Who is the best tout to fade?

[bettingman6]

I’m thinking Brandon Lang. He’s so bad that Bodog sponsored his movie. (Basically a sports book encouraging you to use a specific tout- think about it.)

Teddy Covers seems like a nice fade too.

[Sam Odom]

[Itsamazing777]

West
Keep getting texts randomly even though ive never signed up

[TheMoneyShot]

For a so called professional... Lang sucks.

Choose Lang.

[Sam Odom]

Wonder how much Tout Revenue he gained because of that Movie ?

[jjgold]

Everybody

Nobody wins

All random

[butterpecan]

you look at records, most all of them are terrible. Better question, whose good long term or at least hot. Ras in basketball, sportswagers. Ca. I will say Colin cowherds, blazing five has winning at very high rate. I love fs1 afternoon lineup with lock it in.

I would never spend money unless it's on horses.

[kmarinouofm]

What happened to his fade
Thread?

[hubie69]

JJGold easily.

[clockwise1965]

I use sportsbettorswin and they are pretty accurate.

They used to have a fade the Lang thread.

[Bcatswin]

Indian Cowboy still cooking?

[Chi_archie]

wait Lang is still going?

I thought he was done after his failed lawsuite of SBR

[leetreaper]

Wonder how much Tout Revenue he gained because of that Movie ?

I'd say HUGH

[stevenash]

JJGold easily.

Nope, Brock Landers is.

[leetreaper]

JJGold easily.

1 week instaban for this post automatically

[pavyracer]

jjgold

Only reason I come here is to see which teams he touts and bet the other teams.

[thechaoz]

Seaweed

[lonegambler23]

firedawg and pinny420

[SEAHAWKHARRY]

Seaweed
He doesn't charge shit hes a fader

[Headsterx]

Isn't this question an oxy-MORON... 😂😂😂

[BuckyOne]

Yo, guys - you cannot win by fading either. It is a juice bath either way. And then you pay the tout service. By the time the touts release their picks - any value has been hammered out.

There are no shortcuts. Players need to be able to identify value. The guys that win work really hard at it.

[BeatTheJerk]

Yo, guys - you cannot win by fading either. It is a juice bath either way. And then you pay the tout service. By the time the touts release their picks - any value has been hammered out.

There are no shortcuts. Players need to be able to identify value. The guys that win work really hard at it.

This & a little bit of that.

[dj_destroyer]

There are no shortcuts. Players need to be able to identify value. The guys that win work really hard at it.

Spot on, brother. Winning at sports betting is a full time job. I just got canned which is why I've started betting again but it only reminds me how much work is involved. A poor hustler's game. I think I'd rather the job 9 days out of 10.

[bettingman6]

Yo, guys - you cannot win by fading either. It is a juice bath either way. And then you pay the tout service. By the time the touts release their picks - any value has been hammered out.

There are no shortcuts. Players need to be able to identify value. The guys that win work really hard at it.

Isn’t the average bettor supposed to go 48% ATS? That means if you fade a random person, you’ll almost break even. If somebody is just 0.38% worse than an average bettor, then they’re profitable to fade.

[dj_destroyer]

Isn’t the average bettor supposed to go 48% ATS? That means if you fade a random person, you’ll almost break even. If somebody is just 0.38% worse than an average bettor, then they’re profitable to fade.

Being 0.38% worse than the average bettor is same as being 0.38% better, very hard.

[ridgeway]

I use sportsbettorswin and they are pretty accurate.

They used to have a fade the Lang thread.

Bet SBW and fade lang. Good combo.

[firedawg]

firedawg and pinny420

Stop

[BuckyOne]

Isn’t the average bettor supposed to go 48% ATS? That means if you fade a random person, you’ll almost break even. If somebody is just 0.38% worse than an average bettor, then they’re profitable to fade.

LOL - You would have the world by the nuts if you could make that work with a large sample! So, what entity might possibly be the dumbest sports homo sapien on the planet? No, you cannot say Mike Greenberg because there are dumber! Let's say we buy a beer for a guy at the bar if he will fill out our sheet? Or maybe, during our lap dance at the nudie bar we could add a few extra bucks if the dancer would quickly fill out our sheet.

I am willing to do my part for science and query the stripper and you take the drunk guy. I know what you are thinking about me, "What a trooper" but, I want to do my share.

My argument against your point is that it is not possible to consistently be as bad as 46% with random choices. The bookmaker's line is pretty scientifically accurate.

[ronald]

LAUDERDALE

[firedawg]

LAUDERDALE

Agreed

[Luv2Play2]

ty lone1 spot on

[Luv2Play2]

my bad.. short hand skillz suc.. lone .G IS SPOT ON.. TY SIR

[DrunkHorseplayer]

Isn’t the average bettor supposed to go 48% ATS? That means if you fade a random person, you’ll almost break even. If somebody is just 0.38% worse than an average bettor, then they’re profitable to fade.

No; long term, almost everyone, whether a computer genius or a mindless drugger, will go 50/50. That's what the pointspread is designed to do and it works.

[leetreaper]

Wonder how much Tout Revenue he gained because of that Movie ?

Over 1 million of dollars FOR SURE.