Tonight's Steelers / Browns game

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stevenash
    Moderator
    • 01-17-11
    • 65700

    #1
    Tonight's Steelers / Browns game
    After looking at this game for pretty much close to an hour I've deemed this contest pretty much unbettable.
    You guys have any angles tonight?

    I don't trust the Browns in many spots.
    I was one of the few posters here back in August who saw this Browns underachieving act coming.
    Just because you add a collection of talented 'me first' head case players doesn't make you instant champions.
    I can only think of George Steinbrenner's early ownership days that pulled that off.

    Like I said, I don't trust the Browns especially at home.
    Look at their home games so far.
    Blown out of the water versus at best a mediocre Titan team.
    A loss to a suddenly mediocre Rams team, and a four point loss to Seattle.
    If you're going to contend for a championship you have to beat Seattle at home. That's the way I see it.

    Browns only win at home was last week against a new and improved Bills squad by three, hardly a quality win.
    A decent win? Yes. A quality win? no.

    And I don't trust the Steelers on the road either.
    At first glance that 5-4 record may seem pretty good without the services of Bell, Brown, and Ben.
    This is the Steelers fourth road game, they have one win against a Charger team where half of Rivers offensive linemen were out on IR and had second teamers blocking for him.
    The other two games were a blowout by 30 to the Champs, no crime in losing to New England but could you please put up a better showing? And a tough beat on the road to SF however a loss is a loss tough beat or rout.
    (Most JV squads can win at home against the Bengals and the Dolphins but Pitt isn't home)

    I don't trust Cleveland at home and I don't trust Pitt on the road.
    I might play the Steelers if I could get +3.5 but the line isn't budging off of 3 flat.

    Now before you say "Nasher, buy the half point" I'll tell you a thousand times a resounding NO!
    Riddle me this fellas? If buying the half point (the hook) was +EV for us bettors do you really think the books would offer that option? It's a long term losing proposition.

    I'm not going to get into an elaborate math example here but briefly unless your shop is giving you a discounted price on buying a half point off of a three point line one must pay a premium price of .25 cents.
    So instead of (unless you have a reduced juice shop) moving a 3 point line from -110 to -2.5 means you are now laying -135 juice.

    Since 2003 there have been 664 NFL games where the home team was a three point favorite.
    In those 664 NFL games the home team at -3 has a record of 287-316-61 ATS
    (I did the work using Sports Insight's Bet Labs Software.)
    Almost all of you know you must win 52.4 percent of your games or better to turn a profit at -110 juice.
    Like I mentioned the ATS record since 2003 of games where the favorite was exactly three points has a record of 287-316-61 (ATS) which is a win percentage of 47.6 percent far below the 52.4 percent you need to turn a profit.

    Now here's the important part.
    There were 61 pushes at -3 in those 664 games.
    If you bought the hook in each and every game that was -3 and made it -2.5 your record will be now be 348 and 316 which is a win percentage of 52.4 percent.
    Now before you break into a victory dance you paid -135 juice for all those 664 games. not -110.
    At -135 one must win 57.45 percent of the time not 52.4 percent of the time at -110.
    You guys are smart a 52.4 percent win rate where you need to win at a 57.45 percent win rate makes you (say it with your pal Nasher) a long term loser.

    Oh, not for nothing not only can't I find a side to bet the 41.5 total makes me nervous too.
    Do I dare say it, I'm going to sit this one out and just watch it.
  • 2daBank
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 01-26-09
    • 88966

    #2
    I played the 1st half under 20.5, only thing I’m fairly confident in saying Is both defenses better than the offenses.
    Comment
    • GzaTheGenius
      SBR MVP
      • 02-12-13
      • 4181

      #3
      Cleveland shouldnt have won that game last week.

      Im on steelers ml , steelers +3 and have them in a few teasers

      Probably the game im most confident in this week
      Comment
      • Lord_Mar7
        SBR High Roller
        • 11-08-19
        • 174

        #4
        The 3 times these teams have played on short rest TNF; total points of 34, 19, and 17. These are with Ben Roethlisberger as QB.

        With that said, I now expect Baker to throw for 4 TDs and go over 41.5 (I'm in on under 34.5).
        Comment
        • 2daBank
          SBR Aristocracy
          • 01-26-09
          • 88966

          #5
          Originally posted by Lord_Mar7
          The 3 times these teams have played on short rest TNF; total points of 34, 19, and 17. These are with Ben Roethlisberger as QB.

          With that said, I now expect Baker to throw for 4 TDs and go over 41.5 (I'm in on under 34.5).
          I damn sure don’t see Faker doing that, if it goes over it prob be big runs and defensive scores.
          Comment
          • Lord_Mar7
            SBR High Roller
            • 11-08-19
            • 174

            #6
            Originally posted by 2daBank
            I damn sure don’t see Faker doing that, if it goes over it prob be big runs and defensive scores.
            Agreed. Baker threw for 2 TDs this year for the 1st time last week. However, no turnovers last 2 games. CLE def has been notoriously suspect against the run for as long as I can remember.

