I thought for sure they would and give it to NO after what happened to the Saints last year
Should they have reviewed the final play in NO/Minn game?
Collapse
X
-
dlowillySBR Posting Legend
- 11-09-16
- 13862
#1Should they have reviewed the final play in NO/Minn game?
50Yes0%23No0%27Tags: None -
stackz125SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-03-16
- 6192
#2Last year is last year.
I didnt watch the game until the last 3mins.
It matters how they were calling the entire game. The refs should be consistent.Comment -
slayer14SBR Posting Legend
- 08-12-13
- 22022
#3Kirk Cousins proved why he a world class standard player todayComment -
MinnesotaFatsSBR Posting Legend
- 12-18-10
- 14758
-
UnrivaledSBR Hall of Famer
- 10-24-11
- 6685
#5Losers complain about refs when their team comes out flat for the first 3 quarters of a playoff game. Drew Brees is a bum and lost them the game.Comment -
Hu$tleSBR MVP
- 03-31-15
- 1365
#6Wrs push off like that on every play i think it was to be obvious and bigComment -
MrSinkSBR Hall of Famer
- 12-30-08
- 8087
#7they should ve revieved because it is fckn OT and thats the whole point of creating this fckn system
and after review we would know that TD was absolutely legit and vickings won . every single game changing questionable spot needs to replayed .Comment -
MinnesotaFatsSBR Posting Legend
- 12-18-10
- 14758
#8Yeah you're not taking away a WIN for incidental contact versus a DB who isn't even in position.Comment -
pablo222SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-03-19
- 8858
#9To the more important question. Who is hacking the poker?Comment -
fecgp40SBR Hall of Famer
- 02-01-11
- 5750
#10Cousins came through when it counted. Definitely outplayed Brees TODAY. But let's not get carried away.Comment -
WvGamblerSBR Posting Legend
- 04-19-10
- 11618
#11Should they have looked at it? Yes.
Should it get overturned? No
So what’s the point.Comment -
SBR_Guest_ProSBR MVP
- 02-10-15
- 3955
#14YesComment -
blankoblancoSBR MVP
- 11-18-11
- 3500
#16Nice throw and catch with standard physical contact on a game-winner, and you want to possibly overturn it for some ticky-tack crap? That's exactly what we hate about the refs, be grateful they didn't do it this time for the sake of the gameComment -
dlowillySBR Posting Legend
- 11-09-16
- 13862
#18By the letter of the law, that was OPI. He extended his arm to get separation. I don't like the Saints but if they wanted to somewhat make up for last year they could have by reviewing and calling it OPI which it was. Full disclosure I had no bet on the game.Comment -
gojetsgomoxiesSBR MVP
- 09-04-12
- 4222
#19
i think replay needs to be fast, non-slomo and egregiously bad miss on the call. i guess something like foot in-bounds or down-by-contact isn't really judgement. more black/white.. but alot of other stuff is very grayComment -
trytrytrySBR Posting Legend
- 03-13-06
- 23652
#20nfl has already ruined the game with these super slow mo, not enough angles but ok change whatever you want on a judgement. call. less reviews the better, this one not even worth a blink but on scoring they do look at them anyway.Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17822
#21Definetly should have,I mean their always banging on about wanting to get the plays right.Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17822
#22No Rudolph did push off, lets call a spade a spade here.Comment -
sjm5122SBR MVP
- 09-22-08
- 4213
#24But did he make a football move?Comment -
eidolonSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-02-08
- 9531
#26I say no. But I also think reviewing pass interference needs to die.Comment -
krk1030SBR Posting Legend
- 08-13-08
- 17610
#27They should in a vacuum but with how the replay has been all year no. And just remove the rule.Comment -
jtolerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-17-13
- 30967
#28If reviewed they throw flag lotta offensive pi on plays but that one was little more influential in the reception being made factor in the play deciding the game. Refs screw saints with vikes two yrs in a rowComment -
Jeep_Life 42SBR MVP
- 09-28-15
- 1388
#29whats the point of the rule change than?Comment -
blankoblancoSBR MVP
- 11-18-11
- 3500
#32The PI review rule is for super egregious stuff that the refs just literally didn't see because it was obscured from their view or they were watching something else. It is not for stuff like this. End of storyComment -
mngamblerSBR MVP
- 08-01-11
- 2890
#33I'm sure that smug little queef of a coach will complain and get 4 new rules implemented next yearComment -
SBR TonyModerator
- 01-31-18
- 3934
#34I think if it wasn't the last play of the game, it would have been reviewedComment -
d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 39995
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code