal!
One of the good guys on this forum!!
Comment
Smoke
SBR Aristocracy
10-09-09
48111
#15
Saer pleeze
Comment
ThaTopMoron
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
04-30-10
27018
#16
Originally posted by Seaweed
42-13
Might start betting again
saints will win
spread might be tricky
they won't lose again to a poor NFC North opponent yet again in the playoffs for a 3rd time in 4 years
Comment
johnnyvegas13
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
05-21-15
27812
#17
Originally posted by ThaTopMoron
saints will win
spread might be tricky
they won't lose again to a poor NFC North opponent yet again in the playoffs for a 3rd time in 4 years
But they will
Comment
clockwise1965
SBR Hall of Famer
10-01-13
6753
#18
Line at -10
Comment
Da Manster!
SBR Posting Legend
07-13-07
17720
#19
Give me the Bears and the generous amount of points here.......these two teams played earlier in the season with the Saints winning in OT 26 - 23...Both teams were healthy and had most of their starters playing except for Michael Thomas who was serving a suspension I believe...Anyhow, Saints had 394 yards of total offense and the Bears had 329 (and that was with sorry ass Nick Foles at QB...hell, he was 28/41 for 272 yds, 2TD's, 1 INT)...as long as Mitch Trubisky doesn't throw bonehead interceptions which give the Saints very short fields or squander away potential Bear's scoring opportunities, Chicago should be able to keep this a one score game and stay well within the number.
Comment
b1slickguy
SBR Posting Legend
11-24-11
11959
#20
Originally posted by JMobile
This is one of those obvious games that not even seaweed can jinx it
Comment
Thrilla
SBR Posting Legend
03-10-15
13809
#21
Seaweed!
Comment
Vene1616
SBR MVP
09-20-20
1023
#22
Originally posted by stevenash
Don't sleep on Washington their defense makes life difficult for straight drop back QB's.
Last I checked TB has a 43 year old straight back QB.
Let's not lose sight of the fact that Washington closed like a freight train going 5-2 down the stretch.
People laughed at me when I told them they'd beat SF straight up.
Fade me if you want tomorrow night.
I love, don't like, but love Washington and 7.5
My best bet.
Lets say Smith is ruled out and his backup starts the game. Do you still love this, say at plus 8 plus 9?
Comment
cincinnatikid513
SBR Aristocracy
11-23-17
45360
#23
seabiscuit u can make the saints turn into the aints
Comment
thomorino
Restricted User
06-01-17
45842
#24
Originally posted by Da Manster!
Give me the Bears and the generous amount of points here.......these two teams played earlier in the season with the Saints winning in OT 26 - 23...Both teams were healthy and had most of their starters playing except for Michael Thomas who was serving a suspension I believe...Anyhow, Saints had 394 yards of total offense and the Bears had 329 (and that was with sorry ass Nick Foles at QB...hell, he was 28/41 for 272 yds, 2TD's, 1 INT)...as long as Mitch Trubisky doesn't throw bonehead interceptions which give the Saints very short fields or squander away potential Bear's scoring opportunities, Chicago should be able to keep this a one score game and stay well within the number.
The Saints scored 26 points in that game without either of their starting receivers sanders and Thomas. Stupid take. That game was on grass without the Saints having either starting receiver, it means zero.
Comment
Da Manster!
SBR Posting Legend
07-13-07
17720
#25
Originally posted by thomorino
The Saints scored 26 points in that game without either of their starting receivers sanders and Thomas. Stupid take. That game was on grass without the Saints having either starting receiver, it means zero.
fuk off
Comment
thomorino
Restricted User
06-01-17
45842
#26
Originally posted by Da Manster!
fuk off
You are a dumb shit.
Comment
Da Manster!
SBR Posting Legend
07-13-07
17720
#27
Originally posted by thomorino
You are a dumb shit.
you are a parasite
Comment
thomorino
Restricted User
06-01-17
45842
#28
Originally posted by Da Manster!
you are a parasite
You are a dumb shit
Comment
Da Manster!
SBR Posting Legend
07-13-07
17720
#29
Originally posted by thomorino
You are a dumb shit
fuk off
Comment
thomorino
Restricted User
06-01-17
45842
#30
Originally posted by Da Manster!
fuk off
You are a dumb shit
Comment
Da Manster!
SBR Posting Legend
07-13-07
17720
#31
Originally posted by thomorino
You are a dumb shit
you are a parasite
Comment
pologq
SBR Posting Legend
10-07-12
19899
#32
i like the saints to win by 10. makes it a no bet for me except in teasers.
Comment
Da Manster!
SBR Posting Legend
07-13-07
17720
#33
Originally posted by pologq
i like the saints to win by 10. makes it a no bet for me except in teasers.
this is probably one of those games where you can tease either side and win...