Cincy UCF
Collapse
X
-
shocka1212SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-12
- 16788
#36Comment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#37At some point they have to learn you don't let the officials who made the call review their own call, they don't want to overturn themselves.Comment -
shocka1212SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-12
- 16788
#40actually you're wrong....UCF outgained, had more first downs and should have won the game QB threw a pick 6 and then another int deep in the red zone which would have made it a 3 point game with 12 minutes left in the game. turnover margin was the difference. its pretty clear to see. not sure what you're trying to say hereComment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#41
actually you're wrong....UCF outgained, had more first downs and should have won the game QB threw a pick 6 and then another int deep in the red zone which would have made it a 3 point game with 12 minutes left in the game. turnover margin was the difference. its pretty clear to see. not sure what you're trying to say hereComment -
Mac4LyfeSBR Aristocracy
- 01-04-09
- 48383
-
cincinnatikid513SBR Aristocracy
- 11-23-17
- 45360
#43feel like you left a few points out there boysComment -
shocka1212SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-12
- 16788
#44coaching has nothing to do with a player jumping a route.... what you're saying makes no sense. UCF QB made poor decisions down the stretch. thats all that happened hereComment -
iwantcougarsSBR MVP
- 09-29-09
- 2156
#45the difference were the pick6 and the int on the redzone (from the tipped ball). But uc secondary played tough, ucf qb is trows like tebow too much air on the passesComment -
QuantumLeapSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-22-08
- 6880
#46actually you're wrong....UCF outgained, had more first downs and should have won the game QB threw a pick 6 and then another int deep in the red zone which would have made it a 3 point game with 12 minutes left in the game. turnover margin was the difference. its pretty clear to see. not sure what you're trying to say here
Shocka is right because turnovers were the difference. Without them UCF would have outscored Cincy.
However, Thomorino is right in that the Freshman QB was exposed by the Cincy defense which caused the turnovers Shocka was referring to by getting a good rush on him.Comment -
shocka1212SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-12
- 16788
#47Some people say I'm so open-minded my brain falls out but I can see both of you being right here.
Shocka is right because turnovers were the difference. Without them UCF would have outscored Cincy.
However, Thomorino is right in that the Freshman QB was exposed by the Cincy defense which caused the turnovers Shocka was referring to by getting a good rush on him.Comment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#48
Some people say I'm so open-minded my brain falls out but I can see both of you being right here.
Shocka is right because turnovers were the difference. Without them UCF would have outscored Cincy.
However, Thomorino is right in that the Freshman QB was exposed by the Cincy defense which caused the turnovers Shocka was referring to by getting a good rush on him.Comment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#49You're a fool if you think that. 2nd half adjustments were huge. Far more blitzing, jumping routes, completely different strategy. Cincinnati defensive coordinator will be a head coach soon.Comment -
TonyPhizzleSBR Sharp
- 08-30-17
- 410
#50Lmao both of y’all arguing about the dumbest shiiiit. You’re both right how ever way you look at it Jesus 🤦🏻*♂️Comment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#51
Some people say I'm so open-minded my brain falls out but I can see both of you being right here.
Shocka is right because turnovers were the difference. Without them UCF would have outscored Cincy.
However, Thomorino is right in that the Freshman QB was exposed by the Cincy defense which caused the turnovers Shocka was referring to by getting a good rush on him.Comment -
shocka1212SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-12
- 16788
#52ok...... so the 3 int's and fumbled hand off that led to points for cincinatti weren't the difference. got it. clearly just trying to engage me here to make a little more traffic here on a Friday night. just another paid SBR poster trying to trigger people.
Comment -
shocka1212SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-12
- 16788
#53Comment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#54The fumble occurred because of a blitz. The strategy in the second half was completely different than the first. You so not understand football - why you'll never post and track. You'd get exposed in 2 seconds.Comment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
-
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#56If you think the defensive strategy was the same in both halves by Cincinnati you either don't know football or didn't watch the game, in this case probably both.Comment -
shocka1212SBR Posting Legend
- 10-06-12
- 16788
#57Just another paid poster trying to trigger people lending nothing but useless insults in response to articulated analaysis.Comment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code