            I'm siding with TNF history here.
            Comment
            • stevenash
              Moderator
              • 01-17-11
              • 65700

              #7
              Spread











              ATS Record Units ATS Record After Buying 0.5 Units Difference
              -3 286-316-61 -55.12 347-316-0 -58.24 -3.12
              3 316-287-61 0.24 377-287-0 -7.76 -8
              -7 137-139-16 -14.47 153-139-0 -16.6 -2.13
              7 139-137-16 -10.65 155-137-0 -13 -2.35
              -10 58-69-7 -16.28 65-69-0 -14.86 1.42
              10 69-58-7 4.72 76-58-0 5.31 0.59
              -4 110-89-5 10.99 115-89-0 6.8 -4.19
              4 89-110-5 -29.09 94-110-0 -31.7 -2.61
              -6 98-98-10 -8.92 108-98-0 -8.04 0.88
              6 98-98-10 -8.92 108-98-0 -8.04 0.88
              Total 1400-1400-198 -127.5 1598-1400-0 -146.13 -18.63


              Assuming -110 standard juice

              -135 to buy off +/- 3
              -125 to buy off +/- 7
              -120 to buy off all others
              Comment
              • Big Bear
                SBR Aristocracy
                • 11-01-11
                • 43253

                #8
                Originally posted by stevenash
                After looking at this game for pretty much close to an hour I've deemed this contest pretty much unbettable.
                You guys have any angles tonight?

                I don't trust the Browns in many spots.
                I was one of the few posters here back in August who saw this Browns underachieving act coming.
                Just because you add a collection of talented 'me first' head case players doesn't make you instant champions.
                I can only think of George Steinbrenner's early ownership days that pulled that off.

                Like I said, I don't trust the Browns especially at home.
                Look at their home games so far.
                Blown out of the water versus at best a mediocre Titan team.
                A loss to a suddenly mediocre Rams team, and a four point loss to Seattle.
                If you're going to contend for a championship you have to beat Seattle at home. That's the way I see it.

                Browns only win at home was last week against a new and improved Bills squad by three, hardly a quality win.
                A decent win? Yes. A quality win? no.

                And I don't trust the Steelers on the road either.
                At first glance that 5-4 record may seem pretty good without the services of Bell, Brown, and Ben.
                This is the Steelers fourth road game, they have one win against a Charger team where half of Rivers offensive linemen were out on IR and had second teamers blocking for him.
                The other two games were a blowout by 30 to the Champs, no crime in losing to New England but could you please put up a better showing? And a tough beat on the road to SF however a loss is a loss tough beat or rout.
                (Most JV squads can win at home against the Bengals and the Dolphins but Pitt isn't home)

                I don't trust Cleveland at home and I don't trust Pitt on the road.
                I might play the Steelers if I could get +3.5 but the line isn't budging off of 3 flat.

                Now before you say "Nasher, buy the half point" I'll tell you a thousand times a resounding NO!
                Riddle me this fellas? If buying the half point (the hook) was +EV for us bettors do you really think the books would offer that option? It's a long term losing proposition.

                I'm not going to get into an elaborate math example here but briefly unless your shop is giving you a discounted price on buying a half point off of a three point line one must pay a premium price of .25 cents.
                So instead of (unless you have a reduced juice shop) moving a 3 point line from -110 to -2.5 means you are now laying -135 juice.

                Since 2003 there have been 664 NFL games where the home team was a three point favorite.
                In those 664 NFL games the home team at -3 has a record of 287-316-61 ATS
                (I did the work using Sports Insight's Bet Labs Software.)
                Almost all of you know you must win 52.4 percent of your games or better to turn a profit at -110 juice.
                Like I mentioned the ATS record since 2003 of games where the favorite was exactly three points has a record of 287-316-61 (ATS) which is a win percentage of 47.6 percent far below the 52.4 percent you need to turn a profit.

                Now here's the important part.
                There were 61 pushes at -3 in those 664 games.
                If you bought the hook in each and every game that was -3 and made it -2.5 your record will be now be 348 and 316 which is a win percentage of 52.4 percent.
                Now before you break into a victory dance you paid -135 juice for all those 664 games. not -110.
                At -135 one must win 57.45 percent of the time not 52.4 percent of the time at -110.
                You guys are smart a 52.4 percent win rate where you need to win at a 57.45 percent win rate makes you (say it with your pal Nasher) a long term loser.

                Oh, not for nothing not only can't I find a side to bet the 41.5 total makes me nervous too.
                Do I dare say it, I'm going to sit this one out and just watch it.
                holy cow guy threw up all over the keyboard and all this nonsense for no play???

                mods please give this guy an infraction
                Comment
                • jjgold
                  SBR Aristocracy
                  • 07-20-05
                  • 388179

                  #9
                  Cleve might win out
                  Schedule easy
                  Comment
                  Search
                  Collapse
                  SBR Contests
                  Collapse
                  Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                  Collapse
                  Working...